Why Squared Increments Produce a Correction
For a twice differentiable function, a small change \(x\mapsto x+\Delta x\) contributes a second-order Taylor term \(\tfrac12 f''(x)(\Delta x)^2\). Along a smooth path, the sum of these squared increments vanishes as the partition is refined. For Brownian motion, the squared increments instead accumulate to elapsed time. Thus the second-order Taylor term need not disappear: its coefficient \(\tfrac12\) remains, and its squared-increment factor becomes a time integral. This is the source of the one-half second-derivative correction in Ito calculus.
Work on a filtered probability space \((\Omega,\mathcal{F},(\mathcal{F}_t)_{t\ge0},\mathbb{P})\). Throughout, \(B_t\) is Brownian motion with respect to this filtration: it is adapted, has continuous paths and independent Gaussian increments, and, for every \(s<t\), \(B_t-B_s\) is independent of \(\mathcal{F}_s\) and has distribution \(N(0,t-s)\). This independence from the filtration’s past is important; independence of the increments from each other alone would not justify the conditional-expectation arguments below.
Fix \(T>0\) and a deterministic partition \(\Pi=\{0=t_0<t_1<\cdots<t_n=T\}\). Write \(h_i=t_i-t_{i-1}\), \(\Delta B_i=B_{t_i}-B_{t_{i-1}}\), and \(|\Pi|=\max_i h_i\). The quadratic variation sum is \(Q_\Pi=\sum_{i=1}^n(\Delta B_i)^2\). For stochastic integrals, the integrand class used here is \(\mathcal{L}^2\): progressively measurable \(H\) such that \(\mathbb{E}\int_0^T H_s^2\,ds<\infty\). The integral \(\int_0^T H_s\,dB_s\) is the Ito integral.
Quadratic Variation Converges to Elapsed Time
Proof. Since \(\Delta B_i\sim N(0,h_i)\), its second moment is \(h_i\), and its fourth moment is \(3h_i^2\). Therefore \(\mathbb{E}[Q_\Pi]=\sum_i h_i=T\), while \(\operatorname{Var}((\Delta B_i)^2)=3h_i^2-h_i^2=2h_i^2\). The Brownian increments over disjoint intervals are independent, so their squares are independent and the variance of their sum is the sum of their variances. Finally, \(h_i^2\le|\Pi|h_i\), whence \(\sum_i h_i^2\le|\Pi|T\). Since the mean of \(Q_\Pi\) is \(T\), we obtain \(\mathbb{E}[(Q_\Pi-T)^2]=\operatorname{Var}(Q_\Pi)\le2T|\Pi|\), which tends to zero with the mesh. \(\square\)
Worked Example: A Two-Interval Quadratic Variation Sum
For Brownian motion on \([0,1]\) with partition \(0<\tfrac12<1\), compute the mean and variance of \(Q_\Pi\).
Both time increments have length \(h_1=h_2=\tfrac12\), so \(Q_\Pi=(\Delta B_1)^2+(\Delta B_2)^2\). Its mean is \(\tfrac12+\tfrac12=1\). Each squared increment has variance \(2(\tfrac12)^2=\tfrac12\); independence gives \(\operatorname{Var}(Q_\Pi)=\tfrac12+\tfrac12=1\).
Check: the theorem’s bound is \(2T|\Pi|=2\cdot1\cdot\tfrac12=1\), agreeing with the exact variance. This particular partition has a random quadratic variation sum, not a sum that equals \(1\) on every Brownian path.
Weighted Squared Increments
The second-order Taylor term is weighted by the second derivative evaluated at the left endpoint. The next result explains why such weights do not change the basic quadratic-variation mechanism. The filtration assumption in the Brownian definition ensures that the next increment is independent of the information available at its left endpoint.
