← Clinical Trial Results
Breast Cancer Biomarker Analysis Completed NCT00991263

CALGB 9344: Complete Statistical Analysis of Paclitaxel Biomarker Analysis in Breast Cancer

An independent statistical review of CALGB 9344, a completed breast cancer study evaluating tissue samples and biomarker analyses from women treated with paclitaxel on CALGB-9344 or CALGB-9741.

Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology · Enrollment: 3677 · Study start: 2009-04
Scope of this record

This page provides an independent statistical analysis and educational interpretation of publicly reported results. ClinicalTrials.gov provides the official trial registry record.

1. Trial at a Glance

CALGB 9344 was a completed clinical study in breast cancer focused on laboratory and biomarker analyses using tissue samples from women treated with paclitaxel in CALGB-9344 or CALGB-9741.

3677
Enrollment
1
Number of arms
10 years
DFS time frame
NCT00991263
Registry identifier
FeatureCALGB 9344
ConditionBreast Cancer
StatusCOMPLETED
Lead sponsorAlliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
Sponsor typeOTHER
InterventionsGene expression analysis; polymerase chain reaction; laboratory biomarker analysis

2. Clinical Question

Population

Women with breast cancer treated with paclitaxel on clinical trial CALGB-9344 or CALGB-9741.

Intervention

Tissue sample evaluation using genetic and laboratory biomarker analysis methods.

Comparator

The registry lists one arm for this study.

Primary question

The study evaluated biomarker relationships with disease-free survival.

3. Trial Design

The registry describes CALGB 9344 as a completed study with 3677 participants and one listed arm. The study interventions involved analysis of tissue samples using gene expression analysis, polymerase chain reaction, and laboratory biomarker analysis.

Study population

Women treated with paclitaxel for breast cancer on CALGB-9344 or CALGB-9741.

Laboratory approach

Genetic and biomarker laboratory analyses were used to evaluate tissue samples.

4. Endpoints

EndpointTime frame
Disease-free survival (DFS)Up to 10 years

5. Planned Analysis

The ClinicalTrials.gov record identifies disease-free survival (DFS) as the primary endpoint with a follow-up time frame of up to 10 years. The registry does not report posted statistical analyses or endpoint results.

Planned statistical approach:

Disease-free survival is a time-to-event endpoint. Analyses of this type commonly use methods that account for censoring, such as Kaplan-Meier estimation and regression approaches for time-to-event outcomes. Results have not been posted on ClinicalTrials.gov.

6. Statistical Methodology

Time-to-event analysis

Disease-free survival measures the time until a defined event occurs or until the participant is last known to be event-free. Statistical analysis must account for participants who have incomplete follow-up through censoring.

Statistical interpretation

A survival endpoint is different from a simple proportion because it incorporates both whether an event occurred and when it occurred. A patient followed longer without an event contributes different information from a patient with a shorter observation period.

Biomarker analysis context

Biomarker studies often investigate whether measurable biological characteristics are associated with clinical outcomes. Interpretation requires attention to the relationship between laboratory measurements, endpoint definitions, and the statistical framework used for evaluation.

7. Statistical Methods Explained

Why is disease-free survival analyzed differently from a simple rate?

Because follow-up times can differ between participants, time-to-event methods incorporate both event timing and censoring rather than only counting events.

What does censoring mean?

Censoring occurs when a participant's exact event time is not observed during follow-up. Proper methods use available follow-up information without assuming the participant experienced an event afterward.

Why are biomarkers not automatically predictive?

A biomarker association requires statistical evidence showing that measured biological characteristics relate to clinical outcomes. Associations must be interpreted within the design and analysis framework.

Why is endpoint definition important?

The meaning of a statistical result depends on the exact endpoint being analyzed. Disease-free survival has a different interpretation from overall survival or response measures.

Why are confidence intervals important?

Confidence intervals describe uncertainty around an estimate. They help show how precisely an observed association has been estimated.

8. Limitations

9. Why This Trial Matters Statistically

CALGB 9344 illustrates how clinical trial resources can be used beyond the primary treatment comparison by studying biological information from collected tissue samples.

ConceptApplication
Time-to-event analysisDisease-free survival over up to 10 years
Biomarker analysisGene expression and laboratory measurements
CensoringImportant consideration for survival endpoints
Clinical interpretationConnecting laboratory findings with patient outcomes

10. Sources