Tutorials › Calculus I › Common Mistakes About Critical Points

Curve Analysis and Sketching · Tutorial 856 of 1495

Common Mistakes About Critical Points

Understand why critical points are candidates rather than guaranteed extrema, and how to check derivative and domain conditions correctly.

Intermediate 9 min read

What You'll Learn

  • Define critical numbers and critical points, including the role of the function’s domain.
  • Explain why a zero derivative does not guarantee a local maximum or minimum.
  • Identify in-domain points where the derivative is undefined.
  • Reject apparent critical numbers that are outside the function’s domain.
  • Use Fermat’s theorem correctly and recognize its interior-point condition.
  • Separate critical-point candidates from endpoints and actual extrema.

Why Critical Points Are Easy to Misread

A critical point is an important clue when analyzing a curve, but it is not a conclusion about the curve’s behavior. A zero derivative does not automatically mean that the graph turns. A derivative that does not exist does not automatically mean that a point is an extremum. And a number obtained while solving a derivative equation is not a candidate at all unless it belongs to the function’s domain.

These distinctions matter because critical points are used to organize curve analysis. The useful question is not simply, “Where does the derivative vanish?” It is, “Which points in the domain require further inspection, and what does the function actually do near them?”

Definition: A critical number of \(f\) is a number \(c\) in the domain of \(f\) such that either \(f'(c)=0\) or \(f'(c)\) does not exist. The corresponding point on the graph, \((c,f(c))\), is a critical point. The derivative here is the ordinary two-sided derivative. When analyzing a restricted domain, boundary points are also checked as potential extrema; some conventions list them separately from interior critical numbers.

The requirement \(c\) belongs to the domain is essential: a graph has no point \((c,f(c))\) when \(f(c)\) is undefined. Also, the definition identifies candidates, not necessarily local or global extrema.

A Zero Derivative Is Not Enough

A horizontal tangent means the derivative is zero at that point. It does not tell us whether the function changes from increasing to decreasing, from decreasing to increasing, or continues in the same direction. For example, the graph of \(f(x)=x^3\) has a horizontal tangent at the origin but passes through it while increasing.

Worked Example: A Critical Point That Is Not an Extremum

Consider \(f(x)=x^3\), defined for every real \(x\). Differentiate:

$$ f'(x)=3x^2. $$

Set the derivative equal to zero:

$$ 3x^2=0 \quad\Longrightarrow\quad x^2=0 \quad\Longrightarrow\quad x=0. $$

Since \(0\) is in the domain and \(f'(0)=0\), it is a critical number. Its graph point is \((0,f(0))=(0,0)\). To check whether it is an extremum, compare values on either side. For every \(h>0\),

$$ f(-h)=(-h)^3=-h^3<0=f(0)<h^3=f(h). $$

There are values below and above \(f(0)\) arbitrarily close to \(x=0\). Thus \(f(0)\) is neither a local maximum nor a local minimum. In fact, \(f'(x)=3x^2>0\) for \(x\ne 0\), so the function is increasing on both sides. The derivative test has found a point to inspect, not an extremum.

Check: Substituting \(x=0\) into the derivative gives \(f'(0)=3(0)^2=0\), as required for the critical-number calculation.

What Fermat’s Theorem Actually Says

There is a useful theorem connecting differentiable local extrema with zero derivatives. Its hypotheses matter: the point must be an interior point of the domain, the function must have a local extremum there, and the derivative must exist there.

Theorem (Fermat’s theorem): If \(f\) has a local maximum or local minimum at an interior point \(c\) of its domain, and \(f'(c)\) exists, then \(f'(c)=0\).

This is a necessary condition, not a sufficient one. It says that a differentiable local extremum in the interior must have zero derivative. It does not say that every zero derivative gives an extremum. It also does not rule out extrema where the derivative fails to exist, or extrema at the boundary of a restricted domain.

