When the Amplitude Is Random but Fixed in Time
A deterministic Wiener integral \(\int_0^T f(t)\,dB_t\) is built from Brownian increments with deterministic weights. If the weights are all multiplied by a random variable known at time zero, the resulting integral has a useful factorization. The random variable does not change over time, but it can change the integral’s distribution and its second moment.
Work on a filtered probability space \((\Omega,\mathcal{F},(\mathcal{F}_t)_{t\ge0},\mathbb{P})\) carrying a Brownian motion \(B_t\) relative to this filtration. In particular, Brownian increments after time \(s\) are independent of \(\mathcal{F}_s\). Fix \(T>0\), let \(Z\) be a real-valued, square-integrable, \(\mathcal{F}_0\)-measurable random variable, and let \(f:[0,T]\to\mathbb{R}\) be deterministic and measurable with \(\int_0^T f(t)^2\,dt<\infty\). All stochastic integrals below are Itô integrals. Their integrands belong to \(\mathcal{L}^2\): they are progressively measurable and have finite expected integrated square.
The integral’s factorization is not an appeal to an ordinary chain rule or to a Stratonovich convention. It follows from the construction of the Itô integral and the independence between \(\mathcal{F}_0\) and Brownian increments. The same independence is what allows the second moment to separate into a factor involving \(Z\) and a factor involving \(f\).
Factorization, Moments, and Approximation
Proof. Choose deterministic step functions \(f_n\) converging to \(f\) in \(L^2([0,T])\), and put \(J_n=\int_0^T f_n(t)\,dB_t\) and \(J=\int_0^T f(t)\,dB_t\). Each \(J_n\) is a finite sum of deterministic multiples of Brownian increments. The Brownian increments are independent of \(\mathcal{F}_0\), so \(J_n\) is independent of \(\mathcal{F}_0\). The Itô isometry gives \(\mathbb{E}[(J_n-J)^2]=\int_0^T(f_n-f)^2\,dt\to0\). Thus \(J\) is measurable with respect to the completed sigma-field generated by Brownian motion on \([0,T]\), which is independent of \(\mathcal{F}_0\); in particular, \(J_n-J\) is independent of \(Z\). By the definition of the integral for step integrands, \(\int_0^T Zf_n(t)\,dB_t=ZJ_n\). Also, $$ \mathbb{E}\big[(ZJ_n-ZJ)^2\big] =\mathbb{E}[Z^2]\mathbb{E}[(J_n-J)^2] =\mathbb{E}[Z^2]\int_0^T(f_n-f)^2\,dt\longrightarrow0. $$ The Itô isometry applied to \(Z(f_n-f)\) shows that the left-hand sequence of integrals converges in \(L^2(\mathbb{P})\) to \(\int_0^T Zf(t)\,dB_t\). Uniqueness of an \(L^2\) limit proves the factorization. For the moment identities, \(J\) is centered and independent of \(Z\), and the Itô isometry gives \(\mathbb{E}[J^2]=\int_0^T f^2\,dt\). Therefore \(\mathbb{E}[ZJ]=\mathbb{E}[Z]\mathbb{E}[J]=0\) and \(\mathbb{E}[(ZJ)^2]=\mathbb{E}[Z^2]\mathbb{E}[J^2]\). Independence also gives \(\mathbb{E}[J^2\mid\mathcal{F}_0]=\mathbb{E}[J^2]\), so \(\mathbb{E}[Z^2J^2\mid\mathcal{F}_0]=Z^2\mathbb{E}[J^2]\). Finally, apply the same factorization to \(f-g\): the difference of the two integrals is \(Z\int_0^T(f-g)\,dB_t\). Its second moment, by independence and the Itô isometry, is \(\mathbb{E}[Z^2]\int_0^T(f-g)^2\,dt\). All expressions remain valid in degenerate cases: if \(f=0\) almost everywhere or \(\mathbb{E}[Z^2]=0\), the integral and the stated second moments are zero. \(\square\)
The approximation formula gives more than convergence: it is the exact squared \(L^2\) error, not just an upper bound. If \(g_n\) approaches \(f\) in deterministic \(L^2([0,T])\), then the random-amplitude integral of \(g_n\) approaches \(I\) in \(L^2(\mathbb{P})\). The error is scaled by \(\mathbb{E}[Z^2]\), not by \((\mathbb{E}[Z])^2\).
