Tutorials › Stochastic Processes › Probability Laws of Compound Poisson Sums

Compound, Nonhomogeneous and Spatial Poisson Processes · Tutorial 437 of 994

Probability Laws of Compound Poisson Sums

Condition on the Poisson count to find the full law and transform formulas for compound Poisson sums, including exact Bernoulli and exponential-mark examples.

Advanced 10 min read

What You'll Learn

  • Define a compound Poisson sum and its zero-count contribution.
  • Derive the convolution-mixture distribution by conditioning on the event count.
  • Obtain the probability generating function for nonnegative integer-valued marks.
  • Obtain the characteristic function for general real-valued marks.
  • Identify the compound Poisson law generated by Bernoulli marks.
  • Work out exact laws for exponential and deterministic marks.

Conditioning on the Event Count

A compound Poisson sum records the total contribution from a random number of events. Each event brings a random mark, such as a claim amount, batch size, or jump size. The count determines how many marks are added; conditioning on that count turns the random sum into an ordinary sum of a fixed number of independent marks. This gives the entire distribution, not just a summary such as its mean.

Work on a probability space \((\Omega,\mathcal{F},\mathbb{P})\). Let \((N_t)_{t\ge0}\) be a Poisson process of rate \(\lambda\ge0\), and let \((Y_k)_{k\ge1}\) be independent, identically distributed real-valued random variables with common probability law \(F\). Assume that the marks are independent of the Poisson process. For a fixed \(t\ge0\), define the compound Poisson sum \(S_t=\sum_{k=1}^{N_t}Y_k\), with an empty sum equal to zero. Write \(\theta=\lambda t\); then \(N_t\) has the Poisson distribution with parameter \(\theta\).

Definition: For probability laws \(F\) and \(G\) on the real line, their convolution \(F*G\) is the law of \(U+V\) when \(U\) and \(V\) are independent with laws \(F\) and \(G\). Write \(F^{*n}\) for the convolution of \(n\) copies of \(F\), and set \(F^{*0}=\delta_0\), the point mass at zero.

The convention \(F^{*0}=\delta_0\) matters: if no events occur, the sum is zero regardless of the mark distribution. Also, marks need not be positive for the convolution-mixture law or the characteristic function below to hold. Nonnegative integer-valued marks will be required for the probability generating function.

Theorem (Compound Poisson law and transforms): For every Borel set \(A\subseteq\mathbb{R}\), $$ \mathbb{P}(S_t\in A) =e^{-\theta}\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{\theta^n}{n!}F^{*n}(A). $$ In particular, the term \(n=0\) assigns mass \(e^{-\theta}\) to zero. For any real-valued marks, define \(\phi_Y(u)=\mathbb{E}[e^{iuY_1}]\) and \(\phi_{S_t}(u)=\mathbb{E}[e^{iuS_t}]\); then $$ \phi_{S_t}(u)=\exp\!\bigl(\theta(\phi_Y(u)-1)\bigr),\qquad u\in\mathbb{R}. $$ If the marks take values in the nonnegative integers, define \(G_Y(z)=\mathbb{E}[z^{Y_1}]\) and \(G_{S_t}(z)=\mathbb{E}[z^{S_t}]\). For \(|z|\le1\), $$ G_{S_t}(z)=\exp\!\bigl(\theta(G_Y(z)-1)\bigr). $$

Proof. Fix a Borel set \(A\). On the event \(N_t=n\), the sum \(S_t\) consists of the first \(n\) marks. Since the marks are independent and have common law \(F\), their sum has law \(F^{*n}\), including the case \(n=0\). Independence of the marks and \(N_t\) therefore gives \(\mathbb{P}(S_t\in A\mid N_t=n)=F^{*n}(A)\) whenever \(\mathbb{P}(N_t=n)>0\). If \(\theta=0\), then \(N_t=0\) almost surely and the claimed mixture reduces to \(F^{*0}\); otherwise every count \(n\ge0\) has positive probability. Summing the conditional probabilities with weights \(\mathbb{P}(N_t=n)=e^{-\theta}\theta^n/n!\) proves the mixture formula. For the characteristic function, condition on \(N_t=n\). Independence gives \(\mathbb{E}[e^{iuS_t}\mid N_t=n]=\phi_Y(u)^n\), so $$ \phi_{S_t}(u)=e^{-\theta}\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{\theta^n}{n!}\phi_Y(u)^n =e^{-\theta}e^{\theta\phi_Y(u)} =\exp\!\bigl(\theta(\phi_Y(u)-1)\bigr). $$ The series is valid because \(|\phi_Y(u)|\le1\), and the exponential series converges absolutely. For nonnegative integer-valued marks, the same conditioning gives \(\mathbb{E}[z^{S_t}\mid N_t=n]=G_Y(z)^n\). Since \(|G_Y(z)|\le1\) when \(|z|\le1\), summing the Poisson series gives \(G_{S_t}(z)=e^{-\theta}e^{\theta G_Y(z)}\), as claimed. \(\square\)

The characteristic function applies whether marks are continuous, discrete, or mixed, and whether they can be negative or zero. The probability generating function is more specialized: its exponents represent integer-valued sums, so it is appropriate only when marks are nonnegative integers. Both formulas retain the contribution from zero events through the subtraction of \(1\) in the exponent.