The short proof shows why the interior and differentiability conditions appear. Suppose \(f\) has a local maximum at \(c\). For sufficiently small nonzero \(h\), the points \(c+h\) remain in the domain and \(f(c+h)\leq f(c)\). If \(h>0\), then

$$ \frac{f(c+h)-f(c)}{h}\leq 0. $$

If \(h<0\), dividing the same inequality by a negative number reverses its direction, so

$$ \frac{f(c+h)-f(c)}{h}\geq 0. $$

Because \(f'(c)\) exists, both one-sided limits of these difference quotients equal the same number. The limit from the right is at most zero, while the limit from the left is at least zero. Therefore their common value must be zero: \(f'(c)=0\). For a local minimum, the inequalities reverse, and the same conclusion follows.

This argument cannot be applied at a boundary point if there are not domain points on both sides. It also cannot be applied when the derivative does not exist. Those are precisely reasons to check such points separately rather than force them into the zero-derivative rule.

Points Where the Derivative Does Not Exist

A point can be in the domain even though the derivative there does not exist. Such a point is a critical-number candidate under the definition above. It may be an extremum, or it may not be. The function’s behavior must still be examined.

Worked Example: An Undefined Derivative at a Minimum

Let \(f(x)=|x|\), with domain \(\mathbb{R}\). For \(x<0\), \(f(x)=-x\), so \(f'(x)=-1\). For \(x>0\), \(f(x)=x\), so \(f'(x)=1\). At \(x=0\), the left-hand derivative is \(-1\) and the right-hand derivative is \(1\); since they differ, \(f'(0)\) does not exist.

The number \(0\) is in the domain, so it is a critical number even though its derivative is undefined. To decide whether it is an extremum, note that for every \(x\),

$$ f(x)=|x|\geq 0=f(0). $$

Thus \(x=0\) is a global minimum, and hence also a local minimum. This example shows why looking only for solutions of \(f'(x)=0\) can miss an extremum.

Check: The function value at the candidate is \(f(0)=|0|=0\), and the inequality above verifies directly that no domain value is smaller.

Worked Example: An Undefined Derivative Without an Extremum

Consider \(g(x)=\sqrt[3]{x}\), defined on \(\mathbb{R}\). For \(x\ne 0\), differentiation gives

$$ g'(x)=\frac{1}{3x^{2/3}}. $$

This formula is undefined at \(x=0\). The derivative at zero does not exist as a finite number: for \(h\ne 0\),

$$ \frac{g(0+h)-g(0)}{h} = \frac{\sqrt[3]{h}}{h} = \frac{1}{h^{2/3}}, $$

and this quotient grows without bound as \(h\) approaches zero. Hence \(0\) is a critical number. But \(g(-1)=-1<g(0)=0<g(1)=1\), and more generally the cube-root function is increasing through zero. There are both smaller and larger function values arbitrarily near the candidate, so it is neither a local maximum nor a local minimum.

Check: At the candidate, the difference quotient is \(1/h^{2/3}\), not a finite limit; the derivative is indeed undefined. The values on opposite sides confirm that the point is not an extremum.

Together, these examples show both directions of the warning: an undefined derivative can occur at an extremum, as for \(|x|\), or at a point that is not an extremum, as for \(\sqrt[3]{x}\). Undefinedness alone does not settle the question.

Every Candidate Must Belong to the Domain

Derivative algebra is performed on the part of the real line where the original function is defined and differentiable. Solving an equation obtained from a derivative expression does not restore excluded inputs. In particular, a denominator equal to zero is not a valid derivative value, and cancellation in a formula does not fill a hole in the original function’s domain.

Worked Example: Rejecting a Candidate Outside the Domain

Consider

$$ f(x)=\frac{x^2-1}{x-1}. $$

The original denominator is zero at \(x=1\), so the domain is \(\mathbb{R}\setminus\{1\}\). For \(x\ne 1\), use the quotient rule:

$$ f'(x) = \frac{2x(x-1)-(x^2-1)}{(x-1)^2} = \frac{2x^2-2x-x^2+1}{(x-1)^2} = \frac{(x-1)^2}{(x-1)^2} = 1. $$

The cancellation is valid only when \(x\ne 1\), the existing domain restriction. The derivative is never zero on the domain and exists at every point of the domain. Therefore there are no critical numbers. The apparent solution \(x=1\), obtained by setting the unsimplified numerator \((x-1)^2\) equal to zero, is not a critical number: \(f(1)\) is undefined.

