← Clinical Trial Results
Anaplastic Glioma Phase 3 Completed NCT00717210

NOA-04: Complete Statistical Analysis of Sequential Radiochemotherapy in Anaplastic Glioma

An independent statistical review of the randomized phase 3 NOA-04 study evaluating sequential radiochemotherapy strategies using chemotherapy approaches and focal radiotherapy in patients with anaplastic glioma.

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00717210
Scope of this record

This page provides an independent statistical analysis and educational interpretation of publicly reported results. ClinicalTrials.gov provides the official trial registry record.

1. Trial at a Glance

NOA-04 was a randomized phase 3 study of sequential radiochemotherapy of anaplastic glioma with PCV or temozolomide-based treatment strategies.

318
Enrollment
3
Phase
2
Arms
1999-2008
Primary endpoint timeframe
FeatureNOA-04
ConditionAnaplastic Astrocytoma; Oligodendroglioma; Oligoastrocytoma
AllocationRandomized
Design modelParallel
MaskingNone
Primary purposeTreatment
Lead sponsorNeuro-Oncology Working Group of the German Cancer Society

2. Clinical Question

Population

Patients with anaplastic astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma, or oligoastrocytoma.

Intervention

Sequential radiochemotherapy strategies involving chemotherapy and focal radiotherapy.

Comparator

The randomized parallel treatment strategy assigned in the study.

Primary question

The study evaluated time-to-treatment-failure after radiotherapy and one chemotherapy sequence.

3. Trial Design

Randomization

The study used randomized allocation.

Study structure

The design model was parallel with two treatment arms and no masking.

Study period

Enrollment began in 1999-06 and primary completion occurred in 2005-02.

Enrollment

A total of 318 participants were enrolled.

4. Endpoints

EndpointDefinitionTime frame
Time-to-treatment-failureDefined as progression after radiotherapy and one chemotherapy in either sequence1999-2008

5. Planned Analysis

The ClinicalTrials.gov record identifies the primary endpoint as a time-to-event outcome. Time-to-treatment-failure endpoints are typically analyzed using methods that account for follow-up time, censoring, and the timing of failure events.

Registry reporting status. Results have not been posted on ClinicalTrials.gov.

6. Statistical Methodology

Time-to-event analysis

Time-to-treatment-failure compares how long participants remain without the defined failure event. Unlike simple proportions, time-to-event methods incorporate when events occur and allow participants without an observed event at the end of follow-up to contribute partial information.

Conceptual framework
Time-to-event methods estimate the distribution of event times while accounting for censoring.

The choice of analysis method depends on the prespecified statistical analysis plan and the characteristics of the observed event data.

Censoring

Participants who have not experienced treatment failure by the end of observation are typically censored rather than treated as if failure occurred. Proper handling of censoring is essential for unbiased time-to-event estimation.

7. Statistical Methods Explained

Why is time-to-treatment-failure a time-to-event endpoint?

Because the endpoint measures the time until a defined event occurs, the analysis must incorporate both event occurrence and follow-up duration.

Why does randomization matter?

Randomization creates treatment groups that can be compared without relying on measured baseline differences alone.

Why is censoring important?

A participant who has not experienced failure at the end of follow-up still provides information about the period during which failure did not occur.

Why are registry endpoint definitions important?

Precise endpoint definitions determine which events count, when measurement begins, and how statistical comparisons should be interpreted.

8. Limitations

9. Why This Trial Matters Statistically

ConceptHow it appears in NOA-04
RandomizationParticipants were assigned using randomized allocation.
Parallel designThe trial used a parallel study structure with two arms.
Time-to-event analysisThe primary endpoint was time-to-treatment-failure.
Endpoint definitionThe registry specifies failure after radiotherapy and one chemotherapy sequence.

10. Related Tutorials

Learn more about the methods used in this trial:

11. Related Calculators

12. Sources