Tutorials › Measure Theory › Local Convergence With Spatial Tightness

Uniform Integrability and Vitali's Theorem · Tutorial 371 of 798

Local Convergence With Spatial Tightness

Combine local convergence, local uniform integrability, and spatial tightness to obtain convergence in L1 on a sigma-finite measure space.

Advanced 10 min read

What You'll Learn

  • Define local convergence in measure and local uniform integrability on a sigma-finite measure space.
  • State a precise spatial tightness condition for a sequence of integrals.
  • Prove that the three hypotheses imply convergence in L1.
  • Check why the limit function inherits local integrability and spatial tail control.
  • Distinguish failure caused by spikes from failure caused by mass escaping to infinity.

From Local Information to Global L1 Convergence

On an infinite measure space, convergence on every finite-measure region does not by itself control what happens far away. Even when a sequence is well behaved on each such region, its integrals may remain concentrated in narrower and narrower spikes, or may keep moving out of every fixed region. A global \(L^1\) conclusion therefore needs two kinds of control: local uniform integrability to rule out spikes, and spatial tightness to rule out mass escaping to infinity.

Throughout, \((X,\mathcal{M},\mu)\) is a sigma-finite measure space, and \(f_n,f:X\to\mathbb{R}\) are measurable real-valued functions. Sigma-finiteness means that \(X\) is a countable union of measurable sets of finite measure. All integrals of absolute values below are Lebesgue integrals and may initially be infinite. Convergence in measure on a finite-measure set \(K\) means that for every \(\alpha>0\), \(\mu(K\cap\{|f_n-f|>\alpha\})\to0\).

Definition: The sequence \((f_n)\) is locally uniformly integrable if, for every \(K\in\mathcal{M}\) with \(\mu(K)<\infty\), (i) \(\sup_n\int_K|f_n|\,d\mu<\infty\), and (ii) for every \(\varepsilon>0\) there is a \(\delta>0\) such that \(\int_A|f_n|\,d\mu<\varepsilon\) for every \(n\) and every measurable \(A\subseteq K\) with \(\mu(A)<\delta\). The sequence is spatially tight in integral if, for every \(\varepsilon>0\), there is a measurable \(K\) with \(\mu(K)<\infty\) such that \(\sup_n\int_{K^c}|f_n|\,d\mu<\varepsilon\).

In the small-set condition, the same \(\delta\) must work for every \(n\). Spatial tightness also uses the same set \(K\) for every member of the sequence. The complement \(K^c\) is where the tail integrals are measured.

The Local-to-Global Criterion

Theorem: Suppose that on the sigma-finite measure space \((X,\mathcal{M},\mu)\), the measurable real-valued functions \(f_n,f\) satisfy:
  • \(f_n\to f\) in measure on every measurable \(K\) of finite measure;
  • \((f_n)\) is locally uniformly integrable;
  • \((f_n)\) is spatially tight in integral.
Then \(f\in L^1(\mu)\), \(f_n\in L^1(\mu)\) for every \(n\), and \(\int_X|f_n-f|\,d\mu\to0\). Thus \(f_n\to f\) in \(L^1(\mu)\).

Proof. We first obtain a subsequence that converges to \(f\) almost everywhere on \(X\). By sigma-finiteness, choose increasing measurable sets \(K_j\) of finite measure with \(\bigcup_{j=1}^{\infty}K_j=X\). For each \(k\), local convergence in measure allows us to choose an index \(n_k>n_{k-1}\) such that, for each \(j\le k\),

$$ \mu\bigl(K_j\cap\{|f_{n_k}-f|>1/k\}\bigr)<2^{-k}/k. $$

The union of these sets over \(j\le k\) has measure less than \(2^{-k}\). For a fixed \(j\), the sum over \(k\ge j\) of the measures of the corresponding exceptional sets is finite. The measure of the union of those sets for \(k\ge N\) is at most the tail of this convergent sum, which tends to zero as \(N\to\infty\). Therefore almost every point of \(K_j\) belongs to only finitely many exceptional sets. At each such point, \(|f_{n_k}-f|\le1/k\) eventually, so \(f_{n_k}\to f\). Taking the countable union over \(j\) proves convergence almost everywhere on \(X\).