Indeed, for every \(x\ne 1\), the function simplifies to \(f(x)=x+1\), a line with a missing point at \(x=1\). The missing point is not on the graph and cannot be an extremum of this function.

Check: At any allowed input, such as \(x=0\), the original formula gives \(f(0)=(-1)/(-1)=1\), while \(f'(0)=1\). The simplified expression gives \(0+1=1\) and derivative \(1\) as well. At \(x=1\), the original formula has denominator zero, confirming that this input must be excluded.

A Reliable Check for Common Errors

When finding critical points, keep the function’s domain visible throughout the calculation. A useful sequence is to identify the domain, find where the derivative is zero or undefined, and then retain only inputs that belong to the domain. Finally, inspect what the function does near each retained point before calling it an extremum.

1
Record the domain.
Use the original function to determine which inputs are allowed. Do not let later algebra erase an exclusion.
2
Find derivative candidates.
Locate in-domain points where \(f'(x)=0\) and where the derivative does not exist.
3
Check each candidate’s status.
Verify that the function is defined there. For a restricted domain, also check boundary points when extrema are being sought.
4
Decide whether an extremum occurs.
Use the function’s nearby values or an appropriate derivative test. Do not infer an extremum merely from a zero or undefined derivative.

A common incorrect calculation is: “\(f'(x)=0\) at \(x=c\), therefore \(f\) has a maximum or minimum at \(c\).” The conclusion does not follow. For \(f(x)=x^3\), \(f'(0)=0\), but values immediately to the left are negative and values immediately to the right are positive. The correction is: “\(c\) is a critical number and must be checked; the derivative equation alone does not classify it.”

A second error is accepting every algebraic root of a derivative numerator. In the rational example, setting \((x-1)^2=0\) produces \(x=1\), but the derivative quotient and the original function are not defined there. The correction is to test each proposed input against the original domain before including it in the critical set.

Why the Distinctions Matter

Critical points help organize curve analysis because they mark locations where the usual derivative information may change or fail. But the definition is deliberately broad: it gathers points that need checking. It does not replace the check. Confusing a candidate with a conclusion can produce false extrema; ignoring points of nondifferentiability can omit real extrema; and ignoring the domain can add points that are not on the graph at all.

Keep three statements separate:

  • A zero derivative at a point in the domain makes that point a critical-number candidate.
  • An undefined derivative at a point in the domain also makes it a critical-number candidate.
  • A critical number is not automatically a local or global extremum.

Fermat’s theorem supplies one necessary condition for an interior differentiable extremum. The other candidates and the boundary of the domain require their own inspection. This careful separation makes curve analysis reliable rather than mechanical.

Check Your Understanding

For each question, distinguish the candidate calculation from the conclusion about extrema.

  1. For \(f(x)=x^4\), find the critical number. Does the derivative equation alone prove that it is a local minimum?
  2. For \(f(x)=|x-2|\), identify the point where the derivative does not exist and state whether it is an extremum.
  3. Why does Fermat’s theorem require an interior point where the derivative exists?
  4. For \(q(x)=\frac{x^2-9}{x-3}\), why must \(x=3\) be excluded when checking derivative candidates?
  5. Can a critical number fail to be a local extremum? Give an example and explain the nearby function values.

Test yourself: Calculus I final exam practice

Ready to check what you know? Work a full-length practice final, then open the complete worked solutions.

Want all 1,114 practice problems?

This tutorial covers one topic. Calc Pass covers the full Calculus AB & BC curriculum (the core of Calculus I and II): full review, every practice question, and step-by-step solutions to each one.

QR code to download the Calc Pass app

Get the Calc Pass App

Scan to download and practice on the go, with instant scoring.

Calc Pass Volume 1: 1,114 Practice Questions book cover

Vol. 1: 1,114 Questions

The complete practice question bank, organized by AB & BC topic.

View on Amazon
Calc Pass Volume 2: Solutions Manual book cover

Vol. 2: Solutions Manual

Fully worked solutions to every question in Volume 1.

View on Amazon