From Mean-Square Control to Almost-Sure Convergence
For Brownian motion, the sum of squared increments over a fine partition has mean equal to the length of the time interval. A mean-square error bound shows that these sums become close to that value in \(L^2\). Almost-sure convergence is stronger: it says that, with probability one, the sums converge along the specified sequence of partitions. The dyadic grids provide a particularly direct route from the error bound to this pathwise conclusion, because the variances decrease fast enough to be summable.
Work on a probability space \((\Omega,\mathcal{F},\mathbb{P})\), and let \((B_t)_{t\ge0}\) be standard Brownian motion with continuous sample paths. Fix \(T>0\). For \(n\ge0\), divide \([0,T]\) into \(2^n\) equal intervals, each of length \(h_n=T2^{-n}\). For \(t\in[0,T]\), define the squared-increment sum, including the possibly incomplete final increment, by
If \(t\) is a grid point, the final term is zero. At \(t=T\), the sum contains all \(2^n\) full increments. We will first study the sum at fixed times, then use dyadic endpoints and continuity to obtain a simultaneous pathwise statement for all \(t\in[0,T]\).
The Variance Bound and a Summability Principle
Each increment on a grid of width \(h_n\) has distribution \(N(0,h_n)\), and the increments on that grid are independent. If \(Z\) has distribution \(N(0,h)\), then \(\mathbb{E}[Z^2]=h\) and \(\mathbb{E}[Z^4]=3h^2\), so \(\operatorname{Var}(Z^2)=3h^2-h^2=2h^2\). Adding the means and variances of the independent squared increments gives, for \(m\le 2^n\),
In particular, at the right endpoint \(T\), there are \(2^n\) increments. Thus the mean is \(2^n h_n=T\), and the variance is \(2\cdot 2^n h_n^2=2T^2 2^{-n}\). The key feature is not just that this variance tends to zero: its sum over \(n\) is finite.
Proof. For each \(m\), the event that at least one \(E_n\) occurs for \(n\ge m\) is contained in \(\bigcup_{n\ge m}E_n\). By countable subadditivity, its probability is at most \(\sum_{n\ge m}\mathbb{P}(E_n)\). These tail sums tend to zero as \(m\to\infty\). The event that infinitely many \(E_n\) occur is contained in \(\bigcup_{n\ge m}E_n\) for every \(m\), so its probability is zero. \(\square\)
Proof. First consider the completed-increment sum \(A_n(t)=\sum_{k=0}^{m_n(t)-1}(B_{(k+1)h_n}-B_{kh_n})^2\). For fixed \(t\), its number of increments is \(m_n(t)\), and its mean is \(m_n(t)h_n\). Its variance is \(2m_n(t)h_n^2\le 2Th_n=2T^2 2^{-n}\). Also \(0\le t-m_n(t)h_n<h_n\), so its mean tends to \(t\). For any \(\varepsilon>0\), once \(h_n<\varepsilon/2\), Chebyshev’s inequality gives \(\mathbb{P}(|A_n(t)-t|>\varepsilon)\le 8T^2\varepsilon^{-2}2^{-n}\). These bounds are summable. Applying the lemma for each threshold \(\varepsilon=1/j\), \(j\ge1\), and taking the countable intersection of the resulting probability-one events proves \(A_n(t)\to t\) almost surely. The remaining term in \(Q_n(t)\) is at most the square of the largest Brownian increment over a grid interval. By continuity of the path on the compact interval \([0,T]\), that largest increment tends to zero. Hence \(Q_n(t)-A_n(t)\to0\) almost surely, proving the claim. \(\square\)
Worked Variance Calculations
Worked Example: The Endpoint \(T=1\) at Grid Level \(n=2\)
Here \(h_2=1\cdot 2^{-2}=\tfrac14\), and there are \(2^2=4\) increments. Each squared increment has mean \(\tfrac14\) and variance \(2(\tfrac14)^2=\tfrac18\). Therefore \(\mathbb{E}[Q_2(1)]=4\cdot\tfrac14=1\) and \(\operatorname{Var}(Q_2(1))=4\cdot\tfrac18=\tfrac12\).
Check: The endpoint formula gives \(2T^2 2^{-n}=2\cdot1^2\cdot2^{-2}=\tfrac12\), agreeing with the sum of the four variances. This is a finite-level calculation; almost-sure convergence concerns the full sequence as \(n\to\infty\).
Worked Example: A Chebyshev Bound on \([0,2]\)
For \(T=2\), the variance at level \(n\) is \(2T^2 2^{-n}=8\cdot2^{-n}\). At \(n=8\), this is \(8/256=\tfrac1{32}\). Chebyshev’s inequality, centered at the mean \(2\), gives \(\mathbb{P}(|Q_8(2)-2|>\tfrac14)\le (\tfrac1{32})/(\tfrac14)^2=\tfrac12\). The bound is valid, though not especially sharp at this one level.
