Tutorials › VEE Accounting and Finance › Dividends and European Put Values

VEE Accounting and Finance · Option Value and Basic Relationships · Tutorial 936 of 996

Dividends and European Put Values

See how dividends affect European put prices, calculate their present value, and distinguish exact parity results from the adjusted-spot valuation convention.

Advanced 10 min read

What You'll Learn

  • Discount known cash dividends to obtain their present value at the valuation date.
  • Explain why lower adjusted stock value generally means a higher European put value.
  • Apply the adjusted-spot Black–Scholes formula under its stated assumptions.
  • Use generalized put–call parity with known cash dividends.
  • Avoid treating dividend present value as an exact standalone increase in a put premium.

Why Dividends Matter to a European Put

A European put gives its holder the right to sell a share for the exercise price \(K\) at expiration \(T\). Its expiration payoff is \(\max(K-S_T,0)\), where \(S_T\) is the share price at expiration. A cash dividend paid before expiration generally reduces the value of the shares remaining in the company: all else equal, the ex-dividend share price is lower than it would have been without that payment. A lower share price makes the put’s payoff more likely to be positive and can increase its value today.

The amount and timing of dividends matter. A dividend paid sooner has a different present value from the same dividend paid later. For valuation, expected dividends are often treated as known deterministic cash amounts. That is a modeling assumption, not a claim that future dividends are certain. If dividends are materially uncertain, simply discounting their expected amounts may not capture all the relevant risk.

Definition: For cash dividends \(D_j\) paid at times \(t_j\) before expiration, their present value at the valuation date, using a constant force of interest \(\delta\), is $$ D_0=\sum_j D_j e^{-\delta t_j}. $$ The adjusted spot price is \(S^*=S_0-D_0\), where \(S_0\) is the current share price. The adjusted-spot method uses \(S^*\) to account for the anticipated reduction in share value due to those dividends.

The term “expected dividend” can refer to a forecast, but a valuation formula needs a specified input. In the examples below, dividend amounts and dates are treated as deterministic, and \(\delta\) is the continuously compounded risk-free rate used for discounting. Changing a dividend forecast changes \(D_0\), and therefore changes the adjusted spot price.

Present Value of the Dividend Stream

Each dividend is discounted from its own payment date. Adding the undiscounted amounts and subtracting their total from the share price ignores the time value of money. The following calculation illustrates the correct timing.

Worked Example: Discounting Two Cash Dividends

A share is expected to pay a hypothetical cash dividend of $2 after 3 months and $3 after 9 months. A European put expires in one year. The constant force of interest is \(\delta=0.04\). Find the present value of the dividends and the adjusted spot price if \(S_0=\$80\).

Method. Discount each dividend from its payment date, measured in years. The payment times are \(t_1=3/12=0.25\) and \(t_2=9/12=0.75\).

$$ D_0=2e^{-0.04(0.25)}+3e^{-0.04(0.75)} =2e^{-0.01}+3e^{-0.03}. $$

Using \(e^{-0.01}\approx0.9900498\) and \(e^{-0.03}\approx0.9704455\), the two present values are \(2(0.9900498)=\$1.98010\) and \(3(0.9704455)=\$2.91134\). Thus \(D_0\approx\$1.98010+\$2.91134=\$4.89144\), or $4.89 to the nearest cent.

The adjusted spot price is \(S^*=80-4.89144=\$75.10856\), or $75.11 to the nearest cent. The check is that \(S^*+D_0=\$80.00\), apart from rounding.

Common mistake avoided: Adding the dividends as if both were paid today would give $5.00. The correct present value is $4.89 because neither payment occurs at the valuation date.

Adjusted-Spot Black–Scholes Valuation

A common way to estimate a European put value when future discrete cash dividends are known is the adjusted-spot Black–Scholes convention. It replaces \(S_0\) with \(S^*=S_0-D_0\), then applies the ordinary Black–Scholes put formula. In this convention, the adjusted share value is modeled as lognormal over the option’s life, with volatility \(\sigma\); the continuously compounded risk-free force \(\delta\) is constant; and the dividend amounts and dates are deterministic.

For discrete cash dividends, subtracting their present value from spot and then applying Black–Scholes is generally an approximation, not an exact consequence of the continuous-dividend Black–Scholes model. It is a useful convention when its assumptions are appropriate. It can be less reliable for large dividends, especially when subtracting them makes the adjusted spot very small, or when the dividend amounts are uncertain. Do not apply it mechanically without checking the valuation model being used.

