Why Mix Over the Variance?
A normal model with a fixed variance gives relatively little probability to extreme observations. If its variance itself varies across observations, however, most observations can come from low-variance conditions while a smaller number come from high-variance conditions. Integrating over that uncertainty produces a distribution with heavier tails. A particularly important case is the Student t distribution, obtained by mixing a zero-mean normal law over an inverse-gamma variance.
The construction is useful in its own right: it gives a direct route to the t density and explains why its tails decay as a power rather than exponentially. It also makes precise how the degrees of freedom control the existence of moments.
The Inverse-Gamma Normal Mixture
The second inverse-gamma parameter is the scale \(b=\nu s^2/2\) in the density above; inverse-gamma parameter conventions can differ, so specifying the density avoids ambiguity. The parameter \(s\) is the t distribution's scale, not generally the standard deviation of \(X\).
Deriving the Student t Density
Write \(a=\nu/2\) and \(b=\nu s^2/2\). The conditional normal density is \((2\pi v)^{-1/2}\exp(-x^2/(2v))\). By the continuous-mixture density formula, the marginal density at \(x\) is the integral of this conditional density against \(f_V(v)\).
For \(c>0\), substitute \(u=c/v\) to obtain
where \(\Gamma(q)=\int_0^\infty u^{q-1}e^{-u}\,du\). Apply this identity with \(q=a+1/2\) and \(c=b+x^2/2\). Since \(b=\nu s^2/2\), simplifying gives the density below.
In particular, the t density is symmetric about zero. Its shape depends on \(\nu\): smaller degrees of freedom give heavier tails. As \(\nu\) increases, the tail becomes less heavy; for a fixed \(s\), the density approaches the \(N(0,s^2)\) density.
Worked Example: Calculating a t Density From the Mixture
Let \(\nu=5\) and \(s=2\). Identify the mixing distribution and calculate the marginal density at \(x=2\).
The inverse-gamma shape and scale are \(a=\nu/2=5/2\) and \(b=\nu s^2/2=5(4)/2=10\). Thus \(V\sim\operatorname{InvGamma}(5/2,10)\), and \(X\mid V=v\sim N(0,v)\).
The t density has coefficient $$ \frac{\Gamma(3)}{\Gamma(5/2)\sqrt{5\pi}\,2} =\frac{2}{(3\sqrt{\pi}/4)\,2\sqrt{5\pi}} =\frac{4}{3\pi\sqrt{5}}. $$ At \(x=2\), the factor involving \(x\) is $$ \left(1+\frac{2^2}{5(2^2)}\right)^{-3} =\left(\frac{6}{5}\right)^{-3} =\frac{125}{216}. $$ Therefore $$ f_X(2)=\frac{4}{3\pi\sqrt{5}}\frac{125}{216} =\frac{125}{162\pi\sqrt{5}}. $$
Power-Law Tail Behavior
The density formula shows that the t distribution has polynomial, or power-law, tails. To obtain the exact leading constant, rewrite its density for \(x>0\) as
The final factor tends to \(1\) as \(x\) tends to infinity. Consequently,
Here \(g(x)\sim h(x)\) means \(g(x)/h(x)\to1\). The density is symmetric, so the same density asymptotic, with \(|x|\) in place of \(x\), holds in the left tail. Integrating the asymptotic density gives the one-sided and two-sided survival-tail asymptotics:
For justification of the integration, for every \(\epsilon>0\) the density ratio \(f_X(y)/(Ay^{-\nu-1})\) lies between \(1-\epsilon\) and \(1+\epsilon\) for all sufficiently large \(y\). Integrating those bounds from \(x\) to infinity and using \(\int_x^\infty y^{-\nu-1}\,dy=x^{-\nu}/\nu\) proves the one-sided equivalence. Symmetry gives the two-sided result.
Worked Example: Tail Asymptotics for Three Degrees of Freedom
Let \(X\sim t_3(0,2)\). Calculate the leading density and two-sided tail constants.
