← Clinical Trial Results
Clinical Trial Results › Cardiology › CLARITY-TIMI 28
Acute Coronary SyndromesPhase 3PreventionNCT00714961

CLARITY-TIMI 28: Complete Statistical Analysis of Clopidogrel in Acute Coronary Syndromes

An independent statistical analysis and educational interpretation of the randomized phase 3 CLARITY-TIMI 28 trial evaluating clopidogrel as adjunctive reperfusion therapy compared with placebo.

Scope of this record

This page provides an independent statistical analysis and educational interpretation of publicly reported results. ClinicalTrials.gov provides the official trial registry record.

1. Trial at a Glance

CLARITY-TIMI 28 was a randomized, parallel, quadruple-masked phase 3 trial evaluating clopidogrel (SR25990) versus placebo as adjunctive reperfusion therapy in acute coronary syndromes.

3491
Enrollment
2
Arms
Phase 3
Trial Phase
2003-02
Start Date
FeatureCLARITY-TIMI 28
ClinicalTrials.gov identifierNCT00714961
StatusCOMPLETED
Primary completion date2005-01
Lead sponsorSanofi
Sponsor typeINDUSTRY
AllocationRANDOMIZED
Design modelPARALLEL
MaskingQUADRUPLE

2. Clinical Question

Population

Patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Intervention

Clopidogrel (SR25990).

Comparator

Placebo.

Primary question

Does adjunctive clopidogrel improve the prespecified efficacy endpoint while maintaining acceptable safety compared with placebo?

3. Trial Design

01
Randomization
3491 participants
02
Treatment
Clopidogrel vs placebo
03
Assessment
Efficacy and safety endpoints

4. Endpoints

EndpointRegistry definition
Efficacy primary endpointComposite of an included infarct-related artery on the pre-discharge angiogram, or death or recurrent MI by the time of the start of coronary angiography.
Safety primary endpointTIMI major bleeding.

5. Planned Analysis

The ClinicalTrials.gov record identifies the primary efficacy and safety endpoints but does not report posted statistical analyses or results.

For a composite efficacy endpoint involving clinical events and angiographic assessment, analyses would typically compare event occurrence between randomized groups using methods appropriate for binary outcomes and the prespecified analysis population. Safety endpoints such as TIMI major bleeding are typically summarized by treatment group and compared using prespecified safety analysis methods.

No formal statistical analyses were posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

6. Statistical Methodology

Randomization

Randomization is the foundation of the treatment comparison. By assigning participants to treatment groups, randomized trials aim to balance measured and unmeasured baseline factors between groups.

Composite endpoints

The efficacy endpoint combines multiple clinical outcomes into one measure. Composite endpoints can increase statistical efficiency by accumulating events, but interpretation depends on the contribution and clinical importance of each component.

Safety endpoints

Safety outcomes are interpreted separately from efficacy. A treatment effect on the primary efficacy endpoint does not automatically describe the balance of risks and benefits.

7. Statistical Methods Explained

Why use a composite endpoint?

A composite endpoint can capture several clinically relevant outcomes together. The interpretation depends on which components occur and whether treatment effects are consistent across components.

Why is randomization important?

Randomization reduces systematic differences between treatment groups, allowing differences in outcomes to be attributed more reliably to the assigned intervention.

Why analyze safety separately?

Efficacy and safety answer different statistical questions. A safety endpoint evaluates adverse outcomes rather than treatment benefit.

What is a clinically meaningful endpoint?

Clinical trial endpoints should represent outcomes relevant to patients and investigators. Statistical significance alone does not determine clinical importance.

8. Limitations

9. Why This Trial Matters Statistically

ConceptHow it appears in CLARITY-TIMI 28
Randomized designTwo-arm randomized comparison.
BlindingQuadruple masking.
Composite endpointPrimary efficacy endpoint combines angiographic and clinical outcomes.
Safety analysisTIMI major bleeding assessed as a primary safety endpoint.

10. Sources