From Probability Statements to CDF Values
The cumulative distribution function packages the probabilities of all events of the form \(X\le x\): by definition, \(F(x)=P(X\le x)\). Recovering a CDF value from a probability statement is therefore often direct. The care is needed when the statement uses a strict inequality, a right-hand interval, or an interval with endpoints included in a different way. Those choices determine whether the equation involves \(F(x)\) or its left limit.
For a real-valued random variable \(X\), the probability statements may be translated into equations and then solved. Sometimes the supplied statements determine a requested value uniquely; sometimes they determine only a difference between CDF values. The first step is to write each event with its exact endpoint conventions, rather than informally treating all nearby inequalities as equivalent.
The equivalence \(F(x-)=P(X<x)\) follows from continuity of probability for increasing events. For example, the events \(\{X\le x-1/n\}\) increase to \(\{X<x\}\), so their probabilities converge to \(P(X<x)\). This limit is exactly the left limit of the CDF.
Half-Lines Give Direct CDF Equations
The two left half-lines determine the CDF value and its left limit directly. The right half-lines give their complements. These identities are useful whenever a problem gives a tail probability rather than a probability written in CDF form.
The first two equations follow from the definitions of \(F(x)\) and \(F(x-)\). For the last two, the relevant events are complements: \(\{X>x\}\) is the complement of \(\{X\le x\}\), and \(\{X\ge x\}\) is the complement of \(\{X<x\}\). Thus, for example, \(P(X>x)=1-P(X\le x)=1-F(x)\). This also shows why replacing \(>\) by \(\ge\) in a tail statement can change the answer when \(P(X=x)>0\).
Worked Example: Recovering Values From Half-Lines
Suppose \(P(X\le 4)=0.72\) and \(P(X<4)=0.65\). Find \(F(4)\), \(F(4-)\), \(P(X=4)\), and \(P(X>4)\).
By definition, \(F(4)=P(X\le4)=0.72\), while \(F(4-)=P(X<4)=0.65\). Therefore the point probability is
The right-tail probability is the complement of \(X\le4\):
As a check, the events \(X<4\), \(X=4\), and \(X>4\) are disjoint and cover all outcomes. Their probabilities sum to \(0.65+0.07+0.28=1\).
Interval Probabilities and Endpoint Conventions
An interval probability is a difference between two cumulative probabilities. The exact difference depends on whether either endpoint is included. For real numbers \(a<b\), the four standard forms are:
These identities can be derived by decomposing events, which makes the endpoint choices explicit. The event \(\{X\le b\}\) is the disjoint union of \(\{X\le a\}\) and \(\{a<X\le b\}\). Subtracting their probabilities gives \(P(a<X\le b)=F(b)-F(a)\). For an interval that includes \(a\), the part to remove is instead \(\{X<a\}\), whose probability is \(F(a-)\). At the right endpoint, including \(b\) uses \(F(b)\); excluding \(b\) uses \(F(b-)\). These decompositions prove all four identities.
The formulas can be read in reverse to recover a CDF value. For example, if \(F(a)\) is known and \(P(a<X\le b)=q\), then \(F(b)=F(a)+q\). But if that interval probability is the only information given, it determines \(F(b)-F(a)\), not generally either value separately.
Worked Example: An Interval With a Known Starting Value
Suppose \(F(-2)=0.18\) and \(P(-2<X\le1)=0.47\). Find \(F(1)\).
The interval is open at \(-2\) and closed at \(1\), so its probability is \(F(1)-F(-2)\). Substitute the given values and solve:
The result is within the required range \([0,1]\), and it satisfies \(F(1)\ge F(-2)\), as a CDF must. The endpoint convention matters: using \(F(-2-)\) here would correspond to including \(-2\), which this interval does not do.
Solving a Finite Collection of Statements
When several probability statements are given, assign a symbol to each unknown CDF value and translate every statement into an equation. Solve the resulting system, then check that the answers obey the basic CDF constraints: each value lies between zero and one, and CDF values cannot decrease as their arguments increase. Endpoint statements involving \(<\) may require left-limit values as additional unknowns.
Worked Example: Solving for Several CDF Values
Suppose the following probabilities are known: \(P(X\le0)=0.25\), \(P(0<X\le2)=0.40\), \(P(2<X\le5)=0.20\), and \(P(X>5)=0.15\). Find \(F(0)\), \(F(2)\), and \(F(5)\), and verify the probabilities are consistent.
The first statement gives \(F(0)=0.25\). The second interval has the form \((0,2]\), so \(P(0<X\le2)=F(2)-F(0)\). Hence
The third interval similarly gives \(P(2<X\le5)=F(5)-F(2)\), so
Finally, the complement identity gives \(P(X>5)=1-F(5)=1-0.85=0.15\), agreeing with the fourth statement. The recovered values satisfy \(0.25\le0.65\le0.85\), so they pass the monotonicity check as well as the probability check.
When the Information Is Not Enough
An interval probability by itself usually gives a difference, not an absolute CDF value. If \(P(a<X\le b)=q\), the equation is \(F(b)-F(a)=q\). Without another statement anchoring either endpoint, this one equation does not specify both unknown values. Do not silently assume \(F(a)=0\); that would require additional information, such as \(X>a\) with probability one.
Worked Example: Recognizing an Undetermined CDF Value
Suppose \(P(1<X\le3)=0.50\), and no other probability information is provided. Can \(F(3)\) be determined?
The interval identity gives
This specifies a difference, not either term alone. For example, the pairs \(F(1)=0.10,\ F(3)=0.60\) and \(F(1)=0.30,\ F(3)=0.80\) both satisfy the equation and the bounds \(0\le F(1)\le F(3)\le1\). They give different values of \(F(3)\). Thus the supplied statement does not determine \(F(3)\); another probability statement is needed.
The same issue arises with endpoint information. If \(P(X<1)=0.20\), \(P(1\le X\le3)=0.60\), and \(P(X>3)=0.20\), then \(F(1-)=0.20\), \(F(3)=0.80\), and \(F(3)-F(1-)=0.60\). These statements still do not determine \(F(1)\), because they do not specify how much probability is concentrated at \(1\).
Common Mistake: Dropping the Endpoint
A frequent error is to treat \(P(X>x)\) and \(P(X\ge x)\) as interchangeable, or to use \(F(x)\) whenever an endpoint \(x\) appears. That reasoning is only valid when the point probability \(P(X=x)\) is zero. In general,
For example, if \(P(X<2)=0.30\) and \(P(X=2)=0.15\), then \(F(2)=0.45\), not \(0.30\). The correction is to preserve each inequality exactly, translate it to \(F(x)\) or \(F(x-)\), and only then perform the algebra.
Check Your Understanding
For each question, write the relevant probability equation before solving or deciding what can be known.
- If \(P(X\le3)=0.62\), what are \(F(3)\) and \(P(X>3)\)?
- If \(F(1)=0.40\) and \(P(1<X\le4)=0.35\), find \(F(4)\).
- Express \(P(a\le X<b)\) using \(F\) and left limits.
- If \(P(2<X\le5)=0.30\) is the only information supplied, can \(F(5)\) be determined? Explain.
- If \(P(X<6)=0.72\) and \(P(X\le6)=0.80\), find \(P(X=6)\).