From the Self-Integral to a Normal Variable
Fix a time horizon \(T>0\) and work on a filtered probability space \((\Omega,\mathcal{F},(\mathcal{F}_t)_{t\ge0},\mathbb{P})\) carrying a standard Brownian motion \(B_t\). The Brownian self-integral on \([0,T]\) is the Ito integral with integrand \(H_s=B_s\). This integrand is adapted and progressively measurable, and it belongs to the class \(\mathcal{L}^2\), since
Thus \(I_T=\int_0^T B_s\,dB_s\) is well-defined as a square-integrable Ito integral. Its key identity comes from quadratic variation, not the ordinary chain rule. On a partition \(0=t_0<\cdots<t_n=T\), write \(\Delta B_i=B_{t_i}-B_{t_{i-1}}\). The exact algebraic identity \(B_{t_i}^2-B_{t_{i-1}}^2=2B_{t_{i-1}}\Delta B_i+(\Delta B_i)^2\), summed over the partition, gives \(B_T^2=2\sum_iB_{t_{i-1}}\Delta B_i+\sum_i(\Delta B_i)^2\). As the mesh tends to zero, the left-endpoint sums converge to the Ito integral, and the quadratic-variation sums converge to \(T\). Consequently, the identity established from quadratic variation is
Since \(B_T\) has the normal distribution \(N(0,T)\), we can write \(B_T=\sqrt{T}\,Z\) in distribution, where \(Z\sim N(0,1)\). Therefore
This representation determines the entire distribution. It also warns against a common shortcut: a stochastic integral with a random integrand need not be Gaussian, even though deterministic Wiener integrals are Gaussian.
Distribution and Moment-Generating Function
Proof. Since \(Z^2\ge0\), the representation \(I_T\overset{d}{=}(T/2)(Z^2-1)\) implies \(I_T\ge -T/2\). Equality would require \(Z=0\), an event of probability zero for a standard normal variable, so there is no atom at the boundary. For \(y>0\), the transformation \(Y=Z^2\) has density \(f_Y(y)=\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi y}}e^{-y/2}\): the two preimages are \(z=\sqrt y\) and \(z=-\sqrt y\), and each contributes the normal density multiplied by \(\left|dz/dy\right|=1/(2\sqrt y)\). Now set \(y=1+2x/T\), so \(dy/dx=2/T\). Substitution into \(f_Y(y)\) gives the displayed density for \(x>-T/2\). For the moment-generating function, when \(\lambda<1/T\), the normal integral for \(\mathbb{E}[e^{\lambda T Z^2/2}]\) is finite and equals \((1-\lambda T)^{-1/2}\); multiplying by \(e^{-\lambda T/2}\) gives the formula. If \(\lambda\ge1/T\), the Gaussian integral diverges, so the moment-generating function is not finite there. \(\square\)
Worked Example: Density and Support at Time Two
Take \(T=2\). The representation becomes \(I_2\overset{d}{=}Z^2-1\). Because \(Z^2\ge0\), the support is \([-1,\infty)\), and the endpoint has probability zero. To transform the density, set \(y=x+1\), so \(dy/dx=1\). The density of \(Z^2\) at \(y>0\) is \(e^{-y/2}/\sqrt{2\pi y}\). Hence
Check: the change of variables \(y=x+1\) maps \((-1,\infty)\) onto \((0,\infty)\), and its Jacobian is \(1\). Thus the integral of this density over \((-1,\infty)\) is the integral of the density of \(Z^2\) over \((0,\infty)\), which is \(1\). The strict inequality \(x>-1\) is appropriate because \(x=-1\) has probability zero.
The moment-generating function is useful when exponential moments are wanted, but its domain matters: the positive exponential moment exists only for \(\lambda<1/T\). In particular, one should not assume that every positive exponential moment is finite merely because all polynomial moments are finite.
Expectation, Variance, and All Raw Moments
Proof. For a standard normal variable, integration by parts in its density gives \(\mathbb{E}[Z^{2k}]=(2k-1)\mathbb{E}[Z^{2k-2}]\) for \(k\ge1\). The boundary term vanishes because a polynomial times \(e^{-z^2/2}\) tends to zero at both ends of the real line. Starting from \(\mathbb{E}[Z^0]=1\), induction yields \(\mathbb{E}[Z^{2k}]=(2k-1)!!\). Expanding \((Z^2-1)^n\) by the binomial theorem and taking expectations proves the general formula. For \(n=1\), it gives \((T/2)(1-1)=0\). For \(n=2\), it gives \((T/2)^2(3-2+1)=T^2/2\); since the mean is zero, this is the variance. For \(n=3\), the sum is \(15-9+3-1=8\), giving \(T^3\). For \(n=4\), the sum is \(105-60+18-4+1=60\), giving \(15T^4/4\). \(\square\)
The expectation and variance are consistent with the Ito integral itself. In fact, the Ito isometry gives \(\mathbb{E}[I_T^2]=\mathbb{E}\int_0^T B_s^2\,ds=T^2/2\), and the integral has mean zero. More specifically, \(M_t=\int_0^tB_s\,dB_s\) is a true martingale on any fixed finite horizon: it is square-integrable because \(\mathbb{E}[M_t^2]=t^2/2<\infty\), and its conditional expectation satisfies \(\mathbb{E}[M_t\mid\mathcal{F}_s]=M_s\) for \(s\le t\). This conditional-mean property follows from the Ito integral construction: for adapted step integrands, each future Brownian increment has conditional mean zero given its left endpoint, and the property passes to the square-integrable Ito-integral limit. The martingale property explains the zero expectation, but does not by itself determine the distribution.