Fix any finite-measure \(K\). Fatou’s lemma, applied to the nonnegative functions \(|f_{n_k}|\chi_K\), gives \(\int_K|f|\,d\mu\le\liminf_k\int_K|f_{n_k}|\,d\mu<\infty\), where the final bound follows from local uniform integrability. If \(A\subseteq K\) and \(\mu(A)<\delta\), the same argument applied on \(A\) gives \(\int_A|f|\,d\mu\le\liminf_k\int_A|f_{n_k}|\,d\mu\). Hence the small-set bound for the sequence also holds for \(f\), with a non-strict bound; choosing the original bound smaller than any desired tolerance gives the strict bound when needed.

We now show convergence in \(L^1\) on \(K\). If \(\mu(K)=0\), the integral of \(|f_n-f|\) on \(K\) is zero. Otherwise fix \(\varepsilon>0\). Choose \(\eta>0\) with \(\eta\mu(K)<\varepsilon/3\). Local uniform integrability, and the small-set bound just obtained for \(f\), give a \(\delta>0\) such that whenever \(A\subseteq K\) and \(\mu(A)<\delta\), both \(\int_A|f_n|\,d\mu<\varepsilon/3\) for every \(n\) and \(\int_A|f|\,d\mu<\varepsilon/3\). Set \(A_n=K\cap\{|f_n-f|>\eta\}\). Convergence in measure on \(K\) gives \(\mu(A_n)<\delta\) for all sufficiently large \(n\). On \(K\setminus A_n\), \(|f_n-f|\le\eta\); on \(A_n\), \(|f_n-f|\le|f_n|+|f|\). Thus

$$ \int_K|f_n-f|\,d\mu \le \eta\mu(K)+\int_{A_n}|f_n|\,d\mu+\int_{A_n}|f|\,d\mu <\varepsilon. $$

So \(\int_K|f_n-f|\,d\mu\to0\) for every finite-measure \(K\).

It remains to control the part outside \(K\). Given \(\varepsilon>0\), spatial tightness supplies a finite-measure \(K\) with \(\sup_n\int_{K^c}|f_n|\,d\mu<\varepsilon/2\). For the almost-everywhere convergent subsequence constructed above, Fatou’s lemma on \(K^c\) gives \(\int_{K^c}|f|\,d\mu\le\liminf_k\int_{K^c}|f_{n_k}|\,d\mu\le\varepsilon/2\). In particular, \(f\) is integrable outside \(K\). It is integrable on \(K\) by the preceding local argument, so \(f\in L^1(\mu)\). Each \(f_n\) is integrable on \(K\) by local uniform integrability and on \(K^c\) by the spatial tail bound, so each \(f_n\in L^1(\mu)\) as well.

For this \(K\), the triangle inequality yields \(\int_{K^c}|f_n-f|\,d\mu<\varepsilon\) for every \(n\). The local result gives \(\int_K|f_n-f|\,d\mu\to0\). Hence \(\limsup_n\int_X|f_n-f|\,d\mu\le\varepsilon\). Since the argument applies for every \(\varepsilon>0\), the nonnegative integrals converge to zero. \(\square\)

Worked Examples: Applying and Testing the Conditions

Worked Example: Shrinking Supports with Vanishing Mass

On \((\mathbb{R},\mathcal{L},m)\), let \(f_n=\chi_{[0,1/n]}\) and \(f=0\). Verify the hypotheses and compute the \(L^1\) limit.

For any \(\alpha>0\), since \(f_n\) takes only the values zero and one, the set \(\{|f_n|>\alpha\}\) is either \([0,1/n]\) when \(0<\alpha<1\), or empty when \(\alpha\ge1\). Its measure is at most \(1/n\). Intersecting with any finite-measure \(K\) cannot increase that measure, so \(f_n\to0\) in measure on every such \(K\).

For local uniform integrability, \(|f_n|\le1\), so for every finite-measure \(K\), \(\int_K|f_n|\,dm\le m(K)\). Also, for every measurable \(A\subseteq K\), \(\int_A|f_n|\,dm\le m(A)\). Given \(\varepsilon>0\), taking \(\delta=\varepsilon\) verifies the small-set condition. Spatial tightness holds with \(K=[0,1]\): every \(f_n\) vanishes on \(K^c\), so every tail integral there is zero.

Finally, the support has length \(1/n\), and \(f_n=1\) on that interval, so

$$ \int_{\mathbb{R}}|f_n-f|\,dm=\int_{\mathbb{R}}f_n\,dm=1\cdot\frac1n=\frac1n\longrightarrow0. $$

As a check, \(f_n\ge0\) and its only nonzero contribution is the interval of length \(1/n\), giving the same integral \(1/n\).

