Tutorials › Stochastic Calculus › Integrating Deterministic Step Functions

Construction of the Ito Integral for Simple Processes · Tutorial 87 of 600

Integrating Deterministic Step Functions

Learn how deterministic step integrands turn Ito integrals into weighted sums of independent Gaussian increments, and how to read off their distributions and moments.

Advanced 9 min read

What You'll Learn

  • Express a deterministic step-function Ito integral as a finite sum of Brownian increments.
  • Derive the integral’s Gaussian distribution from independence of Brownian increments.
  • Compute its mean and variance, including the zero-integrand case.
  • Find the distribution of the integral process at a time inside a partition interval.
  • Avoid false independence assumptions when rewriting Brownian increments using endpoint values.

From a Step Integrand to a Gaussian Sum

For a deterministic step function, the Ito integral is an explicit finite sum. Each term is a fixed coefficient multiplied by a Brownian increment, and increments over disjoint time intervals are independent Gaussian random variables. This makes the distribution and moments of the integral directly computable.

Work on a filtered probability space \((\Omega,\mathcal{F},(\mathcal{F}_t)_{t\ge0},\mathbb{P})\) carrying a standard Brownian motion \(B_t\). Fix \(T>0\) and a partition \(0=t_0<t_1<\cdots<t_n=T\). Write \(\Delta t_j=t_j-t_{j-1}>0\), and let \(h_1,\ldots,h_n\) be deterministic real numbers. Set \(H_s=h_j\) on \((t_{j-1},t_j]\); the value at the single time \(0\) can be chosen arbitrarily.

Definition: The deterministic step integrand \(H\) is integrated here in the Ito sense. It is progressively measurable and belongs to \(\mathcal{L}^2\), the class of progressively measurable processes satisfying \(\mathbb{E}\int_0^T H_s^2\,ds<\infty\). Its Ito integral is $$ \int_0^T H_s\,dB_s=\sum_{j=1}^n h_j(B_{t_j}-B_{t_{j-1}}). $$ The integral is not a Stratonovich integral: no symmetric-sum convention or Ito-to-Stratonovich correction is being applied.

In this setting the integrability condition is finite because \(\mathbb{E}\int_0^T H_s^2\,ds=\sum_{j=1}^n h_j^2\Delta t_j\), a finite sum. Since the partition intervals have positive lengths, \(H\) is square-integrable precisely when its step heights are finite. Changing the values of \(H\) at finitely many endpoints does not change this time integral or the displayed sum.

Distribution, Mean, and Variance

Theorem: Let \(I_T=\int_0^T H_s\,dB_s\) for the deterministic step integrand above, and put \(V=\sum_{j=1}^n h_j^2\Delta t_j\). If \(V>0\), then \(I_T\) has distribution \(N(0,V)\), so \(\mathbb{E}[I_T]=0\) and \(\operatorname{Var}(I_T)=V\). If \(V=0\), then \(I_T=0\) almost surely, with mean and variance both zero.

Proof. Let \(\Delta B_j=B_{t_j}-B_{t_{j-1}}\). Brownian independent increments give independent random variables \(\Delta B_j\), each with distribution \(N(0,\Delta t_j)\). For any real \(u\), independence and the characteristic function of a centered normal variable give

$$ \mathbb{E}\!\left[e^{iuI_T}\right] =\prod_{j=1}^n\mathbb{E}\!\left[e^{iu h_j\Delta B_j}\right] =\prod_{j=1}^n\exp\!\left(-\frac{u^2h_j^2\Delta t_j}{2}\right) =\exp\!\left(-\frac{u^2V}{2}\right). $$

When \(V>0\), this is the characteristic function of \(N(0,V)\), proving the claimed distribution. Its mean is zero and its variance is \(V\). When \(V=0\), every nonnegative summand \(h_j^2\Delta t_j\) must be zero. Since \(\Delta t_j>0\), every \(h_j=0\), and the finite-sum definition gives \(I_T=0\) almost surely. This also verifies the stated moments in the degenerate case. \(\square\)

The mean and variance can also be seen directly from the sum: each increment has mean zero and variance \(\Delta t_j\), and distinct increments are independent. Thus cross-covariances vanish and the variance is the sum of the individual variances \(h_j^2\Delta t_j\). The characteristic-function argument supplies the stronger conclusion that the entire law is Gaussian.