The Integral Process Is a Martingale
For \(0\le t\le T\), define \(M_t=\int_0^t Zf(u)\,dB_u\), using the same \(\mathcal{L}^2\) assumptions on each interval \([0,t]\). This is a true martingale, not merely a local martingale. Indeed, the Itô isometry gives \(\mathbb{E}[M_t^2]=\mathbb{E}[Z^2]\int_0^t f(u)^2\,du<\infty\), so \(M_t\) is integrable. For \(0\le s\le t\), the increment has the factorization \(M_t-M_s=Z\int_s^t f(u)\,dB_u\). The latter deterministic Wiener integral is independent of \(\mathcal{F}_s\), is centered, and is square-integrable. Since \(Z\) is \(\mathcal{F}_s\)-measurable, it follows that \(\mathbb{E}[M_t-M_s\mid\mathcal{F}_s]=0\), hence \(\mathbb{E}[M_t\mid\mathcal{F}_s]=M_s\).
Worked Example: A Two-Level Amplitude
Let \(T=1\), let \(\mathbb{P}(Z=1)=\mathbb{P}(Z=3)=\tfrac12\), and set \(f(t)=1\) for \(0\le t<\tfrac12\) and \(f(t)=2\) for \(\tfrac12\le t\le1\). Compute the integral and its second moment.
First compute the amplitude’s second moment: \(\mathbb{E}[Z^2]=\tfrac12(1^2)+\tfrac12(3^2)=\tfrac12+\tfrac92=5\). The deterministic Wiener integral is a weighted sum of two Brownian increments: $$ J=\int_0^1 f(t)\,dB_t =(B_{1/2}-B_0)+2(B_1-B_{1/2}). $$ The factorization gives \(I=ZJ\). Since the increments are independent and centered, and their variances are both \(\tfrac12\), $$ \mathbb{E}[J^2]=\tfrac12+2^2\cdot\tfrac12=\tfrac12+2=\tfrac52. $$ Therefore \(\mathbb{E}[I]=0\), and \(\mathbb{E}[I^2]=5\cdot\tfrac52=\tfrac{25}{2}\).
Check: Directly expanding \(J^2\), the cross term has expectation zero because the increments are independent and centered. Thus \(\mathbb{E}[J^2]=\tfrac12+4\cdot\tfrac12=\tfrac52\), and multiplying by the independently distributed \(Z^2\) again gives \(\tfrac{25}{2}\).
Worked Example: Error from a Left-Endpoint Approximation
Let \(T=1\), let \(Z\) have values \(1\) and \(3\), each with probability \(\tfrac12\), and let \(f(t)=t\). Approximate \(I=\int_0^1 Zt\,dB_t\) using four equal intervals and left endpoints, and compute the exact mean-square error.
Here \(g(t)=0,\tfrac14,\tfrac12,\tfrac34\) on the successive intervals \([0,\tfrac14),[\tfrac14,\tfrac12),[\tfrac12,\tfrac34),[\tfrac34,1]\). Thus $$ I_g=Z\left(0\cdot(B_{1/4}-B_0)+\tfrac14(B_{1/2}-B_{1/4}) +\tfrac12(B_{3/4}-B_{1/2})+\tfrac34(B_1-B_{3/4})\right). $$ On each interval, write \(t=a+u\), where \(a\) is its left endpoint and \(0\le u\le\tfrac14\). Then \(f(t)-g(t)=u\), and the error integral on that interval is \(\int_0^{1/4}u^2\,du=(\tfrac14)^3/3=\tfrac1{192}\). There are four intervals, so \(\int_0^1(f-g)^2\,dt=4\cdot\tfrac1{192}=\tfrac1{48}\). As \(\mathbb{E}[Z^2]=\tfrac12(1)+\tfrac12(9)=5\), the theorem gives $$ \mathbb{E}[(I-I_g)^2]=5\cdot\tfrac1{48}=\tfrac5{48}. $$ For \(n\) equal intervals, the same calculation gives \(\mathbb{E}[(I-I_g)^2]=5/(3n^2)\), which tends to zero.
