Tutorials › CAS Exam 8 - Advanced Ratemaking › Compute Premiums From Stated Retro Parameters

CAS Exam 8 · Retrospective Plan Parameters · Tutorial 616 of 989

Compute Premiums From Stated Retro Parameters

Calculate a retrospective premium from fully stated plan parameters, keeping each conversion, expense, and multiplier in the order specified.

Advanced 10 min read

What You'll Learn

  • Identify the inputs needed to calculate a premium from stated retrospective plan parameters.
  • Convert a specified loss amount using the plan’s stated loss conversion factor.
  • Apply expense provisions according to their stated base and timing.
  • Evaluate a sequence of additions and multiplications in the contractual order.
  • Check a premium calculation for missing inputs and common order-of-operations errors.

From Plan Parameters to a Premium

A retrospective premium calculation is only as determinate as the plan terms supplied. A stated loss amount cannot be converted unless the applicable loss conversion factor is known, and a percentage expense provision cannot be calculated unless its base is stated. Once all inputs are available, the central task is to apply them in the specified order—not to substitute a familiar formula for the contract’s actual sequence.

This tutorial treats the plan’s supplied loss amount as the amount to which its stated loss conversion factor applies. It does not determine how reported claims are aggregated, limited, or otherwise converted before that point. Those steps must already be addressed by the plan specification or supplied as part of the problem data.

Definition: Let \(B\) be the basic premium, \(L\) the specified loss amount used in the calculation, and \(c\) the stated loss conversion factor. The converted loss amount is \(cL\). An expense provision may be given as a dollar amount or as a rate applied to a specifically stated base. A premium multiplier is applied to the subtotal specified by the plan. The retrospective premium is the result of applying all these stated provisions in the plan’s stated order.

A plan might specify that converted losses are added to the basic premium, that a provision equal to a percentage of the basic premium is then added, that the subtotal is multiplied, and that a fixed provision is added last. A different plan may place the fixed provision before the multiplier or define an expense rate on a different base. There is no universal order that overrides the written terms.

Write the Sequence Before Calculating

Before doing arithmetic, rewrite the plan as a sequence of operations. Name each subtotal and label the base for every percentage. This simple setup makes it easier to see whether a parameter is missing and helps prevent an expense rate from being applied to the wrong amount.

1
List the inputs.
Record the basic premium, specified loss amount, loss conversion factor, expense provisions, and multipliers. Confirm that each percentage provision has a stated base.
2
Convert the specified loss amount.
Calculate \(cL\) using the stated factor. Do not infer a factor from context or silently use a value from a different plan.
3
Build the subtotal in order.
Add or multiply components exactly where the plan places them. Keep fixed-dollar provisions and percentage provisions distinct.
4
Check and report the result.
Verify each intermediate subtotal, confirm the final operation, and report the premium in dollars and cents when the inputs are in dollars.

For one common sequence, the plan adds converted losses and an expense provision equal to a fraction \(e\) of the basic premium, multiplies that subtotal by \(m\), and adds a fixed provision \(F\) last. In that case, the formula is:

$$ P=m(B+cL+eB)+F $$

This formula is conditional on that exact order and expense base. It is not a general retrospective premium formula for every plan. For example, if the plan instead adds \(F\) before applying \(m\), the corresponding expression is \(P=m(B+cL+eB+F)\), which can produce a different result.

Worked Calculations

Worked Example: Percentage of Basic Premium and a Fixed Provision Last

A hypothetical plan has a basic premium \(B=\$75{,}000\) and a specified loss amount \(L=\$42{,}000\). Its stated loss conversion factor is \(c=1.10\). The plan adds converted losses to the basic premium, then adds an expense provision equal to 8% of \(B\), multiplies the subtotal by 1.05, and adds a fixed \(\$2{,}000\) provision last. Calculate the premium.

Method. Follow the stated sequence, using \(eB\) for the expense provision because the plan defines its base as the basic premium.

First convert the specified loss amount:

$$ cL=1.10(\$42{,}000)=\$46{,}200 $$

Add the converted losses to the basic premium:

$$ \$75{,}000+\$46{,}200=\$121{,}200 $$

Calculate the expense provision from the stated base:

$$ 0.08B=0.08(\$75{,}000)=\$6{,}000 $$

Add that provision and multiply the resulting subtotal:

$$ \$121{,}200+\$6{,}000=\$127{,}200 $$
$$ 1.05(\$127{,}200)=\$133{,}560 $$

The fixed provision is added last, as specified:

$$ P=\$133{,}560+\$2{,}000=\boxed{\$135{,}560.00} $$

Check. The calculation uses the stated conversion factor, applies 8% to \(B\), and adds the fixed amount after the multiplier. The common mistake to avoid is multiplying the fixed provision too: that would contradict the instruction that it is added last.

Worked Example: Multiplier Followed by a Fixed Expense

A hypothetical plan has a basic premium of \(\$80{,}000\), a specified loss amount of \(\$10{,}000\), and a stated loss conversion factor \(c=1.10\). It adds converted losses to the basic premium, multiplies that sum by 0.90, and then adds a fixed \(\$1{,}000\) expense provision. Calculate the premium.

Method. Convert first, apply the multiplier to the sum of \(B\) and converted losses, and add the fixed provision afterward.

The converted loss amount is:

$$ cL=1.10(\$10{,}000)=\$11{,}000 $$

The subtotal before the multiplier is:

$$ B+cL=\$80{,}000+\$11{,}000=\$91{,}000 $$

Apply the 0.90 multiplier:

$$ 0.90(\$91{,}000)=\$81{,}900 $$

Add the fixed provision after the multiplier:

$$ P=\$81{,}900+\$1{,}000=\boxed{\$82{,}900.00} $$

Check. The conversion factor is explicitly supplied, so the converted losses are determined. The final premium is below the initial \(B+cL\) subtotal plus the fixed provision because the multiplier reduces the subtotal before that provision is added. Do not move the fixed expense inside the multiplication.

