Tutorials › Measure Theory › Absolute Continuity of Indefinite Integrals

Absolutely Continuous Functions and the Fundamental Theorem · Tutorial 653 of 798

Absolute Continuity of Indefinite Integrals

Learn how the absolute continuity of the Lebesgue integral gives absolute continuity of its indefinite integral, with explicit estimates and examples.

Advanced 12 min read

What You'll Learn

  • State the absolute continuity condition for a function on a compact interval
  • Prove that an integrable function has small integrals over sets of sufficiently small measure
  • Apply that estimate to prove absolute continuity of an indefinite Lebesgue integral
  • See why the result applies even when the integrand is unbounded
  • Distinguish an \(L^1\) bound from an invalid bound using the supremum of an unbounded function

Small Sets and Indefinite Integrals

Let \(f\) be integrable on a compact interval \([a,b]\). Its indefinite Lebesgue integral is the function \(F(x)=\int_a^x f(t)\,dt\). The key point is that the integral of \(|f|\) over a measurable set becomes small when the set has sufficiently small measure. This remains true even if \(f\) is unbounded; it is the estimate that turns small total interval length into small total change in \(F\).

Throughout, \([a,b]\) is equipped with the Lebesgue sigma-algebra and the restriction of Lebesgue measure \(m\). This is a complete finite measure space, with \(m([a,b])=b-a\). Unless \(a=b\), assume \(a<b\). The function \(f:[a,b]\to\mathbb{R}\) is measurable and satisfies \(\int_{[a,b]}|f|\,dm<\infty\), so \(f\in L^1([a,b])\). The integral and the resulting \(F\) are real-valued. Changing \(f\) on a null set does not change any of these integrals or \(F\).

Definition: A function \(G:[a,b]\to\mathbb{R}\) is absolutely continuous on \([a,b]\) if, for every \(\varepsilon>0\), there is a \(\delta>0\) such that for every finite family of pairwise disjoint subintervals \([u_i,v_i]\subseteq[a,b]\), the condition \(\sum_i(v_i-u_i)<\delta\) implies \(\sum_i|G(v_i)-G(u_i)|<\varepsilon\). Intervals that meet only at endpoints may also be used: those shared endpoints have Lebesgue measure zero.

The definition controls a sum of changes across any finite family of intervals, not just the change across one interval. The following estimate supplies precisely that stronger control.

Absolute Continuity of the Lebesgue Integral on Small Sets

Lemma: Let \(f:[a,b]\to\mathbb{R}\) be measurable with \(\int_{[a,b]}|f|\,dm<\infty\). For every \(\varepsilon>0\), there is a \(\delta>0\) such that for every Lebesgue measurable \(E\subseteq[a,b]\), \(m(E)<\delta\) implies \(\int_E|f|\,dm<\varepsilon\).

Proof. Set \(g_n=\min(|f|,n)\) for each positive integer \(n\). These are nonnegative measurable functions, \(g_n\uparrow |f|\) everywhere, and \(\int |f|\,dm<\infty\). By the Monotone Convergence Theorem, \(\int g_n\,dm\uparrow\int|f|\,dm\). Since both limiting integrals are finite, it follows that \(\int(|f|-g_n)\,dm=\int|f|\,dm-\int g_n\,dm\to0\).

For every real \(y\ge0\), \(y\chi_{\{y>2n\}}\le2(y-\min(y,n))\): if \(y\le2n\), the left side is zero; if \(y>2n\), then \(2(y-n)\ge y\). Substituting \(y=|f(t)|\) and integrating gives \(\int_{\{|f|>2n\}}|f|\,dm\le2\int(|f|-g_n)\,dm\). Choose \(n\ge1\) large enough that this last bound is less than \(\varepsilon/2\), and set \(\delta=\varepsilon/(4n)\). For any measurable \(E\subseteq[a,b]\), split its integral into the parts where \(|f|\le2n\) and \(|f|>2n\). Then $$ \int_E|f|\,dm \le 2n\,m(E)+\int_{\{|f|>2n\}}|f|\,dm. $$ If \(m(E)<\delta\), the first term is less than \(2n\delta=\varepsilon/2\), and the second term is less than \(\varepsilon/2\). Thus \(\int_E|f|\,dm<\varepsilon\), as required. \(\square\)

The truncation argument is important: it first controls the part of \(f\) above a large threshold by its integrable tail, then controls the bounded part using the measure of \(E\). In particular, the lemma does not assume that \(f\) is bounded.

