Why Choosing the Technique Matters
Some integration problems are difficult because the algebra is complicated. Others are difficult because the main challenge is recognizing how to begin. On an AP Calculus problem, the first question should not be "What formula do I memorize?" It should be: What structure does this integral have?
Different integrals suggest different techniques. A polynomial may require nothing more than the power rule. A composition may be designed for . A product may suggest integration by parts. A rational function may need partial fractions. And sometimes the best technique is simply to rewrite the integrand before doing anything else.
Don't choose an integration technique based on the appearance of one term. Look at the entire integrand and ask what transformation would make the integral simpler.
The Integration Decision Process
When you encounter an unfamiliar integral, work through the following checklist.
- Can I integrate it directly? Try the basic power, exponential, logarithmic, or trigonometric rules first.
- Can I simplify it algebraically? Expand, factor, split fractions, or rewrite radicals and negative powers if that produces a familiar form.
- Does it contain a function and its derivative? Look for a likely substitution.
- Is it a product of two different types of functions? Consider integration by parts.
- Is it a rational function with a factorable denominator? Partial fractions may be appropriate.
- Does the problem contain a definite integral with a convenient substitution? Consider changing the bounds along with the substitution.
Technique 1: Direct Integration
The simplest technique is often the correct one. Before reaching for a more complicated method, check whether the integrand already matches a basic antiderivative rule.
For example, powers of , exponentials, and basic trigonometric functions can usually be integrated immediately.
Evaluate .
Technique 2: Algebraic Simplification
Sometimes an integral looks complicated only because it has been written in an inconvenient form. Rewrite the expression before deciding that a special technique is necessary.
For example, negative exponents can turn a quotient into a polynomial-style expression, while splitting a sum inside an integral can produce several easy integrals.
Evaluate .
Technique 3: u-Substitution
Use u-substitution when the integrand contains a composition of functions and you can identify the derivative of the inside function, either exactly or up to a constant multiple.
The pattern to recognize is:
The key question is: "Do I see an inside function and something proportional to its derivative?"
Evaluate .
Technique 4: Integration by Parts
Integration by parts is useful when the integrand is a product of functions and differentiating one factor makes it simpler.
A useful way to think about it is that you are reversing the product rule. If differentiation turns a product into two terms, integration by parts lets you move the derivative from one factor to another.
For choosing , a common strategy is to choose as the factor that becomes simpler when differentiated.
Evaluate .
Technique 5: Partial Fractions
Partial fractions are designed for certain rational functions: quotients of polynomials where the degree of the numerator is smaller than the degree of the denominator and the denominator can be factored appropriately.
The basic idea is to replace one complicated fraction with a sum of simpler fractions whose antiderivatives are familiar.
Evaluate .
How to Tell the Techniques Apart
- Simple polynomial or basic trig/exponential: integrate directly.
- Expression plus its derivative: try u-substitution.
- Product such as polynomial × exponential or polynomial × trig: consider integration by parts.
- Rational function with a factorable denominator: consider partial fractions.
- Awkward powers, radicals, or fractions: simplify algebraically first.
A More Important Question: What Does the Derivative Look Like?
One of the strongest integration skills is to work backward from differentiation.
Ask yourself:
- "What derivative rule would produce this integrand?"
- "Does this look like the derivative of a composition?"
- "Does this look like the product rule in reverse?"
- "Can this rational expression be decomposed into simpler pieces?"
For example, if you see , the presence of suggests that the expression may have come from differentiating . That is a strong signal for u-substitution.
Definite Integrals: Don't Forget the Bounds
When using u-substitution on a definite integral, you have two clean choices: substitute back to before evaluating the original bounds, or change the bounds to the corresponding -values.
Changing the bounds is often cleaner because it eliminates the need to substitute back.
Evaluate .
Common Mistakes
Not every complicated-looking integral contains an inside function and its derivative. If there is no useful substitution, stop forcing one. Look for a product, rational function, or algebraic simplification instead.
An expression such as may look like a quotient problem, but rewriting it as makes direct integration immediate.
A product does not automatically mean integration by parts. If one factor is actually the derivative of an inside function, u-substitution may be much easier.
The derivative of the inside function does not have to appear exactly. A constant multiple can usually be factored out. For example, an integrand containing may still be a perfect u-substitution problem.
A Reliable AP Calculus Strategy
On a test, don't stare at the integral waiting for the technique to "look obvious." Use a systematic process.
- Simplify the integrand.
- Try the basic antiderivative rules.
- Look for an inside function plus its derivative.
- Look for a product that suggests integration by parts.
- Look for a rational expression that suggests partial fractions.
- Differentiate your answer. If the derivative returns the original integrand, your technique worked.
The final step is especially powerful. Integration is an inverse process to differentiation, so differentiation gives you a built-in way to check your work.
Practice Problems
Which technique should you use to evaluate ?
Show answer
Which technique should you use to evaluate ?
Show answer
Which technique should you use to evaluate ?
Show answer
Which technique should you use to evaluate ?
Show answer
Which technique should you use to evaluate ?
Show answer
Test yourself: AP Calculus practice exams
Ready to check what you know? Work an AP-style practice exam, then open the full solutions.
Want all 1,114 practice problems?
This tutorial covers one topic. Calc Pass covers all of AP Calculus AB & BC: full review, every practice question, and step-by-step solutions to each one.
Get the Calc Pass App
Scan to download and practice on the go, with instant scoring.
Vol. 1: 1,114 Questions
The complete practice question bank, organized by AB & BC topic.
View on Amazon