Worked Example: An Expense Rate on a Subtotal

A hypothetical plan has \(B=\$60{,}000\), a specified loss amount \(L=\$28{,}000\), and a stated loss conversion factor \(c=1.25\). It first adds the basic premium and converted losses. It then adds an expense provision equal to 4% of that combined subtotal, multiplies the new subtotal by 1.02, and adds a fixed \(\$850\) charge last. Calculate the premium, rounding only at the final step to cents.

Method. Here the expense base is \(B+cL\), not just \(B\). Calculate that base before applying the 4% provision.

Convert the specified loss amount:

$$ cL=1.25(\$28{,}000)=\$35{,}000 $$

The combined subtotal and its 4% expense provision are:

$$ B+cL=\$60{,}000+\$35{,}000=\$95{,}000 $$
$$ 0.04(\$95{,}000)=\$3{,}800 $$

Add the provision, then apply the multiplier:

$$ \$95{,}000+\$3{,}800=\$98{,}800 $$
$$ 1.02(\$98{,}800)=\$100{,}776 $$

Finally, add the fixed charge:

$$ P=\$100{,}776+\$850=\boxed{\$101{,}626.00} $$

Check. Four percent of \(\$95{,}000\) is \(\$3{,}800\), and 2% of \(\$98{,}800\) is \(\$1{,}976\), giving the multiplier result \(\$100{,}776\). The final fixed charge is added afterward. A frequent error is to apply the 4% to \(B\) alone; the stated expense base in this problem is \(B+cL\).

Why the Order Changes the Result

The arithmetic sequence can be justified by representing each contractual operation directly. Suppose the plan first forms a subtotal \(S=B+cL+eB\), applies the multiplier \(m\), and adds \(F\) afterward. By definition of multiplication, the multiplied amount is \(mS\), so adding the final provision gives \(P=mS+F\), or \(P=m(B+cL+eB)+F\).

If the fixed provision is instead included before multiplication, the result is \(m(S+F)\). Expanding both expressions shows the difference:

$$ m(S+F)-(mS+F)=mS+mF-mS-F=(m-1)F $$

Thus the two orders agree only if \(m=1\) or \(F=0\). For a nonzero fixed provision and a multiplier other than 1, moving the provision across the multiplication changes the premium. This is why “add all charges, then multiply” is not a safe shortcut unless the plan explicitly says so.

Parameter Completeness and Common Traps

Before calculating, verify that the problem gives enough information to determine each requested amount. If \(L\) is stated but \(c\) is not, then \(cL\) and the premium cannot be computed unless some other plan term supplies the conversion. Likewise, a percentage expense provision without a stated base is ambiguous. Do not fill these gaps with a typical value or an assumption that is not in the plan.

A useful audit is to write each intermediate amount with its label and unit. For instance, a percentage of the basic premium is \(eB\); a percentage of the loss-inclusive subtotal is \(e(B+cL)\). These are generally unequal. Carry full precision through the sequence and round only when reporting the final dollar premium, unless the plan explicitly requires rounding at an intermediate step.

  • Missing conversion factor: If the factor is not stated, do not produce converted losses by guessing it. Identify the missing input.
  • Wrong expense base: Use the exact base named for the percentage, rather than an intuitively chosen subtotal.
  • Reordered operations: A fixed provision added after a multiplier is not equivalent to one added before it.
  • Premature rounding: Round the final premium as requested, not intermediate calculations, unless the terms direct otherwise.
  • Unstated plan assumptions: Do not add a cap, minimum, or other adjustment unless it is part of the supplied terms and the requested calculation.
Key takeaway: A premium calculated from stated parameters is a sequence, not merely a list of inputs. Confirm that every factor and expense base is specified, convert the stated loss amount, follow the plan’s exact operation order, and check the resulting subtotals.

Check Your Understanding

For each hypothetical plan, calculate the premium using only the stated parameters and the stated order.

  1. A plan has \(B=\$64{,}000\), \(L=\$18{,}000\), and \(c=1.20\). It adds converted losses and an expense provision equal to 5% of \(B\), multiplies the subtotal by 1.04, and adds \(\$400\) last. (Answer: \(\$92{,}752.00\))
  2. A plan has \(B=\$92{,}000\), \(L=\$25{,}000\), and \(c=1.08\). It multiplies \(B+cL\) by 0.95 and then adds a fixed \(\$2{,}500\) provision. (Answer: \(\$115{,}550.00\))
  3. A plan has \(B=\$150{,}000\), \(L=\$44{,}000\), and \(c=1.15\). It adds an expense provision equal to 3% of \(B\) to \(B+cL\), multiplies the result by 1.03, and adds \(\$1{,}200\) last. (Answer: \(\$212{,}453.00\))
  4. A plan has \(B=\$48{,}000\), \(L=\$32{,}000\), and \(c=1.25\). It adds converted losses and an expense equal to 2% of \(B\), multiplies that subtotal by 1.10, and then adds \(\$3{,}000\). (Answer: \(\$100{,}856.00\))
  5. A plan has \(B=\$110{,}000\), \(L=\$36{,}000\), and \(c=1.10\). It adds an expense equal to 7% of \(B\) to \(B+cL\), multiplies the subtotal by 0.98, and adds \(\$1{,}800\) last. (Answer: \(\$155{,}954.00\))
Clinical Biostats