Tutorials › Measure Theory › Uniqueness for Sigma-Finite Product Measures

Product Sigma-Algebras and Measures · Tutorial 390 of 798

Uniqueness for Sigma-Finite Product Measures

Learn how finite-measure exhaustion turns uniqueness for finite product measures into uniqueness for sigma-finite product measures.

Advanced 10 min read

What You'll Learn

  • Construct increasing finite-measure exhaustions from sigma-finite covers.
  • State the rectangle formula that characterizes a product measure.
  • Restrict candidate measures to finite-measure exhaustion rectangles.
  • Apply finite-measure uniqueness on the product sigma-algebra.
  • Pass from the local equalities to equality on the whole space.
  • Recognize why finite uniqueness cannot be applied directly to infinite total mass.

From Finite Uniqueness to Sigma-Finite Uniqueness

Finite uniqueness applies when the measures being compared have finite total mass. For sigma-finite factors, however, the product space may have infinite measure, so that argument cannot be applied directly to the whole space. The remedy is to compare the measures on an increasing sequence of rectangles whose measures are finite. On each such rectangle, finite uniqueness applies; continuity from below then recovers equality on the entire product space.

Let \((X,\mathcal{M},\mu)\) and \((Y,\mathcal{N},\nu)\) be sigma-finite measure spaces. Here sigma-finite means that each space is a countable union of measurable sets of finite measure. The product sigma-algebra \(\mathcal{M}\otimes\mathcal{N}\) is the sigma-algebra generated by the measurable rectangles \(A\times B\), where \(A\in\mathcal{M}\) and \(B\in\mathcal{N}\). The product measure \(\mu\times\nu\), constructed earlier, satisfies \((\mu\times\nu)(A\times B)=\mu(A)\nu(B)\), with the usual nonnegative extended-real convention for the right-hand side.

Finite-measure uniqueness theorem: If two finite measures on a sigma-algebra agree on a pi-system that generates that sigma-algebra and contains the whole space, then they agree on the entire sigma-algebra. A pi-system is a family closed under finite intersections. We use this standard finite uniqueness result, established in the earlier material on uniqueness for finite product measures.

The rectangles form a pi-system: the intersection of \(A_1\times B_1\) and \(A_2\times B_2\) is \((A_1\cap A_2)\times(B_1\cap B_2)\), and the whole space \(X\times Y\) is itself a rectangle. Their generated sigma-algebra is \(\mathcal{M}\otimes\mathcal{N}\). The point of the proof below is to arrange that the measures to which finite uniqueness is applied are finite, even when the original measures are not.

Building the Finite-Measure Rectangles

Lemma: If \((X,\mathcal{M},\mu)\) is sigma-finite, there is an increasing sequence \((X_n)\) in \(\mathcal{M}\) such that \(X_n\) has finite measure for every \(n\) and \(\bigcup_{n=1}^{\infty}X_n=X\).

Proof. Sigma-finiteness gives a sequence \((A_k)\) of measurable sets with \(\mu(A_k)<\infty\) and \(\bigcup_{k=1}^{\infty}A_k=X\). Define \(X_n=\bigcup_{k=1}^{n}A_k\). Then \(X_n\subseteq X_{n+1}\), and finite subadditivity gives \(\mu(X_n)\le\sum_{k=1}^{n}\mu(A_k)<\infty\). Also, every point of \(X\) belongs to some \(A_k\), hence to \(X_n\) for every \(n\ge k\). Therefore \(\bigcup_nX_n=X\). If \(X\) is empty, the same conclusion holds by taking every \(X_n\) empty. \(\square\)

Apply the lemma to both factor spaces. We obtain increasing sequences \((X_n)\) and \((Y_n)\) of measurable sets with finite measures and unions \(X\) and \(Y\), respectively. Set \(C_n=X_n\times Y_n\). Then \(C_n\in\mathcal{M}\otimes\mathcal{N}\), \(C_n\subseteq C_{n+1}\), and \(\bigcup_n C_n=X\times Y\). The last equality follows because for any \((x,y)\), there are indices \(r,s\) with \(x\in X_r\) and \(y\in Y_s\), so \((x,y)\in C_{\max(r,s)}\).

