Tutorials › Measure Theory › Reciprocals and Quotients of Measurable Functions

Measurable Functions · Tutorial 187 of 798

Reciprocals and Quotients of Measurable Functions

Learn how to handle reciprocal and quotient measurability carefully, including the domain where a denominator vanishes.

Intermediate 9 min read

What You'll Learn

  • Define the measurable domain on which a reciprocal exists.
  • Prove reciprocal measurability using strict half-line preimages.
  • Extend a reciprocal to the zero set by assigning the value zero.
  • Establish quotient measurability using the measurable product rule.
  • Distinguish a quotient on its natural domain from a conventionally extended function.
  • Identify and correct a common sign and inequality error in reciprocal preimages.

Where a Reciprocal Is Defined

For real-valued functions, division requires attention to the set where the denominator vanishes. If \(g\) is measurable, its zero set is measurable, so its complement is a measurable domain on which \(1/g\) is defined. A quotient can then be made into a function on the whole space by specifying a value on the zero set. The choice of that value is a convention; it is not a value supplied by division.

Throughout, let \((X,\mathcal{M},\mu)\) be any measure space; no assumption of finiteness, sigma-finiteness, or completeness is needed. All functions in this tutorial are finite real-valued functions, and measurability is with respect to \(\mathcal{M}\) and the Borel sigma-algebra \(\mathcal{B}_{\mathbb{R}}\). The conclusions are pointwise measurability statements, not assertions up to \(\mu\)-almost everywhere equality. We use the earlier level-set criterion: a real-valued function is measurable if and only if the preimage of every open half-line \((t,\infty)\), \(t\in\mathbb{R}\), is measurable. We also use that level and equality sets of measurable real-valued functions are measurable.

Definition: For a measurable real-valued function \(g:X\to\mathbb{R}\), define \(Z=\{x\in X:g(x)=0\}\) and \(D=Z^c=\{x\in X:g(x)\ne0\}\). The reciprocal \(1/g\) is the function \(D\to\mathbb{R}\) given by \(x\mapsto 1/g(x)\). The set \(D\) is its natural domain.

Since \(Z\in\mathcal{M}\), also \(D\in\mathcal{M}\). To discuss measurability of a function defined only on \(D\), we equip \(D\) with the trace sigma-algebra \(\mathcal{M}|_D=\{D\cap E:E\in\mathcal{M}\}\). A subset measurable in this trace sigma-algebra is also a member of \(\mathcal{M}\), because \(D\cap E\in\mathcal{M}\).

Measurability of the Reciprocal

Theorem: If \(g:X\to\mathbb{R}\) is measurable on \((X,\mathcal{M},\mu)\), then \(1/g:D\to\mathbb{R}\) is measurable on \((D,\mathcal{M}|_D)\), where \(D=\{g\ne0\}\). No measure assumptions beyond those in the definition of a measure space are required.

Proof. We check the half-line criterion on \(D\). Fix \(t\in\mathbb{R}\). If \(t>0\), then \(1/g(x)>t\) is possible only when \(g(x)>0\). For positive \(g(x)\), multiplying by \(g(x)\) preserves the inequality and gives \(1>t g(x)\). Thus \(\{x\in D:1/g(x)>t\}=\{x:0<g(x)<1/t\}\). If \(t=0\), the inequality \(1/g(x)>0\) holds exactly when \(g(x)>0\), so the preimage is \(\{g>0\}\). If \(t<0\), every \(x\in D\) with \(g(x)>0\) qualifies. For \(g(x)<0\), multiplying \(1/g(x)>t\) by the negative number \(g(x)\) reverses the inequality and gives \(1<t g(x)\), or \(g(x)<1/t\). Hence \(\{x\in D:1/g(x)>t\}=\{g>0\}\cup\{g<1/t\}\). Each displayed set is measurable by the level-set criterion, and each is a subset of \(D\). The half-line criterion on the measurable space \((D,\mathcal{M}|_D)\) now proves that \(1/g\) is measurable there. \(\square\)

The sign split is essential. The reciprocal function is continuous on \(\mathbb{R}\setminus\{0\}\), but it is not a continuous real-valued function on all of \(\mathbb{R}\). The preimage calculation makes explicit both the restricted domain and the direction of the inequalities.

