← Clinical Trial Results
Coronary Stenting Phase 4 Bleeding Endpoint NCT00769938

WOEST: Complete Statistical Analysis of Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Therapy in Coronary Stenting

An independent statistical review of the randomized WOEST trial evaluating antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy strategies in patients with oral anticoagulation undergoing coronary stenting.

ClinicalTrials.gov record: NCT00769938
Scope of this record

This page provides an independent statistical analysis and educational interpretation of publicly reported results. ClinicalTrials.gov provides the official trial registry record.

1. Trial at a Glance

WOEST was a randomized, parallel-design phase 4 trial evaluating treatment strategies involving antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with coronary stenting.

573
Enrollment
Randomized participants
2
Arms
Parallel comparison
1 year
Primary endpoint
Follow-up timeframe
4
Phase
Registry phase
FeatureWOEST
NCT IDNCT00769938
TitleWOEST (What is the Optimal antiplatElet & Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients With Oral Anticoagulation and Coronary StenTing)
StatusCompleted
Start date2008-12
Primary completion date2012-08
Lead sponsorR&D Cardiologie
AllocationRandomized
MaskingNone

2. Clinical Question

Population

Patients with oral anticoagulation undergoing coronary stenting.

Intervention

Antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy strategy evaluated in the trial.

Comparator

Alternative randomized treatment strategy.

Primary question

How did randomized treatment strategies compare for bleeding complications during hospitalization and one year follow-up?

3. Trial Design

01
Randomized
573 patients
02
Parallel
2 arms
03
Treatment
PCI setting
04
Assessment
Bleeding
05
Follow-up
1 year

4. Endpoints

EndpointDefinitionTime frame
Primary endpointThe combined end point of minor, moderate or major bleeding complications during the initial hospitalization & one year follow-up. (TIMI & GUSTO criteria).1 year

5. Planned Analysis

The registry identifies the primary endpoint as a combined bleeding outcome measured during the initial hospitalization and one year follow-up using TIMI and GUSTO criteria. For a randomized comparison of a binary composite bleeding endpoint, analyses would typically compare event proportions between treatment groups using an appropriate hypothesis test and estimate treatment differences with measures of uncertainty.

Results status: The ClinicalTrials.gov record does not report posted statistical analyses for the primary endpoint.

6. Statistical Methodology

Composite endpoints

The primary endpoint combines minor, moderate, and major bleeding complications. Composite endpoints allow multiple clinically relevant events to be evaluated together, but interpretation depends on understanding the contribution of each component.

Randomized comparison

Randomization creates treatment groups intended to be comparable at baseline. The primary statistical goal is to compare outcomes while preserving the advantages of randomized allocation.

Time-frame based outcomes

The endpoint includes events during initial hospitalization and through one year follow-up. The timing definition determines which observations contribute to the analysis.

7. Statistical Methods Explained

Why use a composite bleeding endpoint?

A composite endpoint can increase the number of observed events by combining related outcomes. Interpretation requires attention to whether the components represent similar levels of clinical importance.

What do TIMI and GUSTO criteria represent?

They are standardized bleeding classifications used to define bleeding severity categories for clinical research outcomes.

Why does randomization matter?

Random allocation reduces systematic differences between groups, allowing differences in outcomes to be attributed more directly to the treatment comparison.

Why is follow-up time important?

The one-year timeframe defines the period in which bleeding events contribute to the primary endpoint.

8. Limitations

9. Why This Trial Matters Statistically

ConceptHow it appears in WOEST
RandomizationRandomized parallel-group design
Composite endpointCombined minor, moderate, and major bleeding outcome
Clinical outcome classificationTIMI and GUSTO bleeding criteria
Longitudinal follow-upInitial hospitalization through one year

10. Sources