Uniqueness for Sigma-Finite Product Measures

Theorem: Let \((X,\mathcal{M},\mu)\) and \((Y,\mathcal{N},\nu)\) be sigma-finite measure spaces. If \(\eta\) is a measure on \((X\times Y,\mathcal{M}\otimes\mathcal{N})\) satisfying \(\eta(A\times B)=\mu(A)\nu(B)\) for every \(A\in\mathcal{M}\) and \(B\in\mathcal{N}\), then \(\eta=\mu\times\nu\) on \(\mathcal{M}\otimes\mathcal{N}\). No separate sigma-finiteness assumption on \(\eta\) is needed.

Proof. Choose increasing finite-measure exhaustions \((X_n)\) and \((Y_n)\) as above, and write \(C_n=X_n\times Y_n\). For each \(n\), define two measures on \(\mathcal{M}\otimes\mathcal{N}\) by \(\eta_n(E)=\eta(E\cap C_n)\) and \(\rho_n(E)=(\mu\times\nu)(E\cap C_n)\). They are finite because \(\eta_n(X\times Y)=\eta(C_n)=\mu(X_n)\nu(Y_n)<\infty\), and the same rectangle formula gives \(\rho_n(X\times Y)=\mu(X_n)\nu(Y_n)<\infty\). Thus the assumed rectangle identity also shows that \(\eta\) is sigma-finite: the sets \(C_n\) cover the space and have finite \(\eta\)-measure.

For any measurable rectangle \(A\times B\), its intersection with \(C_n\) is \((A\cap X_n)\times(B\cap Y_n)\). Both factor sets have finite measure, so the rectangle formula gives \(\eta_n(A\times B)=\mu(A\cap X_n)\nu(B\cap Y_n)=\rho_n(A\times B)\). The rectangles are a pi-system generating \(\mathcal{M}\otimes\mathcal{N}\) and containing \(X\times Y\). The finite-measure uniqueness theorem therefore gives \(\eta_n(E)=\rho_n(E)\) for every \(E\in\mathcal{M}\otimes\mathcal{N}\).

Now fix any \(E\in\mathcal{M}\otimes\mathcal{N}\). The sets \(E\cap C_n\) increase to \(E\). By continuity from below for measures, \(\eta(E)=\lim_n\eta(E\cap C_n)\) and \((\mu\times\nu)(E)=\lim_n(\mu\times\nu)(E\cap C_n)\). The terms in these limits agree for every \(n\), since they are \(\eta_n(E)\) and \(\rho_n(E)\). Hence \(\eta(E)=(\mu\times\nu)(E)\), with infinite values allowed. Since \(E\) was arbitrary, the measures agree on the whole product sigma-algebra. \(\square\)

For completeness, continuity from below is a direct consequence of countable additivity: if \(E_n\uparrow E\), write \(E\) as the disjoint union of \(E_1\) and the differences \(E_k\setminus E_{k-1}\) for \(k\ge2\). The measure of \(E_n\) is the partial sum of the measures of these disjoint pieces, and those partial sums increase to the measure of their union. This argument allows the limit to be \(+\infty\).

Worked Example: Turning a Cover into an Exhaustion

Let \(X=\mathbb{N}=\{1,2,\ldots\}\) with all subsets measurable and \(\mu(\{k\})=1/k\). Use the cover ordered as \(\{1\},\{3\},\{2\},\{5\},\{4\},\ldots\), and let \(Y=\{*\}\) have measure \(\nu(\{*\})=1\). The cover sets have finite measure but are not nested. Form \(X_n\) by taking the union of the first \(n\) cover sets, and put \(Y_n=Y\).

The first three exhaustions are \(X_1=\{1\}\), \(X_2=\{1,3\}\), and \(X_3=\{1,2,3\}\). Their measures are \(\mu(X_1)=1\), \(\mu(X_2)=1+\tfrac13=\tfrac43\), and \(\mu(X_3)=1+\tfrac12+\tfrac13=\tfrac{11}{6}\). Consequently, the finite-measure rectangles \(C_n=X_n\times Y\) have measures \(1,\tfrac43,\tfrac{11}{6}\) at these three stages. For example, the third value follows from the rectangle formula: \((\mu\times\nu)(X_3\times Y)=\mu(X_3)\nu(Y)=\tfrac{11}{6}\cdot1=\tfrac{11}{6}\).

Check: the three listed points are distinct, so their singleton masses add to \(1+\tfrac12+\tfrac13=\tfrac{11}{6}\), the same as the third exhaustion calculation. The sets \(X_n\) increase and their union is \(\mathbb{N}\), even though the original cover was presented in a non-nested order.

