Tutorials › CAS Exam 5 - Basic Ratemaking and Estimated Claim Liabilities › Anatomy of an Overall Rate Level Indication

CAS Exam 5 · Indication Framework and Data · Tutorial 200 of 989

Anatomy of an Overall Rate Level Indication

Trace each input into an overall rate level indication and calculate the resulting factor without mixing cost targets and premium provisions.

Beginner 10 min read

What You'll Learn

  • Identify the experience amounts and selected adjustments that form a prospective cost target
  • Distinguish the projected cost target from the current-rate-level premium base
  • Assemble loss, loss adjustment expense, fixed expense, variable expense, and profit inputs consistently
  • Derive and apply the overall indication formula under stated assumptions
  • Detect common errors involving expense percentages, double counting, and adjustment bases

Introduction

An overall rate level indication is a calculation assembled from several kinds of information. It needs an experience-based estimate of prospective costs, adjustments that put those costs on the intended basis, a premium base at the current rate level, and provisions for expenses and profit. The result is only meaningful when those pieces are consistent with one another.

The main task here is to keep each input in its proper role. Losses and loss adjustment expenses contribute to the prospective cost target. On-level premium supplies the current-rate-level premium base. Variable expense and profit provisions are percentages of premium, while fixed expenses enter as a dollar amount (or as a dollar amount derived from a stated exposure basis). The overall indication brings these pieces together.

Definition: An overall rate level indication compares the premium needed to fund a specified prospective cost target and expense and profit provisions with the premium available at the current rate level. When expressed as a factor, a value above 1 indicates a higher required premium level under the stated assumptions; a value below 1 indicates a lower one.

The framework is aligned with the CAS Exam 5 (Basic Ratemaking and Estimated Claim Liabilities) syllabus. It does not select the experience period or determine the appropriate trend, loss measure, or premium base; those are inputs to be selected and made consistent before the calculation.

The Components of the Indication

A useful way to organize the calculation is to identify five components before doing any arithmetic.

  1. Experience data. Identify the premium and loss or loss adjustment expense amounts being used, including their measurement basis. For example, a loss amount must be understood as the relevant incurred or ultimate amount before applying any selected prospective adjustments.
  2. Selected adjustments. Apply only the selected factors that move each experience amount to the intended prospective basis. The loss and loss adjustment expense amounts need not receive the same factors. Each factor must match the component and basis to which it is applied.
  3. Current-rate-level premium base. Use premium adjusted to represent the current rate level. Denote this amount by \(P_{\mathrm{CL}}\). It is the baseline for comparison, not the prospective cost target.
  4. Expense and profit provisions. Include fixed expenses as a dollar amount \(F\), and represent variable expenses and profit or contingencies as proportions \(v\) and \(q\) of premium, respectively.
  5. Indication. Compare the total required amount with the portion of current-level premium available to fund that amount after variable expense and profit provisions.

Let \(L^*\) be the adjusted prospective target for losses and loss adjustment expenses combined. If components are adjusted separately, it can be written as the sum of the adjusted amounts:

$$ L^* = \sum_j A_j f_j $$

Here, \(A_j\) is an experience amount for component \(j\), and \(f_j\) is its selected adjustment factor. This notation is a bookkeeping device: it does not imply that every component must have a separate factor. If the supplied target is already projected and combined, use it directly rather than adjusting it a second time.

Under the assumptions below, the overall indication factor \(I\) is:

$$ I = \frac{L^* + F}{P_{\mathrm{CL}}(1-v-q)} $$

The expression requires \(P_{\mathrm{CL}}>0\) and \(1-v-q>0\). It also assumes that variable expenses and the profit provision are both percentages of premium, while \(F\) is a fixed dollar amount that does not change with the indicated premium. If expenses are stated on a different basis, or if a provision is already included in \(L^*\) or elsewhere, the formula must be adapted to avoid omission or duplication.

