Why Condition on a Positive Payment?
A deductible can eliminate some losses from the insurer’s payments. A probability conditional on a positive payment therefore describes the distribution among claims that pass the deductible, rather than among all losses. The distinction matters: the condition changes the probability denominator, and the deductible type determines how a loss threshold translates into a payment threshold.
This tutorial considers an individual nonnegative loss \(X\) and a deductible \(d\ge 0\). We use strict exceedance throughout: a loss must be greater than \(d\) to produce a positive payment. This convention is important for discrete loss models, which can assign positive probability to exactly \(d\). Results use the survival function \(S_X(t)=P(X>t)\), so the strict inequality is explicit. The methods are aligned with the SOA Exam FAM (Fundamentals of Actuarial Mathematics) syllabus.
The payment amounts differ once the loss exceeds \(d\). With an ordinary deductible, a loss of \(d+4\) produces a payment of \(4\); with a franchise deductible, it produces a payment of \(d+4\). Thus the conditional loss probability \(P(X>x\mid Y>0)\) is the same for either contract, but the conditional payment probability \(P(Y>y\mid Y>0)\) generally is not.
Conditional Loss Probabilities
Conditioning on a positive payment is equivalent to conditioning on \(X>d\), for either deductible. For a threshold \(x\ge d\), the event \(X>x\) is contained in \(X>d\), so the intersection in the conditional probability is just \(X>x\). If \(x<d\), every loss that passes the deductible is already greater than \(x\).
At \(x=d\), the ratio equals one, as it should: conditional on \(X>d\), the loss exceeds \(d\) with certainty. At \(x>d\), the survival-function ratio accounts for both the losses that exceed \(x\) and the reduced population of losses that passed the deductible. No continuity assumption is needed; using \(S_X(t)=P(X>t)\) makes the result valid even when \(X\) has atoms.
Conditional Payment Probabilities
For nonnegative payment thresholds \(y\), the payment event can be translated back into an event about \(X\). Under an ordinary deductible, a positive payment greater than \(y\) requires the loss to exceed \(d+y\). Under a franchise deductible, every loss above \(d\) is paid in full, so a payment greater than \(y\) requires the loss to exceed \(y\), as well as to pass the deductible.
At \(y=d\), every positive franchise payment is strictly greater than \(d\), since it comes from a loss strictly greater than \(d\). The ratio \(S_X(d)/S_X(d)\) would also give one at this boundary. For an ordinary deductible, \(P(Y^L>0\mid Y^L>0)=1\), and the formula at \(y=0\) gives exactly that result.
For either deductible under the stated strict-threshold convention, \(Y>0\) means \(X>d\). Check that \(S_X(d)>0\).
For a loss threshold, retain \(X>x\). For a payment threshold, use \(X>d+y\) for an ordinary deductible and \(X>y\) for a franchise deductible, while also retaining \(X>d\).
Use \(P(X>d)=S_X(d)\) as the denominator. If the translated event is automatic among positive payments, the conditional probability is one.
Worked Examples
Worked Example: Exponential Losses Under Both Deductibles
A hypothetical insurer models a claim amount by an exponential distribution with rate \(\lambda=0.1\) per dollar, so \(S_X(t)=e^{-0.1t}\) for \(t\ge0\). The deductible is \(d=\$5\). Calculate (a) \(P(X>10\mid Y>0)\), (b) the probability that an ordinary-deductible payment exceeds \(\$3\), given a positive payment, and (c) the probability that a franchise-deductible payment exceeds \(\$8\), given a positive payment. Give probabilities to four decimals. Method: translate each event to a loss threshold and divide its survival probability by \(S_X(5)\). The main trap is using an unconditional tail probability as the answer.
First, the positive-payment probability for either contract is \(S_X(5)=e^{-0.1(5)}=e^{-0.5}=0.6065307\).
(a) Conditional loss tail. Since \(10\ge5\), $$ P(X>10\mid Y>0)=\frac{S_X(10)}{S_X(5)} =\frac{e^{-1}}{e^{-0.5}} =e^{-0.5}=0.6065307. $$ Rounded to four decimals, the answer is \(0.6065\).
(b) Ordinary payment. The event \(Y^L>3\) is \(X-5>3\), or \(X>8\). Therefore $$ P(Y^L>3\mid Y^L>0)=\frac{S_X(8)}{S_X(5)} =\frac{e^{-0.8}}{e^{-0.5}} =e^{-0.3}=0.7408182. $$ The answer is \(0.7408\).
(c) Franchise payment. Here a positive payment equals the full loss. Since \(8>d\), the event \(Y^F>8\), conditional on a positive payment, has probability $$ P(Y^F>8\mid Y^F>0)=\frac{S_X(8)}{S_X(5)} =\frac{e^{-0.8}}{e^{-0.5}} =e^{-0.3}=0.7408182. $$ The answer is \(0.7408\). As a check, a franchise payment greater than \(8\) requires a loss greater than \(8\), whereas an ordinary payment greater than \(3\) requires a loss greater than \(5+3=8\); the matching probabilities are expected.
Worked Example: Discrete Losses and a Boundary Atom
A hypothetical warranty loss \(X\) takes values \(\$2,\$6,\$9,\$14\) with probabilities \(0.15, 0.25, 0.35, 0.25\), respectively. The deductible is \(d=\$6\), and the contract pays only when \(X>d\). Calculate (a) \(P(X>9\mid Y>0)\), (b) \(P(Y^L>3\mid Y^L>0)\), and (c) \(P(Y^F>8\mid Y^F>0)\). Give probabilities to four decimals. Method: list the outcomes in each strict-threshold event. The trap is treating a loss equal to the deductible as a positive payment.
