Tutorials › Exam FM - Financial Mathematics › Expiration Payoff And Profit From Short Stock

Exam FM · Spreads, Collars, and Short Sales · Tutorial 857 of 998

Expiration Payoff And Profit From Short Stock

Separate a short position’s expiration value from its profit by tracking the initial sale proceeds and the cost of covering the shares.

Advanced 10 min read

What You'll Learn

  • Distinguish a short stock position’s expiration payoff from the profit on the complete trade.
  • Calculate short-sale proceeds and the later cost to buy shares to cover.
  • Use position size and stock prices to find total and per-share payoff and profit.
  • Combine shares sold at different prices using total proceeds or a weighted average sale price.
  • Identify the break-even expiration price and explain why a short position’s loss can be unbounded.

Introduction

A short stock position reverses the usual direction of a stock trade: the investor sells borrowed shares first and later buys shares to return them. If the stock price falls, buying the shares back costs less than the initial sale proceeds. If the price rises, covering costs more. The key calculation is straightforward, but it is easy to confuse the value of the short position at expiration with the profit on the whole trade.

This tutorial focuses on the expiration payoff and simple trade profit for a short stock position. It excludes interest earned or paid on cash, dividends, borrowing fees, transaction costs, taxes, and margin requirements. Those items can change the result in an actual short sale, but they are not part of the basic calculation here.

Definition: Suppose \(q\) shares are sold short at price \(S_0\) per share and bought back at expiration at price \(S_T\) per share. The short position’s expiration payoff, measured as the market value of the short stock position, is \(-qS_T\). The simple profit on the complete trade, excluding other cash flows and costs, is \(qS_0-qS_T=q(S_0-S_T)\). The initial sale proceeds are \(qS_0\); they are not, by themselves, the trade’s profit.

The negative sign in the expiration payoff matters. A long position in \(q\) shares has value \(qS_T\) at expiration. A short position has the opposite exposure: it is committed to returning \(q\) shares, whose market value is \(qS_T\). Its signed value is therefore \(-qS_T\). The short seller also received \(qS_0\) from selling the shares at the outset. Combining that initial receipt with the cost of covering gives the simple profit.

Payoff, Proceeds, and Profit

Keep three quantities separate when setting up a calculation:

  • Initial sale proceeds: \(qS_0\), a positive cash inflow when the borrowed shares are sold.
  • Expiration payoff of the short position: \(-qS_T\), the signed market value of the short position at expiration.
  • Simple trade profit: initial sale proceeds minus the cost to buy back the shares, or \(qS_0-qS_T\).

The payoff alone is not the profit. For example, \(-qS_T\) describes the short position at expiration, but it does not include the initial cash received from selling the shares. Conversely, the initial proceeds alone do not tell whether the trade made or lost money. The expiration price determines how much it costs to cover.

These expressions use the standard simplified stock-trade convention: the initial sale proceeds and the expiration covering cost are compared directly, without accumulating or discounting either cash flow. Thus the result is a simple trade profit, not a rate of return on invested capital or a measure that accounts for the timing value of money.

$$ \begin{aligned} \text{Initial sale proceeds} &= qS_0,\\ \text{Expiration payoff of short stock} &= -qS_T,\\ \text{Simple trade profit} &= qS_0-qS_T=q(S_0-S_T). \end{aligned} $$

Why the Profit Formula Holds

The formula follows by recording the two cash flows in the trade. At the initial sale, selling \(q\) shares for \(S_0\) per share brings in \(qS_0\). At expiration, buying \(q\) shares for \(S_T\) per share costs \(qS_T\), so that cash flow is negative. Add the two cash flows:

$$ qS_0+(-qS_T)=qS_0-qS_T=q(S_0-S_T). $$

This also checks the sign. If \(S_T<S_0\), then \(S_0-S_T>0\), so the short trade has a positive profit. If \(S_T>S_0\), then \(S_0-S_T<0\), so the trade has a loss. At \(S_T=S_0\), the simple profit is zero.

Worked Example: A Short Position That Gains

An investor sells 36 shares short at \(S_0=\$82\) per share. At expiration, the stock price is \(S_T=\$67\). Find the initial proceeds, the expiration payoff of the short position, the covering cost, and the simple trade profit. Ignore all other cash flows and costs.