Worked Example: Moments at Time Two
Using \(I_2\overset{d}{=}Z^2-1\), compute its expectation, variance, third moment, and fourth moment. The normal even moments needed are \(\mathbb{E}[Z^2]=1\), \(\mathbb{E}[Z^4]=3\), \(\mathbb{E}[Z^6]=15\), and \(\mathbb{E}[Z^8]=105\).
The expectation is \(\mathbb{E}[Z^2-1]=1-1=0\). The variance is \(\mathbb{E}[(Z^2-1)^2]=3-2(1)+1=2\). For the third moment, expand fully: \(\mathbb{E}[(Z^2-1)^3]=15-3(3)+3(1)-1=15-9+3-1=8\). For the fourth moment, \(\mathbb{E}[(Z^2-1)^4]=105-4(15)+6(3)-4(1)+1=105-60+18-4+1=60\).
Check: the general formulas give variance \(T^2/2=2^2/2=2\), third moment \(T^3=2^3=8\), and fourth moment \(15T^4/4=15\cdot16/4=60\), matching the direct expansions.
Worked Example: A Strict-Threshold Probability
At \(T=1\), find the probability that the self-integral is negative. Since \(I_1=(Z^2-1)/2\) in distribution, the strict event \(I_1<0\) is equivalent to \(Z^2<1\), or \(-1<Z<1\). Therefore
The equality \(\Phi(-1)=1-\Phi(1)\) follows from symmetry of the standard normal density. There is no atom at \(I_1=0\), because that would require \(Z=1\) or \(Z=-1\), each a probability-zero event. Thus replacing the strict inequality \(I_1<0\) by \(I_1\le0\) gives the same probability.
Check: the boundary value \(I_1=0\) corresponds exactly to \(Z^2=1\); the standard normal distribution assigns probability zero to these two points. The probability can therefore also be obtained by integrating the density of \(I_1\) over \((-1/2,0)\), with the same result.
Worked Example: Skewness at Time Three
Take \(T=3\). The mean is zero, the variance is \(T^2/2=9/2\), the third moment is \(T^3=27\), and the fourth moment is \(15T^4/4=15\cdot81/4=1215/4\). The standardized skewness is the third central moment divided by the variance to the power \(3/2\):
The standardized fourth moment is \((1215/4)/(9/2)^2=(1215/4)/(81/4)=15\). Check: for every \(T>0\), the same formulas give skewness \(T^3/(T^2/2)^{3/2}=2\sqrt{2}\) and standardized fourth moment \((15T^4/4)/(T^4/4)=15\), agreeing with the calculations at \(T=3\). A Gaussian variable has skewness zero, so this nonzero skewness confirms that \(I_T\) is not Gaussian.
Common Pitfall: The Isometry Does Not Give the Law
A tempting but incorrect calculation is to treat \(\int_0^T B_s\,dB_s\) as Gaussian just because the Ito isometry supplies a variance. The isometry does give \(\mathbb{E}[I_T^2]=T^2/2\), but a mean and variance do not determine a distribution. For example, a mistaken conclusion would be \(I_T\sim N(0,T^2/2)\); that Gaussian law has third moment zero. The actual third moment is \(T^3\), as follows from the shifted-square representation. The correction is to use the quadratic-variation identity to identify the random variable itself, and only then calculate its law and moments.
The integral is centered and is a true martingale at each finite time, yet its terminal distribution is asymmetric and supported below only by the finite boundary \(-T/2\). These facts are compatible: the martingale property constrains conditional means, not Gaussianity or symmetry. The distinction is important whenever the integrand depends on the Brownian path being integrated against.
Check Your Understanding
Use the representation \(I_T\overset{d}{=}\frac{T}{2}(Z^2-1)\) and the stated moment formula to answer each question.
- For a fixed \(T>0\), identify the support of \(I_T\) and explain why there is no atom at its lower endpoint.
- Calculate \(\mathbb{E}[I_T^5]\) by expanding \((Z^2-1)^5\) and using the even moments of a standard normal variable.
- For \(T=4\), compute the variance and third moment, showing the substitution into each formula.
- Explain why the Ito isometry does not imply that \(I_T\) is normally distributed.
- State the domain on which the moment-generating function of \(I_T\) is finite.