Why an Annulus Reveals the Vortex
A vortex field can circulate around a point even when its curl is zero everywhere the field is defined. The apparent puzzle comes from the point at the center: the field is singular there, so a disk containing that point is not a valid surface on which to apply Stokes’ theorem.
An annulus avoids the singularity. Its boundary has two circles, and the circulation on one must be counted in the direction opposite to the other. For a rotating vortex field, this distinction lets us see both the persistent circulation due to the vortex and the contribution from ordinary rotation.
The Rotating Vortex Field
Write \(r=\sqrt{x^2+y^2}\), and let \(\omega\) and \(\kappa\) be constants. On the region \(r>0\), consider the planar vector field
The first term is solid-body rotation: its tangential speed grows in proportion to distance from the origin. The second term is a point-vortex field: its tangential speed decreases in proportion to \(1/r\). In polar coordinates, with \(\mathbf{e}_{\theta}=(-\sin\theta,\cos\theta)\), this becomes
Take an annulus with inner radius \(a\) and outer radius \(b\), where \(0<a<b\). The field is smooth throughout this annulus because it does not include the origin.
For a positively oriented planar region, the outer boundary is traversed counterclockwise and any inner boundary is traversed clockwise. Thus the annulus’s boundary consists of the outer circle traversed counterclockwise and the inner circle traversed clockwise.
Circulation Around a Circle
First consider a circle of radius \(r\), traversed counterclockwise. Parametrize it by \(\mathbf{r}(\theta)=(r\cos\theta,r\sin\theta)\), for \(0\leq\theta\leq2\pi\). Its tangent displacement is \(d\mathbf{r}=r\mathbf{e}_{\theta}\,d\theta\). The field is tangential, so its dot product with this displacement is \((\omega r+\kappa/r)r\,d\theta\). Therefore,
The solid-body rotation contributes \(2\pi\omega r^2\), which depends on the circle’s radius. The vortex contributes \(2\pi\kappa\), which is the same for every circle around the origin.
Worked Example: A Pure Vortex on an Annulus
Worked Example: A Pure Vortex on an Annulus
Let \(\omega=0\), \(\kappa=3\), and take the annulus \(1\leq r\leq4\). Compute the circulation around each circle counterclockwise, then compute the circulation along the oriented boundary of the annulus.
For either circle, the counterclockwise formula gives \(2\pi(0\cdot r^2+3)=6\pi\). Thus the outer circle has counterclockwise circulation \(6\pi\), and the inner circle, if traversed counterclockwise on its own, also has circulation \(6\pi\).
For the annulus boundary, however, the inner circle is traversed clockwise. Its contribution is therefore \(-6\pi\), while the outer contribution remains \(6\pi\). The total boundary circulation is \(6\pi-6\pi=0\).
As a check, the field has zero curl for \(r>0\), so its curl integral over this annulus is also zero. This agrees with the oriented boundary calculation.
Curl on the Annulus
For a tangential field of the form \(\mathbf{F}=g(r)\mathbf{e}_{\theta}\), its scalar curl at \(r>0\) is \(\frac{1}{r}\frac{d}{dr}(rg(r))\). In the rotating vortex field, \(g(r)=\omega r+\kappa/r\). Consequently,
The vortex part has zero curl at every point with \(r>0\). That statement is local: it does not say the field is defined at the origin. The annulus excludes the origin, so the curl is defined everywhere on the region where we integrate.
Why the Boundary Difference Equals the Curl Integral
For this radial tangential field, the relationship can be verified directly, without leaving any sign implicit. Let \(C_b\) and \(C_a\) denote the outer and inner circles, each initially traversed counterclockwise. Their circulations are \(2\pi b\,g(b)\) and \(2\pi a\,g(a)\), respectively. Since the inner circle is reversed in the annulus boundary, the total is
Meanwhile, polar coordinates give the curl integral over the annulus \(A\):
The final equality follows by evaluating the antiderivative \(rg(r)\) at \(b\) and \(a\). This is exactly the oriented boundary circulation. The subtraction at the inner radius is not optional: it is the contribution of the clockwise inner boundary.
