← Clinical Trial Results
Calorie Restriction Completed 2-Year Intervention NCT00943215

CALERIE: Complete Statistical Analysis of Calorie Restriction in Adults

An independent statistical review of the CALERIE clinical trial evaluating how participants behave and respond after completing a 2-year intervention of calorie restriction.

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00943215
Scope of this record

This page provides an independent statistical analysis and educational interpretation of publicly reported results. ClinicalTrials.gov provides the official trial registry record.

1. Trial at a Glance

CALERIE was a completed clinical trial sponsored by Pennington Biomedical Research Center evaluating participant behavior and response after a 2-year intervention of calorie restriction.

42
Enrollment
Registered participants
2-year
Primary Time Frame
Calorie restriction intervention
2009-07
Start Date
2015-02
Primary Completion
FeatureCALERIE
NCT IDNCT00943215
StatusCOMPLETED
SponsorPennington Biomedical Research Center
Sponsor typeOTHER
ConditionExcessive Diet Restriction
Enrollment42

2. Clinical Question

Population

Participants enrolled in the CALERIE study.

Intervention

A 2-year intervention of calorie restriction.

Comparator

The registry describes participant behavior and response after completing the intervention.

Primary Question

How participants behave and respond on their own after completing a 2-year intervention of calorie restriction.

3. Trial Design

Study Period

Start date: 2009-07
Primary completion date: 2015-02

Study Objective

Evaluation of participant behavior and response following completion of a calorie restriction intervention.

4. Endpoints

EndpointTime FrameDescription
Calorie Restriction 2-year The purpose of this study is to gain knowledge about how participants behave and respond on their own after completing a 2-year intervention of calorie restriction.

5. Planned Analysis

The ClinicalTrials.gov record lists the primary endpoint but does not report posted statistical analyses or outcome estimates.

For an endpoint describing response following an intervention over time, statistical analysis would typically depend on the specific outcome measurements collected. Continuous outcomes may commonly be summarized using descriptive statistics and compared using methods appropriate for repeated measurements, while categorical outcomes may require proportion-based analyses or regression models. The appropriate method depends on the prespecified analysis plan and measurement structure.

Registry analysis status: No formal statistical analyses were posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

6. Statistical Methodology

Clinical trial analysis begins with clearly defining the population, intervention, comparison framework, endpoint definitions, and timing of assessment. CALERIE's registered primary endpoint focuses on participant behavior and response after a 2-year calorie restriction intervention.

General endpoint framework
Observed outcome → Statistical summary → Comparison or estimation → Interpretation

The statistical method must match the type of endpoint collected, the timing of assessments, and the scientific question being addressed.

7. Statistical Methods Explained

How would a 2-year intervention endpoint typically be analyzed?

A 2-year endpoint may involve comparison of measurements collected before, during, and after the intervention. The analysis approach depends on whether outcomes are continuous, categorical, or time-dependent.

Why is the endpoint definition important?

The endpoint definition determines what statistical quantity is estimated. A clearly specified endpoint prevents changes in interpretation after observing results.

Why are repeated measurements important?

Measurements collected at multiple time points contain within-participant correlation. Statistical methods should account for this dependence when estimating changes over time.

Why can enrollment size affect interpretation?

The precision of estimated effects depends partly on the amount of information available. Smaller studies generally produce greater uncertainty around estimates.

8. Limitations

9. Why This Trial Matters Statistically

CALERIE illustrates several important concepts in clinical trial methodology: defining clinically meaningful endpoints, aligning statistical methods with measurement structure, and interpreting intervention studies within the framework established before outcomes are observed.

ConceptApplication
Endpoint definitionPrimary endpoint focused on calorie restriction response over a 2-year time frame.
Longitudinal assessmentIntervention studies may require methods that account for measurements over time.
Statistical interpretationResults require estimates, uncertainty measures, and prespecified analyses.

10. Sources

Clinical Biostats Statistical Education

Explore statistical concepts used in clinical research, including endpoint selection, study design, and interpretation.