The loss probabilities sum to \(0.15+0.25+0.35+0.25=1\). Because the loss of \(\$6\) does not exceed the deductible, positive payment occurs only for losses of \(\$9\) and \(\$14\). Thus $$ P(Y>0)=P(X>6)=0.35+0.25=0.60. $$
(a) Conditional loss tail. Of the positive-payment outcomes, only \(X=14\) exceeds \(9\). Hence $$ P(X>9\mid Y>0)=\frac{0.25}{0.60}=0.4166667, $$ which rounds to \(0.4167\).
(b) Ordinary payment. Payments at \(X=9\) and \(X=14\) are \(\$3\) and \(\$8\), respectively. The strict event \(Y^L>3\) excludes the \(\$3\) payment, so $$ P(Y^L>3\mid Y^L>0)=\frac{P(X=14)}{0.60} =\frac{0.25}{0.60}=0.4167. $$
(c) Franchise payment. The payments are \(\$9\) and \(\$14\). Only the \(\$14\) payment exceeds \(\$8\), so $$ P(Y^F>8\mid Y^F>0)=\frac{0.25}{0.60}=0.4167. $$ Check: the ordinary event \(Y^L>3\) and franchise event \(Y^F>8\) both select just the loss of \(\$14\). The mass at \(X=6\) contributes to neither the numerator nor the positive-payment denominator.
Worked Example: Pareto Losses and Threshold Shifts
A hypothetical equipment portfolio uses a Pareto loss model with survival function \(S_X(t)=(20/(20+t))^2\) for \(t\ge0\). The deductible is \(d=\$10\). Find (a) the probability that the loss exceeds \(\$30\), given a positive payment, (b) the probability that an ordinary-deductible payment exceeds \(\$10\), given a positive payment, and (c) the probability that a franchise payment exceeds \(\$20\), given a positive payment. Give probabilities to four decimals. Method: substitute each correctly translated threshold into the survival ratio. The trap is forgetting the deductible shift for the ordinary payment.
The denominator is $$ S_X(10)=\left(\frac{20}{20+10}\right)^2 =\left(\frac{2}{3}\right)^2=\frac{4}{9}. $$
(a) Conditional loss tail. Since \(S_X(30)=(20/50)^2=4/25\), $$ P(X>30\mid Y>0)=\frac{4/25}{4/9} =\frac{9}{25}=0.36. $$ The answer is \(0.3600\).
(b) Ordinary payment. A payment greater than \(\$10\) requires \(X>10+10=20\). Since \(S_X(20)=(20/40)^2=1/4\), $$ P(Y^L>10\mid Y^L>0)=\frac{1/4}{4/9} =\frac{9}{16}=0.5625. $$
(c) Franchise payment. A franchise payment greater than \(\$20\) requires \(X>20\), so $$ P(Y^F>20\mid Y^F>0)=\frac{S_X(20)}{S_X(10)} =\frac{1/4}{4/9}=\frac{9}{16}=0.5625. $$ The check is that these last two questions translate to the same loss event, \(X>20\); their conditional probabilities must therefore agree.
Why the Denominator and Deductible Type Matter
The conditional-probability identity \(P(A\mid B)=P(A\cap B)/P(B)\), for \(P(B)>0\), explains the survival ratios. For example, when \(x\ge d\), the events \(\{X>x\}\) and \(\{X>d\}\) intersect in \(\{X>x\}\). Therefore
The payment results follow by the same reasoning. Under an ordinary deductible, \(Y^L>y\) is equivalent to \(X>d+y\) for \(y\ge0\). Under a franchise deductible, \(Y^F>y\), together with \(Y^F>0\), is equivalent to \(X>\max(d,y)\). These event equivalences produce the respective formulas and show why a deductible shift belongs in the ordinary-payment numerator, but not in the franchise-payment threshold.
A frequent exam error is to report \(S_X(d+y)\) itself as the ordinary conditional payment probability. In the exponential example, for \(d=5\) and \(y=3\), that incorrect calculation gives \(S_X(8)=e^{-0.8}=0.4493\). It is an unconditional probability. The required conditional probability is $$ \frac{S_X(8)}{S_X(5)} =\frac{0.4493}{0.6065} \approx 0.7408. $$ Another error is to apply the ordinary shift \(d+y\) to a franchise payment. A franchise payment of \(y\) dollars is the full loss, not the loss in excess of the deductible.
Check Your Understanding
Use strict exceedance and give probabilities to four decimals. Each problem is hypothetical.
- A loss is exponential with rate \(0.2\) per dollar and has an ordinary deductible of \(\$3\). Find \(P(X>8\mid Y^L>0)\). (Answer: \(0.3679\))
- A loss is exponential with rate \(0.1\) per dollar and has a franchise deductible of \(\$4\). Find \(P(Y^F>7\mid Y^F>0)\). (Answer: \(0.7408\))
- A loss is \(\$1,\$5,\$9,\) or \(\$15\), with respective probabilities \(0.10,0.20,0.40,0.30\). Under an ordinary deductible of \(\$6\), find \(P(Y^L>4\mid Y^L>0)\). (Answer: \(0.4286\))
- A loss has survival function \(S_X(t)=(20/(20+t))^3\), \(t\ge0\). Under an ordinary deductible of \(\$5\), find \(P(Y^L>10\mid Y^L>0)\). (Answer: \(0.3644\))
- A loss is uniform on \([0,20]\), and a franchise deductible is \(\$8\). Find \(P(X>12\mid Y^F>0)\) and \(P(Y^F>12\mid Y^F>0)\). (Answer: \(0.6667\) for each)