The Energy Behind the Quadratic Variation
Work on a filtered probability space \((\Omega,\mathcal{F},(\mathcal{F}_t)_{t\ge0},\mathbb{P})\) carrying a Brownian motion \(B_t\). On a fixed interval \([0,T]\), an Ito integrand in \(\mathcal{L}^2\) is a progressively measurable process \(H_t\) satisfying \(\mathbb{E}\int_0^T H_s^2\,ds<\infty\). Its Ito integral is \(M_t=\int_0^t H_s\,dB_s\). A locally square-integrable integrand need only satisfy \(\int_0^T H_s^2\,ds<\infty\) almost surely for every finite \(T\); its integral is defined by stopping when accumulated energy reaches finite levels.
For a partition \(\Pi=\{0=t_0<\cdots<t_m=t\}\), the quadratic variation sum of \(M\) is \(\sum_{i=1}^m(M_{t_i}-M_{t_{i-1}})^2\). Quadratic variation \([M]_t\) is the limit in probability of these sums as the mesh tends to zero. The formula below identifies that limit. Its right side, \(\int_0^t H_s^2\,ds\), is the accumulated energy of the integrand.
The proof has two stages. First establish the limit for an \(\mathcal{L}^2\) integrand, using bounded-integrand estimates and approximation. Then stop a locally square-integrable integrand at finite energy levels and remove the stopping. In the proof, \(dB_t\,dB_t=dt\), \(dB_t\,dt=0\), and \(dt\,dt=0\) are the Ito multiplication rules; they encode quadratic variation, not the ordinary chain rule.
The Square-Integrable Case
Begin with a progressively measurable \(H\in\mathcal{L}^2\) on \([0,T]\) that also satisfies \(|H_s|\le C\) almost surely for a fixed finite \(C\). For a partition of \([0,t]\), set \(\Delta_i M=M_{t_i}-M_{t_{i-1}}\) and \(A_i=\int_{t_{i-1}}^{t_i}H_s^2\,ds\). The Ito isometry gives \(\mathbb{E}[(\Delta_i M)^2]=\mathbb{E}[A_i]\), and its conditional version gives \(\mathbb{E}[(\Delta_i M)^2-A_i\mid\mathcal{F}_{t_{i-1}}]=0\). Thus the errors for successive intervals have conditional mean zero.
We need a fourth-moment bound for each increment. On an interval \([a,b]\), let \(N_u=\int_a^uH_s\,dB_s\), where \(a\le u\le b\). Ito's formula for \(f(x)=x^4\) has \(f'(x)=4x^3\), \(f''(x)=12x^2\), and correction \(\tfrac12 f''(x)H_s^2\,ds=6N_s^2H_s^2\,ds\). Stop \(N\) when \(|N|\) reaches \(k\). The stopped stochastic integral in this formula is square-integrable and has expectation zero. The Ito isometry gives \(\mathbb{E}[N_{s\wedge\rho_k}^2]\le C^2(s-a)\). Consequently, after taking expectations in the stopped formula and then using Fatou's lemma as \(k\to\infty\),
Also \(0\le A_i\le C^2(t_i-t_{i-1})\). Put \(D_i=(\Delta_iM)^2-A_i\). The conditional-mean identity makes the \(D_i\) orthogonal in \(L^2\): for \(i<j\), \(D_i\) is \(\mathcal{F}_{t_{j-1}}\)-measurable, so \(\mathbb{E}[D_iD_j]=\mathbb{E}[D_i\mathbb{E}(D_j\mid\mathcal{F}_{t_{j-1}})]=0\). Moreover, the fourth-moment bound and \((x-y)^2\le2x^2+2y^2\) give \(\mathbb{E}[D_i^2]\le8C^4(t_i-t_{i-1})^2\). Therefore
This tends to zero with the mesh. In particular the quadratic variation sums converge in \(L^2\) for bounded \(H\).
For a general \(H\in\mathcal{L}^2\), define \(H^{(n)}=H\mathbf{1}_{\{|H|\le n\}}\), with integrals \(M^{(n)}\). Then \(\mathbb{E}\int_0^T(H-H^{(n)})^2\,ds\to0\) by dominated convergence. For any partition, write \(Q(M)=\sum_i(\Delta_iM)^2\). The pathwise Cauchy–Schwarz inequality and the Ito isometry imply
Here \(\mathbb{E}Q(M-M^{(n)})=\mathbb{E}\int_0^T(H-H^{(n)})^2\,ds\), while \(\mathbb{E}Q(M^{(n)})=\mathbb{E}\int_0^T(H^{(n)})^2\,ds\le\mathbb{E}\int_0^TH^2\,ds\). These bounds do not depend on the partition, and the displayed expression tends to zero as \(n\to\infty\). The target energies also converge in \(L^1\), since \(\mathbb{E}\int_0^T|H^2-(H^{(n)})^2|\,ds\to0\). Approximate first by \(H^{(n)}\), apply the bounded case, and then let \(n\to\infty\). This proves convergence in probability for every \(H\in\mathcal{L}^2\).
Localization Extends the Formula
Now suppose only that \(H\) is progressively measurable and has finite energy almost surely on every finite time interval. Define \(A_t=\int_0^tH_s^2\,ds\) and the stopping time \(\tau_n=\inf\{t\ge0:A_t\ge n\}\), for positive integers \(n\). The stopped integrand \(H_s\mathbf{1}_{\{s\le\tau_n\}}\) has energy at most \(n\) on every finite interval, so it belongs to \(\mathcal{L}^2\) there.