Proof. Subtract the ordinary time sum and put \(Y_i=G_{t_{i-1}}\big((\Delta B_i)^2-h_i\big)\). The variable \(G_{t_{i-1}}\) is \(\mathcal{F}_{t_{i-1}}\)-measurable. Brownian motion with respect to the filtration has \(\Delta B_i\) independent of \(\mathcal{F}_{t_{i-1}}\); hence \(\mathbb{E}[Y_i\mid\mathcal{F}_{t_{i-1}}]=0\). Also, the conditional second moment of \((\Delta B_i)^2-h_i\) is \(2h_i^2\), so \(\mathbb{E}[Y_i^2]\le2C^2h_i^2\). If \(i<j\), then \(Y_i\) is \(\mathcal{F}_{t_{j-1}}\)-measurable. Conditioning on \(\mathcal{F}_{t_{j-1}}\) gives \(\mathbb{E}[Y_iY_j]=\mathbb{E}[Y_i\mathbb{E}[Y_j\mid\mathcal{F}_{t_{j-1}}]]=0\). Thus $$ \mathbb{E}\left[\left(\sum_iY_i\right)^2\right] =\sum_i\mathbb{E}[Y_i^2] \le2C^2\sum_i h_i^2 \le2C^2T|\Pi|\longrightarrow0. $$ It remains to pass from \(\sum_iG_{t_{i-1}}h_i\) to \(\int_0^T G_t\,dt\). For every continuous path of \(G\), these are left-endpoint Riemann sums and converge to the integral. Their absolute values and the integral are bounded by \(CT\); consequently dominated convergence gives convergence in \(L^2\) as well. Combining the two convergences proves the claim. \(\square\)
In particular, if \(f\) is twice continuously differentiable and \(f''\) is bounded, then \(G_t=f''(B_t)\) meets the hypotheses: it is adapted and continuous, and is bounded by the bound on \(f''\). Therefore the weighted squared-increment sum converges to \(\int_0^T f''(B_t)\,dt\). Taylor’s second-order term carries an additional factor \(\tfrac12\), so its quadratic-variation contribution converges to \(\tfrac12\int_0^T f''(B_t)\,dt\). This identifies the correction’s source. It does not, by itself, prove that all Taylor remainders vanish or establish the full Ito formula; those require further estimates.
Worked Consequences of the Second-Order Term
Worked Example: The Quadratic Function
Take \(f(x)=x^2\) on \([0,2]\). Its derivatives are \(f'(x)=2x\) and \(f''(x)=2\), so the Taylor second-order term on interval \(i\) is exactly \(\tfrac12(2)(\Delta B_i)^2=(\Delta B_i)^2\). Summing these terms gives \(Q_\Pi\), which converges in \(L^2\) to \(2\). Equivalently, the limiting correction is \(\tfrac12\int_0^2 2\,dt=2\).
The finite-partition identity also makes the role of this term exact. Expanding each square gives \(B_{t_i}^2-B_{t_{i-1}}^2=2B_{t_{i-1}}\Delta B_i+(\Delta B_i)^2\). Summing and using \(B_0=0\) yields $$ B_2^2=2\sum_iB_{t_{i-1}}\Delta B_i+Q_\Pi. $$ The left-endpoint sums converge to \(\int_0^2 B_s\,dB_s\). Indeed, \(B\in\mathcal{L}^2\) on this interval because \(\mathbb{E}\int_0^2B_s^2\,ds=\int_0^2s\,ds=2\); the Ito isometry gives the squared error as \(\sum_i\int_{t_{i-1}}^{t_i}(s-t_{i-1})\,ds=\tfrac12\sum_i h_i^2\), which tends to zero. Taking the limit in the identity gives \(B_2^2=2\int_0^2B_s\,dB_s+2\).
Check: the Ito integral here has mean zero: its defining left-endpoint sums have mean zero because \(B_{t_{i-1}}\) is measurable at the left endpoint and the next Brownian increment is independent of that past and has mean zero; convergence in \(L^2\) preserves the mean. Also \(\mathbb{E}[B_2^2]=2\), so the mean of the right side is \(2\cdot0+2=2\), as required.
Worked Example: The Cosine Function
Take \(f(x)=\cos x\). Then \(f'(x)=-\sin x\) and \(f''(x)=-\cos x\), with bounded second derivative. The weighted quadratic-variation result shows that the sum of the second-order Taylor terms converges to \(-\tfrac12\int_0^T\cos(B_t)\,dt\).
