Tutorials › Stochastic Calculus › Quadratic Variation as the Source of the Ito Correction

Ito's Formula for Brownian Motion · Tutorial 140 of 600

Quadratic Variation as the Source of the Ito Correction

See how Brownian squared increments accumulate to elapsed time and turn the second-order Taylor term into the source of the Ito correction.

Advanced 12 min read

What You'll Learn

  • Prove convergence of Brownian squared-increment sums in mean square.
  • Explain why Brownian increments must be independent of the filtration’s past in the weighted argument.
  • Show how the Taylor coefficient one-half combines with quadratic variation to produce the correction.
  • Work out the second-order contribution for quadratic and trigonometric functions.
  • Distinguish Brownian quadratic variation from the vanishing squared increments of a smooth path.
  • Identify the error in replacing each squared Brownian increment by its time increment.

Why Squared Increments Produce a Correction

For a twice differentiable function, a small change \(x\mapsto x+\Delta x\) contributes a second-order Taylor term \(\tfrac12 f''(x)(\Delta x)^2\). Along a smooth path, the sum of these squared increments vanishes as the partition is refined. For Brownian motion, the squared increments instead accumulate to elapsed time. Thus the second-order Taylor term need not disappear: its coefficient \(\tfrac12\) remains, and its squared-increment factor becomes a time integral. This is the source of the one-half second-derivative correction in Ito calculus.

Work on a filtered probability space \((\Omega,\mathcal{F},(\mathcal{F}_t)_{t\ge0},\mathbb{P})\). Throughout, \(B_t\) is Brownian motion with respect to this filtration: it is adapted, has continuous paths and independent Gaussian increments, and, for every \(s<t\), \(B_t-B_s\) is independent of \(\mathcal{F}_s\) and has distribution \(N(0,t-s)\). This independence from the filtration’s past is important; independence of the increments from each other alone would not justify the conditional-expectation arguments below.

Fix \(T>0\) and a deterministic partition \(\Pi=\{0=t_0<t_1<\cdots<t_n=T\}\). Write \(h_i=t_i-t_{i-1}\), \(\Delta B_i=B_{t_i}-B_{t_{i-1}}\), and \(|\Pi|=\max_i h_i\). The quadratic variation sum is \(Q_\Pi=\sum_{i=1}^n(\Delta B_i)^2\). For stochastic integrals, the integrand class used here is \(\mathcal{L}^2\): progressively measurable \(H\) such that \(\mathbb{E}\int_0^T H_s^2\,ds<\infty\). The integral \(\int_0^T H_s\,dB_s\) is the Ito integral.

Quadratic Variation Converges to Elapsed Time

Theorem: For each deterministic partition of \([0,T]\), \(\mathbb{E}[Q_\Pi]=T\) and \(\operatorname{Var}(Q_\Pi)=2\sum_i h_i^2\le 2T|\Pi|\). Consequently, as \(|\Pi|\to0\), \(Q_\Pi\to T\) in \(L^2(\mathbb{P})\).

Proof. Since \(\Delta B_i\sim N(0,h_i)\), its second moment is \(h_i\), and its fourth moment is \(3h_i^2\). Therefore \(\mathbb{E}[Q_\Pi]=\sum_i h_i=T\), while \(\operatorname{Var}((\Delta B_i)^2)=3h_i^2-h_i^2=2h_i^2\). The Brownian increments over disjoint intervals are independent, so their squares are independent and the variance of their sum is the sum of their variances. Finally, \(h_i^2\le|\Pi|h_i\), whence \(\sum_i h_i^2\le|\Pi|T\). Since the mean of \(Q_\Pi\) is \(T\), we obtain \(\mathbb{E}[(Q_\Pi-T)^2]=\operatorname{Var}(Q_\Pi)\le2T|\Pi|\), which tends to zero with the mesh. \(\square\)

Worked Example: A Two-Interval Quadratic Variation Sum

For Brownian motion on \([0,1]\) with partition \(0<\tfrac12<1\), compute the mean and variance of \(Q_\Pi\).

Both time increments have length \(h_1=h_2=\tfrac12\), so \(Q_\Pi=(\Delta B_1)^2+(\Delta B_2)^2\). Its mean is \(\tfrac12+\tfrac12=1\). Each squared increment has variance \(2(\tfrac12)^2=\tfrac12\); independence gives \(\operatorname{Var}(Q_\Pi)=\tfrac12+\tfrac12=1\).

Check: the theorem’s bound is \(2T|\Pi|=2\cdot1\cdot\tfrac12=1\), agreeing with the exact variance. This particular partition has a random quadratic variation sum, not a sum that equals \(1\) on every Brownian path.