Bernoulli Marks and Poisson Counts

Proposition: Suppose each mark is Bernoulli with parameter \(p\), so it equals \(1\) with probability \(p\) and \(0\) with probability \(1-p\), where \(0\le p\le1\). Then \(S_t\) has a Poisson distribution with parameter \(\theta p\). If \(\theta p=0\), this means \(S_t=0\) almost surely.

Proof. If \(\theta=0\) or \(p=0\), there are almost surely no events or no nonzero marks, respectively, so the sum is zero. Otherwise, for each integer \(k\ge0\), condition on the count \(N_t=n\). A sum of \(n\) Bernoulli marks equals \(k\) with probability \(\binom{n}{k}p^k(1-p)^{n-k}\) for \(n\ge k\), and with probability zero for \(n<k\). Therefore $$ \begin{aligned} \mathbb{P}(S_t=k) &=e^{-\theta}\sum_{n=k}^{\infty}\frac{\theta^n}{n!}\binom{n}{k}p^k(1-p)^{n-k}\\ &=e^{-\theta}\frac{(\theta p)^k}{k!} \sum_{m=0}^{\infty}\frac{(\theta(1-p))^m}{m!}\\ &=e^{-\theta}\frac{(\theta p)^k}{k!}e^{\theta(1-p)} =e^{-\theta p}\frac{(\theta p)^k}{k!}. \end{aligned} $$ Here the second equality uses \(m=n-k\) and \(\binom{n}{k}/n!=1/(k!(n-k)!)\). The final expression is the Poisson probability mass function with parameter \(\theta p\), including \(p=1\) when the inner sum is \(1\). \(\square\)

This result says that zero-valued marks can be discarded without changing the type of count: the number of nonzero contributions is Poisson with parameter \(\theta p\). The next example computes the law directly from the mixture and checks that conclusion.

Worked Example: Bernoulli Marks with Exact Parameters

Take \(\lambda=2\), \(t=1\), and marks with \(\mathbb{P}(Y_k=1)=\tfrac13\) and \(\mathbb{P}(Y_k=0)=\tfrac23\). Thus \(\theta=\lambda t=2\). Find the probability that the sum equals \(k\), for any integer \(k\ge0\).

Given \(N_t=n\), exactly \(k\) marks must equal \(1\). The mixture calculation is

$$ \begin{aligned} \mathbb{P}(S_t=k) &=e^{-2}\sum_{n=k}^{\infty}\frac{2^n}{n!} \binom{n}{k}\left(\frac13\right)^k\left(\frac23\right)^{n-k}\\ &=e^{-2}\frac{(2/3)^k}{k!} \sum_{m=0}^{\infty}\frac{(4/3)^m}{m!}\\ &=e^{-2}e^{4/3}\frac{(2/3)^k}{k!} =e^{-2/3}\frac{(2/3)^k}{k!}. \end{aligned} $$

For the second line, set \(m=n-k\); the factor from \(2^n(2/3)^{n-k}\) becomes \(2^k(4/3)^m\), and \(2^k(1/3)^k=(2/3)^k\). Thus \(S_t\) is Poisson with parameter \(\theta p=2/3\). Check: summing the displayed probabilities over \(k\ge0\) gives \(e^{-2/3}\sum_{k\ge0}(2/3)^k/k!=e^{-2/3}e^{2/3}=1\), as required.

Exponential Marks: An Atom and a Density

When marks are positive and continuous, the mixture usually has both an atom at zero and a density away from zero. The atom comes from \(N_t=0\); conditional on at least one exponential mark, the sum has a gamma distribution. The mixture formula specifies the full law even when the resulting density is best left as a series.

Worked Example: Exponential Marks at a Fixed Time

Let \(\lambda=1\), \(t=1\), so \(\theta=1\), and let the marks be independent exponential random variables with rate \(\beta=2\). Find the atom at zero and the density of \(S_t\) for \(x>0\).

With zero marks, \(S_t=0\), so \(\mathbb{P}(S_t=0)=\mathbb{P}(N_t=0)=e^{-1}\). Given \(N_t=n\ge1\), the sum has density \(2^n x^{n-1}e^{-2x}/(n-1)!\) for \(x>0\). To verify this conditional formula, it holds for \(n=1\), the exponential density. If it holds for \(n\), convolution with one more exponential density gives $$ \int_0^x \frac{2^n u^{n-1}e^{-2u}}{(n-1)!}\,2e^{-2(x-u)}\,du =\frac{2^{n+1}e^{-2x}}{(n-1)!}\int_0^x u^{n-1}\,du =\frac{2^{n+1}x^n e^{-2x}}{n!}. $$ This is the asserted formula with \(n+1\) in place of \(n\).

