From a Linear Hypothesis to an Exact F Distribution
A multi-parameter hypothesis asks whether several restrictions on a regression coefficient vector hold together. In a normal linear model, the usual F statistic has an exact distribution under the null. Away from the null, it has a noncentral F distribution. Its noncentrality parameter records how far the true coefficient vector departs from the hypothesis, on a scale determined by the design and the error variance.
We derive that distribution for a general rank-\(q\) hypothesis, then show precisely how its noncentrality parameter is the squared distance to the null set under the design metric. The result is exact for finite samples under the stated normal-model assumptions.
Full column rank ensures that all components of \(\beta\) are identifiable in this model. The rank condition on \(A\) means that the \(q\) restrictions are linearly independent. Write \(\hat\beta=(X'X)^{-1}X'Y\) for the least-squares estimator, and let \(\operatorname{SSE}=(Y-X\hat\beta)'(Y-X\hat\beta)\). The F statistic compares the estimated departure from the restrictions with the residual mean square.
The Exact Distribution
A noncentral chi-square variable with \(q\) degrees of freedom and noncentrality parameter \(\lambda\ge 0\) is the distribution of \(\sum_{j=1}^q(Z_j+m_j)^2\), where the \(Z_j\) are independent \(N(0,1)\) variables and \(\sum_{j=1}^q m_j^2=\lambda\). A noncentral F variable with degrees of freedom \(q,\nu\) and noncentrality \(\lambda\) is the distribution of \[ \frac{U/q}{V/\nu}, \] where \(U\) has this noncentral chi-square distribution, \(V\sim\chi^2_\nu\), and \(U,V\) are independent. When \(\lambda=0\), these become the usual central chi-square and F distributions.
Proof. Let \(\nu=n-p\) and \(M_X=I-X(X'X)^{-1}X'\), the residual projection matrix. From the model, $$ \hat\beta=\beta+(X'X)^{-1}X'\varepsilon,\qquad A\hat\beta-b\sim N_q(A\beta-b,\sigma^2 C). $$ Since \(C\) is positive definite, choose a symmetric square root \(C^{-1/2}\). The vector \(C^{-1/2}(A\hat\beta-b)/\sigma\) has covariance \(I_q\) and mean \(C^{-1/2}(A\beta-b)/\sigma\). Its squared length therefore has a noncentral chi-square distribution with \(q\) degrees of freedom and $$ \lambda=\frac{(A\beta-b)'C^{-1}(A\beta-b)}{\sigma^2}. $$ Consequently, the numerator quadratic form divided by \(\sigma^2\) has that distribution.
The residual sum of squares is \(\operatorname{SSE}=\varepsilon'M_X\varepsilon\). The matrix \(M_X\) is symmetric and idempotent, with rank \(n-p=\nu\). Orthogonally diagonalizing this projection shows that \(\operatorname{SSE}/\sigma^2\sim\chi^2_\nu\). To verify independence, the numerator error term depends linearly on \(X'\varepsilon\), while the residual vector is \(M_X\varepsilon\). Their cross-covariance is zero because \(X'M_X=0\). These are jointly normal, so zero cross-covariance implies independence; hence the numerator quadratic form and \(\operatorname{SSE}\) are independent. Dividing their scaled versions by \(q\) and \(\nu\), respectively, gives the asserted noncentral F distribution. If \(A\beta=b\), the mean of the whitened numerator vector is zero, so \(\lambda=0\). \(\square\)
Noncentrality as Distance to the Null Set
The expression for \(\lambda\) can be read as a distance, but the relevant metric is determined by the design. Define \(G=X'X\), which is positive definite. For any coefficient vectors \(\beta\) and \(\gamma\), the squared design-metric distance between them is \((\beta-\gamma)'G(\beta-\gamma)\). The null set is the affine set of vectors \(\gamma\) satisfying \(A\gamma=b\).
Proof. Set \(h=\beta-\gamma\), so the constraint becomes \(Ah=\delta\). With \(G=X'X\) and \(C=AG^{-1}A'\), define \(h_*=G^{-1}A'C^{-1}\delta\). Then \(Ah_*=CC^{-1}\delta=\delta\), so \(h_*\) satisfies the constraint. For any other feasible \(h\), write \(h=h_*+v\), where \(Av=0\). The cross-term in the squared length vanishes: $$ h_*'Gv=\delta'C^{-1}Av=0. $$ Therefore \(h'Gh=h_*'Gh_*+v'Gv\), and \(v'Gv\ge 0\) because \(G\) is positive definite. The minimum is attained at \(h_*\). Its value is $$ h_*'Gh_*=\delta'C^{-1}AG^{-1}A'C^{-1}\delta =\delta'C^{-1}\delta, $$ as claimed. Dividing by \(\sigma^2\) gives the theorem's \(\lambda\). \(\square\)
This distance depends on \(X'X\): coefficient directions estimated precisely count differently from directions estimated imprecisely. It is not generally the ordinary Euclidean distance between coefficient vectors. The variance scale matters too: for a fixed departure from the null set, larger \(\sigma^2\) means smaller noncentrality.
