Tutorials › Stochastic Calculus › Null-Set Completion and Right-Continuous Brownian Filtrations

Martingale Representation · Tutorial 324 of 600

Null-Set Completion and Right-Continuous Brownian Filtrations

See why the usual augmentation of a Brownian filtration preserves representation, and why completing a probability space is not the same as having the predictable representation property.

Advanced 10 min read

What You'll Learn

  • Define the raw, completed, and right-continuous Brownian filtrations.
  • Understand why the completed natural Brownian filtration is already right-continuous.
  • Prove that square-integrable martingale representation survives usual augmentation.
  • Identify how null-set modifications affect terminal variables and stochastic integrals.
  • Distinguish probability-space completeness from the predictable representation property.

Three Filtrations, Two Different Properties

Brownian martingale representation is often first established for the filtration generated by Brownian motion. In applications, however, filtrations are usually completed by adding subsets of probability-zero events and made right-continuous. The representation property survives these usual augmentations. The reason is that completion only changes random variables up to almost-sure equality, while right-continuous augmentation adds no new information to the natural Brownian filtration.

Work on a filtered probability space \((\Omega,\mathcal{F},(\mathcal{F}_t)_{t\ge0},\mathbb{P})\) carrying a standard Brownian motion \(B_t\). Let \(\mathcal{F}^0_t=\sigma(B_s:0\le s\le t)\) be its raw natural filtration. Let \(\mathcal{N}\) denote all subsets of \(\mathbb{P}\)-null sets in \(\mathcal{F}\), and define the completed natural filtration by \(\overline{\mathcal{F}}_t=\sigma(\mathcal{F}^0_t\cup\mathcal{N})\). Its right-continuous augmentation is \(\mathcal{F}_t=\bigcap_{u>t}\overline{\mathcal{F}}_u\). Equalities of sigma-fields below are understood up to completion, or equivalently up to events that differ by a null set.

Definition: The predictable representation property with respect to \(B_t\) means that every square-integrable martingale \(M_t\) on a fixed finite time interval \([0,T]\) has the form \(M_t=M_0+\int_0^t H_s\,dB_s\), with \(H\) predictable and \(\mathbb{E}\int_0^T H_s^2\,ds<\infty\). The integral is the Ito integral on the stated filtered probability space; its integrand is adapted, progressively measurable, and square-integrable in the displayed sense. A complete probability space instead means that every subset of every \(\mathbb{P}\)-null event in \(\mathcal{F}\) belongs to \(\mathcal{F}\). Completeness is a property of the probability space, not a representation assertion.

Why the Completed Brownian Filtration Is Right-Continuous

The key Brownian fact is that observing the path immediately after time \(t\) adds no extra information at time \(t\), once null sets have been included. Here is a proof of the fact in the form needed for representation. We use the standard density of bounded continuous functions of finitely many Brownian coordinates in \(L^2\) of the Brownian path sigma-field; it follows by approximating measurable functions of finite coordinate vectors and then using that those coordinates generate the path sigma-field.

Lemma: For every \(t\ge0\), \(\bigcap_{u>t}\overline{\mathcal{F}}_u=\overline{\mathcal{F}}_t\).

Proof. Choose \(u_n=t+1/n\), and write \(\mathcal{G}_n=\overline{\mathcal{F}}_{u_n}\). These sigma-fields decrease. Their intersection is \(\bigcap_{u>t}\overline{\mathcal{F}}_u\): for any \(u>t\), some \(u_n<u\), so \(\mathcal{G}_n\subseteq\overline{\mathcal{F}}_u\); the reverse inclusion follows because every \(u_n>t\).

For \(X\in L^2(\overline{\mathcal{F}}_T)\), the reverse martingale convergence theorem gives \(\mathbb{E}[X\mid\mathcal{G}_n]\to\mathbb{E}[X\mid\bigcap_n\mathcal{G}_n]\) in \(L^2\). We identify the same limit first for a bounded continuous cylinder variable \(X=g(B_{s_1},\ldots,B_{s_m})\). For all sufficiently large \(n\), the coordinates with \(s_i\le t\) are already observed at \(u_n\), and the remaining coordinates are at times \(s_i>u_n\). Conditional on \(\overline{\mathcal{F}}_{u_n}\), their future increments have the Brownian Gaussian distribution, independent of that sigma-field. Thus the conditional expectation is obtained by integrating \(g\) against the joint Gaussian law of those future increments, with starting value \(B_{u_n}\). As \(n\to\infty\), continuity of Brownian paths gives \(B_{u_n}\to B_t\), and the Gaussian increment means and covariances converge to those for increments starting at \(t\). Boundedness and continuity of \(g\) then give convergence in \(L^2\) to \(\mathbb{E}[X\mid\overline{\mathcal{F}}_t]\). If a coordinate time equals \(t\), its value is already known and the same argument applies.

