From Complex Measures to Complex Integrals
A complex measure can assign non-real values to measurable sets, so its integral must preserve both magnitude and phase. The natural control measure is its total variation: it records the size of the measure without cancellation. We first define the integral on simple functions, then extend it to every function integrable with respect to total variation.
Let \((X,\mathcal M)\) be a measurable space, and let \(\nu:\mathcal M\to\mathbb C\) be a countably additive complex measure with finite total variation. Its total variation \(|\nu|\) is the finite positive measure defined on \(E\in\mathcal M\) by taking the supremum of \(\sum_{j=1}^k|\nu(E_j)|\) over finite measurable partitions \(E=\bigcup_{j=1}^k E_j\). We use the standard properties of total variation: \(|\nu(E)|\le|\nu|(E)\), and \(|\nu|(X)<\infty\). Thus \((X,\mathcal M,|\nu|)\) is a finite measure space. Functions below are complex-valued and \(\mathcal M\)-measurable; integrability means \(\int |f|\,d|\nu|<\infty\).
There is also a positive-measure description of \(\nu\). Write \(\nu=\nu_R+i\nu_I\), where \(\nu_R\) and \(\nu_I\) are the real and imaginary signed measures. Their Jordan decompositions are \(\nu_R=\nu_R^+-\nu_R^-\) and \(\nu_I=\nu_I^+-\nu_I^-\), with each component a finite positive measure. The standard variation inequalities give \(\nu_R^\pm\le|\nu|\) and \(\nu_I^\pm\le|\nu|\). These four positive measures let us define the integral using ordinary Lebesgue integrals against positive measures.
For a complex simple function, integration against a positive measure is defined by linearity from indicators; its real and imaginary parts give the usual complex Lebesgue integral. The component formula above follows from \(\nu(E)=\nu_R^+(E)-\nu_R^-(E)+i\nu_I^+(E)-i\nu_I^-(E)\) on every measurable set \(E\). It is independent of the chosen disjoint representation: two representations have a common finite measurable refinement, and splitting a set into disjoint pieces preserves the sum of its \(\nu\)-values by finite additivity.
Worked Example: A Finite Atomic Complex Measure
Let \(X=\{1,2,3\}\) with all subsets measurable, and set \(\nu(\{1\})=1+i\), \(\nu(\{2\})=-2i\), and \(\nu(\{3\})=2\). Let \(f(1)=2-i\), \(f(2)=i\), and \(f(3)=-1\). The singleton partition gives \(|\nu|(X)=|1+i|+|-2i|+|2|=\sqrt2+2+2=\sqrt2+4\). The integral is
Here \(|f(1)|=\sqrt5\), \(|f(2)|=1\), and \(|f(3)|=1\). Therefore \(\int|f|\,d|\nu|=\sqrt5\sqrt2+1\cdot2+1\cdot2=\sqrt{10}+4\). The bound is \(|3+i|=\sqrt{10}\le\sqrt{10}+4\). Check: the modulus of the computed integral is \(\sqrt{3^2+1^2}=\sqrt{10}\), as used in the inequality.
Extension from Simple Functions
We record why the definition extends to every \(f\) with \(\int|f|\,d|\nu|<\infty\). Such functions can be approximated in \(L^1(|\nu|)\) by complex simple functions. In this setting, the approximation can be seen directly: truncate \(f\) to zero on \(\{|f|>n\}\), and on \(\{|f|\le n\}\) round its real and imaginary parts to a grid with spacing \(1/n\). The result \(\varphi_n\) is simple, and on \(\{|f|\le n\}\) it satisfies \(|f-\varphi_n|\le\sqrt2/n\). On the complement, \(|f-\varphi_n|=|f|\). Consequently,
The last term tends to zero by the Dominated Convergence Theorem: its integrand is bounded by the integrable function \(|f|\) and tends pointwise to zero. The first term tends to zero because \(|\nu|(X)\) is finite.
Proof. For a simple function \(\psi=\sum_j c_j\chi_{F_j}\) written on disjoint measurable sets, the total-variation inequality gives $$ \left|\int\psi\,d\nu\right| =\left|\sum_jc_j\nu(F_j)\right| \le\sum_j|c_j|\,|\nu(F_j)| \le\sum_j|c_j|\,|\nu|(F_j) =\int|\psi|\,d|\nu|. $$ If \((\varphi_n)\) is any sequence of simple functions converging to \(f\) in \(L^1(|\nu|)\), then applying this inequality to \(\varphi_n-\varphi_m\) shows $$ \left|\int\varphi_n\,d\nu-\int\varphi_m\,d\nu\right| \le\int|\varphi_n-\varphi_m|\,d|\nu|\longrightarrow0 $$ as \(m,n\to\infty\). Thus the integrals form a Cauchy sequence in \(\mathbb C\), which is complete, and have a limit. If \((\psi_n)\) is another such approximation, then $$ \left|\int\varphi_n\,d\nu-\int\psi_n\,d\nu\right| \le\int|\varphi_n-f|\,d|\nu|+\int|\psi_n-f|\,d|\nu|\longrightarrow0. $$ The limit is therefore independent of the approximation, proving existence and uniqueness of the extension. This construction also agrees with the four positive-measure integrals in the definition: each component is bounded above by \(|\nu|\), so convergence in \(L^1(|\nu|)\) implies convergence in \(L^1\) for every component.
