Tutorials › CAS Exam 8 - Advanced Ratemaking › A Complete Retrospective Premium Calculation

CAS Exam 8 · Retrospective Rating Structure · Tutorial 603 of 989

A Complete Retrospective Premium Calculation

Learn to calculate the indicated retrospective premium step by step, including the tax multiplier and contractual premium bounds.

Intermediate 10 min read

What You'll Learn

  • Calculate converted losses from eligible losses and a loss conversion factor
  • Distinguish a stated tax multiplier from a multiplier derived from a tax rate
  • Gross up the premium when taxes are assessed as a percentage of premium
  • Apply minimum and maximum premium bounds in the specified contractual order
  • Check whether either bound changes the calculated premium
  • Identify common sequencing and tax-multiplier errors

From Plan Inputs to the Final Premium

A complete retrospective premium calculation is a sequence of distinct operations. Start with the basic premium and eligible losses, convert the losses using the plan’s loss conversion factor, apply the tax multiplier, and then enforce the contractual minimum and maximum. The result may equal the tax-loaded indication, or a premium bound may replace it.

The order matters. In this tutorial, the stated contract applies both bounds to the tax-loaded indicated premium. A contract can specify a different basis or sequence, so the wording of the plan controls. The examples below state the sequence and inputs explicitly.

Definition: Let \(B\) be the basic premium, \(L\) the eligible losses supplied for the calculation, \(c\) the loss conversion factor, \(T\) the tax multiplier, \(P_{\min}\) the minimum premium, and \(P_{\max}\) the maximum premium. Converted losses are \(cL\). The unbounded retrospective premium is \(T(B+cL)\). When the contract applies both bounds to that amount, the final premium is $$ P=\min\!\left(P_{\max},\max\!\left(P_{\min},T(B+cL)\right)\right). $$ This formula assumes \(P_{\min}\leq P_{\max}\), and that the stated losses and factors are already on the bases required by the plan. It does not replace a contract’s explicitly different definitions or ordering.

The loss amount \(L\) is an input here: it is the eligible loss total provided for the calculation, not a claim-by-claim aggregation exercise. The basic premium and converted losses are added before the tax multiplier is applied. If the indicated premium is below the minimum, the minimum governs; if it is above the maximum, the maximum governs; otherwise, the indicated amount stands.

Why a Tax Rate Can Require a Gross-Up

A tax multiplier may be supplied directly in the plan. If instead the problem gives a tax rate as a percentage of the premium, the multiplier must reflect that the tax itself is a portion of the premium collected. Suppose \(Q\) is the amount needed before tax, and \(t\) is the tax rate. If the gross premium is \(G\), then \(G-tG=Q\): the insurer retains the gross premium less the tax.

$$ G(1-t)=Q \qquad\Longrightarrow\qquad G=\frac{Q}{1-t} $$

Thus, under this convention, the tax multiplier is \(T=1/(1-t)\), not \(1+t\). This derivation assumes the tax is calculated as a fraction of the gross premium and that \(Q\) is the amount to be retained before that tax. If the plan supplies \(T\) directly, use the stated multiplier rather than inferring a tax rate.

Important distinction: A tax rate and a tax multiplier are not interchangeable. For example, a 4% tax rate under the gross-up convention gives \(T=1/0.96\), approximately \(1.041667\). A plan that directly states a multiplier of \(1.04\) instead requires multiplication by \(1.04\).

A Reliable Calculation Sequence

Use a staged calculation so that each plan component can be checked before the final premium is selected. Keep full precision through the calculation and round the final dollar amount to the nearest cent unless the contract or problem specifies otherwise.

1
Identify the calculation basis.
Record the basic premium, eligible loss amount, loss conversion factor, tax information, and the stated minimum and maximum. Check that the bounds are expressed on a compatible dollar basis.
2
Convert the losses.
Multiply eligible losses by the loss conversion factor: \(cL\). Do not apply the factor to the basic premium.
3
Form the pre-tax amount.
Add the converted losses to the basic premium: \(B+cL\).
4
Apply the tax multiplier.
Use the stated multiplier, or derive it from the stated tax rate using the plan’s specified convention. This produces the unbounded indicated premium.
5
Apply the contractual bounds.
Raise an indication below the minimum to the minimum, reduce one above the maximum to the maximum, and leave an indication between the bounds unchanged.

Worked Calculations

Worked Example: An Indication Between Both Bounds

A hypothetical insured has a basic premium of $120,000 and eligible losses of $78,400. The loss conversion factor is 1.15. Taxes are 4% of the gross premium, so the plan uses the gross-up convention. The contract sets a minimum premium of $96,000 and a maximum of $240,000, with both bounds applied to the tax-loaded indication. Calculate the final premium.

Step 1: Convert the losses. Multiply the eligible losses by the loss conversion factor:

$$ cL=1.15(78{,}400)=90{,}160 $$

Step 2: Add the basic premium.

$$ B+cL=120{,}000+90{,}160=210{,}160 $$

Step 3: Derive and apply the tax multiplier. With \(t=0.04\), the gross-up multiplier is \(T=1/(1-0.04)=1/0.96=1.041666\ldots\). Therefore, the unbounded premium is:

$$ T(B+cL)=\frac{210{,}160}{0.96}=218{,}916.666\ldots $$

Step 4: Test the bounds. The indication is greater than $96,000 and less than $240,000, so neither bound changes it. Rounded to the nearest cent, the final premium is $218,916.67.

Check: The amount is inside the stated interval \([96{,}000,240{,}000]\), as required. The method avoids treating a 4% tax rate as a 1.04 multiplier.