Adjusted-spot Black–Scholes formula: For \(S^*>0\), strike \(K\), time to expiration \(T\), volatility \(\sigma>0\), and constant force of interest \(\delta\), define $$ d_1=\frac{\ln(S^*/K)+(\delta+\sigma^2/2)T}{\sigma\sqrt{T}}, \qquad d_2=d_1-\sigma\sqrt{T}. $$ Then the European put value is $$ P=Ke^{-\delta T}N(-d_2)-S^*N(-d_1), $$ where \(N(z)\) is the cumulative distribution function of a standard normal random variable.

The formula uses the normal distribution function to account for the modeled range of expiration share prices. The first term discounts the exercise-price payment associated with put exercise; the second term accounts for the adjusted share value in the put valuation. A dividend lowers \(S^*\), changing both \(d_1,d_2\) and the resulting put value.

Why a Higher Dividend Present Value Raises the Put Value

In the adjusted-spot model, hold the strike, expiration, volatility, and interest rate fixed. The Black–Scholes put value is decreasing in adjusted spot. Since \(S^*=S_0-D_0\), increasing the dividend present value lowers adjusted spot and raises the put value.

The derivative gives a concise justification. Write the put formula as a function of \(S^*\). Differentiating its two terms and using the identity \(S^*\phi(d_1)=Ke^{-\delta T}\phi(d_2)\), where \(\phi\) is the standard normal density, causes the terms involving the derivatives of \(d_1\) and \(d_2\) to cancel. The remaining derivative is:

$$ \frac{\partial P}{\partial S^*}=-N(-d_1). $$

Because \(N(-d_1)>0\), this derivative is negative. As \(dS^*/dD_0=-1\), the chain rule gives:

$$ \frac{\partial P}{\partial D_0} = \frac{\partial P}{\partial S^*}\frac{\partial S^*}{\partial D_0} =N(-d_1)>0. $$

Thus, within this model, a larger dividend present value increases the put value, all else equal. The derivative is a local sensitivity: it measures the approximate dollar change in the put for a small change in \(D_0\), not a rule that the put rises dollar-for-dollar with the full dividend amount.

Worked Example: Comparing Put Values With and Without Dividends

A hypothetical share has \(S_0=\$100\). A cash dividend of \(D_1=\$4.10127\) is paid after 6 months, and a European put with \(K=\$100\) expires in one year. Use the adjusted-spot Black–Scholes convention with \(\delta=0.05\) and \(\sigma=0.20\). Compare the put value with its value if the dividend were zero. Use the standard normal distribution function and round final dollar values to the nearest cent.

Method. First discount the dividend, then calculate \(d_1,d_2\) and the put value in each case. The dividend present value is \(4.10127e^{-0.05(0.5)}\approx\$4.00\), so \(S^*\approx\$96.00\).

With the dividend. Using \(S^*=96\), \(T=1\), and \(\sigma\sqrt T=0.20\),

$$ d_1=\frac{\ln(96/100)+(0.05+0.20^2/2)}{0.20} =\frac{-0.0408220+0.0700000}{0.20} \approx0.145890, \qquad d_2\approx0.145890-0.200000=-0.054110. $$

The standard normal probabilities are \(N(-d_1)=N(-0.145890)\approx0.442004\) and \(N(-d_2)=N(0.054110)\approx0.521576\). Also, \(Ke^{-\delta T}=100e^{-0.05}\approx\$95.122942\). Substitution gives:

$$ P\approx95.122942(0.521576)-96(0.442004) =49.613844-42.432384 =\$7.181460 \approx\$7.18. $$

Without the dividend. Now \(S^*=S_0=100\), so \(d_1=(0+0.07)/0.20=0.35\) and \(d_2=0.35-0.20=0.15\). The probabilities are \(N(-0.35)\approx0.363169\) and \(N(-0.15)\approx0.440382\). Therefore:

$$ P\approx95.122942(0.440382)-100(0.363169) =41.890432-36.316900 =\$5.573532 \approx\$5.57. $$

The dividend-adjusted estimate is about \(\$7.18-\$5.57=\$1.61\) higher. The calculation checks the expected direction: the dividend reduces adjusted spot and raises the European put value. The rounded probabilities shown support the displayed rounded put values.

Common mistake avoided: Do not add the $4.00 dividend present value directly to the no-dividend put price. The adjusted-spot formula changes both normal probabilities as well as the share-price term; the resulting change is about $1.61 here, not $4.00.

Generalized Put–Call Parity

There is also an exact no-arbitrage relationship for European calls and puts on the same share, with the same strike and expiration, when the intervening cash dividends are known. Assume frictionless trading, no taxes or transaction costs, and borrowing and lending at the same constant risk-free force \(\delta\). Then:

Theorem: If \(D_0\) is the present value of the known cash dividends paid before expiration, generalized put–call parity is $$ C-P=S_0-D_0-Ke^{-\delta T}, $$ or equivalently $$ P=C-S_0+D_0+Ke^{-\delta T}. $$

To see why, compare two portfolios at expiration. A share purchased today will distribute the known dividends before \(T\); buying the share while borrowing the present value of those dividends leaves the value of the prepaid share, \(S_0-D_0\), exposed at expiration. The call plus a risk-free investment of \(Ke^{-\delta T}\) pays \(\max(S_T,K)\). A prepaid share plus a put pays \(S_T+\max(K-S_T,0)=\max(S_T,K)\). Since the expiration payoffs agree in every state, no-arbitrage requires their initial values to agree: \(C+Ke^{-\delta T}=S_0-D_0+P\). Rearranging gives the stated identity.