Method. Calculate the proceeds and covering cost separately, then combine them. This avoids treating the initial sale receipt as though it were already profit.

Initial proceeds. The sale brings in

$$ 36(82)=\$2{,}952. $$

Expiration payoff. The signed market value of the short position is

$$ -36(67)=-\$2{,}412. $$

Cost to cover. Buying back 36 shares at \(\$67\) each costs

$$ 36(67)=\$2{,}412. $$

Profit. Subtract the covering cost from the sale proceeds:

$$ \$2{,}952-\$2{,}412=\$540. $$

As a check, the per-share price decline is \(\$82-\$67=\$15\), and \(36(\$15)=\$540\), matching the cash-flow calculation. The negative expiration payoff is not a loss of \(\$2{,}412\) by itself; the initial proceeds must also be included to find the trade profit.

Interpreting the Price Relationship

For a fixed positive number of shares \(q\), profit changes linearly with the expiration price. Each one-dollar increase in \(S_T\) increases the covering cost by \(q\) dollars and reduces profit by \(q\) dollars. Each one-dollar decrease in \(S_T\) reduces the covering cost by \(q\) dollars and increases profit by \(q\) dollars.

$$ \text{Profit}=q(S_0-S_T) \qquad\text{and}\qquad \text{break-even occurs when }S_T=S_0. $$

A stock price cannot fall below zero. Therefore, in this simplified model, the greatest possible profit occurs if the stock price falls to zero: the short seller keeps the initial proceeds without paying anything to cover. That profit is \(qS_0\). There is no corresponding finite maximum loss: if the stock price rises without bound, the cost to cover also rises without bound, so the loss can be arbitrarily large.

The profit line and the expiration payoff line answer different questions. The payoff line starts at zero when the stock price is zero and becomes more negative as the stock price rises. The profit line also reflects the initial sale proceeds, so it crosses zero at \(S_0\). Keeping those reference points straight prevents a frequent error in short-position calculations.

Worked Example: Loss When the Stock Price Rises

A trader sells 24 shares short at \(\$55\) per share. At expiration, the stock is worth \(\$73\) per share. Find the short position’s expiration payoff and the trade’s simple profit. State the result per share as well as in total.

Method. Use the signed value \(-qS_T\) for expiration payoff and compare the initial sale proceeds with the later covering cost for profit. This prevents the payoff from being mistaken for the total loss.

Initial proceeds.

$$ 24(55)=\$1{,}320. $$

Expiration payoff.

$$ -24(73)=-\$1{,}752. $$

Covering cost. The trader must spend \(\$1{,}752\) to buy back the shares.

Total profit.

$$ \$1{,}320-\$1{,}752=-\$432. $$

Per-share profit.

$$ \$55-\$73=-\$18. $$

The total is \(24(-\$18)=-\$432\), confirming the calculation. The negative amount is a loss. The short position’s payoff is \(-\$1{,}752\), but the trade’s loss is only \(\$432\) under the stated assumptions because the trader initially received \(\$1{,}320\).

Multiple Short-Sale Prices

If shares are sold short in separate transactions at different prices, calculate total proceeds by adding the proceeds from each sale. At expiration, if all shares are covered at the same price, the total covering cost is the total number of shares times that price. Profit is still total proceeds minus total covering cost.

An equivalent method is to find the weighted average sale price. The weights are the numbers of shares sold at each price. This average is useful because it gives the break-even expiration price for the combined position, but it does not replace the need to track the total number of shares.

Worked Example: Shares Sold at Two Prices

A trader sells 15 shares short at \(\$48\) per share and later sells another 25 shares short at \(\$56\) per share. At expiration, all 40 shares are covered at \(\$52\) per share. Find total proceeds, total expiration payoff, total profit, and the weighted average sale price.

Method. Add the proceeds from each sale, then subtract the cost of covering all shares. This avoids incorrectly applying one sale price to every share.