For linearity, choose simple approximations \(\varphi_n\to f\) and \(\psi_n\to g\) in \(L^1(|\nu|)\). Then \(\alpha\varphi_n+\beta\psi_n\to\alpha f+\beta g\), since $$ \int|\alpha(\varphi_n-f)+\beta(\psi_n-g)|\,d|\nu| \le|\alpha|\int|\varphi_n-f|\,d|\nu|+|\beta|\int|\psi_n-g|\,d|\nu|\longrightarrow0. $$ Linearity holds for simple functions by finite sums. Taking limits in that identity proves linearity for \(f,g\). Finally, for simple \(\varphi_n\to f\), the simple-function bound gives \(\left|\int\varphi_n\,d\nu\right|\le\int|\varphi_n|\,d|\nu|\). The left side tends to \(\left|\int f\,d\nu\right|\), because modulus is continuous. Also, $$ \left|\int|\varphi_n|\,d|\nu|-\int|f|\,d|\nu|\right| \le\int\big||\varphi_n|-|f|\big|\,d|\nu| \le\int|\varphi_n-f|\,d|\nu|\longrightarrow0. $$ The first inequality is the usual integral bound for real integrable functions against the positive measure \(|\nu|\); the second is the pointwise reverse triangle inequality. Passing to the limit proves the asserted variation bound. If two functions agree \(|\nu|\)-a.e., their \(L^1(|\nu|)\) distance is zero, so the construction gives the same integral. \(\square\)
Worked Example: A Complex Density on an Interval
On \(([0,1],\mathcal L)\), let \(\nu(E)=\int_E(1+ix)\,dm\), and take \(f(x)=x\). The density has modulus \(\sqrt{1+x^2}\), so \(|\nu|(E)=\int_E\sqrt{1+x^2}\,dm\). This is the standard variation formula for a complex measure with an integrable density. In particular, \(f\) is \(|\nu|\)-integrable, since \(0\le x\sqrt{1+x^2}\le\sqrt2\) on \([0,1]\). Using the density,
The variation integral is exactly $$ \int|f|\,d|\nu|=\int_0^1x\sqrt{1+x^2}\,dx =\left[\frac{(1+x^2)^{3/2}}{3}\right]_0^1 =\frac{2\sqrt2-1}{3}. $$ The left side of the bound is \(\left|\frac12+\frac{i}{3}\right|=\frac{\sqrt{13}}6\). To check the inequality exactly, both sides are positive, and their squares satisfy $$ \frac{13}{36}<\frac{(2\sqrt2-1)^2}{9} \quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad 13<36-16\sqrt2 \quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad 16\sqrt2<23. $$ The last inequality follows by squaring positive quantities: \(512<529\). Thus the computed values satisfy the bound.
Check: differentiating \((1+x^2)^{3/2}/3\) gives \(x\sqrt{1+x^2}\), and evaluating the primitive at \(1\) and \(0\) gives \((2\sqrt2-1)/3\), as required.
Countable Atoms and a Common Pitfall
Worked Example: Integrating over Countably Many Atoms
Let \(X=\mathbb N=\{1,2,\ldots\}\) with all subsets measurable. Set \(\nu(\{n\})=(i/2)^n\) and \(f(n)=(-1)^n\). Since \(\sum_{n=1}^\infty|\nu(\{n\})|=\sum_{n=1}^\infty2^{-n}=1\), this defines a finite complex measure and \(\int|f|\,d|\nu|=1\). The integral is the absolutely convergent series
For the final simplification, multiply numerator and denominator by \(1-i/2\): the numerator becomes \((-i/2)(1-i/2)=-1/4-i/2\), and the denominator is \(1+1/4=5/4\). Check: multiplying the answer by \(1+i/2\) gives \((-1/5-2i/5)(1+i/2)=-i/2\), the first term of the geometric-series formula \(r/(1-r)\) with \(r=-i/2\). The bound reads \(\sqrt5/5\le1\), which holds because \(5\le25\).
A frequent error is to replace integration against \(\nu\) by integration against \(|\nu|\). These are different measures: total variation controls the integral but does not preserve its complex values. For a one-point example, let \(X=\{a\}\), \(\nu(\{a\})=i\), and \(f(a)=1\). Then \(|\nu|(\{a\})=1\), so \(\int f\,d\nu=i\), whereas \(\int f\,d|\nu|=1\). The correct conclusion is the bound \(\left|\int f\,d\nu\right|\le\int|f|\,d|\nu|\), not equality with the variation integral.
The positive components explain how the complex integral is assembled; total variation supplies a single positive measure for approximation and estimates. This combination makes the definition stable under \(L^1(|\nu|)\) limits and is the basic tool for controlling complex-measure pairings.
Check Your Understanding
For each question, keep the complex integral and the total-variation integral distinct.
- For a simple function \(\varphi=\sum_{j=1}^k a_j\chi_{E_j}\) on disjoint measurable sets, write \(\int\varphi\,d\nu\) using the four positive measures from the Jordan decompositions.
- Why does convergence of simple functions to \(f\) in \(L^1(|\nu|)\) make their complex integrals a Cauchy sequence?
- On a one-point space with \(\nu(\{a\})=-i\) and \(f(a)=2\), compute \(\int f\,d\nu\), \(|\nu|(\{a\})\), and \(\int|f|\,d|\nu|\).
- For the countable atomic example, compute the first two terms of the series for \(\int f\,d\nu\), and state why the full series converges absolutely.
- Explain why changing an integrable function on a \(|\nu|\)-null set does not change its integral.