Weighted Squared Increments

The second-order Taylor term is weighted by the second derivative evaluated at the left endpoint. The next result explains why such weights do not change the basic quadratic-variation mechanism. The filtration assumption in the Brownian definition ensures that the next increment is independent of the information available at its left endpoint.

Theorem: Suppose \(G_t\) is adapted, has continuous paths, and satisfies \(|G_t|\le C\) for all \(t\in[0,T]\) almost surely, for a deterministic finite constant \(C\). Then, along deterministic partitions with mesh tending to zero, $$ \sum_{i=1}^n G_{t_{i-1}}(\Delta B_i)^2 \longrightarrow \int_0^T G_t\,dt \quad\text{in }L^2(\mathbb{P}). $$

Proof. Subtract the ordinary time sum and put \(Y_i=G_{t_{i-1}}\big((\Delta B_i)^2-h_i\big)\). The variable \(G_{t_{i-1}}\) is \(\mathcal{F}_{t_{i-1}}\)-measurable. Brownian motion with respect to the filtration has \(\Delta B_i\) independent of \(\mathcal{F}_{t_{i-1}}\); hence \(\mathbb{E}[Y_i\mid\mathcal{F}_{t_{i-1}}]=0\). Also, the conditional second moment of \((\Delta B_i)^2-h_i\) is \(2h_i^2\), so \(\mathbb{E}[Y_i^2]\le2C^2h_i^2\). If \(i<j\), then \(Y_i\) is \(\mathcal{F}_{t_{j-1}}\)-measurable. Conditioning on \(\mathcal{F}_{t_{j-1}}\) gives \(\mathbb{E}[Y_iY_j]=\mathbb{E}[Y_i\mathbb{E}[Y_j\mid\mathcal{F}_{t_{j-1}}]]=0\). Thus $$ \mathbb{E}\left[\left(\sum_iY_i\right)^2\right] =\sum_i\mathbb{E}[Y_i^2] \le2C^2\sum_i h_i^2 \le2C^2T|\Pi|\longrightarrow0. $$ It remains to pass from \(\sum_iG_{t_{i-1}}h_i\) to \(\int_0^T G_t\,dt\). For every continuous path of \(G\), these are left-endpoint Riemann sums and converge to the integral. Their absolute values and the integral are bounded by \(CT\); consequently dominated convergence gives convergence in \(L^2\) as well. Combining the two convergences proves the claim. \(\square\)

In particular, if \(f\) is twice continuously differentiable and \(f''\) is bounded, then \(G_t=f''(B_t)\) meets the hypotheses: it is adapted and continuous, and is bounded by the bound on \(f''\). Therefore the weighted squared-increment sum converges to \(\int_0^T f''(B_t)\,dt\). Taylor’s second-order term carries an additional factor \(\tfrac12\), so its quadratic-variation contribution converges to \(\tfrac12\int_0^T f''(B_t)\,dt\). This identifies the correction’s source. It does not, by itself, prove that all Taylor remainders vanish or establish the full Ito formula; those require further estimates.

Worked Consequences of the Second-Order Term

Worked Example: The Quadratic Function

Take \(f(x)=x^2\) on \([0,2]\). Its derivatives are \(f'(x)=2x\) and \(f''(x)=2\), so the Taylor second-order term on interval \(i\) is exactly \(\tfrac12(2)(\Delta B_i)^2=(\Delta B_i)^2\). Summing these terms gives \(Q_\Pi\), which converges in \(L^2\) to \(2\). Equivalently, the limiting correction is \(\tfrac12\int_0^2 2\,dt=2\).

The finite-partition identity also makes the role of this term exact. Expanding each square gives \(B_{t_i}^2-B_{t_{i-1}}^2=2B_{t_{i-1}}\Delta B_i+(\Delta B_i)^2\). Summing and using \(B_0=0\) yields $$ B_2^2=2\sum_iB_{t_{i-1}}\Delta B_i+Q_\Pi. $$ The left-endpoint sums converge to \(\int_0^2 B_s\,dB_s\). Indeed, \(B\in\mathcal{L}^2\) on this interval because \(\mathbb{E}\int_0^2B_s^2\,ds=\int_0^2s\,ds=2\); the Ito isometry gives the squared error as \(\sum_i\int_{t_{i-1}}^{t_i}(s-t_{i-1})\,ds=\tfrac12\sum_i h_i^2\), which tends to zero. Taking the limit in the identity gives \(B_2^2=2\int_0^2B_s\,dB_s+2\).