Worked Example: A Spike That Defeats Local Uniform Integrability

On \((\mathbb{R},\mathcal{L},m)\), let \(f_n=n\chi_{(0,1/n)}\) and \(f=0\). The sequence converges in measure on every finite-measure set: for each fixed \(\alpha>0\), once \(n>\alpha\), the set \(\{|f_n|>\alpha\}\) is \((0,1/n)\), whose measure is \(1/n\to0\). It is spatially tight, since all the supports lie in \([0,1]\) and the integrals outside that finite-measure set are zero.

But local uniform integrability fails on \(K=[0,1]\). For any \(\delta>0\), choose \(n\) so large that \(1/n<\delta\), and take \(A=(0,1/n)\). Then \(m(A)=1/n<\delta\), but

$$ \int_A|f_n|\,dm=n\cdot\frac1n=1. $$

Thus no choice of \(\delta\) makes the integrals over all such small sets less than, for example, \(1/2\). Directly, \(\int_{\mathbb{R}}|f_n-f|\,dm=1\) for every \(n\), so \(L^1\) convergence fails. The calculation shows why convergence in measure and spatial control alone do not rule out spikes.

Worked Example: Mass Escaping to Infinity

On \((\mathbb{R},\mathcal{L},m)\), let \(f_n=\chi_{[n,n+1)}\) and \(f=0\). For any finite-measure \(E\), \(m(E\cap[n,n+1))\to0\): indeed, these intersections lie in \(E\cap[n,\infty)\), whose measure tends to zero by continuity from above, since \(m(E)<\infty\) and \(\bigcap_n(E\cap[n,\infty))=\varnothing\). Thus \(f_n\to0\) in measure on every finite-measure set.

Local uniform integrability holds. For finite-measure \(K\), \(\int_K|f_n|\,dm\le m(K)\); and for \(A\subseteq K\), \(\int_A|f_n|\,dm\le m(A)\), so \(\delta=\varepsilon\) works for the small-set condition. However, spatial tightness fails. Let \(K\) be any measurable set of finite measure. The intervals \([n,n+1)\) are disjoint, and therefore \(\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}m(K\cap[n,n+1))\le m(K)<\infty\). Consequently, at least one \(n\) has \(m(K\cap[n,n+1))<1/2\); otherwise the sum would be infinite. For that \(n\),

$$ \int_{K^c}|f_n|\,dm =m([n,n+1)\setminus K) =1-m(K\cap[n,n+1)) >\frac12. $$

No finite-measure \(K\) can make all the tails smaller than \(1/2\). Also, \(\int_{\mathbb{R}}|f_n-f|\,dm=1\) for each \(n\), confirming that global \(L^1\) convergence fails. The local convergence does not detect mass that moves away from every fixed region.

What Each Hypothesis Controls

These examples separate the roles of the assumptions. Local convergence in measure describes the sequence on each finite-measure region, but says nothing by itself about the integral of a spike or about mass located far away. Local uniform integrability controls the first issue by making integrals small on sufficiently small sets, uniformly in \(n\). Spatial tightness controls the second by ensuring that one finite-measure set captures all but a uniformly small amount of every integral.

A useful way to apply the theorem is to choose a tolerance, first select a finite-measure region using spatial tightness, and then use convergence in measure and local uniform integrability on that region. The theorem concerns convergence in \(L^1\), meaning \(\int_X|f_n-f|\,d\mu\to0\); it does not assert pointwise convergence of the full sequence. In the proof, an almost-everywhere convergent subsequence is used only to pass local integrability and the tail bound to the limit function.

Check Your Understanding

For each question, identify which hypothesis is being used and whether the conclusion is local or global.

  1. On \(\mathbb{R}\), does \(f_n=\chi_{[n,n+1)}\) satisfy local uniform integrability? Does it satisfy spatial tightness? Justify both answers.
  2. For \(f_n=n\chi_{(0,1/n)}\) on \(\mathbb{R}\), calculate the integral over \((0,1/n)\) and explain which condition fails.
  3. Why does sigma-finiteness allow the proof to obtain one subsequence converging almost everywhere on all of \(X\), rather than only on one finite-measure set?
  4. Suppose a sequence satisfies the theorem’s hypotheses and \(f_n\to f\) in measure on every finite-measure set. Which step proves that \(f\) is integrable outside a suitable finite-measure set?
  5. On a finite-measure space, how can the spatial tightness condition be satisfied, and what does the theorem then reduce to?