Why the Formula Works

Suppose the indicated premium is \(I P_{\mathrm{CL}}\). Variable expenses consume the fraction \(v\) of that premium, and the profit or contingency provision consumes the fraction \(q\). The remaining amount must fund the adjusted loss and loss adjustment expense target plus fixed expenses. Equating these amounts gives:

$$ I P_{\mathrm{CL}} - v I P_{\mathrm{CL}} - q I P_{\mathrm{CL}} = L^* + F $$

Factoring the left side yields \(I P_{\mathrm{CL}}(1-v-q)=L^*+F\). Dividing by the positive quantity \(P_{\mathrm{CL}}(1-v-q)\) gives the indication formula. This also explains why variable expense and profit percentages reduce the premium available for fixed costs and losses: they are shares of the indicated premium, not fixed dollar additions.

Worked Calculations

Worked Example: Assembling Separate Loss and LAE Adjustments

A hypothetical program has $2,400,000 of experience premium and a selected on-level factor of 1.05. Its experience losses are $1,600,000, adjusted by a selected factor of 1.08, and its loss adjustment expenses are $240,000, adjusted by a selected factor of 1.00. The fixed expense provision is $252,000. Variable expenses are 22% of premium and profit and contingencies are 6% of premium. Calculate the overall indication factor, rounding to four decimal places.

Method. First construct the current-rate-level premium base, then calculate the adjusted prospective cost target, and finally apply the expense and profit provisions.

1. Current-rate-level premium. Apply the on-level factor to the experience premium:

$$ P_{\mathrm{CL}} = \$2{,}400{,}000 \times 1.05 = \$2{,}520{,}000 $$

2. Adjusted losses. Apply the loss factor to losses:

$$ \$1{,}600{,}000 \times 1.08 = \$1{,}728{,}000 $$

3. Adjusted loss adjustment expenses and total target. The selected LAE factor is 1.00, so:

$$ \$240{,}000 \times 1.00 = \$240{,}000 $$

Thus \(L^*=\$1{,}728{,}000+\$240{,}000=\$1{,}968{,}000\). Add fixed expenses to obtain the total target: \(\$1{,}968{,}000+\$252{,}000=\$2{,}220{,}000\).

4. Premium available after variable provisions. The retained proportion is \(1-0.22-0.06=0.72\). Therefore:

$$ \$2{,}520{,}000 \times 0.72 = \$1{,}814{,}400 $$

5. Indication and check. Divide the total target by the available premium:

$$ I = \frac{\$2{,}220{,}000}{\$1{,}814{,}400} = 1.223544\ldots \approx 1.2235 $$

As a check, at the unrounded indicated premium, the amount remaining after 28% for variable expenses and profit is \(1.223544\ldots\times \$1{,}814{,}400=\$2{,}220{,}000\), the required target. This calculation avoids treating the two adjustment factors as interchangeable: the loss factor applies to losses, while the LAE factor applies to LAE.

Worked Example: Applying Prospective Factors to the Correct Components

A hypothetical specialty insurer has a current-rate-level premium base of $3,200,000. Experience losses of $2,100,000 receive a selected prospective factor of 1.04, and experience loss adjustment expenses of $280,000 receive a selected factor of 1.05. Fixed expenses are $322,000. Variable expenses are 18% of premium and the profit provision is 7% of premium. Find the indication factor, rounded to four decimal places.

Method. The current-rate-level premium is already supplied, so do not apply another on-level factor to it. Adjust each cost component once.

The adjusted losses are:

$$ \$2{,}100{,}000 \times 1.04 = \$2{,}184{,}000 $$

The adjusted LAE is:

$$ \$280{,}000 \times 1.05 = \$294{,}000 $$

The combined target is \(L^*=\$2{,}184{,}000+\$294{,}000=\$2{,}478{,}000\). Including fixed expenses gives \(\$2{,}478{,}000+\$322{,}000=\$2{,}800{,}000\).

Variable expenses and profit total \(0.18+0.07=0.25\) of premium, leaving \(1-0.25=0.75\) available for the target. The denominator is:

$$ \$3{,}200{,}000 \times 0.75 = \$2{,}400{,}000 $$

Therefore:

$$ I = \frac{\$2{,}800{,}000}{\$2{,}400{,}000} = 1.166666\ldots \approx 1.1667 $$

The check is \(1.166666\ldots\times \$2{,}400{,}000=\$2{,}800{,}000\). A common mistake is to adjust the already current-level premium again. That would change the denominator without a stated adjustment and would no longer answer the problem as given.