Use the counterclockwise formula \(2\pi r\,g(r)\) at the inner and outer radii.
Keep the outer circulation and subtract the inner counterclockwise circulation.
In polar coordinates, the radial factor in the area element cancels the \(1/r\) in the curl formula.
Both calculations give \(2\pi(bg(b)-ag(a))\).
Worked Example: Solid-Body Rotation Plus a Vortex
Worked Example: Solid-Body Rotation Plus a Vortex
Let \(\omega=2\), \(\kappa=3\), and take the annulus \(1\leq r\leq2\). Find the circulation around each boundary circle with its induced orientation, then verify the curl integral.
On the outer circle, \(r=2\), so its counterclockwise circulation is \(2\pi(2\cdot2^2+3)=2\pi(8+3)=22\pi\).
On the inner circle, \(r=1\), the counterclockwise circulation would be \(2\pi(2\cdot1^2+3)=2\pi(2+3)=10\pi\). The annulus orientation reverses this circle, so its actual boundary contribution is \(-10\pi\). The total is \(22\pi-10\pi=12\pi\).
The curl is \(2\omega=4\). The annulus has area \(\pi(2^2-1^2)=3\pi\), so its curl integral is \(4(3\pi)=12\pi\). It matches the boundary circulation.
Worked Example: A Vortex with Radius-Dependent Swirl
Worked Example: A Vortex with Radius-Dependent Swirl
Consider \(\mathbf{F}=r^2\mathbf{e}_{\theta}\) on \(1\leq r\leq2\). Compute the boundary circulation and the curl integral.
Here \(g(r)=r^2\). A counterclockwise circle of radius \(r\) has circulation \(2\pi r\,g(r)=2\pi r^3\). The outer circle contributes \(2\pi(2^3)=16\pi\). The inner circle, counterclockwise on its own, contributes \(2\pi(1^3)=2\pi\); as the annulus’s inner boundary it contributes \(-2\pi\). The total is \(16\pi-2\pi=14\pi\).
The curl is \(\frac{1}{r}\frac{d}{dr}(r^3)=\frac{1}{r}(3r^2)=3r\). Thus
The curl integral and the oriented boundary circulation both equal \(14\pi\).
The Central Singularity and a Common Mistake
For a pure vortex, the field \(\kappa\mathbf{e}_{\theta}/r\) is undefined at \(r=0\). Its curl is zero on any annulus that excludes the origin, yet a counterclockwise loop around the origin has circulation \(2\pi\kappa\). There is no contradiction: Stokes’ theorem applies on the annulus, whose two boundary circulations cancel, but it cannot be applied to the disk containing the singular point as though the field were smooth there.
A frequent error is to compute both boundary circles counterclockwise and add their circulations. For the example with \(\omega=2\), \(\kappa=3\), and radii \(1\) and \(2\), that incorrect calculation gives \(22\pi+10\pi=32\pi\). It treats the inner circle as counterclockwise, even though the annulus’s induced orientation there is clockwise. Reversing its sign gives \(22\pi-10\pi=12\pi\), which agrees with the curl integral.
This calculation makes the role of the hole precise. Each circle can carry nonzero circulation from the vortex, while the oriented total around the annulus reflects only the change between the two radii. The curl integral measures that same change across the region.
Check Your Understanding
Use the orientation and formulas developed above to answer these questions.
- For a pure vortex with \(\kappa=5\), what is the counterclockwise circulation on a circle of radius \(3\)? What is its contribution when it is the inner boundary of an annulus?
- For \(\omega=1\), \(\kappa=2\), and radii \(a=1\), \(b=3\), compute the total circulation along the oriented annular boundary.
- For a tangential field \(g(r)\mathbf{e}_{\theta}\), explain why the inner-circle term is subtracted in the annular boundary circulation.
- For \(g(r)=r^2\) on \(2\leq r\leq3\), compute the outer and inner boundary contributions and their total.
- Why does zero curl on the punctured plane not justify applying Stokes’ theorem to a disk that contains the vortex center?