Worked Example: A Minimum Premium Applies

A hypothetical fleet has a basic premium of $85,000 and eligible losses of $8,000. Its loss conversion factor is 1.10. The plan taxes the gross premium at 5%, uses the corresponding gross-up multiplier, and sets a $105,000 minimum and a $150,000 maximum. Both bounds apply after the tax gross-up. Find the final premium.

Step 1: Convert the losses.

$$ cL=1.10(8{,}000)=8{,}800 $$

Step 2: Form the pre-tax amount.

$$ B+cL=85{,}000+8{,}800=93{,}800 $$

Step 3: Gross up for tax. The tax rate is \(t=0.05\), so \(T=1/(1-0.05)=1/0.95=1.0526315789\ldots\). The unbounded indication is:

$$ T(B+cL)=\frac{93{,}800}{0.95}=98{,}736.842105\ldots $$

Step 4: Apply the minimum and maximum. The indication is below the $105,000 minimum, so it is raised to $105,000. That amount is below the $150,000 maximum, so the maximum does not change it. The final premium is $105,000.00.

Check: The final amount is at the minimum and below the maximum. This case illustrates why a low loss amount does not by itself determine the premium: the contractual floor can govern the result.

Worked Example: A Maximum Premium Applies

A hypothetical manufacturer has a basic premium of $140,000 and eligible losses of $190,000. The loss conversion factor is 1.05. The plan specifies a 3% tax on gross premium, a $100,000 minimum, and a $310,000 maximum; both bounds apply to the tax-loaded indication. Calculate the amount before bounds and the final premium.

Step 1: Convert the losses.

$$ cL=1.05(190{,}000)=199{,}500 $$

Step 2: Add the basic premium.

$$ B+cL=140{,}000+199{,}500=339{,}500 $$

Step 3: Apply the tax gross-up. Here \(t=0.03\), so \(T=1/0.97=1.0309278351\ldots\). The unbounded indication is:

$$ T(B+cL)=\frac{339{,}500}{0.97}=350{,}000 $$

Step 4: Apply the bounds. The indication exceeds the $310,000 maximum, so the maximum governs. It is above the $100,000 minimum, which therefore does not affect the result. The final premium is $310,000.00.

Check: The final premium equals the stated maximum and is not below the minimum. Applying the maximum to the pre-tax amount instead would use the wrong contractual basis in this problem.

Common Errors and Contract Checks

The arithmetic is short, but several plausible shortcuts change the result. Consider the first example’s pre-tax amount of $210,160 and tax rate of 4%. A common wrong calculation is to multiply by \(1.04\):

$$ 210{,}160(1.04)=218{,}566.40 $$

That is not the gross-up result. The correct calculation is \(210{,}160/0.96=218{,}916.666\ldots\), or $218,916.67 to the nearest cent. The wrong calculation treats the tax as 4% of the pre-tax amount, whereas the stated convention makes tax 4% of the gross premium.

Other errors to guard against include:

  • Applying the loss conversion factor to the wrong component. The formula converts eligible losses, \(cL\), and then adds the basic premium. It does not convert \(B\).
  • Applying the tax multiplier before adding the components. The stated structure is \(T(B+cL)\), not \(TB+cL\).
  • Applying bounds to an amount the contract does not name. If the plan says the bounds apply after taxes, compare them with the tax-loaded indication. If it states a different basis, follow that language instead.
  • Assuming the result must be between the bounds without checking. The bound that is not reached has no effect; a calculation can be uncapped, minimum-limited, or maximum-limited.
  • Rounding intermediate amounts too early. Carry the full indicated precision through the multiplier and bounds, then round the final dollar premium as instructed.

Before accepting a result, verify that the converted-loss amount is based on the specified eligible losses, the tax multiplier follows the specified convention, the bounds are compared on the contractual basis, and the final premium satisfies \(P_{\min}\leq P\leq P_{\max}\).

Key takeaway: For the stated sequence, calculate converted losses, add them to the basic premium, apply the tax multiplier, and then enforce the minimum and maximum. The final amount is the tax-loaded indication unless a contractual bound changes it.

Check Your Understanding

For each hypothetical plan, calculate the final premium. Unless stated otherwise, apply the bounds to the tax-loaded indication and round the final amount to the nearest cent.

  1. A plan has a basic premium of $96,000, eligible losses of $52,000, a loss conversion factor of 1.20, and a 6% tax on gross premium. Its minimum is $100,000 and its maximum is $175,000. What is the final premium? (Answer: $168,510.64)
  2. A plan has a basic premium of $72,000, eligible losses of $20,000, and a loss conversion factor of 1.15. Its tax rate is 5% of gross premium. The minimum is $104,000 and the maximum is $150,000. What is the final premium? (Answer: $104,000.00)
  3. A plan has a basic premium of $125,000, eligible losses of $210,000, a loss conversion factor of 1.08, and a 4% gross-premium tax. Its minimum is $110,000 and its maximum is $340,000. Calculate the unbounded indication and the final premium. (Answer: Unbounded indication $366,458.33; final premium $340,000.00)
  4. A plan has a basic premium of $110,000 and eligible losses of $64,000. Its loss conversion factor is 1.25, and the plan directly states a tax multiplier of 1.03. Its minimum is $120,000 and its maximum is $190,000. What is the final premium? (Answer: $190,000.00)
  5. A plan has a basic premium of $90,000, eligible losses of $150,000, and a loss conversion factor of 1.10. The tax is 4% of gross premium. Its minimum is $150,000 and maximum is $250,000. Show whether the result is changed by each bound and give the final premium. (Answer: Unbounded indication $265,625.00; the maximum binds and the final premium is $250,000.00)
Clinical Biostats