Worked Example: Two Different Step Heights

Take \(T=2\), with \(H_s=2\) on \((0,\tfrac12]\) and \(H_s=-1\) on \((\tfrac12,2]\). Compute the integral’s distribution, mean, and variance.

The two time lengths are \(\tfrac12\) and \(2-\tfrac12=\tfrac32\). The integral is

$$ I_2=2(B_{1/2}-B_0)-(B_2-B_{1/2}) =3B_{1/2}-B_2, $$

where \(B_0=0\). The variance parameter from the theorem is

$$ V=2^2\left(\frac12\right)+(-1)^2\left(\frac32\right) =2+\frac32=\frac72. $$

Therefore \(I_2\sim N(0,\tfrac72)\), \(\mathbb{E}[I_2]=0\), and \(\operatorname{Var}(I_2)=\tfrac72\).

Check: In the endpoint expression \(3B_{1/2}-B_2\), the covariance is \(\operatorname{Cov}(B_{1/2},B_2)=\tfrac12\). Hence its variance is \(9(\tfrac12)+2-6(\tfrac12)=\tfrac92+2-3=\tfrac72\), agreeing with the increment calculation.

Worked Example: A Step Function That Vanishes on One Interval

On \([0,1]\), set \(H_s=1\) on \((0,\tfrac14]\), \(H_s=-2\) on \((\tfrac14,\tfrac34]\), and \(H_s=0\) on \((\tfrac34,1]\). Find the integral’s law and moments.

The integral is the sum of the three weighted increments:

$$ I_1=(B_{1/4}-B_0)-2(B_{3/4}-B_{1/4})+0(B_1-B_{3/4}) =3B_{1/4}-2B_{3/4}. $$

The interval lengths are \(\tfrac14\), \(\tfrac34-\tfrac14=\tfrac12\), and \(1-\tfrac34=\tfrac14\). Thus

$$ V=1^2\left(\frac14\right)+(-2)^2\left(\frac12\right)+0^2\left(\frac14\right) =\frac14+2+0=\frac94. $$

It follows that \(I_1\sim N(0,\tfrac94)\), with mean \(0\) and variance \(\tfrac94\). The zero-height interval contributes neither an increment to the sum nor any variance.

Check: Since \(\operatorname{Cov}(B_{1/4},B_{3/4})=\tfrac14\), the endpoint expression has variance \(9(\tfrac14)+4(\tfrac34)-12(\tfrac14)=\tfrac94+3-3=\tfrac94\). This matches the variance computed from the independent increments.

The Integral at an Intermediate Time

Proposition: For \(t\in[t_{k-1},t_k]\), the integral process \(I_t=\int_0^t H_s\,dB_s\) satisfies $$ I_t=\sum_{j=1}^{k-1}h_j(B_{t_j}-B_{t_{j-1}})+h_k(B_t-B_{t_{k-1}}). $$ It is Gaussian with mean zero and variance $$ V(t)=\sum_{j=1}^{k-1}h_j^2\Delta t_j+h_k^2(t-t_{k-1}). $$ If \(V(t)>0\), its law is \(N(0,V(t))\); if \(V(t)=0\), it is zero almost surely.