For \(T=2\), compute the expectation of this correction. Since \(B_t\sim N(0,t)\), the characteristic function of a centered normal variable gives \(\mathbb{E}[\cos(B_t)]=e^{-t/2}\). The correction is bounded in absolute value by \(T/2=1\), so expectation can be taken under the time integral. Therefore $$ \mathbb{E}\left[-\frac12\int_0^2\cos(B_t)\,dt\right] =-\frac12\int_0^2e^{-t/2}\,dt =-\frac12\left[-2e^{-t/2}\right]_0^2 =-(1-e^{-1}). $$ The same value is obtained as the limit of the expectations of the partition sums: for a left endpoint \(t_{i-1}\), independence gives \(\mathbb{E}[\cos(B_{t_{i-1}})(\Delta B_i)^2]=h_i\mathbb{E}[\cos(B_{t_{i-1}})]=h_ie^{-t_{i-1}/2}\). Multiplying by \(-\tfrac12\) and summing gives Riemann sums for the displayed integral.
Worked Example: Why a Smooth Path Has No Such Accumulation
Let \(x(t)=t\) on \([0,1]\), partitioned into \(n\) equal intervals, and use \(f(x)=x^2\). Each increment of the path is \(\Delta x_i=1/n\). The sum of the second-order terms is $$ \sum_{i=1}^n\frac12 f''(x(t_{i-1}))(\Delta x_i)^2 =\sum_{i=1}^n\frac12\cdot2\cdot\frac1{n^2} =\frac1n\longrightarrow0. $$ The exact endpoint difference is \(f(x(1))-f(x(0))=1-0=1\); the first-order Taylor terms sum to \(\sum_i2(i-1)n^{-1}\cdot n^{-1}=(n-1)/n\), and adding the second-order sum \(1/n\) gives \(1\) for every \(n\). Thus the second-order contribution disappears in the smooth limit, unlike the Brownian case.
Check: at \(n=2\), the two first-order terms are \(0\) and \(1/2\); the two second-order terms are \(1/4\) and \(1/4\). Their total is \(0+\tfrac12+\tfrac14+\tfrac14=1\), matching the endpoint difference.
Common Pitfall: Replacing Every Square by Its Mean
A tempting but incorrect calculation is to replace every \((\Delta B_i)^2\) by \(h_i\) as though the two quantities were equal on each interval. For the two-interval partition of \([0,1]\), this would claim \((\Delta B_1)^2=(\Delta B_2)^2=\tfrac12\) on every outcome. In fact, each square has mean \(\tfrac12\) and variance \(2(\tfrac12)^2=\tfrac12\), so it is not a constant. What is true is that the sum of squared increments converges to elapsed time in \(L^2\) as the mesh tends to zero.
Likewise, applying the ordinary chain rule to \(B_t^2\) and writing \(B_2^2=2\int_0^2B_s\,dB_s\) omits the accumulated second-order term. The exact partition identity above shows what is missing: \(Q_\Pi\), whose limit on \([0,2]\) is \(2\). In differential shorthand, this mechanism is recorded as \(dB_t\,dB_t=dt\), while \(dB_t\,dt=0\) and \(dt\,dt=0\). These rules summarize limits of increment products; they do not assert that an individual random squared increment equals its time increment.
Check Your Understanding
Use the squared-increment and weighted-sum arguments to answer the following.
- For a deterministic partition of \([0,3]\), give the mean and variance of \(Q_\Pi\) in terms of its interval lengths, and state a bound that tends to zero with the mesh.
- Why does the weighted-sum proof require Brownian increments to be independent of \(\mathcal{F}_{t_{i-1}}\), not merely independent of earlier Brownian increments?
- For \(f(x)=\sin x\), write \(f'\), \(f''\), and the limiting second-order Taylor contribution on \([0,T]\).
- For \(f(x)=x^2\), identify the finite-partition sum that converges to the correction and its limit on \([0,T]\).
- In the smooth-path example \(x(t)=t\) with \(f(x)=x^2\), what is the second-order sum for \(n\) equal intervals, and why does its limit differ from the Brownian case?