Why Brownian Motion Produces Polynomial Martingales
Brownian motion has Gaussian increments, and Gaussian moments are governed by a useful family of polynomials. The key point is that these are not merely polynomials of the current value \(B_t\): they also depend on time. That time dependence cancels the drift term created by Ito's formula. The resulting processes have zero drift and are martingales.
Work on a filtered probability space \((\Omega,\mathcal{F},(\mathcal{F}_t)_{t\ge0},\mathbb{P})\) carrying a Brownian motion \(B_t\) relative to the filtration. In particular, \(B_t-B_s\) is independent of \(\mathcal{F}_s\) and has law \(N(0,t-s)\) when \(s<t\). For an Ito integral on \([0,T]\), the integrand will be progressively measurable and in \(\mathcal{L}^2\), meaning \(\mathbb{E}\int_0^T H_s^2\,ds<\infty\).
The convention here makes the first polynomials \(H_0(t,x)=1\), \(H_1(t,x)=x\), \(H_2(t,x)=x^2-t\), \(H_3(t,x)=x^3-3tx\), and \(H_4(t,x)=x^4-6tx^2+3t^2\). The polynomials \(H_n(t,B_t)\) will be the martingales of interest. Their time arguments are essential; for example, \(B_t^2\) itself has a nonzero Ito drift.
Derivative Identities and the Martingale Result
Proof. Differentiate the generating function with respect to \(x\). Its derivative is \(u\exp(ux-u^2t/2)\); comparing the coefficients of \(u^n/n!\) gives \(\partial_xH_n=nH_{n-1}\). Differentiating with respect to \(t\) gives \(-\tfrac12u^2\exp(ux-u^2t/2)\), hence \(\partial_tH_n=-\tfrac12 n(n-1)H_{n-2}\) for \(n\ge2\), while \(\partial_tH_0=\partial_tH_1=0\). Applying the spatial derivative identity twice gives \(\partial_{xx}H_n=n(n-1)H_{n-2}\). Thus, for \(n\ge2\), \(\partial_tH_n+\tfrac12\partial_{xx}H_n=0\); the same equation holds for \(n=0,1\), since both derivatives in it vanish.
Fix \(n\ge1\) and apply Ito's formula to the function \(f(t,x)=H_n(t,x)\) and the process \(B_t\), whose drift is zero and whose diffusion coefficient is one. The partial derivatives and correction term are \(\partial_tf=-\tfrac12n(n-1)H_{n-2}\), \(\partial_xf=nH_{n-1}\), and \(\tfrac12\partial_{xx}f=\tfrac12n(n-1)H_{n-2}\) for \(n\ge2\). For \(n=1\), the time derivative and second spatial derivative are both zero. In each case the time derivative cancels the Ito correction, so $$ H_n(t,B_t)=H_n(0,B_0)+\int_0^t nH_{n-1}(s,B_s)\,dB_s. $$ For \(n=0\), \(H_0(t,B_t)=1\).
On any fixed interval \([0,T]\), \(nH_{n-1}(s,B_s)\) is progressively measurable, since it is a polynomial in the adapted continuous process \(B_s\) and time. Its square is integrable over time and probability: the Gaussian variable \(B_s\) has finite moments of every order, and the polynomial coefficients are bounded for \(s\in[0,T]\). Therefore the integrand belongs to \(\mathcal{L}^2\). The Ito integral is square-integrable, and its increment from \(s\) to \(t\) has conditional expectation zero given \(\mathcal{F}_s\). This gives the stated conditional identity and verifies the martingale property; in particular, each \(M_t^{(n)}\) is integrable. The case \(n=0\) is immediate. \(\square\)
The same conditional identity can also be checked directly from Brownian increments. Given \(\mathcal{F}_s\), write \(B_t=B_s+Y\), where \(Y\) is independent of \(\mathcal{F}_s\) and has law \(N(0,t-s)\). For each fixed \(b\), the Gaussian moment-generating function gives \(\mathbb{E}[\exp(u(b+Y)-u^2t/2)]=\exp(ub-u^2s/2)\). Comparing coefficients of \(u^n/n!\) yields \(\mathbb{E}[H_n(t,b+Y)]=H_n(s,b)\). The coefficient comparison is valid because the Gaussian moment-generating function is finite for every real \(u\); each coefficient is a finite polynomial moment. Substituting \(b=B_s\) proves the conditional identity. This also shows how the time parameter compensates for the variance \(t-s\) of the new increment.