Weight each conditional density by \(\mathbb{P}(N_t=n)=e^{-1}/n!\). The density away from zero is consequently $$ f_{S_t}(x)=e^{-1-2x}\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{2^n x^{n-1}}{n!(n-1)!},\qquad x>0. $$ The first three terms of the sum are \(2\), \(2x\), and \(\tfrac23x^2\): for \(n=1\) the coefficient is \(2/1!=2\); for \(n=2\) it is \(2^2/(2!\,1!)=2\); for \(n=3\) it is \(2^3/(3!\,2!)=\tfrac23\).

Check the total probability: each conditional density integrates to \(1\), so the density’s total mass is \(e^{-1}\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}1/n!=e^{-1}(e-1)=1-e^{-1}\). Adding the atom \(e^{-1}\) gives \(1\). As a transform check, an exponential mark of rate \(2\) has Laplace transform \(\mathbb{E}[e^{-sY_1}]=2/(2+s)\) for \(s\ge0\). At \(s=2\), the compound sum formula gives \(\mathbb{E}[e^{-2S_t}]=\exp(1(2/4-1))=e^{-1/2}\). Conditioning on the count gives \(e^{-1}\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(1/2)^n/n!=e^{-1}e^{1/2}=e^{-1/2}\), the same value.

Deterministic Marks and a Lattice-Valued Sum

Worked Example: Every Event Adds Three Units

Suppose \(\lambda=2\), \(t=1\), and each mark equals \(3\) with probability \(1\). Then \(\theta=2\) and \(S_t=3N_t\). Find the probability that the total is \(6\), and give its probability generating function.

The sum equals \(6\) exactly when \(N_t=2\). Thus $$ \mathbb{P}(S_t=6)=\mathbb{P}(N_t=2) =e^{-2}\frac{2^2}{2!}=2e^{-2}. $$ The mark generating function is \(G_Y(z)=z^3\), so the compound-sum formula gives \(G_{S_t}(z)=\exp(2(z^3-1))\). Expanding it, $$ G_{S_t}(z)=e^{-2}\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{2^n z^{3n}}{n!}. $$ The coefficient of \(z^6\) is the \(n=2\) term, namely \(e^{-2}2^2/2!=2e^{-2}\), agreeing with the direct count calculation. Check: at \(z=1\), the generating function is \(\exp(2(1-1))=1\), so its probabilities sum to one.

Reading the Formulas Correctly

The mixture law is often the most direct route when the marks have a simple sum distribution conditional on a fixed count. The transform formulas are compact alternatives: a mark characteristic function \(\phi_Y(u)\) becomes \(\exp(\theta(\phi_Y(u)-1))\), while a mark probability generating function \(G_Y(z)\) becomes \(\exp(\theta(G_Y(z)-1))\). The two transforms answer different questions and have different domains: the characteristic function is always defined for real \(u\), whereas the probability generating function requires nonnegative integer-valued marks.

Common mistake. A tempting but incorrect formula for Bernoulli marks is \(G_{S_t}(z)=\exp(\theta pz)\). It omits the zero-event correction. For the exact parameters \(\theta=2\) and \(p=\tfrac13\), this wrong expression has value \(e^{2/3}\) at \(z=1\), not \(1\), so it cannot be a probability generating function. The mark generating function is \(G_Y(z)=\tfrac23+\tfrac13z\); substituting it correctly gives $$ G_{S_t}(z)=\exp\!\left(2\left(\frac23+\frac13z-1\right)\right) =\exp\!\left(\frac23(z-1)\right), $$ which equals \(1\) at \(z=1\). The subtraction of \(1\) accounts for the fact that each Poisson event contributes a mark, while no event contributes nothing.

Check Your Understanding

Use conditioning on the event count or the transform formulas, and check that each proposed probability law is normalized.

  1. If \(\theta=3\) and marks are Bernoulli with success probability \(\tfrac12\), what is the distribution of \(S_t\)?
  2. Why does the convolution mixture contain the term \(e^{-\theta}\delta_0\), and what happens to that term when \(\theta=0\)?
  3. For exponential marks with rate \(\beta\), write the conditional density of the sum given \(N_t=n\ge1\). How does the mixture weight enter the unconditional density?
  4. If every mark equals \(2\), express \(\phi_{S_t}(u)\) in terms of \(\theta\) and \(u\). What values can \(S_t\) take?
  5. Explain why the probability generating function formula is not appropriate for marks that can take arbitrary real values.