← Clinical Trial Results
Metastatic Prostate Cancer
Phase 3
NCT01957436

PEACE-1: Complete Statistical Analysis of Abiraterone and Radiotherapy in Metastatic Prostate Cancer

An independent statistical review of the randomized phase 3 PEACE-1 trial evaluating treatment strategies for patients with metastatic hormone-naïve prostate cancer.

Scope of this record. This page provides an independent statistical analysis and educational interpretation of publicly reported results. ClinicalTrials.gov provides the official trial registry record.

1. Trial at a Glance

PEACE-1 was a phase 3 randomized treatment trial in patients with metastatic hormone-naïve prostate cancer. The registry lists a four-arm design evaluating combinations involving abiraterone acetate, radiotherapy, androgen deprivation therapy, and docetaxel.

1173
Enrollment
4
Number of Arms
3
Phase
2013-11-13
Study Start
FeaturePEACE-1
StatusActive, not recruiting
SponsorUNICANCER
ConditionMetastatic Prostate Cancer
AllocationRandomized
Design modelParallel
MaskingNone
Primary purposeTreatment

2. Clinical Question

Population

Patients with metastatic hormone-naïve prostate cancer.

Interventions

Abiraterone acetate, radiotherapy, androgen deprivation therapy, and docetaxel were evaluated within the four-arm design.

Comparator

The randomized parallel-arm structure compares treatment strategies defined within the trial design.

Primary Question

The registry evaluates survival outcomes in patients treated with androgen deprivation therapy and docetaxel, including analyses involving additional treatment strategies.

3. Trial Design

01
Randomization
02
Four-arm treatment comparison
03
Survival assessment
04
Long-term follow-up

4. Endpoints

EndpointTime FrameDescription
Survival7.5 years after the first inclusionOverall and radiographic progression-free survival in patients with metastatic hormone-naïve prostate cancer treated by androgen deprivation therapy and docetaxel
Survival9.5 years after the first inclusionOverall and radiographic progression-free survival in hormone-naïve prostate cancer patients with low metastatic burden whatever the standard of care received

5. Planned Analysis

The registry identifies survival and radiographic progression-free survival as primary endpoints. Time-to-event endpoints of this type are commonly analyzed using methods such as Kaplan-Meier estimation, comparison tests between randomized groups, and regression models estimating relative event rates.

Registry reporting status. No formal statistical analyses were posted to ClinicalTrials.gov for these primary endpoints.

6. Statistical Methodology

Time-to-event analysis

Overall survival and radiographic progression-free survival are time-to-event outcomes. These outcomes account for both whether an event occurred and when it occurred. Patients without an observed event at the analysis time are typically handled through censoring methods.

Randomized comparisons

Randomization is designed to create comparable treatment groups at baseline. The parallel randomized structure supports comparison of survival outcomes between assigned treatment strategies.

Four-arm factorial considerations

A multi-arm randomized design allows investigators to examine multiple treatment strategies within one trial framework. Interpretation depends on the prespecified comparisons and statistical control of multiple treatment questions.

7. Statistical Methods Explained

Why is survival analyzed differently from a simple percentage?

Survival outcomes include follow-up time. A patient followed for several years without an event contributes different information from a patient followed briefly.

What does a hazard ratio represent?

A hazard ratio compares estimated event rates over time between groups. It does not represent the percentage of patients who benefit or the probability that an individual patient will experience an outcome.

Why is censoring important?

Censoring allows patients with incomplete event information to contribute available follow-up while avoiding the assumption that their later outcomes are known.

Why does a four-arm trial require careful interpretation?

Multiple randomized comparisons increase the importance of prespecified analysis plans and appropriate interpretation of statistical uncertainty.

8. Limitations

9. Why This Trial Matters Statistically

ConceptApplication in PEACE-1
RandomizationRandomized parallel phase 3 design
Time-to-event analysisSurvival and radiographic progression-free survival endpoints
Multi-arm designFour treatment arms
Long follow-upPrimary endpoint assessments at 7.5 and 9.5 years after first inclusion

10. Related Tutorials

Learn more about the methods used in this trial:

11. Related Calculators

12. Sources