Here \(\nu=3\) and \(s=2\). The density constant is $$ A=\frac{\Gamma(2)3^{3/2}2^3}{\Gamma(3/2)\sqrt{\pi}} =\frac{1\cdot3\sqrt{3}\cdot8}{(\sqrt{\pi}/2)\sqrt{\pi}} =\frac{48\sqrt{3}}{\pi}. $$ Thus \(f_X(x)\sim (48\sqrt{3}/\pi)x^{-4}\) as \(x\to\infty\), and by symmetry the density behaves as \((48\sqrt{3}/\pi)|x|^{-4}\) in either tail. The two-sided survival constant is \(2A/\nu\), so $$ P(|X|>x)\sim\frac{32\sqrt{3}}{\pi}x^{-3}. $$ For example, at a large threshold \(x=10\), the asymptotic approximation is \(32\sqrt{3}/(1000\pi)\), about \(0.0176\). This is an approximation from the tail limit, not the exact probability at \(10\).
Which Moments Exist?
The mixture representation gives a direct moment calculation. Let \(Z\sim N(0,1)\) be independent of \(V\). The conditional normal construction is equivalent to \(X=\sqrt{V}\,Z\). For \(r>0\), independence and nonnegative integration give \(E[|X|^r]=E[V^{r/2}]E[|Z|^r]\), allowing either side to be infinite.
The standard normal absolute moment is \(E[|Z|^r]=2^{r/2}\Gamma((r+1)/2)/\sqrt{\pi}\). From the inverse-gamma density, substituting \(u=b/v\) gives
This expectation is finite exactly when \(r<2a\): the integral defining it near \(v=\infty\) has integrand proportional to \(v^{r/2-a-1}\), which is integrable there exactly under that condition. At \(r=2a\) it diverges logarithmically, and for \(r>2a\) it also diverges. With \(a=\nu/2\) and \(b=\nu s^2/2\), the result is as follows.
The mean exists as an ordinary finite expectation only for \(\nu>1\), in which case symmetry gives \(E[X]=0\). The second moment, and hence the variance, exists only for \(\nu>2\). In that case,
The equality \(E[V]=\nu s^2/(\nu-2)\) follows by evaluating the inverse-gamma moment formula at \(r=2\). Since the mean is zero for \(\nu>2\), this second moment is the variance. When \(\nu\leq2\), the variance is not finite, even though the distribution is still a valid probability law.
Worked Example: Finite Mean but Infinite Fourth Moment
Let \(X\sim t_4(0,3)\). Determine its mean, variance, and fourth absolute moment.
Here \(V\sim\operatorname{InvGamma}(2,18)\), since \(\nu/2=2\) and \(\nu s^2/2=4(9)/2=18\). Because \(4>2\), the mean exists and symmetry gives \(E[X]=0\). The variance is $$ \operatorname{Var}(X)=\frac{4(3^2)}{4-2}=18. $$ For the fourth absolute moment, \(r=4=\nu\), which does not satisfy the required strict inequality \(r<\nu\). Therefore \(E[|X|^4]=\infty\); it is not valid to infer that this moment exists just because the variance is finite.
As a further check, the first absolute moment is finite. Its formula gives $$ E[|X|] =\frac{36^{1/2}\Gamma(1)\Gamma(3/2)} {\sqrt{\pi}\Gamma(2)} =\frac{6\cdot1\cdot(\sqrt{\pi}/2)} {\sqrt{\pi}\cdot1} =3. $$
Common Pitfall: Treating Scale as Standard Deviation
The parameter \(s\) in \(t_\nu(0,s)\) is a scale parameter, not automatically the standard deviation. The variance is \(\nu s^2/(\nu-2)\) only when \(\nu>2\); it is infinite when \(0<\nu\leq2\). For example, the distribution in the preceding example has scale \(3\) but standard deviation \(\sqrt{18}\), not \(3\).
A related mistake is to say that a t distribution has a mean of zero for every positive \(\nu\) simply because its density is symmetric. Symmetry identifies the center, but an ordinary finite expectation requires \(E[|X|]<\infty\), which holds only for \(\nu>1\). For \(\nu\leq1\), the mean is undefined.
Check Your Understanding
Use the mixture density, tail, and moment conditions to answer these questions.
- For \(X\sim t_6(0,2)\), what inverse-gamma shape and scale specify the variance mixture?
- For \(X\sim t_\nu(0,s)\), which power of \(x\) describes the leading decay of the density in the right tail?
- Does a \(t_2(0,1)\) random variable have a finite mean? Does it have a finite variance?
- For \(X\sim t_5(0,1)\), which of \(E[|X|^3]\) and \(E[|X|^5]\) are finite?
- Explain why symmetry alone does not guarantee that the mean exists.