Proof. Fix \(T<\infty\) and \(t\in[0,T]\). Apply the square-integrable result to the stopped integrand. On the event \(\{A_T<n\}\), the stopping time exceeds \(T\), so its integral and energy agree with \(M\) and \(A\) throughout \([0,T]\). For any \(\varepsilon>0\), the probability that the original quadratic variation sum at \(t\) differs from \(A_t\) by more than \(\varepsilon\) is therefore at most \(\mathbb{P}(A_T\ge n)\) plus the corresponding error probability for the stopped integral. For fixed \(n\), the latter tends to zero as the partition mesh tends to zero. Then \(\mathbb{P}(A_T\ge n)\to0\) as \(n\to\infty\), because \(A_T<\infty\) almost surely. This proves the asserted convergence in probability. At each fixed time the limit is unique up to almost-sure equality; applying this at rational times and using the continuous versions of quadratic variation and \(A\) gives indistinguishable equality of the processes. \(\square\)
The argument is about quadratic variation, not an expectation identity for an unstopped local martingale. For \(H\in\mathcal{L}^2\), the Ito isometry gives \(\mathbb{E}[M_t^2]=\mathbb{E}\int_0^tH_s^2\,ds\); it also gives square integrability, and the conditional mean-zero property of future Ito increments verifies that \(M\) is a martingale. For a merely locally square-integrable \(H\), these expectations may be infinite, so the integral is guaranteed to be a local martingale, not necessarily a true martingale.
Worked Applications
Worked Example: A Deterministic Step Integrand
Let \(H_s=3\) for \(0\le s\le2\), and \(H_s=-2\) for \(2<s\le5\). Find the quadratic variation at every time through \(T=5\).
The energy is the integral of the squared coefficient on each interval. For \(0\le t\le2\), \(A_t=3^2t=9t\). For \(2<t\le5\), the first interval contributes \(3^2\cdot2=18\), and the second contributes \((-2)^2(t-2)=4(t-2)\). Thus \(A_t=18+4(t-2)=4t+10\) on the second interval. The theorem gives \([M]_t=A_t\).
Check: at \(t=2\), both expressions give \(9\cdot2=18\). At \(t=5\), the accumulated energy is \(9\cdot2+4\cdot3=18+12=30\); the second formula gives \(4\cdot5+10=30\) as well.
Worked Example: A Time-Varying Deterministic Integrand
Take \(H_s=s\) on \([0,2]\). The quadratic variation is
For an independent check of the energy at \(t=2\), \([M]_2=2^3/3=8/3\). The Ito isometry applies because \(\mathbb{E}\int_0^2s^2\,ds=8/3<\infty\), and gives \(\mathbb{E}[M_2^2]=8/3\), matching the computed energy. Integration by parts also gives \(M_t=tB_t-\int_0^tB_s\,ds\), since \(t\) has finite variation and hence zero quadratic covariation with \(B\).
Worked Example: An Integrand Chosen Using the Past
On \([0,4]\), let \(H_s=\mathbf{1}_{\{B_1>0\}}\mathbf{1}_{(1,3]}(s)\). This process is progressively measurable: after time \(1\), the random factor is already known. The event \(\{B_1>0\}\) has probability \(1/2\), since \(B_1\) has a continuous centered normal distribution. Its energy is
The expected terminal energy is \(2\cdot\tfrac12=1\), so the integrand is in \(\mathcal{L}^2\). Check: at \(t=4\), the pathwise energy is \(2\) on \(\{B_1>0\}\) and \(0\) otherwise; averaging these two values with probabilities \(1/2\) and \(1/2\) gives \(1\), as calculated.
Interpretation and a Common Mistake
The formula says that the diffusion amplitude \(H_s\) contributes its square to quadratic variation at time \(s\). It is the stochastic-integral counterpart of \(dB_t\,dB_t=dt\): formally, \(dM_t=H_t\,dB_t\) yields \(dM_t\,dM_t=H_t^2\,dt\). The assertion is rigorous as a limit of squared increments. It does not say that each individual squared increment equals the corresponding energy increment.
Common mistake: for a local integrand, one might write \(\mathbb{E}[M_t^2]=\mathbb{E}\int_0^tH_s^2\,ds\) without checking finiteness, then use the Ito isometry globally. That equality is justified for \(\mathcal{L}^2\) integrands, not automatically for locally square-integrable ones. The localization proof instead applies the isometry to each stopped integral, whose energy is bounded, and then removes the stopping in probability. Quadratic variation remains \(\int_0^tH_s^2\,ds\) even when that random variable has infinite expectation.
Check Your Understanding
Use the theorem and its hypotheses to answer the following.
- If \(H_s=-4\) on \([0,1]\), what is \([M]_t\) for \(0\le t\le1\), and why is the sign irrelevant?
- For \(H_s=s\) on \([0,3]\), compute the accumulated energy at \(t=3\) and state whether \(H\in\mathcal{L}^2\).
- Why does finite energy almost surely not by itself imply that the integral is a true martingale?
- In the random-indicator example, which information makes the integrand adapted after time \(1\)?
- What convergence of partition sums is used to define quadratic variation in the theorem?