The Indefinite Integral Is Absolutely Continuous

Theorem: Let \(f:[a,b]\to\mathbb{R}\) be measurable with \(\int_{[a,b]}|f|\,dm<\infty\), and define \(F(x)=\int_a^x f(t)\,dt\) for \(x\in[a,b]\). Then \(F\) is absolutely continuous on \([a,b]\).

Proof. If \(a=b\), the domain has one point and the defining interval-sum condition is satisfied for every \(\varepsilon>0\). Suppose \(a<b\), and fix \(\varepsilon>0\). Apply the lemma to \(|f|\), or equivalently to \(f\), to obtain \(\delta>0\) such that \(m(E)<\delta\) implies \(\int_E|f|\,dm<\varepsilon\) for every Lebesgue measurable \(E\subseteq[a,b]\).

Take any finite family of pairwise disjoint subintervals \([u_i,v_i]\subseteq[a,b]\) with \(\sum_i(v_i-u_i)<\delta\). Additivity of the Lebesgue integral on adjacent intervals gives \(F(v_i)-F(u_i)=\int_{[u_i,v_i]}f\,dm\); including or excluding endpoints does not change the integral because finite sets have measure zero. The integral triangle inequality therefore gives $$ \sum_i|F(v_i)-F(u_i)| \le \sum_i\int_{[u_i,v_i]}|f|\,dm =\int_E|f|\,dm, $$ where \(E\) is the union of these intervals, with any shared endpoints counted just once. Since the intervals have disjoint interiors, \(m(E)=\sum_i(v_i-u_i)<\delta\). The lemma now yields \(\int_E|f|\,dm<\varepsilon\). This is exactly the definition of absolute continuity of \(F\). \(\square\)

The proof uses no bound on the values of \(f\). Its essential input is integrability of \(|f|\), which ensures that sets of small measure carry little integral. As an immediate consequence of the definition, \(F\) is continuous: for a single interval \([u,v]\), choosing its length less than \(\delta\) gives \(|F(v)-F(u)|<\varepsilon\).

Worked Example: A Bounded Integrand

On \([0,1]\) with Lebesgue measure, let \(f(t)=2t\) and define \(F(x)=\int_0^x2t\,dt\). Compute \(F\) and give a direct absolute-continuity estimate.

For \(0\le x\le1\), $$ F(x)=\int_0^x2t\,dt=[t^2]_0^x=x^2. $$ For any \(0\le u\le v\le1\), \(F(v)-F(u)=v^2-u^2=\int_u^v2t\,dt\), and \(0\le2t\le2\) on \([0,1]\). Thus \(|F(v)-F(u)|\le2(v-u)\). For a finite family of disjoint subintervals, summing gives \(\sum_i|F(v_i)-F(u_i)|\le2\sum_i(v_i-u_i)\). Given \(\varepsilon>0\), choose \(\delta=\varepsilon/2\); the strict condition \(\sum_i(v_i-u_i)<\delta\) then implies the required strict bound by \(\varepsilon\).

Check: On \([0,1/4]\) and \([1/2,3/4]\), the changes are \(F(1/4)-F(0)=1/16\) and \(F(3/4)-F(1/2)=9/16-4/16=5/16\). Their total is \(6/16=3/8\). Direct integration gives \(\int_0^{1/4}2t\,dt=1/16\) and \(\int_{1/2}^{3/4}2t\,dt=5/16\), confirming both changes.

Worked Example: An Unbounded Integrable Function

On \([0,1]\), define \(f(0)=0\) and \(f(t)=1/\sqrt{t}\) for \(0<t\le1\). Show that \(f\in L^1([0,1])\), find its indefinite integral, and explain why the theorem applies despite the singularity at zero.

