Why the Gaussian Location Form Matters
A normal model with a fixed variance and an unknown mean is a basic continuous-response model. Its density is familiar, but writing it in exponential-family form makes explicit how the unknown parameter enters: through a single coefficient multiplying the observed response. The distinction between that coefficient, the normalizing term, and the parameter-free carrier is important; the same algebra also shows exactly which quantities must be held fixed for this to be a one-parameter representation.
Throughout, let \(Y\) be a real-valued response with distribution \(N(\mu,\sigma^2)\), where \(\sigma^2>0\) is known and fixed while \(\mu\in\mathbb{R}\) is unknown. Densities are with respect to Lebesgue measure on \(\mathbb{R}\). The support does not depend on \(\mu\).
Deriving the Canonical Representation
The normal density is \(f(y;\mu)=(2\pi\sigma^2)^{-1/2}\exp\{-(y-\mu)^2/(2\sigma^2)\}\). Expand the square in its exponent:
The term involving both the unknown mean and the observation is \((\mu/\sigma^2)y\). This identifies the natural parameter as \(\eta=\mu/\sigma^2\), with \(T(y)=y\). Substituting \(\mu=\sigma^2\eta\) in the parameter-only term gives \(\mu^2/(2\sigma^2)=\sigma^2\eta^2/2\). Thus the full density is
The carrier includes both the normal constant and the part of the exponent involving \(y^2\). It does not contain \(\mu\) or \(\eta\). The log-partition function contains the parameter-only term needed to normalize the density. The variance appears in both the carrier and the log-partition function, but it is a fixed known constant in this representation.
Worked Example: Variance Four and Mean Three
Suppose \(Y\sim N(3,4)\). Identify each canonical component and check the exponent for an observed value \(y=1\).
Here \(\sigma^2=4\) and \(\mu=3\), so \(\eta=\mu/\sigma^2=3/4\). The log-partition function at this natural parameter is \(A(3/4)=4(3/4)^2/2=9/8\). The carrier is \(h(y)=(8\pi)^{-1/2}\exp(-y^2/8)\).
At \(y=1\), the canonical exponent, including the carrier's exponential part, is \(-1/8+(3/4)(1)-9/8=-1/2\). The original normal exponent gives \(-(1-3)^2/(2\cdot4)=-4/8=-1/2\), as required. The common multiplicative factor is \((8\pi)^{-1/2}\) in both expressions.
Normalization and the Natural-Parameter Space
The algebraic expansion identifies a candidate \(A(\eta)\). A separate check confirms that it is exactly the log normalizer. For any \(\eta\in\mathbb{R}\), complete the square in the integral of the carrier multiplied by \(\exp(\eta y)\):
Proof. Using the completed square and the Gaussian integral \(\int_{\mathbb R}\exp\{-(y-a)^2/(2v)\}\,dy=\sqrt{2\pi v}\) for \(v>0\), we obtain
The integral is finite for every real \(\eta\), so every real value is permitted in the natural-parameter space. Taking its logarithm gives \(A(\eta)=\sigma^2\eta^2/2\). Dividing \(h(y)\exp(\eta y)\) by this integral gives a density integrating to one, exactly the displayed canonical form. \(\square\)
There is also a direct parameter correspondence. With \(\sigma^2\) fixed and positive, \(\eta=\mu/\sigma^2\) maps \(\mu\in\mathbb{R}\) to \(\eta\in\mathbb{R}\), and the inverse is \(\mu=\sigma^2\eta\). Thus no possible real mean is lost or represented by more than one natural parameter.
Worked Example: Variance Nine and a Negative Mean
Let \(Y\sim N(-6,9)\). Find the natural parameter and log-partition value, then check the density exponent at \(y=-3\).
The natural parameter is \(\eta=-6/9=-2/3\), and \(A(\eta)=9(-2/3)^2/2=2\). The carrier's exponent at \(y=-3\) is \(-(-3)^2/(2\cdot9)=-1/2\). The full canonical exponent is therefore \(-1/2+(-2/3)(-3)-2=-1/2+2-2=-1/2\).
In the original normal form, the exponent is \(-(-3-(-6))^2/(2\cdot9)=-3^2/18=-1/2\). The two calculations agree. This check also illustrates that a negative mean simply produces a negative natural parameter; the natural-parameter space is not restricted to positive values.
Using the Form for Independent Observations
The same factorization applies observation by observation. If \(Y_1,\ldots,Y_n\) are independent and each has distribution \(N(\mu,\sigma^2)\) with common known variance, multiplying their densities yields a likelihood whose data-dependent parameter term uses the sum of the observations. This is a direct consequence of independence and the one-observation representation; it does not require a new density formula.
Worked Example: A Three-Observation Likelihood
Suppose \(Y_1,Y_2,Y_3\) are independent \(N(1,4)\) observations, and the observed values are \(1,2,4\). Write the likelihood in canonical form and verify its parameter-dependent exponent.
For each observation, \(\eta=\mu/\sigma^2=1/4\) and \(A(\eta)=4(1/4)^2/2=1/8\). Independence gives
The observed sum is \(1+2+4=7\), so the parameter-dependent exponent at \(\eta=1/4\) is \((1/4)(7)-3(1/8)=7/4-3/8=11/8\). For a direct check, the original likelihood exponent is \(-[(1-1)^2+(2-1)^2+(4-1)^2]/8=-(0+1+9)/8=-10/8\). The canonical exponent including the carriers is \(-[1^2+2^2+4^2]/8+11/8=-21/8+11/8=-10/8\). The two expressions match.
What Must Stay Fixed
The phrase known variance is part of the model, not an incidental detail. The representation above uses \(\sigma^2\) as a fixed constant when identifying both the natural parameter and the carrier. If the variance is allowed to vary as an unknown parameter, the term involving \(y^2\) is no longer parameter-free. That is not the one-parameter family derived here.
A related point is that the natural parameter is not the mean itself: it is \(\mu/\sigma^2\). For a particular fixed variance, the two parameters are in one-to-one correspondence, but their numerical values differ unless the variance happens to equal one. Keeping the distinction clear prevents errors when comparing normal models with different fixed variances.
Common Mistakes
- Using \(\mu\) as the natural parameter. Expanding the exponent gives the coefficient \(\mu/\sigma^2\) on \(y\), so the canonical parameter is \(\eta=\mu/\sigma^2\).
- Putting the \(y^2\) term in the log-partition function. The log-partition function can depend on the parameter, not on the observed value. The term \(-y^2/(2\sigma^2)\) belongs in the carrier.
- Dropping the normalizing term. The term \(A(\eta)=\sigma^2\eta^2/2\) is required so the density integrates to one; it cannot be omitted just because it does not involve \(y\).
- Treating the carrier as parameter-dependent. This representation assumes \(\sigma^2\) is fixed. With that assumption, the displayed carrier does not depend on \(\mu\) or \(\eta\).
- Restricting the natural parameter to positive values. Since \(\eta=\mu/\sigma^2\), and \(\mu\) can be any real number while \(\sigma^2>0\), the natural-parameter space is all real numbers.
Check Your Understanding
Use the fixed-variance normal density and the canonical form to answer the following.
- For \(Y\sim N(5,4)\), find the natural parameter and log-partition value.
- Which part of the canonical representation contains the term involving \(y^2\), and why?
- What is the natural-parameter space when the variance is fixed and positive? Explain briefly.
- For \(Y\sim N(-2,1)\), write the natural parameter and log-partition function value.
- Why can the carrier in this tutorial be called parameter-free even though it contains the variance?