Clinical Trial Results
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer Phase 3 Statistical Analysis NCT00637910

TAILOR: Complete Statistical Analysis of Erlotinib in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

An independent statistical review of the randomized phase 3 TAILOR trial evaluating erlotinib versus docetaxel in patients with non small cell lung cancer.

ClinicalTrials.gov registry analysis
Scope of this record

This page provides an independent statistical analysis and educational interpretation of publicly reported results. ClinicalTrials.gov provides the official trial registry record.

1. Trial at a Glance

TAILOR was a randomized phase 3 parallel-group treatment trial comparing erlotinib with docetaxel in non small cell lung cancer.

850
Enrollment
2
Arms
Phase 3
Trial Phase
12 months
Primary Endpoint Time Frame
FeatureTAILOR
NCT IDNCT00637910
TitleTarceva Italian Lung Optimization tRial
ConditionNon Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
AllocationRandomized
Design modelParallel
MaskingNone
Primary purposeTreatment
InterventionsErlotinib and docetaxel

2. Clinical Question

Population

Patients with non small cell lung cancer.

Intervention

Erlotinib treatment.

Comparator

Docetaxel treatment.

Primary question

Does erlotinib improve overall survival compared with docetaxel?

3. Trial Design

Randomization

Patients were assigned using a randomized design.

Arms

The trial included two treatment arms.

Enrollment period

Started 2007-11 with primary completion in 2012-02.

Sponsor

Lead sponsor: Fatebenefratelli and Ophthalmic Hospital.

4. Endpoints

EndpointDefinition
Overall SurvivalTime frame: 12 months after the last patient is randomized

5. Statistical Methodology

The registry identifies overall survival as the primary endpoint. Overall survival is a time-to-event outcome and is commonly analyzed using methods designed for censored survival data.

Time-to-event analysis

For overall survival, statistical analyses typically account for patients who have not experienced death by the end of follow-up through censoring. Common approaches include Kaplan-Meier estimation, log-rank comparisons, and Cox proportional-hazards modeling when prespecified in a statistical analysis plan.

6. Planned Analysis

The registry identifies Overall Survival as the primary endpoint with assessment at 12 months after the last patient is randomized.

For an endpoint of this type, investigators typically estimate survival over time and compare treatment groups using survival-analysis methods. Results have not been posted on ClinicalTrials.gov.

7. Statistical Methods Explained

Why is overall survival a time-to-event endpoint?

Overall survival measures the time until death, meaning patients may contribute different amounts of follow-up information.

Why is censoring important?

Censoring allows patients without an observed event during follow-up to contribute information up to their last known status.

What does randomization contribute statistically?

Randomization helps create comparable treatment groups and supports unbiased comparison of outcomes.

Why are hazard ratios often used for survival outcomes?

A hazard ratio summarizes relative event rates over follow-up when a proportional-hazards model is appropriate.

8. Limitations

9. Why This Trial Matters Statistically

TAILOR illustrates several important principles in randomized oncology trials:

ConceptApplication
RandomizationComparison of two treatment strategies
Time-to-event analysisOverall survival as the primary endpoint
CensoringHandling incomplete follow-up in survival analysis
Phase 3 designConfirmatory clinical evaluation

10. Sources