For a fixed positive threshold \(\varepsilon\), the general bound is \(\mathbb{P}(|Q_n(2)-2|>\varepsilon)\le 8\cdot2^{-n}/\varepsilon^2\). The sum over all \(n\ge0\) is \(16/\varepsilon^2\), which is finite. Thus the first Borel–Cantelli implication applies for every fixed \(\varepsilon\); using the thresholds \(1/j\) yields convergence to \(2\) almost surely.
Check: Substituting \(n=8\) and \(\varepsilon=\tfrac14\) into the general bound gives \(8\cdot2^{-8}\cdot16=128/256=\tfrac12\), the same value as the direct calculation.
Worked Example: A Dyadic Interior Time
Take \(T=1\) and \(t=\tfrac34\). For \(n\ge2\), the time \(t\) is a grid point and the number of increments up to it is \(\tfrac34\,2^n=3\cdot2^{n-2}\). At \(n=4\), this is \(3\cdot2^2=12\) increments, each of width \(2^{-4}=\tfrac1{16}\). The sum therefore has mean \(12\cdot\tfrac1{16}=\tfrac34\) and variance \(12\cdot2(\tfrac1{16})^2=12\cdot\tfrac1{128}=\tfrac3{32}\).
For general \(n\ge2\), the variance is \(2(3\cdot2^{n-2})(2^{-n})^2=3\cdot2^{-n-1}\). At \(n=4\), this gives \(3\cdot2^{-5}=\tfrac3{32}\), as computed directly. The variances are summable over \(n\), so the squared-increment sums at this fixed time converge almost surely to \(\tfrac34\).
One Probability-One Event for Every Time
Proof. First restrict attention to dyadic endpoints \(r=jT/2^q\), where \(q\ge0\) and \(0\le j\le2^q\). There are countably many such endpoints. At each fixed endpoint, the proposition gives \(A_n(r)\to r\) almost surely; for \(n\ge q\), \(r\) is a grid point, so \(Q_n(r)=A_n(r)\). Intersecting these countably many probability-one events gives one event of probability one on which convergence holds at every dyadic endpoint.
Fix a path in this event and let \(q\) be fixed. For \(n\ge q\), \(A_n(t)\) is nondecreasing in \(t\), since it is a sum of nonnegative completed squared increments. If \(r_j=jT/2^q\le t\le r_{j+1}=(j+1)T/2^q\), then \(A_n(r_j)\le A_n(t)\le A_n(r_{j+1})\). Since also \(r_j\le t\le r_{j+1}\), it follows that \[ |A_n(t)-t| \le \max_{0\le i\le2^q}|A_n(r_i)-r_i|+\frac{T}{2^q}. \] For fixed \(q\), the maximum on the right tends to zero as \(n\to\infty\), because it is over finitely many endpoints. The remaining bound \(T/2^q\) can be made arbitrarily small by choosing \(q\) large. Therefore \(\sup_{t\in[0,T]}|A_n(t)-t|\to0\).
Finally, \(Q_n(t)-A_n(t)\) is the squared increment from the left endpoint of the grid interval containing \(t\) to \(t\). Its supremum over \(t\) is bounded by the square of the largest oscillation of the continuous path over any interval of length at most \(h_n\). Uniform continuity on \([0,T]\) makes this bound tend to zero. Thus \(\sup_{t\in[0,T]}|Q_n(t)-t|\to0\) on the same probability-one event. \(\square\)
Why the Details Matter
The conclusion is about this particular sequence of dyadic partitions. The variance estimate alone gives a probability bound at each level; summability is what lets the first Borel–Cantelli implication control the sequence almost surely. The extension from countably many grid points to all times uses both monotonicity of the completed sums and continuity of Brownian paths. The incomplete final increment is not itself monotone as a function of time, so it must be controlled separately.
Common mistake: omitting the factor of two in the variance. A tempting but incorrect calculation is \(\operatorname{Var}(Z^2)=h^2\) for \(Z\sim N(0,h)\). For \(T=1\), \(n=2\), this would give a total variance of \(4(\tfrac14)^2=\tfrac14\). The correct fourth moment is \(\mathbb{E}[Z^4]=3h^2\), so \(\operatorname{Var}(Z^2)=3h^2-(\mathbb{E}[Z^2])^2=3h^2-h^2=2h^2\). The correct total variance is therefore \(4\cdot2(\tfrac14)^2=\tfrac12\), also obtained from \(2T^2 2^{-n}=2\cdot1^2\cdot2^{-2}=\tfrac12\).
Check Your Understanding
Use the variance computation and the proof strategy to answer the following.
- For a grid of \(2^n\) intervals on \([0,T]\), compute the mean and variance of the sum of squared increments.
- Why does summability of the Chebyshev bounds imply that a fixed positive error threshold is exceeded only finitely often, almost surely?
- For \(T=1\), \(t=\tfrac12\), and \(n=3\), how many full increments enter \(A_n(t)\), and what are its mean and variance?
- In the all-times argument, why are the completed-increment sums \(A_n(t)\) nondecreasing even though the partial-increment term need not be?
- Which property of Brownian paths ensures that the largest incomplete increment tends to zero uniformly on \([0,T]\)?