Check: the Ito integral here has mean zero: its defining left-endpoint sums have mean zero because \(B_{t_{i-1}}\) is measurable at the left endpoint and the next Brownian increment is independent of that past and has mean zero; convergence in \(L^2\) preserves the mean. Also \(\mathbb{E}[B_2^2]=2\), so the mean of the right side is \(2\cdot0+2=2\), as required.

Worked Example: The Cosine Function

Take \(f(x)=\cos x\). Then \(f'(x)=-\sin x\) and \(f''(x)=-\cos x\), with bounded second derivative. The weighted quadratic-variation result shows that the sum of the second-order Taylor terms converges to \(-\tfrac12\int_0^T\cos(B_t)\,dt\).

For \(T=2\), compute the expectation of this correction. Since \(B_t\sim N(0,t)\), the characteristic function of a centered normal variable gives \(\mathbb{E}[\cos(B_t)]=e^{-t/2}\). The correction is bounded in absolute value by \(T/2=1\), so expectation can be taken under the time integral. Therefore $$ \mathbb{E}\left[-\frac12\int_0^2\cos(B_t)\,dt\right] =-\frac12\int_0^2e^{-t/2}\,dt =-\frac12\left[-2e^{-t/2}\right]_0^2 =-(1-e^{-1}). $$ The same value is obtained as the limit of the expectations of the partition sums: for a left endpoint \(t_{i-1}\), independence gives \(\mathbb{E}[\cos(B_{t_{i-1}})(\Delta B_i)^2]=h_i\mathbb{E}[\cos(B_{t_{i-1}})]=h_ie^{-t_{i-1}/2}\). Multiplying by \(-\tfrac12\) and summing gives Riemann sums for the displayed integral.

Worked Example: Why a Smooth Path Has No Such Accumulation

Let \(x(t)=t\) on \([0,1]\), partitioned into \(n\) equal intervals, and use \(f(x)=x^2\). Each increment of the path is \(\Delta x_i=1/n\). The sum of the second-order terms is $$ \sum_{i=1}^n\frac12 f''(x(t_{i-1}))(\Delta x_i)^2 =\sum_{i=1}^n\frac12\cdot2\cdot\frac1{n^2} =\frac1n\longrightarrow0. $$ The exact endpoint difference is \(f(x(1))-f(x(0))=1-0=1\); the first-order Taylor terms sum to \(\sum_i2(i-1)n^{-1}\cdot n^{-1}=(n-1)/n\), and adding the second-order sum \(1/n\) gives \(1\) for every \(n\). Thus the second-order contribution disappears in the smooth limit, unlike the Brownian case.

Check: at \(n=2\), the two first-order terms are \(0\) and \(1/2\); the two second-order terms are \(1/4\) and \(1/4\). Their total is \(0+\tfrac12+\tfrac14+\tfrac14=1\), matching the endpoint difference.

Common Pitfall: Replacing Every Square by Its Mean

A tempting but incorrect calculation is to replace every \((\Delta B_i)^2\) by \(h_i\) as though the two quantities were equal on each interval. For the two-interval partition of \([0,1]\), this would claim \((\Delta B_1)^2=(\Delta B_2)^2=\tfrac12\) on every outcome. In fact, each square has mean \(\tfrac12\) and variance \(2(\tfrac12)^2=\tfrac12\), so it is not a constant. What is true is that the sum of squared increments converges to elapsed time in \(L^2\) as the mesh tends to zero.

Likewise, applying the ordinary chain rule to \(B_t^2\) and writing \(B_2^2=2\int_0^2B_s\,dB_s\) omits the accumulated second-order term. The exact partition identity above shows what is missing: \(Q_\Pi\), whose limit on \([0,2]\) is \(2\). In differential shorthand, this mechanism is recorded as \(dB_t\,dB_t=dt\), while \(dB_t\,dt=0\) and \(dt\,dt=0\). These rules summarize limits of increment products; they do not assert that an individual random squared increment equals its time increment.

Check Your Understanding

Use the squared-increment and weighted-sum arguments to answer the following.

  1. For a deterministic partition of \([0,3]\), give the mean and variance of \(Q_\Pi\) in terms of its interval lengths, and state a bound that tends to zero with the mesh.
  2. Why does the weighted-sum proof require Brownian increments to be independent of \(\mathcal{F}_{t_{i-1}}\), not merely independent of earlier Brownian increments?
  3. For \(f(x)=\sin x\), write \(f'\), \(f''\), and the limiting second-order Taylor contribution on \([0,T]\).
  4. For \(f(x)=x^2\), identify the finite-partition sum that converges to the correction and its limit on \([0,T]\).
  5. In the smooth-path example \(x(t)=t\) with \(f(x)=x^2\), what is the second-order sum for \(n\) equal intervals, and why does its limit differ from the Brownian case?