Tutorials › Measure Theory › Finite-Measure Embeddings from Lq into Lp

Completeness and Density in L^p · Tutorial 556 of 798

Finite-Measure Embeddings from Lq into Lp

Learn why finite measure gives a bounded inclusion from \(L^q\) into \(L^p\), and how constant functions show that the bound cannot be improved.

Advanced 10 min read

What You'll Learn

  • State the finite-measure \(L^q\)-to-\(L^p\) inclusion with its hypotheses.
  • Prove the finite-exponent bound using Hölder's inequality.
  • Prove the endpoint bound when \(q=\infty\).
  • Compute the least possible embedding constant, including when the measure is zero.
  • Check the estimate on Lebesgue and finite weighted counting-measure examples.
  • Identify and correct the common error of reversing the measure exponent.

Why Finite Measure Controls the Smaller Norm

On a space of finite measure, a function whose \(q\)-th power is integrable also has an integrable \(p\)-th power whenever \(p<q\). The size of the space matters: the estimate must account for how much measure is available to contribute to the lower-power integral. The result is a bounded inclusion, and the measure-dependent factor in its norm bound is the best possible one.

Let \((X,\mathcal{M},\mu)\) be a measure space with finite measure \(\mu(X)<\infty\); it need not be complete. “Finite” means that the measure of all of \(X\) is finite, a stronger condition than being sigma-finite. Functions in this tutorial are measurable real- or complex-valued functions, identified when they agree \(\mu\)-a.e. For \(1\le r<\infty\), \(L^r(\mu)\) consists of these equivalence classes with \(\int_X |f|^r\,d\mu<\infty\), and \(\|f\|_r=(\int_X|f|^r\,d\mu)^{1/r}\). The space \(L^\infty(\mu)\) consists of classes with finite essential supremum norm \(\|f\|_\infty\).

Definition: For \(1\le p<q\le\infty\), the inclusion from \(L^q(\mu)\) into \(L^p(\mu)\) is the identity map on equivalence classes, once it has been shown that every class in \(L^q(\mu)\) also belongs to \(L^p(\mu)\). Its sharp norm bound is the least \(C\ge0\) such that \(\|f\|_p\le C\|f\|_q\) for every \(f\in L^q(\mu)\). We use the convention \(1/\infty=0\).

The Estimate and Its Proof

For finite \(q\), the key ingredient is Hölder's inequality. We record the version needed here and justify it, so the estimate does not depend on an unstated inequality.

Lemma (Hölder's inequality): Let \((X,\mathcal{M},\mu)\) be any measure space, and let \(1<r<\infty\) and \(s=r/(r-1)\). If \(u\in L^r(\mu)\) and \(v\in L^s(\mu)\) are measurable real- or complex-valued functions, then \(\int_X |uv|\,d\mu\le\|u\|_r\|v\|_s\).

Proof. For nonnegative numbers \(a,b\), Young's inequality \(ab\le a^r/r+b^s/s\) follows by maximizing \(ab-a^r/r\) over \(a\ge0\): when \(b>0\), the maximum occurs at \(a=b^{1/(r-1)}\) and is \(b^s/s\); when \(b=0\), the inequality holds directly. If either \(\|u\|_r\) or \(\|v\|_s\) is zero, the corresponding function is zero a.e., so the asserted integral is zero. Otherwise apply Young's inequality pointwise to \(|u|/\|u\|_r\) and \(|v|/\|v\|_s\). Integrating, each normalized power has integral one, and \(1/r+1/s=1\), so the integral of the normalized product is at most one. Multiplying by \(\|u\|_r\|v\|_s\) proves the claim. \(\square\)

Theorem (Finite-measure embedding): Let \((X,\mathcal{M},\mu)\) be a measure space with \(\mu(X)<\infty\). If \(1\le p<q\le\infty\), then every real- or complex-valued \(f\in L^q(\mu)\) belongs to \(L^p(\mu)\), and $$ \|f\|_p\le \mu(X)^{\,1/p-1/q}\|f\|_q, $$ where \(1/q=0\) when \(q=\infty\). If \(0<\mu(X)<\infty\), the constant \(\mu(X)^{1/p-1/q}\) is sharp. If \(\mu(X)=0\), both spaces contain only the zero equivalence class and the least bound is \(0\), which agrees with the displayed formula.