Worked Example: Checking the Role of Premium Percentages

A hypothetical regional pool has a current-rate-level premium base of $5,000,000 and a projected combined loss and LAE target of $3,400,000. The target is already on the intended prospective basis. Fixed expenses are $400,000, variable expenses are 24% of premium, and the profit and contingency provision is 4% of premium. Calculate the overall indication, rounding to four decimal places.

Method. Use the supplied prospective target directly, add the fixed dollar expense, and let the two percentage provisions reduce the premium available for that total.

The total target is \(\$3{,}400{,}000+\$400{,}000=\$3{,}800{,}000\). The retained premium proportion is \(1-0.24-0.04=0.72\), so the current-level premium available for the target is:

$$ \$5{,}000{,}000 \times 0.72 = \$3{,}600{,}000 $$

The indication is:

$$ I = \frac{\$3{,}800{,}000}{\$3{,}600{,}000} = 1.055555\ldots \approx 1.0556 $$

Check the direction and amount: a factor of 1.055555... produces indicated premium of \(\$5{,}277{,}777.78\) before final rounding. After 28% for variable expenses and profit, approximately \(\$3{,}800{,}000\) remains for the target. A tempting but incorrect calculation is \(\$3{,}800{,}000/\$5{,}000{,}000+0.28=1.04\). This adds percentage provisions to a ratio as though they were a fixed increment. They are proportions of indicated premium; the correct operation is to divide by the retained proportion, 0.72.

Input Checks Before Interpreting the Result

A correct formula cannot repair inputs that describe different things. Before interpreting an indication, check the relationship among the experience amounts, adjustments, and premium base.

  • Match each adjustment to its base. A factor applied to losses should not silently be applied to LAE or premium. Record the amount and factor together.
  • Use a prospective cost target once. If an amount is already projected, do not apply the same projection again. Similarly, do not add a component twice because it appears both in a combined target and in a separate line.
  • Keep the premium denominator at the stated rate level. Use the supplied current-rate-level premium, or construct it from experience premium and the stated on-level adjustment. Do not make an additional adjustment without a reason.
  • Separate dollar and percentage provisions. Add fixed expenses as dollars. Account for variable expenses and profit as premium proportions under the formula's assumptions.
  • Check that the retained proportion is positive. If \(v+q\) is at least 1, then \(1-v-q\leq 0\), and the stated model does not yield a meaningful positive available-premium denominator.

The indication is conditional on the selected inputs and assumptions; it is not a guarantee that actual future results will equal the target. Its value is that it makes the relationship between the target costs and the current-level premium explicit and auditable.

Key takeaway: Keep the two sides of the comparison distinct: \(L^*+F\) is the prospective dollar target, while \(P_{\mathrm{CL}}(1-v-q)\) is the current-level premium available to fund that target. Apply each selected adjustment once and to the component for which it was chosen.

Check Your Understanding

For each problem, identify the target and available-premium denominator before calculating the indication.

  1. A hypothetical book has a current-rate-level premium base of $1,800,000, a projected loss and LAE target of $1,100,000, and fixed expenses of $100,000. Variable expenses are 20% of premium and profit is 5%. What is the indication factor, to four decimals? (Answer: 0.8889)
  2. A hypothetical product has a current-rate-level premium base of $4,500,000, a prospective loss and LAE target of $2,700,000, and fixed expenses of $450,000. Variable expenses are 15% and the profit provision is 10% of premium. Calculate the indication factor to four decimals. (Answer: 0.9333)
  3. A hypothetical cover has $2,800,000 current-rate-level premium. Experience losses of $1,400,000 receive a selected factor of 1.10; LAE of $300,000 receive a factor of 1.00. Fixed expenses are $200,000, variable expenses are 25%, and profit is 5% of premium. Find the indication factor to four decimals. (Answer: 1.0408)
  4. A hypothetical portfolio has $6,000,000 of current-rate-level premium, a projected combined loss and LAE target of $3,900,000, and fixed expenses of $600,000. Variable expenses are 17% and profit and contingencies are 8% of premium. Find the indication factor to four decimals. (Answer: 1.0000)
  5. A hypothetical program has a current-rate-level premium base of $3,000,000, a projected loss and LAE target of $1,350,000, and fixed expenses of $150,000. Variable expenses are 20% and profit is 5% of premium. Calculate the indication factor to four decimals. (Answer: 0.6667)
Clinical Biostats