Parity is exact under its assumptions and is useful for checking prices or solving for an unobserved option value. It does not say that the put rises by exactly \(D_0\) when a dividend is introduced: the call value in the parity equation also changes with dividends.

Worked Example: Finding a Put Value From Parity

A European call and put have the same share, strike \(K=\$115\), and expiration \(T=0.5\) years. The current share price is \(S_0=\$120\), the call value is \(C=\$13.25\), and known cash dividends before expiration have present value \(D_0=\$6.40\). The constant force of interest is \(\delta=0.04\). Find the put value, to the nearest cent.

Method. Apply generalized put–call parity. First calculate the present value of the strike:

$$ Ke^{-\delta T}=115e^{-0.04(0.5)} =115e^{-0.02} \approx115(0.98019867) =\$112.72285. $$

Substitute the call value, share price, dividend present value, and discounted strike:

$$ P=C-S_0+D_0+Ke^{-\delta T} =13.25-120+6.40+112.72285 =\$12.37285 \approx\$12.37. $$

As a check, \(C-P\approx13.25-12.37285=0.87715\), while \(S_0-D_0-Ke^{-\delta T}\approx120-6.40-112.72285=0.87715\). The two sides agree.

Common mistake avoided: Omitting \(D_0\) would give an incorrect parity value. The dividend term enters with a plus sign in the rearranged formula for \(P\).

Interpretation and Exam Traps

The central result is directional: in the adjusted-spot model, a higher present value of expected dividends generally raises a European put value, holding other inputs fixed. There are two useful ways to reason about it. The adjusted-spot formula makes the lower effective share value explicit; generalized parity shows how the dividend present value enters an exact relationship between European calls and puts.

  • Discount each dividend to the valuation date. Use its own payment time, rather than the option’s expiration time for every payment.
  • Keep model status clear. Generalized parity is an exact no-arbitrage identity under its assumptions. Subtracting the present value of discrete cash dividends from spot and applying Black–Scholes is a commonly used approximation.
  • Do not equate the put-price change with \(D_0\). The put’s response depends on the option inputs; in the adjusted-spot model its local sensitivity to \(D_0\) is \(N(-d_1)\).
  • Do not treat uncertain dividends as certain cash flows without qualification. If amounts or timing are uncertain, a model must account for that uncertainty; the present value of expected dividends alone may not be sufficient.
Key takeaway: Discount expected cash dividends at their payment dates to find \(D_0\). In the adjusted-spot convention, set \(S^*=S_0-D_0\); a larger \(D_0\) generally raises the European put value. Use generalized put–call parity when an exact relationship between European call and put prices is needed.

Check Your Understanding

Work each problem using the assumptions stated. Answers are rounded to the nearest cent unless a direction or sensitivity is requested.

  1. A hypothetical share pays dividends of $1.20 after 6 months and $2.00 after 18 months. The constant force of interest is \(\delta=0.06\). Find the present value of the dividend stream. (Answer: $2.99)
  2. A European call is worth $6.10. For the same share, strike, and expiration, \(S_0=\$80\), \(K=\$85\), \(D_0=\$2.25\), and \(\delta=0.03\) for one year. Use generalized parity to find the put value. (Answer: $10.84)
  3. Using the adjusted-spot Black–Scholes convention, \(S_0=\$105\), \(D_0=\$5\), \(K=\$100\), \(\delta=0\), \(\sigma=0.20\), and \(T=1\). Calculate \(d_1,d_2\), then the put value using \(N(-0.10)\approx0.460172\) and \(N(0.10)\approx0.539828\). (Answer: \(d_1=0.10\), \(d_2=-0.10\), put value \(\$7.97\))
  4. A European call is worth $9.00; \(S_0=\$100\), \(K=\$102\), and \(T=1\). Known dividends before expiration have present value \(D_0=\$3.20\), and \(\delta=0.02\). Use generalized parity to calculate the put value. (Answer: $12.18)
  5. In the adjusted-spot Black–Scholes model, \(d_1=0.20\). What is the local sensitivity of the put value to a $1 increase in dividend present value, and what is its direction? (Answer: approximately $0.4207 increase per $1 increase in dividend present value)
Clinical Biostats