Worked Example: Localizing Lebesgue Product Measure

Take \(X=Y=\mathbb{R}\) with the Lebesgue sigma-algebra and Lebesgue measure \(m\), and choose \(X_n=Y_n=[-n,n]\). Then \(C_n=[-n,n]^2\), and the rectangle formula gives \((m\times m)(C_n)=(2n)(2n)=4n^2\). Each restriction to \(C_n\) is a finite measure, although the full product measure is not finite.

Consider the measurable rectangle \(E=(0,2]\times[-1,1]\). At \(n=1\), its intersection with \(C_1\) is \((0,1]\times[-1,1]\), whose product measure is \(1\cdot2=2\). At \(n=2\), the whole of \(E\) is contained in \(C_2\), and its product measure is \(2\cdot2=4\). For every \(n\ge2\), it remains contained in \(C_n\), so the restricted value stays \(4\).

Check: direct application of the rectangle formula to \(E\) gives \(m((0,2])m([-1,1])=2\cdot2=4\), matching the eventual restricted value. The endpoint choices do not alter these lengths, since finite sets have Lebesgue measure zero.

Worked Example: A Countable Set in a Weighted Product Space

Let \(X=Y=\mathbb{N}\), with all subsets measurable, let \(\mu(\{k\})=2^{-k}\), and let \(\nu\) be counting measure, so \(\nu(\{j\})=1\). Both measures are sigma-finite. Use \(X_n=Y_n=\{1,\ldots,n\}\), giving \(C_n=\{1,\ldots,n\}^2\). Define \(E=\{(k,j):1\le j\le k\}\).

The set \(E\) is the disjoint union of the singleton rectangles \(\{k\}\times\{j\}\) with \(1\le j\le k\). Countable additivity and the rectangle formula yield \((\mu\times\nu)(E)=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\sum_{j=1}^{k}2^{-k}=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}k2^{-k}\). For a finite partial sum, write \(k=\sum_{j=1}^{k}1\) and rearrange the finite sums: \(\sum_{k=1}^{N}k2^{-k}=\sum_{j=1}^{N}\sum_{k=j}^{N}2^{-k}\). The inner geometric sum is \(2^{1-j}-2^{-N}\). Therefore \(\sum_{k=1}^{N}k2^{-k}=\sum_{j=1}^{N}(2^{1-j}-2^{-N})=2(1-2^{-N})-N2^{-N}=2-(N+2)2^{-N}\). As \(N\to\infty\), \((N+2)2^{-N}\to0\), so the measure of \(E\) is \(2\).

Check: for each fixed \(k\), exactly \(k\) values of \(j\) satisfy \(1\le j\le k\), and each corresponding rectangle has measure \(2^{-k}\cdot1\). Thus the contribution from that row is \(k2^{-k}\), agreeing with the computed series. The finite exhaustion argument also applies to \(E\cap C_n\); these sets increase to \(E\), so their measures tend to \(2\).

A Common Pitfall

It is not valid to apply finite-measure uniqueness to the full product space merely because both candidate measures agree on rectangles. For example, in the Lebesgue product example, \((m\times m)(\mathbb{R}^2)=\infty\): the squares \(C_n\) have measures \(4n^2\), which grow without bound. The finite uniqueness theorem therefore does not apply directly to the two measures on all of \(\mathbb{R}^2\).

The correction is to restrict both measures to the same \(C_n\). The restrictions have total mass \(4n^2<\infty\), agree on every rectangle after intersection with \(C_n\), and hence agree on the full product sigma-algebra by finite uniqueness. Only after that local comparison do we let \(n\) increase. This avoids invalid expressions such as subtracting one infinite measure from another and makes explicit where sigma-finiteness enters the uniqueness proof.

Check Your Understanding

For each question, identify the finite-measure restrictions and the step that returns the result to the whole product space.

  1. Given sigma-finite \(\mu\) and \(\nu\), explain why increasing finite-measure exhaustions \(X_n\) and \(Y_n\) give an increasing cover \(X_n\times Y_n\) of \(X\times Y\).
  2. For a candidate measure \(\eta\) satisfying the rectangle formula, compute \(\eta((A\times B)\cap(X_n\times Y_n))\).
  3. Why do the restrictions \(\eta(E\cap C_n)\) and \((\mu\times\nu)(E\cap C_n)\) have finite total mass?
  4. Which hypotheses allow the finite-measure uniqueness theorem to be applied to these restrictions?
  5. How does continuity from below convert equality on every \(E\cap C_n\) into equality on \(E\), including when the common value is infinite?