Worked Examples
Worked Example: A One-Restriction Test with Correlated Coefficient Estimates
Suppose \(p=2\), \(n=4\), and the columns of \(X\) are \((1,1,1,1)'\) and \((1,1,1,-1)'\). Then $$ X'X=\begin{pmatrix}4&2\\2&4\end{pmatrix}, \qquad (X'X)^{-1}=\begin{pmatrix}1/3&-1/6\\-1/6&1/3\end{pmatrix}. $$ Test \(H_0:\beta_1+\beta_2=0\), so \(A=(1,1)\), \(b=0\), and \(q=1\). Take the true parameter to be \(\beta=(2,1)'\) and \(\sigma^2=4\).
The covariance matrix of \(\hat\beta\) is \(4(X'X)^{-1}\). Its diagonal entries are \(4/3\), and its off-diagonal entries are \(-2/3\), so the coefficient estimates are correlated, with correlation \((-2/3)/(4/3)=-1/2\). For the tested linear combination, $$ C=A(X'X)^{-1}A'=1/3-1/6-1/6+1/3=1/3. $$ The departure is \(A\beta-b=2+1=3\), giving $$ \lambda=\frac{3^2}{(1/3)4}=\frac{27}{4}=6.75. $$ Here \(\nu=n-p=2\), so the statistic has distribution \(F_{1,2}(6.75)\) at these parameter values. Under the null, the same statistic instead has the central \(F_{1,2}\) distribution.
Worked Example: A Two-Restriction Hypothesis
Let \(n=6\), \(p=3\), and suppose the design has \(X'X=4I_3\). Test \(H_0:\beta_1=0,\ \beta_2=0\), represented by $$ A=\begin{pmatrix}1&0&0\\0&1&0\end{pmatrix},\qquad b=\begin{pmatrix}0\\0\end{pmatrix}. $$ Take \(\beta=(1,2,-1)'\) and \(\sigma^2=2\). The hypothesis matrix has rank \(q=2\), and the residual degrees of freedom are \(\nu=6-3=3\).
Since \((X'X)^{-1}=I_3/4\), we have \(C=I_2/4\) and \(C^{-1}=4I_2\). The departure vector is \(\delta=(1,2)'\), so $$ \delta'C^{-1}\delta =(1,2)\begin{pmatrix}4&0\\0&4\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}1\\2\end{pmatrix} =4+16=20. $$ Thus \(\lambda=20/2=10\), and \(F\sim F_{2,3}(10)\). The third coefficient does not enter \(\delta\), but the residual degrees of freedom still depend on the full model dimension \(p\).
Worked Example: Checking the Distance by Constrained Minimization
Let \(X'X=G=\begin{pmatrix}5&1\\1&2\end{pmatrix}\), a positive-definite matrix since its leading diagonal entry is positive and its determinant is \(9\). Test \(H_0:\beta_1-\beta_2=0\), with \(A=(1,-1)\), \(b=0\), and let \(\beta=(3,1)'\). Then \(\delta=A\beta=2\). The inverse design matrix and contrast variance factor are $$ G^{-1}=\frac{1}{9}\begin{pmatrix}2&-1\\-1&5\end{pmatrix}, \qquad C=AG^{-1}A'=1. $$ Therefore the squared design-metric distance is \(\delta^2/C=4\), and \(\lambda=4/\sigma^2\).
To verify the minimum directly, the closest null vector in the \(G\)-metric is \(\gamma=\beta-h_*\), where $$ h_*=G^{-1}A'C^{-1}\delta =\frac{1}{9}\begin{pmatrix}2&-1\\-1&5\end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix}1\\-1\end{pmatrix}2 =\begin{pmatrix}2/3\\-4/3\end{pmatrix}. $$ Hence \(\gamma=(7/3,7/3)'\), which satisfies the null restriction. Also \(Gh_*=(2,-2)'\), so $$ h_*'Gh_*=(2/3)(2)+(-4/3)(-2)=4. $$ This agrees with the contrast formula. For example, if \(\sigma^2=2\), then \(\lambda=2\); with \(n=5,p=2\), the statistic has distribution \(F_{1,3}(2)\).
Interpretation and Common Pitfalls
The noncentral F distribution is useful because it describes the statistic not only when the restrictions are true, but also under specified alternatives. The parameter \(\lambda\) combines the departure \(A\beta-b\), the precision of the tested estimates through \(A(X'X)^{-1}A'\), and the error variance. This exact distribution is a foundation for evaluating how an F test behaves under alternatives.
- Using \(q\) for the residual degrees of freedom. The numerator degrees of freedom are the rank \(q\) of \(A\); the denominator degrees of freedom are \(n-p\), the residual degrees of freedom in the full model.
- Dropping covariance terms. The restrictions may involve correlated coefficient estimates. The quadratic form must use the full matrix \(A(X'X)^{-1}A'\), not separate marginal variances.
- Calling the numerator central under every parameter value. It is central only when \(A\beta=b\). Under an alternative, its noncentrality is determined by the true departure.
- Using ordinary coefficient distance without checking the metric. The distance relevant here is measured using \(X'X\), not necessarily by summing squared coefficient differences.
Check Your Understanding
Use the definitions and results above to answer these questions.
- In the stated model, what assumptions ensure that \(A(X'X)^{-1}A'\) is invertible?
- For a rank-\(q\) hypothesis, why are the numerator and denominator degrees of freedom \(q\) and \(n-p\), respectively?
- What does the noncentrality parameter become when \(A\beta=b\), and what is the resulting F distribution?
- Why does the design metric, rather than ordinary Euclidean distance, appear in the distance-to-null-set result?
- If the error variance doubles while the true coefficient departure and design remain fixed, how does \(\lambda\) change?