Proof. Up to time \(t\), the completed intervals are \((t_{j-1},t_j]\) for \(j<k\), and the remaining part of the current interval is \((t_{k-1},t]\). Applying the finite-sum definition to these pieces gives the displayed expression. The Brownian increments in these disjoint time intervals are independent; the last one is centered normal with variance \(t-t_{k-1}\), including the degenerate zero increment when \(t=t_{k-1}\). Multiplication by each deterministic height gives independent centered normal terms. Their variances add to the stated \(V(t)\), so their sum is centered normal when that variance is positive. If \(V(t)=0\), all contributing terms have zero height or zero duration, and the displayed sum is zero almost surely. \(\square\)

Worked Example: Distribution Halfway Through an Interval

Let \(H_s=1\) on \((0,1]\) and \(H_s=3\) on \((1,2]\). Find the distribution of \(I_{3/2}=\int_0^{3/2}H_s\,dB_s\).

The first interval is complete and the second contributes only from \(1\) to \(\tfrac32\). Therefore

$$ I_{3/2}=B_1+3(B_{3/2}-B_1)=3B_{3/2}-2B_1. $$

The accumulated variance is \(1^2(1-0)+3^2(\tfrac32-1)=1+9(\tfrac12)=\tfrac{11}{2}\). Thus \(I_{3/2}\sim N(0,\tfrac{11}{2})\), its mean is \(0\), and its variance is \(\tfrac{11}{2}\).

Check: Using the endpoint expression, \(\operatorname{Cov}(B_{3/2},B_1)=1\). Its variance is \(9(\tfrac32)+4(1)-12(1)=\tfrac{27}{2}+4-12=\tfrac{11}{2}\), as required.

Why the Independent-Increment Form Matters

The step-integrand formula gives more than a way to evaluate a particular integral. It identifies exactly which Brownian increments contribute and how their coefficients affect uncertainty. A step height \(h_j\) multiplies the standard deviation of its interval’s increment by \(|h_j|\), so that interval contributes \(h_j^2\Delta t_j\) to the total variance. The sign of the height changes the sum but not this variance contribution.

These computations apply to deterministic coefficients. A sum with random, adapted coefficients is a different situation: one cannot generally treat the coefficient-weighted increments as independent Gaussian variables merely by using the same variance formula. The deterministic Gaussian-law conclusion proved here relies on the coefficients being fixed numbers. The calculations also concern the Ito integral; they do not replace the conversion rule between Ito and Stratonovich integrals, which, for a continuous semimartingale integrand \(X\), includes the correction \(\tfrac12[X,B]\).

Common Pitfall: Treating Brownian Values as Independent

Brownian increments on disjoint intervals are independent, but Brownian values at different times generally are not. In the first example, \(B_{1/2}\) and \(B_2\) are not independent: their covariance is \(\tfrac12\). A wrong calculation would omit the covariance term and write \(\operatorname{Var}(3B_{1/2}-B_2)=9(\tfrac12)+2=\tfrac{13}{2}\). The correction includes the cross term:

$$ \operatorname{Var}(3B_{1/2}-B_2) =9\operatorname{Var}(B_{1/2})+\operatorname{Var}(B_2) -6\operatorname{Cov}(B_{1/2},B_2) =\frac92+2-6\left(\frac12\right) =\frac72. $$

The independent objects in the original sum are \(B_{1/2}-B_0\) and \(B_2-B_{1/2}\), not the endpoint values \(B_{1/2}\) and \(B_2\). Whenever the sum is rewritten using Brownian values, covariance must be retained.

Check Your Understanding

Use the finite-sum representation and the variance formula to organize each calculation.

  1. For \(H_s=2\) on \((0,1]\) and \(H_s=-1\) on \((1,3]\), find the integral’s distribution, mean, and variance.
  2. State the distribution of the integral when every step height is zero, and explain why the positive-variance Gaussian case does not apply.
  3. For \(H_s=1\) on \((0,1]\) and \(H_s=2\) on \((1,2]\), find the variance of \(I_{5/4}\).
  4. Explain why deterministic step heights allow the Gaussian characteristic-function calculation to factor into a product.
  5. In the expression \(B_1-2(B_2-B_1)\), identify the independent Brownian increments and explain why \(B_1\) and \(B_2\) themselves are not independent.