Worked Polynomial Martingales
Worked Example: The Second Hermite Polynomial
For \(M_t=B_t^2-t=H_2(t,B_t)\), calculate its Ito differential and verify its conditional identity between times \(1\) and \(2\).
Set \(f(t,x)=x^2-t\). Then \(\partial_tf=-1\), \(\partial_xf=2x\), and \(\partial_{xx}f=2\), so the Ito correction is \(\tfrac12\partial_{xx}f\,dt=dt\). Ito's formula gives $$ d(B_t^2-t)=(-1+1)\,dt+2B_t\,dB_t=2B_t\,dB_t. $$ The integrand \(2B_s\) is in \(\mathcal{L}^2\) on \([0,2]\), since \(\mathbb{E}\int_0^2(2B_s)^2\,ds=4\int_0^2s\,ds=8\). Thus the integral is square-integrable and has zero conditional mean over \([1,2]\).
For a direct check, let \(Y=B_2-B_1\). It is independent of \(\mathcal{F}_1\), with \(\mathbb{E}[Y]=0\) and \(\mathbb{E}[Y^2]=1\). Therefore \(\mathbb{E}[(B_1+Y)^2-2\mid\mathcal{F}_1] =B_1^2+2B_1\mathbb{E}[Y]+\mathbb{E}[Y^2]-2 =B_1^2-1=H_2(1,B_1)\). Also \(\mathbb{E}[B_2^2-2]=2-2=0=H_2(0,0)\), checking the expectation at time \(2\).
Worked Example: The Third Hermite Polynomial
For \(M_t=B_t^3-3tB_t=H_3(t,B_t)\), derive the stochastic differential and check the conditional identity from time \(1\) to time \(2\).
Set \(f(t,x)=x^3-3tx\). Its derivatives are \(\partial_tf=-3x\), \(\partial_xf=3x^2-3t\), and \(\partial_{xx}f=6x\). The Ito correction is \(\tfrac12\partial_{xx}f\,dt=3x\,dt\). Consequently, $$ d f(t,B_t)=\left(-3B_t+3B_t\right)dt+ (3B_t^2-3t)\,dB_t =3H_2(t,B_t)\,dB_t. $$ The integrand is square-integrable on every finite interval because it is a polynomial in a Gaussian variable with finite fourth moment.
For the conditional calculation put \(Y=B_2-B_1\). Here \(\mathbb{E}[Y]=0\), \(\mathbb{E}[Y^2]=1\), and \(\mathbb{E}[Y^3]=0\). Expanding each term, \(\mathbb{E}[(B_1+Y)^3\mid\mathcal{F}_1]=B_1^3+3B_1\), while \(\mathbb{E}[-6(B_1+Y)\mid\mathcal{F}_1]=-6B_1\). Their sum is \(B_1^3-3B_1=H_3(1,B_1)\), as required. At time \(2\), symmetry of the centered normal distribution gives \(\mathbb{E}[B_2^3]=0\), and \(\mathbb{E}[B_2]=0\); hence \(\mathbb{E}[H_3(2,B_2)]=0=H_3(0,0)\).
Worked Example: The Fourth Hermite Polynomial
For \(M_t=B_t^4-6tB_t^2+3t^2\), derive the Ito differential and verify the conditional identity from time \(1\) to time \(2\), then check its expectation at time \(2\).
