Introduction
A claim count is often summarized by its mean and variance, but some questions concern combinations of claims: how many distinct pairs of claims are expected, or what is the probability that at least one pair occurs? For a Poisson count, factorial moments provide a direct route to these quantities. They also make it straightforward to recover ordinary moments such as the mean and variance.
The key distinction is between the number of claims and the number of ways to select claims from the count. If \(N\) claims occur, there are \(N(N-1)\) ordered pairs of distinct claims, but only \(N(N-1)/2\) unordered pairs. Keeping that distinction explicit prevents a common factor-of-two error.
The calculations here are aligned with the SOA Exam FAM (Fundamentals of Actuarial Mathematics) syllabus. The focus is on deriving and using moments under the Poisson model, not on selecting a frequency model for a particular portfolio.
Poisson Counts and Factorial Moments
Let \(N\) be the number of claims in a specified, fixed exposure period. Assume \(N\) has a Poisson distribution with parameter \(\lambda\), where \(\lambda\geq 0\) is the expected number of claims during that period. Its probability mass function is
The parameter \(\lambda\) is tied to the stated exposure period. If a question gives an annual claim count, for example, the resulting moments and probabilities refer to a year unless the model is explicitly adjusted to another period.
For example, \((N)_1=N\), \((N)_2=N(N-1)\), and \((N)_3=N(N-1)(N-2)\). These expressions count ordered selections of distinct claims: if \(N=4\), then \((N)_2=4\cdot3=12\) ordered pairs. The falling factorial is zero when \(N<r\), because there are not enough claims to select \(r\) distinct claims.
Deriving the Poisson Factorial-Moment Formula
For a Poisson count, the factorial moments have a particularly simple form. The derivation starts from the definition of expectation and the Poisson probability mass function. For integer \(r\geq1\), terms with \(n<r\) contribute zero, so
Set \(j=n-r\). As \(n\) runs from \(r\) to infinity, \(j\) runs from 0 to infinity. The remaining sum is the power series for \(e^\lambda\), which gives
The cancellation in the derivation explains why falling factorials are useful: the \(n!\) in the Poisson probability mass function cancels the \(n!\) in \((n)_r\), leaving a shifted exponential series. The result applies to a Poisson count with the stated parameter; it should not be transferred to a different count model merely because that model has the same mean.
Worked Example: Calculating Several Factorial Moments
A hypothetical roadside-assistance portfolio has a Poisson-distributed number \(N\) of reported claims per month, with parameter \(\lambda=3\). Calculate its first four positive-order factorial moments. State the method and verify the results from the formula.
Model and method. The monthly count is assumed to satisfy \(N\sim\operatorname{Poisson}(3)\). Apply \(E[(N)_r]=\lambda^r\), using the order \(r\) requested.
For order 1, \((N)_1=N\), so \(E[(N)_1]=3^1=3\).
For order 2, \((N)_2=N(N-1)\), so \(E[(N)_2]=3^2=9\).
For order 3, \((N)_3=N(N-1)(N-2)\), so \(E[(N)_3]=3^3=27\).
For order 4, \((N)_4=N(N-1)(N-2)(N-3)\), so \(E[(N)_4]=3^4=81\).
Check. Each result is nonnegative, and the \(r\)th value is the \(r\)th power of the stated monthly parameter 3. In particular, the second factorial moment is 9, not the ordinary second moment; converting to that ordinary moment requires adding \(E[N]\).
Common mistake avoided. Treating \(N(N-1)\) as \(N^2\) would confuse a factorial moment with an ordinary moment. They differ because \(N^2=N(N-1)+N\).
From Factorial Moments to Ordinary Moments
An ordinary moment uses powers such as \(N^2\) or \(N^3\), rather than falling factorials. Algebraic identities convert between the two forms. For the second moment,
Taking expectations and applying the Poisson factorial-moment formula gives the second raw moment. Subtracting the square of the mean then gives the variance.
For a higher-order example, expand \(N(N-1)(N-2)=N^3-3N^2+2N\), or rearrange this identity to obtain \(N^3=(N)_3+3(N)_2+(N)_1\). Therefore,
These identities are useful when a question asks for a raw moment directly, or when a moment expression must be simplified before a numerical value is calculated. Always identify whether the requested quantity is factorial, raw, or central; these are different summaries.
Worked Example: Recovering Ordinary Moments
A hypothetical equipment insurer models the number \(N\) of claims reported in a quarter as Poisson with parameter \(\lambda=2.5\). Calculate \(E[N]\), \(E[N^2]\), \(\operatorname{Var}(N)\), and \(E[N^3]\). Give moment values to three decimal places.
Model and method. Use the Poisson factorial moments \(E[(N)_r]=2.5^r\), then convert them to ordinary moments using the algebraic identities above.
The mean is \(E[N]=\lambda=2.5\), or \(2.500\) to three decimal places.
For the second raw moment, first calculate \(E[(N)_2]=2.5^2=6.25\). Since \(N^2=(N)_2+N\),
For the variance, square the mean: \((E[N])^2=2.5^2=6.25\). Thus \(\operatorname{Var}(N)=8.75-6.25=2.5\), or \(2.500\).