Bounded continuous cylinder variables are dense in \(L^2(\overline{\mathcal{F}}_T)\), and conditional expectation is an \(L^2\) contraction. Therefore the convergence to \(\mathbb{E}[X\mid\overline{\mathcal{F}}_t]\) holds for every such \(X\). Comparing the two \(L^2\) limits shows that conditional expectation onto \(\bigcap_n\mathcal{G}_n\) equals conditional expectation onto \(\overline{\mathcal{F}}_t\) for every \(X\in L^2(\overline{\mathcal{F}}_T)\). In particular, applying this to indicators of events in the intersection shows that each such event agrees almost surely with an event in \(\overline{\mathcal{F}}_t\). The reverse inclusion is immediate. This proves equality up to completion, as asserted. \(\square\)

Representation Survives the Usual Augmentation

We use the \(L^2\) Brownian martingale representation theorem for the natural Brownian filtration: a square-integrable terminal variable measurable with respect to the Brownian path up to \(T\) has a representation by an Ito integral with a square-integrable predictable integrand. The result is the standard Brownian representation theorem established in the earlier material on martingale representation. The lemma shows that the right-continuous augmentation does not enlarge the completed natural Brownian filtration beyond its value at each time.

Theorem: If the natural Brownian filtration has the \(L^2\) predictable representation property on \([0,T]\), then its completion and right-continuous augmentation have that property as well. In particular, every square-integrable martingale \(M_t\) adapted to the usual augmented Brownian filtration has a predictable integrand \(H\) such that \(M_t=M_0+\int_0^t H_s\,dB_s\), with \(\mathbb{E}\int_0^T H_s^2\,ds<\infty\).

Proof. Let \(X\) be square-integrable and measurable with respect to the completed terminal sigma-field. Completion means there is an \(\mathcal{F}^0_T\)-measurable \(X_0\) with \(X=X_0\) almost surely. Apply the \(L^2\) representation theorem in the natural Brownian filtration to \(X_0\). It gives a predictable \(H\) with \(\mathbb{E}\int_0^T H_s^2\,ds<\infty\) and \(X_0=\mathbb{E}[X_0]+\int_0^T H_s\,dB_s\). The same integrand is predictable in the augmented filtration. Its Ito integral there agrees with the original integral: both are defined by \(L^2\) limits of integrals of elementary predictable processes, and completion changes processes only up to the relevant almost-sure identifications. Since \(X=X_0\) almost surely, the representation holds for \(X\) as well.

Now let \(M_t\) be any square-integrable martingale adapted to the augmented filtration, and set \(X=M_T\). The martingale property gives \(M_t=\mathbb{E}[X\mid\mathcal{F}_t]\). The representation of \(X\) implies \(M_t=\mathbb{E}[X]+\int_0^t H_s\,dB_s\). To check the martingale step, the Ito integral is square-integrable by the Ito isometry, since its second moment is \(\mathbb{E}\int_0^t H_s^2\,ds<\infty\); its increments have conditional mean zero, first for elementary predictable integrands by Brownian independent increments and then for all such \(H\) by \(L^2\) approximation. Hence its conditional expectation at time \(t\) is its value at time \(t\). Also \(\mathbb{E}[X]=M_0\) almost surely because the augmented Brownian \(\mathcal{F}_0\) is trivial up to null sets. This proves the asserted representation. \(\square\)

Worked Example: Changing a Terminal Variable on a Null Set

Take \(T=1\) and \(A=\{B_1=0\}\). Since \(B_1\) has the continuous normal distribution \(N(0,1)\), \(\mathbb{P}(A)=0\). The event \(A\) is in the completed terminal sigma-field. Let \(X=\mathbf{1}_A\). Then \(X=0\) almost surely, so \(\mathbb{E}[X]=0\) and \(\mathbb{E}[X\mid\mathcal{F}_t]=0\) almost surely for every \(0\le t\le1\).

The representation is \(H_s=0\) for all \(s\), and the integral is \(\int_0^t 0\,dB_s=0\). The integrand is adapted and progressively measurable, with \(\mathbb{E}\int_0^1 0^2\,ds=0\). Check: at \(t=1\), the represented terminal value is \(0\), equal to \(X\) almost surely. The pointwise value \(X(\omega)=1\) for \(\omega\in A\) does not alter a representation that is an almost-sure equality.

Worked Example: A Martingale with an Explicit Brownian Integrand

On \([0,2]\), let \(X=B_2^2\). Independent increments give \(\mathbb{E}[B_2^2\mid\mathcal{F}_t]=B_t^2+(2-t)\): write \(B_2=B_t+(B_2-B_t)\), use the zero conditional mean of the increment and its conditional second moment \(2-t\). Thus \(M_t=B_t^2+(2-t)\).

