Why Higher Moments Control Tails
Uniform integrability asks whether a family’s expected contribution from large values becomes small uniformly over the family. A bound on the first moments alone does not provide the same tail control. A uniform bound on a moment of order \(p>1\), however, makes large values costly enough that their contribution to the expectation must shrink.
The key is to compare a variable’s size on the event where it exceeds a threshold with its \(p\)-th power. This comparison gives explicit rates: probabilities of exceeding a threshold decay at order \(K^{-p}\), while tail expectations decay at order \(K^{-(p-1)}\).
Uniform Integrability by Tail Expectations
Let \((\Omega,\mathcal F,\mathbb P)\) be a probability space, and let \(\mathcal X\) be a family of real-valued random variables on it. Write \(\mathbb E\) for expectation with respect to \(\mathbb P\).
A higher-moment bound gives quantitative control of both the probability of a large value and its contribution to the expected absolute value.
The Higher-Moment Tail Estimates
\(\square\)
The probability estimate is Markov’s inequality applied to \(|X|^p\). The expectation estimate uses the same idea but compares \(|X|\), on the tail event, directly with \(|X|^p\).
Worked Example: A Uniform Second-Moment Bound
Suppose \(\mathcal X\) is a family of random variables satisfying \(\sup_{X\in\mathcal X}\mathbb E|X|^2\le16\). Taking \(p=2\) and \(C=16\) in the proposition gives, for every \(X\in\mathcal X\) and every \(K>0\),
For example, at \(K=4\), the probability of exceeding the threshold is at most \(1\), and the tail expectation is at most \(4\). At \(K=8\), the corresponding bounds are \(1/4\) and \(2\). The probability bound becomes informative as \(K\) grows beyond \(4\), and both estimates decay to zero. These bounds hold simultaneously for every member of the family.
From a Uniform Moment Bound to Uniform Integrability
\(\square\)
The theorem is useful because it converts a single uniform moment estimate into both integrability and uniform tail control. The explicit exponent is important: the probability bound has power \(p\), while the tail-expectation bound loses one power and has power \(p-1\).
Worked Example: Rare Events with Bounded \(p\)-th Moments
Let \(p>1\), and for each \(n\in\mathbb N\), let \(A_n\) be an event with \(\mathbb P(A_n)=1/n\). Define \(X_n=n^{1/p}\mathbf 1_{A_n}\). Then
Thus the family has a uniform \(p\)-th-moment bound with \(C=1\). For \(K>0\), the event \(\{|X_n|>K\}\) is \(A_n\) when \(n^{1/p}>K\), and is empty otherwise. Consequently,
If \(m=\lfloor K^p\rfloor+1\), the smallest integer strictly greater than \(K^p\), then the largest such probability is \(1/m\). In particular, \(1/m\le K^{-p}\). The tail expectation is
Since \(n^{-(p-1)/p}\) decreases with \(n\), its supremum is \(m^{-(p-1)/p}\le K^{-(p-1)}\). Both tail bounds tend to zero as \(K\to\infty\), confirming uniform integrability. Although the nonzero values grow with \(n\), their \(p\)-th moments remain bounded, which is precisely the control used by the theorem.
Worked Example: A Scaled Exponential Family
Let \(Y\) have the exponential distribution with density \(e^{-y}\) for \(y\ge0\), and set \(X_t=tY\) for \(t\in[0,1]\). Integration by parts gives
The boundary terms vanish because \(y^2e^{-y}\) and \(ye^{-y}\) tend to zero at infinity, and the remaining integral \(\int_0^\infty e^{-y}\,dy\) equals \(1\). Therefore \(\mathbb E|X_t|^2=t^2\mathbb E[Y^2]=2t^2\le2\) for every \(t\in[0,1]\). With \(p=2\) and \(C=2\), the theorem gives
The parameter range includes \(t=0\), for which \(X_0=0\); the same bounds still hold. The estimate applies to the entire continuum of scale parameters, not just to a selected sequence.
How to Use the Bounds
In an application, the main task is usually to find a moment order \(p>1\) and a constant \(C\) that work for every variable in the family. Once those are known, the tail estimates follow directly. A larger available moment order can give a faster decay in the tail expectation, provided its uniform bound is finite.
Identify \(p>1\) for which the \(p\)-th absolute moments are finite uniformly over the family.
Set \(C=\sup_{X\in\mathcal X}\mathbb E|X|^p\), and check that \(C<\infty\).
For a threshold \(K>0\), use \(C/K^p\) for tail probabilities and \(C/K^{p-1}\) for tail expectations.
Since \(p-1>0\), the tail-expectation bound vanishes, proving uniform integrability.
A Common Pitfall: The Order Must Exceed One
For uniform integrability, it is not enough to obtain a tail-expectation estimate that stays bounded; it must tend to zero as \(K\) grows. The estimate here has the form \(C/K^{p-1}\), and its convergence to zero depends on \(p>1\). At \(p=1\), the displayed comparison does not produce a decreasing power of \(K\), so a uniform first-moment bound alone cannot be used in this argument to conclude uniform integrability.
It is also important not to confuse a small tail probability with a small tail expectation. A rare event can carry values large enough to contribute substantially to the expectation. The higher-moment estimate controls both quantities and provides separate bounds for each.
Check Your Understanding
Use the definition and estimates in this tutorial to answer the following questions.
- If \(\sup_{X\in\mathcal X}\mathbb E|X|^3\le 27\), what bounds follow for \(\mathbb P(|X|>K)\) and \(\mathbb E[|X|\mathbf 1_{\{|X|>K\}}]\)?
- Why does the tail-expectation estimate require \(p>1\) to imply uniform integrability?
- For \(X_n=n^{1/p}\mathbf 1_{A_n}\) with \(\mathbb P(A_n)=1/n\), calculate \(\mathbb E|X_n|^p\).
- In the scaled exponential example, what uniform constant works for the second moments of \(X_t=tY\), \(0\le t\le1\)?
- Which part of the theorem’s conclusion follows from the probability tail bound, and which part establishes uniform integrability?