Set \(f(t,x)=x^4-6tx^2+3t^2\). Then \(\partial_tf=-6x^2+6t\), \(\partial_xf=4x^3-12tx\), and \(\partial_{xx}f=12x^2-12t\). The correction is \(\tfrac12\partial_{xx}f\,dt=(6x^2-6t)dt\). The drift terms cancel, giving $$ d f(t,B_t)=(4B_t^3-12tB_t)\,dB_t =4H_3(t,B_t)\,dB_t. $$ Again the polynomial integrand is in \(\mathcal{L}^2\) on finite intervals, since its square has finite expectation and is bounded in expectation over each such interval.
Write \(Y=B_2-B_1\), so its first four moments are \(0,1,0,3\), respectively. With \(b=B_1\), \(\mathbb{E}[(b+Y)^4\mid\mathcal{F}_1]=b^4+6b^2+3\) and \(\mathbb{E}[-12(b+Y)^2\mid\mathcal{F}_1]=-12(b^2+1)\). Adding the constant \(12\) from \(3(2)^2\) gives \(b^4-6b^2+3=H_4(1,b)\). Finally \(B_2\sim N(0,2)\), so \(\mathbb{E}[B_2^2]=2\) and \(\mathbb{E}[B_2^4]=3(2)^2=12\). Therefore \(\mathbb{E}[H_4(2,B_2)]=12-6(2)(2)+3(2)^2=12-24+12=0=H_4(0,0)\).
Expectations, Uses, and a Common Pitfall
For every \(n\ge1\), the conditional identity at \(s=0\) gives \(\mathbb{E}[H_n(t,B_t)\mid\mathcal{F}_0]=H_n(0,0)=0\). Taking expectations yields \(\mathbb{E}[H_n(t,B_t)]=0\). Meanwhile \(H_0(t,B_t)=1\) has expectation \(1\). Thus the Hermite polynomials encode cancellations among the ordinary Gaussian moments. Their conditional identities are stronger than the unconditional moment equalities: they retain the dependence on the observed value \(B_s\).
A common mistake is to use the ordinary chain rule on a power of Brownian motion. The wrong calculation \(d(B_t^3)=3B_t^2\,dB_t\) omits the second-derivative correction. For \(f(x)=x^3\), the derivatives are \(f'(x)=3x^2\) and \(f''(x)=6x\), so Ito's formula includes \(\tfrac12 f''(B_t)dt=3B_tdt\): $$ d(B_t^3)=3B_t^2\,dB_t+3B_t\,dt. $$ The time-dependent term in \(B_t^3-3tB_t\) cancels this drift. In fact, applying Ito's formula to \(g(t,x)=3tx\) gives \(\partial_tg=3x\), \(\partial_xg=3t\), \(\partial_{xx}g=0\), and correction \(\tfrac12\partial_{xx}g\,dt=0\); hence \(d(3tB_t)=3B_tdt+3t\,dB_t\). Subtracting recovers \(d(B_t^3-3tB_t)=3(B_t^2-t)\,dB_t\). This is exactly the cancellation that makes the third Hermite polynomial a martingale.
The polynomial martingales are useful for organizing Gaussian moments and constructing explicit martingales from Brownian motion. The distinction between drift and diffusion is visible in their differentials: the time derivative and the Ito correction determine the drift, while the remaining coefficient multiplies \(dB_t\). A zero drift alone is not enough for a martingale claim; here the finite-time square-integrability of the stochastic integrands ensures that the resulting local martingales are true martingales.
Check Your Understanding
Use the generating function, Ito's formula, and the conditional Gaussian increment as appropriate.
- Write \(H_0,\ldots,H_4\) explicitly and identify which are nonconstant martingales when evaluated at \((t,B_t)\).
- For \(H_2(t,B_t)\), compute \(\mathbb{E}[H_2(3,B_3)\mid\mathcal{F}_1]\) in terms of \(B_1\).
- Apply Ito's formula to \(H_1(t,B_t)\), showing its time derivative and second-derivative correction.
- Explain why the integrand \(3H_2(t,B_t)\) in the differential for \(H_3(t,B_t)\) is square-integrable on every finite time interval.
- Find the missing drift term in the ordinary-chain-rule calculation \(d(B_t^4)=4B_t^3\,dB_t\).