To verify the integral representation directly, apply Ito's formula to \(f(t,x)=x^2+2-t\). Its derivatives are \(f_t=-1\), \(f_x=2x\), and \(f_{xx}=2\). The Ito correction is \(\tfrac12 f_{xx}\,dt=dt\), so

$$ dM_t=f_t\,dt+f_x\,dB_t+\tfrac12 f_{xx}\,dt =-dt+2B_t\,dB_t+dt =2B_t\,dB_t. $$

Therefore \(M_t=M_0+\int_0^t2B_s\,dB_s\), where \(H_s=2B_s\) is adapted and progressively measurable. Its square-integrability follows from \(\mathbb{E}\int_0^2(2B_s)^2\,ds=4\int_0^2 s\,ds=8\). The Ito integral is a true square-integrable martingale: its second moment is \(8\) at \(t=2\), and its conditional increments have mean zero by the Ito integral construction. Check: \(M_0=0^2+2=2=\mathbb{E}[B_2^2]\), and \(M_2=B_2^2\), as required. The calculation works unchanged in the completed, right-continuous filtration.

Completeness Does Not Guarantee Representation

Completion makes null events measurable; it does not prevent a filtration from containing additional information that is not generated by \(B_t\). A filtration can be complete and still fail to have the predictable representation property with respect to a given Brownian motion. The following example has trivial initial sigma-field, so the failure is not merely random information already present at time zero.

Worked Example: Information Revealed at a Fixed Time

Let \(U\) be independent of \(B\), with \(\mathbb{P}(U=1)=\mathbb{P}(U=0)=\tfrac12\). Define a filtration that observes \(B\) as usual and reveals \(U\) at time \(1\): before time \(1\) it is the completed Brownian filtration, and at and after time \(1\) it also contains \(\sigma(U)\). This filtration is complete; it is right-continuous at time \(1\) because every sigma-field immediately after time \(1\) contains \(U\).

Set \(M_t=\tfrac12\) for \(0\le t<1\) and \(M_t=U\) for \(t\ge1\). This is the conditional expectation martingale of \(U\): before time \(1\), independence gives \(\mathbb{E}[U\mid\mathcal{F}_t]=\tfrac12\); at and after time \(1\), \(U\) is known. It is square-integrable, since \(\mathbb{E}[M_t^2]\le1\), and the conditional-expectation identity verifies the martingale property. At time \(1\), it jumps by \(U-\tfrac12\), which is nonzero with probability one.

If it had a Brownian representation \(M_t=M_0+\int_0^t H_s\,dB_s\) with adapted, progressively measurable \(H\) satisfying \(\mathbb{E}\int_0^T H_s^2\,ds<\infty\) on any \(T>1\), its paths would be continuous: Ito integrals with square-integrable integrands have continuous versions. But \(M_t\) has a nonzero jump at \(1\), a contradiction. Check: the jump has size \(\tfrac12\) when \(U=1\) and \(-\tfrac12\) when \(U=0\), so it cannot vanish on an event of probability one. Thus completeness alone does not give representation by the Brownian motion.

What the Augmentation Does—and Does Not Do

For the natural Brownian filtration, completion permits arbitrary almost-sure modifications of terminal variables without changing their representing integrands, while right-continuity adds no new information, by the lemma. Consequently the predictable representation property passes to the usual augmented filtration. A martingale in this statement is a true square-integrable martingale, not merely a local martingale: square-integrability supplies the terminal variable and the integrability needed for the \(L^2\) representation theorem. Local martingale representation is a separate localization statement.

Keep the two notions separate. Probability-space completeness concerns subsets of null events. The predictable representation property concerns whether every martingale in a filtration can be expressed using stochastic integrals against the specified Brownian motion (and its initial value). Adding information not generated by that Brownian motion can destroy the property even when the space is complete. Neither completion nor right-continuity, by itself, is a substitute for checking what information the filtration contains.

Check Your Understanding

Use the definitions and arguments above to answer each question.

  1. Why does replacing a terminal variable by an almost-surely equal version leave its \(L^2\) Brownian representation valid?
  2. In the right-continuity lemma, why is it enough to consider the sequence \(t+1/n\) when taking the intersection over all \(u>t\)?
  3. For \(M_t=B_t^2+(2-t)\), compute \(M_1\) and the Ito correction term in its differential.
  4. In the information-revelation example, what are the two possible jump sizes at time \(1\), and why can a Brownian Ito integral not have that jump?
  5. In one sentence each, distinguish completeness of a probability space from the predictable representation property.