Proof. First suppose \(q<\infty\). Set \(r=q/p\), so \(r>1\), and let \(s=q/(q-p)\), so \(1/r+1/s=1\). For \(f\in L^q(\mu)\), apply Hölder's inequality to \(u=|f|^p\) and \(v=\chi_X\). These functions meet the hypotheses: \(\int_X|u|^r\,d\mu=\int_X|f|^q\,d\mu<\infty\), and \(\int_X|v|^s\,d\mu=\mu(X)<\infty\). Thus $$ \int_X|f|^p\,d\mu \le \left(\int_X|f|^q\,d\mu\right)^{p/q}\mu(X)^{1-p/q}. $$ Taking the \(p\)-th root gives the stated estimate and proves \(f\in L^p(\mu)\).

Now suppose \(q=\infty\). By the definition of essential supremum, \(|f|\le\|f\|_\infty\) a.e. To see that the bound holds at the essential supremum itself, for each positive integer \(n\) the inequality \(|f|\le\|f\|_\infty+1/n\) holds outside a null set; the union of those countably many null sets is null, and letting \(n\) increase gives \(|f|\le\|f\|_\infty\) off that union. Therefore $$ \int_X|f|^p\,d\mu\le\|f\|_\infty^p\mu(X), $$ which gives the theorem's estimate. If \(\mu(X)=0\), every measurable function is zero a.e., so the only equivalence class in either space is zero. Finally, if \(\mu(X)>0\), the constant function \(f=1\) has \(\|1\|_q=\mu(X)^{1/q}\) when \(q<\infty\), and \(\|1\|_\infty=1\) when \(q=\infty\); in both cases \(\|1\|_p/\|1\|_q=\mu(X)^{1/p-1/q}\). No smaller constant can therefore work. \(\square\)

In the finite-\(q\) proof, the exponent \(1-p/q\) arises from the \(L^s\) norm of \(\chi_X\): that norm is \(\mu(X)^{1/s}\), and \(1/(ps)=(1/p-1/q)\). At \(q=\infty\), the same final exponent is \(1/p\), because the essential bound is multiplied by the measure of the whole space before taking a \(p\)-th root.

Worked Applications

Worked Example: A Nonconstant Function on a Finite Interval

Take \(X=[0,4]\) with Lebesgue measure \(m\), and choose \(p=1\), \(q=2\), and \(f=\chi_{[0,1]}\). The space has measure \(m(X)=4\), so the theorem gives \(\|f\|_1\le4^{1-1/2}\|f\|_2=2\|f\|_2\).

The function equals one on a set of measure one and zero elsewhere. Consequently, \(\int_X|f|\,dm=1\), so \(\|f\|_1=1\); also \(\int_X|f|^2\,dm=1\), so \(\|f\|_2=1\). Substitution gives \(1\le2\), as required. Check: the ratio \(\|f\|_1/\|f\|_2=1\) is below the bound \(2\). For the constant function \(1\) on this same space, \(\|1\|_1=4\) and \(\|1\|_2=\sqrt4=2\), so the ratio is \(4/2=2\). This verifies sharpness for these parameters.

Worked Example: A Weighted Two-Point Space

Let \(X=\{a,b\}\), let \(\mathcal{M}\) be all subsets of \(X\), and define \(\mu(\{a\})=1\), \(\mu(\{b\})=3\). Then \(\mu(X)=1+3=4\). For \(p=2\), \(q=4\), the theorem's factor is \(4^{1/2-1/4}=4^{1/4}=\sqrt2\). Consider \(f(a)=1\), \(f(b)=0\). Every function on this finite measurable space is measurable.