Worked Example: A Reciprocal on Its Natural Domain

Take \((X,\mathcal{M},\mu)=(\mathbb{R},\mathcal{L},m)\), where \(\mathcal{L}\) is the Lebesgue sigma-algebra and \(m\) is Lebesgue measure. This is a complete, sigma-finite, infinite measure space. Let \(g(x)=x-2\), a real-valued measurable function. Its zero set is \(Z=\{2\}\), so the reciprocal is defined on \(D=\mathbb{R}\setminus\{2\}\).

For the threshold \(t=2>0\), the theorem’s formula gives \(\{x\in D:1/g(x)>2\}=\{x:0<x-2<1/2\}=(2,5/2)\). For a direct check, \(x=9/4\) gives \(g(x)=1/4\) and \(1/g(x)=4>2\). In contrast, \(x=3\) gives \(g(x)=1\) and \(1/g(x)=1\), which does not exceed \(2\). The computed interval includes the first point and excludes the second. The endpoint \(2\) is excluded because \(g(2)=0\), and \(5/2\) is excluded because its reciprocal is exactly \(2\), not strictly greater than \(2\).

Quotients on the Whole Space

To make a quotient a function on all of \(X\), we will assign the value zero wherever its denominator vanishes. First extend the reciprocal by the same convention. The following formulas show directly that this extended function is measurable, including on the zero set.

Theorem: Let \(g:X\to\mathbb{R}\) be measurable and define \(r:X\to\mathbb{R}\) by \(r(x)=1/g(x)\) when \(g(x)\ne0\), and \(r(x)=0\) when \(g(x)=0\). Then \(r\) is measurable on \((X,\mathcal{M},\mu)\).

Proof. Fix \(t\in\mathbb{R}\) and use the half-line criterion. If \(t>0\), points in \(Z\) have \(r=0\) and do not belong to \(\{r>t\}\); the reciprocal formula gives \(\{r>t\}=\{0<g<1/t\}\). If \(t=0\), the zero set again contributes no points, and \(\{r>0\}=\{g>0\}\). If \(t<0\), every point of \(Z\) qualifies because \(r=0>t\). Points where \(g>0\) also qualify. Among points where \(g<0\), the sign-reversal calculation in the preceding proof gives \(1/g>t\) exactly when \(g<1/t\). Therefore \(\{r>t\}=Z\cup\{g>0\}\cup\{g<1/t\}\). In each case the preimage is a measurable set, since \(Z\) and the indicated strict level sets are measurable. Thus \(r\) is measurable. \(\square\)

Theorem (Quotient with zero-set convention): Let \(f,g:X\to\mathbb{R}\) be measurable on \((X,\mathcal{M},\mu)\). Define \[ q(x)= \begin{cases} f(x)/g(x),&g(x)\ne0,\\ 0,&g(x)=0. \end{cases} \] Then \(q:X\to\mathbb{R}\) is measurable. No finiteness, sigma-finiteness, or completeness assumption on \(\mu\) is required.

Proof. Define the measurable extension \(r\) of \(1/g\) by the preceding theorem. At every \(x\in X\), the stated convention gives \(q(x)=f(x)r(x)\): on \(D\) this is \(f(x)/g(x)\), and on \(Z\) it is \(f(x)\cdot0=0\). The earlier measurable sums and products result states that the product of two finite real-valued measurable functions on the same measurable space is measurable. Applying it to \(f\) and \(r\) proves that \(q\) is measurable. \(\square\)

The same argument allows any fixed real value \(c\) on \(Z\), rather than zero: define the reciprocal extension to equal \(c\) on \(Z\), check its half-line preimages by adding \(Z\) precisely when \(c>t\), and multiply by \(f\) only if the desired quotient convention is still zero. For a quotient assigned an arbitrary value on \(Z\), it is simplest to define it directly by measurable restrictions to \(D\) and \(Z\). The zero convention above is especially convenient because it is exactly the product \(f r\). In every case, the value on \(Z\) is a specified extension, not a claim that division by zero is defined.

Worked Example: A Quotient with a Vanishing Denominator

On \((\mathbb{R},\mathcal{L},m)\), let \(f(x)=x^2-1\) and \(g(x)=x-1\). Both are real-valued measurable functions. Define \(q=f/g\) where \(g\ne0\), and set \(q(1)=0\). For \(x\ne1\), factor the numerator and divide: \((x^2-1)/(x-1)=((x-1)(x+1))/(x-1)=x+1\). Thus \(q(x)=x+1\) for \(x\ne1\), while \(q(1)=0\).

