← Clinical Trial Results
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Phase 3 Adjuvant Chemotherapy NCT01526135

PRODIGE 24: Complete Statistical Analysis of mFOLFIRINOX in Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

An independent statistical review of the randomized phase 3 PRODIGE 24 trial comparing adjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01526135
Scope of this record

This page provides an independent statistical analysis and educational interpretation of publicly reported results. ClinicalTrials.gov provides the official trial registry record.

1. Trial at a Glance

PRODIGE 24 was a phase 3 randomized trial evaluating adjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFIRINOX compared with gemcitabine in patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

493
Enrollment
2
Treatment Arms
3
Phase
3 YEARS
Primary Endpoint Time Frame
FeatureRegistry Information
ConditionPancreatic Adenocarcinoma (Ductal Adenocarcinoma)
DesignRandomized, parallel, open-label treatment study
Primary purposeTreatment
Enrollment493
Lead sponsorUNICANCER
InterventionsmFOLFIRINOX and Gemcitabine

2. Clinical Question

Population

Patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Intervention

Adjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFIRINOX.

Comparator

Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine.

Primary Question

Does mFOLFIRINOX improve disease-free survival compared with gemcitabine?

3. Trial Design

01
Randomize
493 patients
02
Parallel Arms
2 groups
03
Treatment
Adjuvant chemotherapy
04
Assessment
DFS evaluation
05
Follow-up
3-year endpoint

mFOLFIRINOX Arm

Experimental treatment arm.

Gemcitabine Arm

Control treatment arm.

4. Endpoints

EndpointDefinition / Time Frame
Disease-free survival (DFS)To compare disease-free survival (DFS) at 3 years between the experimental and control arms.

5. Planned Analysis

The registry identifies disease-free survival (DFS) at 3 years as the primary endpoint. Disease-free survival is a time-to-event outcome that typically evaluates the time from a defined starting point, such as randomization or treatment assignment, until disease recurrence or another prespecified event.

Time-to-event endpoints are commonly analyzed using methods such as Kaplan-Meier estimation to describe event-free probabilities over time, log-rank testing to compare groups, and regression models such as Cox proportional-hazards models to estimate relative treatment effects. The registry does not report posted statistical analyses or endpoint estimates on ClinicalTrials.gov.

Statistical interpretation: Because no formal statistical analyses were posted to ClinicalTrials.gov, treatment-effect estimates, confidence intervals, and p-values are not available in this registry record.

6. Statistical Methodology

Randomized comparison

Randomization creates the framework for comparing treatment groups while reducing the influence of measured and unmeasured baseline differences. In a parallel design, participants remain associated with their assigned treatment group for the primary comparison.

Disease-free survival analysis

DFS is a time-to-event endpoint. Analysis must account for participants who have not experienced the event by the end of follow-up through censoring methods.

Hazard ratios and survival models

For time-to-event outcomes, a hazard ratio is commonly used to summarize the relative event rate between groups over the analyzed follow-up period. The interpretation depends on the statistical model and assumptions used.

7. Statistical Methods Explained

Why use disease-free survival as an endpoint?

Disease-free survival captures events related to recurrence or disease status and can provide an earlier assessment of treatment effects than overall survival in some clinical settings.

Why is randomization important?

Randomization allows treatment groups to be compared using a design intended to minimize systematic differences between groups.

What does censoring mean?

Censoring occurs when a participant's event status is not observed by the analysis cutoff. Statistical methods incorporate available follow-up information without assuming the exact future event time.

Why are confidence intervals important?

Confidence intervals describe uncertainty around an estimated treatment effect. They provide information about statistical precision rather than the range of outcomes experienced by individual patients.

Why is the p-value not an effect-size measure?

A p-value addresses compatibility between observed data and a statistical hypothesis. It does not describe the magnitude or clinical importance of an effect.

8. Limitations

9. Why This Trial Matters Statistically

ConceptHow it appears in PRODIGE 24
RandomizationRandomized phase 3 parallel design
Comparative effectivenessmFOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine
Time-to-event analysisDisease-free survival at 3 years
Clinical trial methodologyAdjuvant treatment comparison in resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma

10. Limitations and Interpretation Issues

The interpretation of a randomized clinical trial depends on the prespecified statistical analysis plan, endpoint definitions, follow-up completeness, and analysis population. The registry record for PRODIGE 24 identifies the design and endpoint framework but does not report statistical analysis outputs.

11. Sources