For the third raw moment, \(E[(N)_3]=2.5^3=15.625\). Also \(E[(N)_2]=6.25\) and \(E[(N)_1]=2.5\). Hence
Check. The variance equals the mean, as it must for a Poisson variable. The second raw moment is \(8.750\), which also equals \(\operatorname{Var}(N)+(E[N])^2=2.500+6.250\). The third raw moment is \(36.875\).
Common mistake avoided. Using \(E[N^2]=\lambda^2\) would omit the \(+\lambda\) term and incorrectly produce a variance of zero. The correct identity includes the first factorial moment as well as the second.
Claim Pairs: Counts and Probabilities
For a realized count \(N=n\), the number of distinct unordered pairs of claims is \(\binom{n}{2}\). Define \(K=\binom{N}{2}\) as the random number of such pairs. Since \(\binom{N}{2}=N(N-1)/2=(N)_2/2\), its expectation is
The factor \(1/2\) converts ordered pairs into unordered pairs. In contrast, \(E[N(N-1)]=\lambda^2\) is the expected number of ordered pairs of distinct claims.
An expected pair count is not itself a probability. For example, \(K\) can take values 0, 1, 3, 6, and so on; it is not restricted to 0 or 1. The event that at least one pair exists is exactly the event \(N\geq2\). Its probability must be calculated from the count probabilities:
The probability of exactly one unordered pair is different: this occurs when \(N=2\), because two claims make one pair, whereas three claims make three pairs. Thus \(P(K=1)=P(N=2)=e^{-\lambda}\lambda^2/2\).
Worked Example: Expected Pairs Versus the Probability of a Pair
A hypothetical repair network models the number \(N\) of claims submitted in a particular week as Poisson with parameter \(\lambda=1.5\). Calculate (1) the expected number of distinct unordered claim pairs, (2) the probability of exactly one such pair, and (3) the probability of at least one pair. Give probabilities to four decimal places.
Model and method. Assume \(N\sim\operatorname{Poisson}(1.5)\) for this week. Use the second factorial moment for the expected pair count, and use the Poisson probability mass function for the two event probabilities.
1. Expected number of pairs. The second factorial moment is \(E[(N)_2]=1.5^2=2.25\). Each unordered pair corresponds to two ordered pairs, so
2. Probability of exactly one pair. Exactly one unordered pair occurs precisely when \(N=2\). Therefore,
3. Probability of at least one pair. At least one pair occurs when the count is two or more. The complement consists of zero claims or one claim:
Check. To four decimal places, the requested values are 1.125 expected pairs, 0.2510 probability of exactly one pair, and 0.4422 probability of at least one pair. The probability of at least one pair exceeds the probability of exactly one pair, as expected, because the former also includes counts of three or more.
Common mistake avoided. It would be incorrect to report 1.125 as a probability. That value is an expectation of a pair count, which can exceed 1. The probability calculation instead sums the probabilities of the count values in the event, or uses the complement shown above.
Common Exam Traps and a Reliable Workflow
Pair-related questions can use similar-looking expressions while asking for different quantities. The following checks help keep the calculations aligned with the wording.
- Confirm the moment type. \(E[N(N-1)]\) is the second factorial moment, while \(E[N^2]\) is the second raw moment. For Poisson \(N\), the former is \(\lambda^2\), but the latter is \(\lambda^2+\lambda\).
- Check whether pairs are ordered. \(N(N-1)\) counts ordered pairs; \(\binom{N}{2}\) counts unordered pairs. Divide by 2 for the unordered count.
- Separate expectation from probability. \(E[\binom{N}{2}]=\lambda^2/2\) is an average number of pairs, not the probability that any pair occurs.
- Translate the event into count values. At least one pair means \(N\geq2\). Exactly one pair means \(N=2\), not \(N\leq2\) or \(N\geq2\).
- Use the parameter for the stated period. A monthly parameter cannot be used for a quarterly event without first expressing the model for that quarter.
A practical sequence is to identify the random count and its Poisson parameter, translate the requested quantity into a formula in \(N\), and then decide whether that formula calls for a factorial moment or for individual probabilities. After calculating, verify that the units and interpretation match the question.
Check Your Understanding
For each problem, identify whether the requested value is a moment, an expected pair count, or an event probability before calculating.
- A hypothetical call center has a Poisson number \(N\) of claims in a day with parameter \(\lambda=2\). Find \(E[(N)_3]\). (Answer: 8)
- A fictional insurer models monthly claims as \(N\sim\operatorname{Poisson}(3.5)\). Find \(E[N^2]\) and \(\operatorname{Var}(N)\). (Answer: \(E[N^2]=15.75\), \(\operatorname{Var}(N)=3.5\))
- A hypothetical claims unit has \(N\sim\operatorname{Poisson}(4)\) for a month. Find the expected number of distinct unordered pairs and the expected number of ordered pairs of distinct claims. (Answer: 8 unordered pairs; 16 ordered pairs)
- A fictional roadside service models its weekly count as \(N\sim\operatorname{Poisson}(2)\). Find the probability of at least one pair of claims, to four decimal places. (Answer: 0.5940)
- A hypothetical insurer models a quarterly count as \(N\sim\operatorname{Poisson}(1)\). Find \(E[N^3]\) and the probability of exactly one unordered pair, to four decimal places. (Answer: \(E[N^3]=5\); \(P(K=1)=0.1839\))