Check: For one interval, the left-endpoint approximation is zero. Its error is \(I\), whose second moment is \(\mathbb{E}[Z^2]\int_0^1t^2\,dt=5\cdot\tfrac13=\tfrac53\). The formula for \(n=1\) gives \(5/(3\cdot1^2)=\tfrac53\), as required.
Random Amplitudes Need Not Preserve Gaussianity
A deterministic Wiener integral with a square-integrable deterministic integrand is Gaussian. Multiplication by an independent random amplitude generally produces a mixture of Gaussian distributions rather than a Gaussian distribution. The factorization theorem still gives the second moment exactly, but that moment alone does not determine the distribution.
Worked Example: A Non-Gaussian Random-Amplitude Integral
Let \(T=1\), \(f(t)=1\), and let \(Z=1\) or \(Z=2\), each with probability \(\tfrac12\). Then \(I=ZB_1\), with \(Z\) independent of \(B_1\). Compute the second and fourth moments and test whether \(I\) is Gaussian.
Since \(\mathbb{E}[Z^2]=\tfrac12(1)+\tfrac12(4)=\tfrac52\) and \(\mathbb{E}[B_1^2]=1\), we have \(\mathbb{E}[I^2]=\tfrac52\). Also, \(\mathbb{E}[Z^4]=\tfrac12(1)+\tfrac12(16)=\tfrac{17}{2}\), while a standard normal variable has fourth moment \(3\). Independence gives $$ \mathbb{E}[I^4]=\mathbb{E}[Z^4]\mathbb{E}[B_1^4] =\tfrac{17}{2}\cdot3=\tfrac{51}{2}. $$ A centered Gaussian variable with variance \(\tfrac52\) would have fourth moment \(3(\tfrac52)^2=\tfrac{75}{4}\), which differs from \(\tfrac{51}{2}=\tfrac{102}{4}\). Therefore \(I\) is not Gaussian.
Check: Conditional on \(Z=1\), \(I\) has variance \(1\); conditional on \(Z=2\), it has variance \(4\). The unconditional variance is their probability-weighted average, \(\tfrac12(1)+\tfrac12(4)=\tfrac52\), matching the second-moment calculation.
Common Pitfall: Using the Mean of the Amplitude
A frequent error is to replace \(\mathbb{E}[Z^2]\) in the second-moment formula by \((\mathbb{E}[Z])^2\). Those quantities need not agree. For the amplitude taking values \(1\) and \(3\) with equal probabilities, \(\mathbb{E}[Z]=2\), so the incorrect multiplier would be \(4\); the correct multiplier is \(\mathbb{E}[Z^2]=5\). In the first worked example, this mistake would give the incorrect second moment \(4\cdot\tfrac52=10\), rather than \(\tfrac{25}{2}\). The correct computation squares the random amplitude first and then takes expectation.
The initial measurability assumption matters as well. The factorization argument uses that \(Z\) is known at time zero and independent of the Brownian path’s increments. It does not license pulling an arbitrary time-dependent random process outside an Itô integral. Here the integrand is specifically \(Zf(t)\), with \(Z\in\mathcal{F}_0\) and deterministic \(f\).
Check Your Understanding
Use the factorization theorem and the Itô isometry to answer the following.
- If \(\mathbb{E}[Z^2]=4\) and \(\int_0^T f(t)^2\,dt=\tfrac32\), what are the mean and second moment of \(\int_0^T Zf(t)\,dB_t\)?
- For \(f(t)=t\) on \([0,1]\) and left-endpoint approximations on \(n\) equal intervals, derive the deterministic squared approximation error.
- Why is \(Z\) independent of \(\int_0^T f(t)\,dB_t\) under the stated assumptions?
- Give an example of a nonzero \(Z\) with \(\mathbb{E}[Z^2]=0\), or explain why none exists. What does the integral become in that degenerate case?
- For \(Z=1\) or \(2\), each with probability \(\tfrac12\), and \(f(t)=1\) on \([0,1]\), compare the fourth moment of the integral with the fourth moment of a Gaussian having the same variance.