Tutorials › Exam FAM - Fundamentals of Actuarial Mathematics › Poisson Counts as an (a,b,0) Distribution

Exam FAM · Panjer Frequency Classes · Tutorial 564 of 988

Poisson Counts as an (a,b,0) Distribution

Connect the Poisson mass function to the (a,b,0) recursion, then use its parameters to calculate probabilities and verify the model.

Advanced 10 min read

What You'll Learn

  • Derive the Poisson probability recursion directly from consecutive mass probabilities
  • Identify the (a,b,0) parameters and the required initial probability
  • State the Poisson count model’s mean and support, including its zero-rate case
  • Calculate count probabilities recursively and check them against the mass function
  • Avoid confusing the coefficient b with the count-dependent factor b/n

Why the Poisson Distribution Belongs to the (a,b,0) Class

A Panjer recursion describes a sequence of count probabilities by relating each probability to the one immediately before it. For a Poisson count, the probability ratio between consecutive counts has a particularly simple form: it is the Poisson parameter divided by the new count. This makes the Poisson distribution a direct example of the \((a,b,0)\) class, with \(a=0\).

The connection matters because a distribution’s class parameters let us recognize its probability structure and apply the corresponding recursion. Here the key is to keep the count index in the right place: the coefficient \(b\) is constant, while the factor \(b/n\) changes with \(n\).

Definition: A probability sequence \(\{p_n\}_{n\geq 0}\) is in the \((a,b,0)\) class if, for \(n\geq 1\), its probabilities satisfy $$ p_n=\left(a+\frac{b}{n}\right)p_{n-1}, $$ with an initial probability \(p_0\) and parameters for which the sequence is a valid probability distribution. For a Poisson random variable \(N\sim\operatorname{Poisson}(\lambda)\), where \(\lambda>0\), the class parameters are \(a=0\) and \(b=\lambda\), and \(p_0=e^{-\lambda}\).

Deriving the Poisson Recursion

Assume the count \(N\) has a Poisson distribution with parameter \(\lambda>0\). Its probability mass function is

$$ p_n=P(N=n)=e^{-\lambda}\frac{\lambda^n}{n!}, \qquad n=0,1,2,\ldots. $$

For \(n\geq 1\), divide the probability at count \(n\) by the probability at count \(n-1\). Both probabilities are positive when \(\lambda>0\), so this ratio is defined:

$$ \frac{p_n}{p_{n-1}} = \frac{e^{-\lambda}\lambda^n/n!} {e^{-\lambda}\lambda^{n-1}/(n-1)!} = \lambda\frac{(n-1)!}{n!} = \frac{\lambda}{n}. $$

Since \(p_n/p_{n-1}=\lambda/n\), multiplying by \(p_{n-1}\) gives the recursion. Matching its coefficient with the defining \((a,b,0)\) form identifies the parameters.

$$ p_n=\frac{\lambda}{n}p_{n-1} =\left(0+\frac{\lambda}{n}\right)p_{n-1}, \qquad a=0,\quad b=\lambda. $$

The initial probability comes from setting \(n=0\) in the Poisson mass function: \(p_0=e^{-\lambda}\). It is not determined by the recurrence alone; it must be specified to start the calculation. For the Poisson model, this initial probability also ensures that the sequence sums to one, because

$$ \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}p_n = p_0\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{\lambda^n}{n!} = p_0e^\lambda = e^{-\lambda}e^\lambda = 1. $$
Key result: If \(N\sim\operatorname{Poisson}(\lambda)\) with \(\lambda>0\), then its \((a,b,0)\) parameters are \(a=0\), \(b=\lambda\); its initial probability is \(p_0=e^{-\lambda}\); its mean is \(E[N]=\lambda\); and its support is \(\{0,1,2,\ldots\}\).

