← Clinical Trial Results
Metabolic Syndrome Hypertriglyceridemia Completed NCT04650152

TRISTAN: Complete Statistical Analysis of Tricor in Metabolic Syndrome

An independent statistical analysis of the TRISTAN study evaluating Tricor (fenofibrate) therapy effectiveness in patients with metabolic syndrome and hypertriglyceridemia.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04650152
Scope of this record

This page provides an independent statistical analysis and educational interpretation of publicly reported results. ClinicalTrials.gov provides the official trial registry record.

1. Trial at a Glance

TRISTAN was a completed clinical study evaluating Tricor (fenofibrate), 145 mg film-coated tablets, in patients with metabolic syndrome and hypertriglyceridemia.

1000
Enrollment
1
Study Arm
6 months
Primary Endpoint Time Frame
2020–2021
Study Period
FeatureTRISTAN
NCT IdentifierNCT04650152
StatusCOMPLETED
Study titleStudy to Assess Tricor Therapy Effectiveness in Patients With Metabolic Syndrome (TRISTAN)
SponsorAbbott
Sponsor typeINDUSTRY
ConditionsHypertriglyceridemia; Metabolic Syndrome
InterventionTricor (fenofibrate), 145 mg, film-coated tablet

2. Clinical Question

Population

Patients with metabolic syndrome and hypertriglyceridemia.

Intervention

Tricor (fenofibrate), 145 mg, film-coated tablet.

Comparator

The registry describes a single-arm study; no comparator arm is listed.

Primary question

What change in triglycerides occurs after 6 months of fenofibrate treatment compared with baseline?

3. Trial Design

01
Enrollment1000 participants
02
TreatmentFenofibrate 145 mg
03
Visit 36 months
04
AnalysisTG change
Start date
2020-10-27
Primary completion date
2021-11-12

4. Endpoints

EndpointDefinitionTime Frame
Change of TG at Visit 3 versus baseline level at Visit 1 Triglycerides represented in mmol/L; change displayed as mean difference of TG at Visit 3 versus Visit 1. 6 months

5. Planned Analysis

The registry lists the primary endpoint as the change in triglyceride concentration from baseline to Visit 3 after 6 months of fenofibrate treatment.

For a continuous laboratory measurement such as triglycerides, the statistical analysis would typically focus on estimating the mean change from baseline and its uncertainty. The registry specifies that the change will be displayed as the mean difference of triglycerides at Visit 3 versus Visit 1.

Results availability: The ClinicalTrials.gov record does not report posted results or formal statistical analyses for the primary endpoint.

6. Statistical Methodology

Continuous endpoint analysis

The primary outcome is a continuous measurement. Analyses of continuous outcomes generally compare observed values over time or estimate the average within-participant change between two visits.

Conceptual form
Mean change = Mean(TG at Visit 3 − TG at Visit 1)

The estimated mean difference summarizes the average change in triglyceride concentration over the analysis population.

Baseline-to-follow-up comparisons

When participants are measured before and after treatment, statistical interpretation depends on the distribution of changes, variability between participants, missing observations, and the analysis population defined for the study.

Confidence intervals

A confidence interval around a mean change provides information about statistical precision. A narrower interval generally indicates a more precise estimate, while a wider interval reflects greater uncertainty.

7. Statistical Methods Explained

Why is triglyceride change analyzed rather than only the final value?

A change-from-baseline endpoint accounts for each participant's starting triglyceride level and evaluates movement over time.

What does a mean difference represent?

A mean difference summarizes the average amount by which triglyceride values changed between Visit 1 and Visit 3.

Why does variability matter?

Two studies can have the same average change but different levels of participant-to-participant variation. Statistical uncertainty depends on both the size of the change and its variability.

Why is the time frame important?

The endpoint is defined at 6 months, so interpretation is tied to the specified Visit 3 assessment rather than an unspecified longer-term period.

What information is needed to interpret a treatment effect fully?

For a complete statistical assessment, results such as the estimated change, confidence interval, and associated statistical analysis would be required.

8. Limitations

9. Why This Trial Matters Statistically

TRISTAN is a useful example for understanding statistical analysis of longitudinal continuous outcomes.

ConceptHow it appears in TRISTAN
Continuous outcomeTriglycerides measured in mmol/L
Change from baselineVisit 3 compared with Visit 1
Repeated measurementBaseline and 6-month assessments
Mean differenceRegistry-defined summary of TG change
Single-arm designOne listed study arm

10. Sources