Initial proceeds from the first sale.

$$ 15(48)=\$720. $$

Initial proceeds from the second sale.

$$ 25(56)=\$1{,}400. $$

Total proceeds.

$$ \$720+\$1{,}400=\$2{,}120. $$

Covering cost and expiration payoff. There are \(15+25=40\) shares to cover. The cost is \(40(52)=\$2{,}080\), so the payoff of the short stock position is

$$ -40(52)=-\$2{,}080. $$

Total profit.

$$ \$2{,}120-\$2{,}080=\$40. $$

Weighted average sale price.

$$ \frac{15(48)+25(56)}{40} =\frac{2{,}120}{40} =\$53. $$

At the weighted average sale price, the per-share price difference is \(\$53-\$52=\$1\). For 40 shares, that is \(\$40\), matching the total-cash-flow result. The expiration price is below the weighted average sale price, so the combined short trade earns a profit.

Common Exam Trap: Calling Proceeds “Profit”

A common mistake is to report the amount received when the shares were sold as the short seller’s profit. That ignores the obligation to buy shares back. Another error is to subtract the initial proceeds from the covering cost in the wrong order, which reverses the sign.

Worked Example: Correcting a Sign Error

An investor sells 50 shares short at \(\$31\) per share. At expiration, the price is \(\$35\). A calculation reports a profit of \(50(35-31)=\$200\). Determine the correct payoff and profit, and explain the error.

Method. Write the cash inflows and outflows with their signs before combining them. This avoids reversing the price difference for a short position.

Initial proceeds.

$$ 50(31)=\$1{,}550. $$

Expiration payoff.

$$ -50(35)=-\$1{,}750. $$

Profit from the two cash flows.

$$ \$1{,}550-\$1{,}750=-\$200. $$

The stated \(\$200\) has the wrong sign because it uses \(S_T-S_0\), the price change in the long-position direction. For a short position, profit is \(q(S_0-S_T)\). Since the stock rises by \(\$4\) per share, the 50-share short position loses \(50(4)=\$200\). The calculation is checked by noting that the investor received \(\$1{,}550\) but must pay \(\$1{,}750\) to cover.

What the Simplified Calculation Leaves Out

The equations here compare the initial proceeds with the covering cost as ordinary dollar amounts. They do not account for what happens to the short-sale proceeds between the sale date and expiration. They also omit possible dividends owed on borrowed shares, stock-borrow charges, fees, and other contractual or operational details. Accordingly, the result is the simple trade profit under the stated assumptions, not a complete account of the economic return from an actual short sale.

For an exam-style calculation, first identify the number of shares, the sale price or prices, and the expiration price. Then write down the proceeds and covering cost separately. Use \(-qS_T\) only when the question asks for the expiration payoff of the short stock position; use \(q(S_0-S_T)\) for simple profit when there is one sale price and no other cash flows.

Key takeaway: A short stock position has expiration payoff \(-qS_T\), while its simple trade profit is initial sale proceeds minus the cost to cover. For one sale price, profit is \(q(S_0-S_T)\); a price decline produces a gain, and a price increase produces a loss.

Check Your Understanding

For each problem, distinguish the expiration payoff of the short stock position from the simple profit where requested. Ignore interest, dividends, borrowing costs, and transaction costs.

  1. An investor sells 18 shares short at \(\$64\) per share. At expiration, the shares are worth \(\$59\) each. Find the sale proceeds, expiration payoff, and simple profit. (Answer: proceeds \(\$1{,}152\); payoff \(-\$1{,}062\); profit \(\$90\))
  2. A trader shorts 32 shares at \(\$41\) each and covers at \(\$46\) each. Find the total simple profit and the profit per share. (Answer: total profit \(-\$160\); per-share profit \(-\$5\))
  3. A position consists of 12 shares sold short at \(\$72\) and 28 shares sold short at \(\$66\). All shares are covered at \(\$68\). Find the total proceeds, expiration payoff, and profit. (Answer: proceeds \(\$2{,}712\); payoff \(-\$2{,}720\); profit \(-\$8\))
  4. A short position has 45 shares sold at one price and is covered at \(\$38\) per share. The simple trade profit is \(\$315\). Find the original sale price per share. (Answer: \(\$45\))
  5. A trader sells 20 shares short at \(\$90\) and 30 shares short at \(\$70\). At expiration, all shares are covered at \(\$78\). Find the weighted average sale price and total profit, and state whether the trade gained or lost. (Answer: weighted average sale price \(\$78\); total profit \(\$0\); neither gain nor loss)
Clinical Biostats