Mean and Support

The Poisson mean can be checked directly from the mass function. The term for \(n=0\) contributes zero to the expectation. For \(n\geq1\), use \(n/n!=1/(n-1)!\), and then re-index the sum with \(j=n-1\):

$$ E[N] = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}n e^{-\lambda}\frac{\lambda^n}{n!} = \lambda e^{-\lambda}\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\lambda^{n-1}}{(n-1)!} = \lambda e^{-\lambda}\sum_{j=0}^{\infty}\frac{\lambda^j}{j!} = \lambda. $$

For \(\lambda>0\), every mass \(e^{-\lambda}\lambda^n/n!\) is positive for each nonnegative integer \(n\). Thus every such count is in the support, and no non-integer value is possible. If \(\lambda=0\), the distribution is degenerate: \(P(N=0)=1\), its mean is zero, and its support is just \(\{0\}\). The recurrence with \(a=b=0\) gives \(p_n=0\) for \(n\geq1\), consistent with that degenerate case.

The recurrence also provides a practical check on calculations: once \(p_0\) is known, each successive probability follows by multiplying the previous one by \(\lambda/n\). The factor changes at every step. The recurrence is not \(p_n=\lambda p_{n-1}\); that would omit the count index and produce incorrect probabilities.

Applying the Recursion

Worked Example: Building Probabilities and a Tail

A hypothetical portfolio has a Poisson annual claim count with parameter \(\lambda=2\). Use the recursion to find \(p_0,p_1,p_2\), then calculate \(P(N\geq3)\). Give probabilities to four decimal places.

Method. Start from the Poisson initial probability and apply \(p_n=(2/n)p_{n-1}\) for each successive count. Then use the complement of the first three probabilities. This avoids summing the entire infinite tail.

The initial probability is \(p_0=e^{-2}=0.1353352832\ldots\). The next probabilities are

$$ p_1=\frac{2}{1}p_0 =2(0.1353352832\ldots) =0.2706705665\ldots, $$
$$ p_2=\frac{2}{2}p_1 =1(0.2706705665\ldots) =0.2706705665\ldots. $$

Therefore

$$ P(N\geq3) =1-(p_0+p_1+p_2) =1-(0.1353352832\ldots+0.2706705665\ldots+0.2706705665\ldots) =1-5e^{-2} =0.3233235838\ldots. $$

Rounded to four decimal places, \(p_0=0.1353\), \(p_1=0.2707\), \(p_2=0.2707\), and \(P(N\geq3)=0.3233\). As a check, the probabilities for counts 0, 1, and 2 sum to \(0.6766764162\ldots\), and that value plus the tail is 1.

Worked Example: Interpreting Class Parameters

A hypothetical count model is specified by \(p_n=(3.5/n)p_{n-1}\) for \(n\geq1\), with \(p_0=e^{-3.5}\). Identify the distribution and its class parameters, calculate \(P(N=1\text{ or }N=2)\), and state its mean and support.

Method. Compare the given recursion with \(p_n=(a+b/n)p_{n-1}\), and match it to the Poisson recursion. Then calculate the two requested probabilities from \(p_0\).

The constant part of the coefficient is zero, and the coefficient of \(1/n\) is 3.5. Thus \(a=0\), \(b=3.5\), and \(\lambda=3.5\). Since the initial probability is \(e^{-3.5}\), the model is \(N\sim\operatorname{Poisson}(3.5)\).

$$ p_0=e^{-3.5}=0.0301973834\ldots, $$
$$ p_1=\frac{3.5}{1}p_0 =3.5(0.0301973834\ldots) =0.1056908419\ldots, $$
$$ p_2=\frac{3.5}{2}p_1 =1.75(0.1056908419\ldots) =0.1849589733\ldots. $$

The events \(N=1\) and \(N=2\) are disjoint, so

$$ P(N=1\text{ or }N=2)=p_1+p_2 =0.1056908419\ldots+0.1849589733\ldots =0.2906498152\ldots \approx 0.2906. $$

The mean is \(E[N]=\lambda=3.5\), and the support is all nonnegative integers. As a check on the recursion, \(p_2/p_1=1.75=3.5/2\), as required for count 2.

Worked Example: Recovering the Parameter from a Probability Ratio

For a hypothetical Poisson count, the ratio \(p_4/p_3\) is observed to be \(0.65\). Determine \(\lambda\), then calculate \(P(N\leq2)\), to four decimal places. Also state the expected count.