For an explicit set check, consider the open interval \((2,3)\). At \(x=1\), \(q(1)=0\), so that point is not in the preimage. For \(x\ne1\), \(q(x)\in(2,3)\) is equivalent to \(2<x+1<3\), or \(1<x<2\). This interval already excludes \(x=1\), so \(q^{-1}((2,3))=(1,2)\), a Lebesgue-measurable set. As a numerical check, at \(x=3/2\), \(f(x)=9/4-1=5/4\) and \(g(x)=3/2-1=1/2\); hence \(q(x)=(5/4)/(1/2)=5/2\), which belongs to \((2,3)\). At \(x=1\), the convention gives \(0\), outside that interval.

The cancellation \(q(x)=x+1\) is valid only for \(x\ne1\). Replacing the conventionally defined \(q\) by \(x+1\) at \(x=1\) would change the function there: its value would become \(2\), not \(0\). Both functions are measurable, but they are not pointwise equal.

Worked Example: Quotient on a Finite Measurable Space

Let \(X=\{a,b,c,d\}\), let \(\mathcal{M}\) be its power set, and let \(\mu\) be counting measure, so this is a finite measure space with \(\mu(X)=4\). Every real-valued function on this measurable space is measurable. Set \(f(a)=6\), \(f(b)=-4\), \(f(c)=8\), \(f(d)=10\), and \(g(a)=3\), \(g(b)=-2\), \(g(c)=0\), \(g(d)=5\). With the zero convention, the quotient values are \(q(a)=6/3=2\), \(q(b)=(-4)/(-2)=2\), \(q(c)=0\), and \(q(d)=10/5=2\).

For example, \(\{x:q(x)>1\}=\{a,b,d\}\), a member of \(\mathcal{M}\), while \(\{x:q(x)>2\}=\varnothing\), since each nonzero-denominator quotient equals \(2\) and the remaining value is \(0\). The strict inequality matters: replacing \(q>2\) by \(q\ge2\) would give \(\{a,b,d\}\), not the empty set. The values also check the convention explicitly: although \(f(c)=8\), the quotient at \(c\) is defined to be \(0\) because \(g(c)=0\).

A Common Error and Its Correction

A frequent mistake is to solve an inequality involving \(1/g\) without first restricting the sign of \(g\). For instance, the incorrect calculation \(\{x:1/x>2\}=\{x:x>1/2\}\) both loses the sign condition and fails to reverse the inequality correctly. On the domain \(x\ne0\), the inequality \(1/x>2\) requires \(x>0\); multiplying by this positive \(x\) then gives \(1>2x\), so the correct set is \((0,1/2)\). The point \(x=1/4\) verifies inclusion because \(1/(1/4)=4>2\), while \(x=1\) verifies exclusion because \(1/1=1\) is not greater than \(2\). When the multiplying quantity is negative, the inequality reverses, which is why reciprocal preimages must be split by sign.

These results establish measurability, not integrability or boundedness. They make no assertion that a quotient has a finite integral, and they do not remove the need to specify what happens where the denominator is zero. The practical sequence is: identify the measurable zero set, establish measurability on its complement, state the convention on the zero set, and then apply the measurable product rule when the convention is zero.

Check Your Understanding

In each question, treat the functions as finite real-valued functions on the stated measurable space.

  1. For measurable \(g\), write the three formulas for \(\{x\in\{g\ne0\}:1/g(x)>t\}\) according as \(t>0\), \(t=0\), or \(t<0\).
  2. On \((\mathbb{R},\mathcal{L},m)\), compute \(\{x:1/(x+1)>1\}\), taking the reciprocal only where \(x\ne-1\).
  3. Explain why defining \(r=1/g\) on \(\{g\ne0\}\) and \(r=0\) on \(\{g=0\}\) makes the zero-convention quotient equal to \(fr\) at every point.
  4. For \(f(x)=x+2\) and \(g(x)=x\) on \((\mathbb{R},\mathcal{L},m)\), give the quotient with zero convention at \(x=0\), and compute its value at \(x=2\).
  5. Identify the sign error in the claim \(\{x:1/x>3\}=(1/3,\infty)\), and give the correct set.