← Clinical Trials
Breast Cancer Phase 1/2 Targeted Antibody-Drug Conjugates NCT05824325

GALAXY: Complete Statistical Analysis of Targeted Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Advanced Breast Cancer

An educational statistical review of the GALAXY phase 1/2 trial evaluating different targeted antibody-drug conjugates for HER2 ultra-low or no expression advanced breast cancer.

Registry status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Lead sponsor: Fudan University
Scope of this record

This page provides an independent statistical analysis and educational interpretation of publicly reported results. ClinicalTrials.gov provides the official trial registry record.

1. Trial at a Glance

GALAXY is a phase 1/2, non-randomized parallel-design treatment study evaluating targeted antibody-drug conjugates in patients with breast cancer characterized by HER2 ultra-low or no expression.

56
Enrollment
Planned participants
2
Arms
Parallel design
1/2
Phase
Phase 1 and Phase 2
2023
Start date
2023-03-14
FeatureGALAXY
ConditionBreast Cancer
Phase1/2
DesignParallel, non-randomized, open-label
Primary purposeTreatment
Enrollment56
InterventionsSHR-A1811; TROP2 ADC
Primary endpointsOccurrence of adverse events (AEs)- Phase 1; Objective Response Rate (ORR)- Phase 2

2. Clinical Question

The clinical question is whether targeted antibody-drug conjugates can be evaluated for safety and antitumor activity in patients with advanced breast cancer with HER2 ultra-low or no expression.

Population

Patients with breast cancer with HER2 ultra-low or no expression.

Intervention

SHR-A1811 or TROP2 ADC.

Comparator

No randomized comparator; the registry describes a non-randomized design.

Primary questions

What adverse events occur during Phase 1, and what is the objective response rate during Phase 2?

3. Trial Design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL
Enrollment
56 participants
ARM 1

SHR-A1811

A targeted antibody-drug conjugate intervention.

ARM 2

TROP2 ADC

A targeted antibody-drug conjugate intervention.

4. Endpoints

EndpointTime frameDescription
Occurrence of adverse events (AEs)- Phase 1Up to follow-up period, approximately 24 monthsOccurrence of AEs in Phase 1 graded according to CTCAE v5.0
Objective Response Rate (ORR)- Phase 2Until progression, assessed up to approximately 24 monthsThe proportion of patients who have a CR or PR, as determined by the Investigator at local site per RECIST 1.1.

5. Statistical Methodology

The registry describes a phase 1/2 non-randomized treatment study. The statistical framework therefore focuses on safety evaluation in Phase 1 and response assessment in Phase 2 rather than randomized treatment-effect estimation.

Safety analysis

The Phase 1 primary endpoint measures occurrence of adverse events graded according to CTCAE v5.0. Safety analyses in early-phase studies commonly summarize the frequency, severity, and timing of observed adverse events.

Objective response rate analysis

The Phase 2 primary endpoint is ORR, defined as the proportion of patients achieving complete response or partial response according to investigator assessment using RECIST 1.1. ORR is typically summarized as a proportion with confidence intervals to describe statistical uncertainty.

6. Planned Analysis

No results are posted on ClinicalTrials.gov for the primary endpoints. The registry specifies that Phase 1 will measure occurrence of adverse events and Phase 2 will measure objective response rate.

Objective response rate
ORR = (Number of patients with CR or PR) / (Number of evaluable patients)

For a response endpoint, interpretation depends on the number of responders, the analysis population definition, assessment timing, and uncertainty around the observed proportion.

Planned statistical interpretation: For ORR, the key statistical considerations are the estimated response proportion, confidence interval precision, and the definition of the evaluable population. For safety, interpretation depends on exposure duration and adverse-event grading.

7. Statistical Methods Explained

Why is ORR used in early-phase oncology studies?

Objective response rate provides a direct measure of tumor shrinkage activity and can be assessed before long-term outcomes such as survival are mature.

What does RECIST 1.1 contribute to response analysis?

RECIST 1.1 provides standardized criteria for determining whether tumor measurements meet definitions such as complete response or partial response.

Why is this trial not analyzed like a randomized trial?

The registry describes a non-randomized design. Without random allocation, comparisons between groups may be affected by differences in patient characteristics rather than treatment alone.

Why are confidence intervals important for ORR?

A response percentage alone does not describe precision. Confidence intervals indicate the uncertainty associated with estimating a response rate from a finite number of patients.

Why is CTCAE grading used?

CTCAE v5.0 provides a standardized framework for classifying adverse-event severity across clinical studies.

8. Limitations

9. Why This Trial Matters Statistically

GALAXY illustrates several important concepts in early-phase oncology statistics: safety monitoring, response-rate estimation, non-randomized treatment evaluation, and the interpretation of antibody-drug conjugate studies.

ConceptHow it appears in GALAXY
Early-phase designPhase 1/2 structure combining safety and response objectives
Safety analysisAdverse events graded according to CTCAE v5.0
Binary endpoint analysisORR based on CR and PR assessments
RECIST methodologyInvestigator assessment using RECIST 1.1
Non-randomized inferenceInterpretation without randomized comparator groups

10. Sources

Continue through the Clinical Biostats knowledge graph

Clinical trial methods connect study design, endpoints, statistical analysis, and interpretation into a broader framework for understanding biomedical research.

11. Record Summary

GALAXY is a phase 1/2 non-randomized clinical trial evaluating SHR-A1811 and TROP2 ADC in advanced breast cancer with HER2 ultra-low or no expression. The statistical focus is on safety evaluation in Phase 1 and objective response rate assessment in Phase 2. ClinicalTrials.gov currently reports the trial design and endpoint framework but does not report primary endpoint results.