Method. Use the consecutive-probability ratio at the specified count, not the ratio at count 3. For a Poisson count, \(p_n/p_{n-1}=\lambda/n\).

At \(n=4\), the ratio is \(\lambda/4\). Therefore

$$ 0.65=\frac{\lambda}{4} \quad\Longrightarrow\quad \lambda=4(0.65)=2.6. $$

The initial probability and the next two probabilities are

$$ p_0=e^{-2.6}=0.0742735782\ldots, $$
$$ p_1=\frac{2.6}{1}p_0 =2.6(0.0742735782\ldots) =0.1931113033\ldots, $$
$$ p_2=\frac{2.6}{2}p_1 =1.3(0.1931113033\ldots) =0.2510446944\ldots. $$

Thus

$$ P(N\leq2)=p_0+p_1+p_2 =0.0742735782\ldots+0.1931113033\ldots+0.2510446944\ldots =0.5184295759\ldots \approx0.5184. $$

The expected count is \(E[N]=2.6\). The ratio check is \(p_4/p_3=2.6/4=0.65\), agreeing with the given information.

Common Exam Trap: Losing the Count Index

The Poisson recursion has \(b=\lambda\), but the multiplier at step \(n\) is \(b/n\), not \(b\) alone. For example, with \(\lambda=2\), the correct first probability after \(p_0\) is

$$ p_1=\frac{2}{1}e^{-2}=0.2707\ldots. $$

A wrong calculation that uses \(p_1=2p_0\) happens to give the same result at \(n=1\), so it may not reveal the error immediately. At the next step, the correct value is \(p_2=(2/2)p_1=p_1\). Continuing to multiply by 2 would instead give \(2p_1\), which is wrong. Always substitute the current count \(n\) into the denominator.

A second trap is to identify \(b\) as \(\lambda/n\). That expression is the full count-specific multiplier, not a class parameter: \(b\) must stay fixed as \(n\) changes. For a Poisson model, \(b=\lambda\), while the recurrence uses \(b/n\).

Key takeaway: A Poisson count with parameter \(\lambda>0\) is in the \((a,b,0)\) class because its consecutive-probability ratio is \(\lambda/n\). Identify \(a=0\), \(b=\lambda\), and \(p_0=e^{-\lambda}\); then use the count index at each step. Its mean is \(\lambda\), and its support is the nonnegative integers.

Check Your Understanding

For each problem, use the Poisson recursion where appropriate. Round probabilities to four decimal places.

  1. A hypothetical Poisson count has \(\lambda=1.6\). State its \((a,b,0)\) parameters and mean, and calculate \(P(N\leq1)\). (Answer: \(a=0,\ b=1.6;\ E[N]=1.6;\ P(N\leq1)=0.5249\))
  2. A count sequence has \(a=0\), \(b=2.25\), and \(p_0=e^{-2.25}\). Identify the Poisson parameter and calculate \(p_1\). (Answer: \(\lambda=2.25;\ p_1=2.25e^{-2.25}=0.2371\))
  3. For a Poisson count, \(p_2/p_1=1.4\). Find \(\lambda\) and calculate \(P(N=0\text{ or }N=1)\). (Answer: \(\lambda=2.8;\ P(N=0\text{ or }N=1)=3.8e^{-2.8}=0.2311\))
  4. A hypothetical event count over a fixed exposure is Poisson with parameter \(\lambda=1.5\). Use the recursion to find \(p_0,p_1,p_2,p_3\), then calculate \(P(N=3)\). (Answer: \(p_0=0.2231,\ p_1=0.3347,\ p_2=0.2510,\ p_3=0.1255;\ P(N=3)=0.1255\))
  5. A proposed count model has \(p_0=e^{-3}\) and \(p_n=(3/n)p_{n-1}\) for \(n\geq1\). Identify its distribution, class parameters, mean, and support. (Answer: \(N\sim\operatorname{Poisson}(3);\ a=0,\ b=3;\ E[N]=3;\ \{0,1,2,\ldots\}\))
Clinical Biostats