Directly, \(\|f\|_2=(1\cdot|1|^2+3\cdot|0|^2)^{1/2}=1\), and \(\|f\|_4=(1\cdot|1|^4+3\cdot|0|^4)^{1/4}=1\). Thus the bound reads \(1\le\sqrt2\). To check that the factor cannot be reduced, take the constant function \(g(a)=g(b)=2\). Then \(\|g\|_2=(4\cdot2^2)^{1/2}=\sqrt{16}=4\), while \(\|g\|_4=(4\cdot2^4)^{1/4}=64^{1/4}=2\sqrt2\). Their ratio is \(4/(2\sqrt2)=\sqrt2\), exactly the stated factor. Check: substituting this ratio into \(\|g\|_2\le\sqrt2\|g\|_4\) gives \(4\le\sqrt2(2\sqrt2)=4\).

Worked Example: The Endpoint q = Infinity

Let \(X=[0,3]\) with Lebesgue measure, take \(p=2\), and define \(f=2\) on \([0,1]\) and \(f=1\) on \((1,3]\). The endpoint estimate has factor \(m(X)^{1/2}=3^{1/2}=\sqrt3\). The essential supremum of \(f\) is \(2\), since \(f\le2\) everywhere and \(f=2\) on a set of measure one.

The squared \(L^2\) norm is $$ \|f\|_2^2=\int_0^1 2^2\,dm+\int_{(1,3]}1^2\,dm =4\cdot1+1\cdot2=6, $$ so \(\|f\|_2=\sqrt6\). The right side of the estimate is \(\sqrt3\cdot2=2\sqrt3\). Both sides are nonnegative, and their squares are \(6\) and \(12\), respectively; hence \(\sqrt6\le2\sqrt3\). Check: the constant function \(1\) on \([0,3]\) has \(L^2\) norm \(\sqrt3\) and \(L^\infty\) norm \(1\), so its ratio is \(\sqrt3\). This is the claimed sharp factor at the endpoint.

Common Pitfall: Reversing the Measure Exponent

A frequent error is to write the factor as \(\mu(X)^{1/q-1/p}\), reversing the exponents. This cannot be correct in general. On \(X=[0,4]\) with Lebesgue measure, set \(p=1\), \(q=2\), and take \(f=1\). The incorrect factor would be \(4^{1/2-1}=4^{-1/2}=1/2\); since \(\|f\|_2=2\), that would assert \(\|f\|_1=4\le(1/2)2=1\), which is false. The correct factor is \(4^{1-1/2}=2\), and the estimate gives \(4\le2\cdot2=4\). The constant function both exposes the reversed-exponent error and confirms the sharp bound.

The role of the finite-measure hypothesis is also visible in the proof: it is precisely what makes \(\chi_X\) belong to the conjugate space used in Hölder's inequality, and what makes the integral in the \(L^\infty\) argument finite. The conclusion is an inclusion of equivalence classes with a norm bound; it does not assert pointwise boundedness everywhere, nor does it say that every \(L^p\) function belongs to \(L^q\).

Check Your Understanding

In each question, specify the measure space and verify which exponent and measure factor the theorem supplies.

  1. On a measurable space of measure \(9\), what is the sharp bound factor from \(L^4\) into \(L^2\)?
  2. For \(q=\infty\), derive the \(L^p\) bound directly by integrating the a.e. inequality \(|f|^p\le\|f\|_\infty^p\).
  3. On \([0,2]\) with Lebesgue measure, compute the \(L^1\) and \(L^2\) norms of the constant function \(3\), and check sharpness for the inclusion \(L^2\) into \(L^1\).
  4. What are the \(L^p\) equivalence classes when \(\mu(X)=0\), and what is the least embedding constant?
  5. For finite \(q\), identify the conjugate exponents used when applying Hölder to \(|f|^p\) and \(\chi_X\).