For \(0<r<1\), direct integration on \([r,1]\) gives \(\int_r^1t^{-1/2}\,dt=2-2\sqrt r\). Letting \(r\downarrow0\) yields \(\int_0^1|f(t)|\,dt=2\), so \(f\in L^1([0,1])\). For every \(x\in[0,1]\), the same computation gives $$ F(x)=\int_0^x f(t)\,dt=2\sqrt{x}, $$ including \(F(0)=0\). The theorem proves that this \(F\) is absolutely continuous. Although \(f\) is unbounded near zero, it has a finite integral, so the small-set lemma applies.

Check: On \([1/4,1]\), the integral is \(2-2\sqrt{1/4}=2-1=1\), and the change in \(F\) is \(F(1)-F(1/4)=2-1=1\). The two computations agree. Also, \(f\) is not bounded on \((0,1]\): for every \(K>0\), taking \(0<t<1/K^2\) gives \(f(t)>K\).

Worked Example: A Piecewise Constant Integrand

On \([0,1]\), let \(f(t)=1\) for \(0\le t<1/2\) and \(f(t)=-2\) for \(1/2\le t\le1\). Compute \(F(x)=\int_0^x f(t)\,dt\) and verify absolute continuity with an explicit estimate.

If \(0\le x\le1/2\), then \(F(x)=x\). If \(1/2\le x\le1\), split the integral at \(1/2\): $$ F(x)=\int_0^{1/2}1\,dt+\int_{1/2}^x(-2)\,dt =\frac12-2\left(x-\frac12\right)=\frac32-2x. $$ In both pieces \(|f|\le2\). For every interval \([u,v]\subseteq[0,1]\), \(|F(v)-F(u)|\le\int_u^v|f|\,dt\le2(v-u)\). Summing over any finite disjoint family gives \(\sum_i|F(v_i)-F(u_i)|\le2\sum_i(v_i-u_i)\), so \(\delta=\varepsilon/2\) works.

Check: On \([0,1/4]\), the change is \(1/4\). On \([1/2,3/4]\), it is \(|F(3/4)-F(1/2)|=|0-1/2|=1/2\). The total is \(3/4\); the corresponding integral of \(|f|\) is \(1/4+2(1/4)=3/4\).

A Common Pitfall: Using a Supremum That Does Not Exist as a Finite Bound

For bounded \(f\), the estimate \(|F(v)-F(u)|\le\|f\|_\infty(v-u)\) is useful. But it cannot be applied to the unbounded integrand in the preceding example: there is no finite \(\|f\|_\infty\). A concrete incorrect calculation would treat the supremum as \(1\), conclude \(\int_0^{1/16}t^{-1/2}\,dt\le1/16\), and thereby claim that the integral over that interval is at most its length. In fact, $$ \int_0^{1/16}t^{-1/2}\,dt=2\sqrt{1/16}=\frac12, \qquad m([0,1/16])=\frac1{16}. $$ The proposed bound fails. The correction is not to force a supremum estimate, but to use the small-set lemma: for this integrable \(f\), sufficiently small measure guarantees a small integral, with a threshold chosen using the tail of \(f\). Thus the theorem covers unbounded \(L^1\) integrands, not merely bounded ones.

Takeaway: If \(f\in L^1([a,b])\), the change in its indefinite integral across an interval is controlled by the integral of \(|f|\) over that interval. The absolute continuity of the Lebesgue integral on small sets then controls the sum of changes across any finite disjoint family of short intervals. This conclusion does not assert a formula for the derivative of \(F\); differentiation of indefinite Lebesgue integrals is a separate result.

Check Your Understanding

For each question, identify where integrability or the small-set estimate enters.

  1. State the definition of absolute continuity on \([a,b]\) using a finite family of disjoint subintervals.
  2. In the small-set lemma, why is it useful to split \(|f|\) at a large threshold rather than assume \(f\) is bounded?
  3. If \(f\in L^1([0,1])\) and \(F(x)=\int_0^x f(t)\,dt\), what estimate bounds \(\sum_i|F(v_i)-F(u_i)|\) in terms of the union of disjoint intervals?
  4. For \(f(t)=t^{-1/2}\) on \((0,1]\), compute \(\int_0^r f(t)\,dt\) for \(0\le r\le1\). Why does the unboundedness of \(f\) not obstruct absolute continuity of its indefinite integral?
  5. What fails if one tries to use \(\|f\|_\infty\) as a finite constant for \(f(t)=t^{-1/2}\) on \((0,1]\)?