Motion Along an Implicit Constraint
A moving point in the plane has coordinates \(x(t)\) and \(y(t)\), both depending on time. Sometimes its path is described not by giving \(y\) explicitly as a function of \(x\), but by a constraint such as \(F(x,y)=0\). As the point moves while remaining on that path, its coordinates, velocities, and accelerations cannot vary independently.
The chain rule makes those dependencies precise. Differentiating the constraint once gives a relation between the velocity components. Differentiating a second time gives a relation involving both velocities and accelerations. The second relation is especially useful when one acceleration component is known and the other must be found.
The First Derivative: A Relation Between Velocities
Write \(x'(t)\) and \(y'(t)\) for the coordinate velocities. The partial derivatives \(F_x\) and \(F_y\) describe how \(F\) changes with its first and second inputs. Applying the chain rule to the constraint gives
This equation is an instantaneous relation: at a particular time, the partial derivatives are evaluated at the point’s current position. If \(F_y\ne 0\) there, it can be rearranged to determine the vertical velocity from the horizontal velocity:
The division is valid only when \(F_y\ne 0\). The undivided equation remains the appropriate velocity relation even when \(F_y=0\).
The Second Derivative: A Relation Between Accelerations
Assume \(F\) has continuous second partial derivatives near the point under consideration, and \(x(t)\) and \(y(t)\) are twice differentiable. Differentiate the first-derivative relation with respect to time. The derivatives \(F_x\) and \(F_y\) also vary with time because their inputs \(x(t)\) and \(y(t)\) vary.
The acceleration terms \(x''\) and \(y''\) appear multiplied by the first partial derivatives. The other terms account for how the constraint’s slope and curvature interact with the point’s velocities. In particular, the mixed term \(2F_{xy}x'y'\) must be included when \(F_{xy}\) is nonzero.
Why the Second-Derivative Formula Holds
The derivation follows by differentiating the first-derivative identity, applying the chain rule to each partial derivative. Starting from
differentiate the first product. The chain rule gives \(\frac{d}{dt}F_x=F_{xx}x'+F_{xy}y'\), so the product rule yields
For the second product, \(\frac{d}{dt}F_y=F_{yx}x'+F_{yy}y'\), and therefore
Adding these expressions gives zero because the derivative of the identically zero constraint relation is zero. Since \(F_{yx}=F_{xy}\), the two mixed terms add to \(2F_{xy}x'y'\), proving the formula. The factor of \(2\) comes from differentiating both products; it is not an extra assumption.
Worked Example: Motion on a Circle
Worked Example: Motion on a Circle
A point moves on the circle \(x^2+y^2=25\), with coordinates measured in metres and time in seconds. At an instant, its position is \((3,4)\), its horizontal velocity is \(x'=2\), and its horizontal acceleration is \(x''=1\). Find \(y'\) and \(y''\) at that instant.
Set \(F(x,y)=x^2+y^2-25\). Its first partial derivatives are \(F_x=2x\) and \(F_y=2y\). The velocity relation is
Substitute \(x=3\), \(y=4\), and \(x'=2\):
For the second derivative, \(F_{xx}=2\), \(F_{xy}=0\), and \(F_{yy}=2\). Thus
Substitute the known values, including the velocity just found:
Check the first relation: \(2(3)(2)+2(4)(-3/2)=12-12=0\). Check the second: \(6+8(-37/16)+8+9/2=6-37/2+8+9/2=0\). Both values satisfy the differentiated constraint.
Worked Example: A Product Constraint
Worked Example: A Product Constraint
Suppose a point satisfies \(xy=12\) while moving. At an instant, \(x=3\), \(y=4\), \(x'=2\), and \(x''=-1\). Find \(y'\) and \(y''\).
Use \(F(x,y)=xy-12\), for which \(F_x=y\), \(F_y=x\), \(F_{xy}=F_{yx}=1\), and \(F_{xx}=F_{yy}=0\). First,
Substitution gives \(4(2)+3y'=0\), so \(8+3y'=0\) and \(y'=-8/3\).
The second-derivative relation is \(yx''+xy''+2x'y'=0\). Substituting the data gives
Check the velocity relation: \(4(2)+3(-8/3)=8-8=0\). Check the acceleration relation: \(4(-1)+3(44/9)+4(-8/3)=-4+44/3-32/3=0\). The acceleration is \(44/9\) in the units determined by the coordinates and time.
Worked Example: A Nonlinear Constraint
Worked Example: A Nonlinear Constraint
A point moves subject to \(x^2+y^3=9\). At the instant when \((x,y)=(1,2)\), its horizontal velocity is \(x'=3\) and horizontal acceleration is \(x''=0\). Find its vertical velocity and acceleration.
Let \(F(x,y)=x^2+y^3-9\). Then \(F_x=2x\) and \(F_y=3y^2\). The first-derivative relation gives
The second partial derivatives are \(F_{xx}=2\), \(F_{xy}=0\), and \(F_{yy}=6y\). At \(y=2\), \(F_{yy}=12\), so the second-derivative relation becomes
Using \(x'=3\), \(y'=-1/2\), \(x=1\), and \(x''=0\), we obtain
The first relation checks as \(6+12(-1/2)=0\). The second checks as \(18+3+0+12(-7/4)=21-21=0\).
A Common Pitfall: Losing the Mixed Term
When differentiating twice, it is easy to differentiate the first-derivative equation as if \(F_x\) and \(F_y\) were constants. They are generally not constant along the motion. For the product constraint, this mistake would omit the term \(2x'y'\).
In the product example, omitting that term would give the incorrect equation \(yx''+xy''=0\), and hence \(4(-1)+3y''=0\), or \(y''=4/3\). But substituting this into the correct acceleration relation gives
Thus the proposed value fails the constraint’s second-derivative test. The mixed term is required because both partial derivatives change along the path.
Using the Relations at a Specified Instant
A practical calculation keeps the general equations intact until the known position and rates are substituted. This helps preserve every term and makes it easier to check signs.
Write \(F(x(t),y(t))=0\) and confirm the motion is constrained by it over an interval.
Compute \(F_x,F_y,F_{xx},F_{xy},F_{yy}\), then evaluate them at the specified position.
Determine an unknown velocity component before inserting velocities into the second-derivative relation.
Substitute into the second-derivative equation, solve for the unknown acceleration, and substitute the result back into both relations.
Each equation describes an instantaneous requirement imposed by the path. If \(F_y\ne0\), the acceleration relation can be solved for \(y''\) after the velocities are known. If \(F_y=0\), do not divide by it: the equation still constrains the motion, but it may not determine \(y''\) by itself.
Why These Equations Matter
The first relation tells how the velocity vector must be oriented relative to the constraint. The second tells how the velocity and acceleration components must combine to keep the point on the same curve. This is useful whenever a path is given implicitly and the question concerns motion at a particular instant, rather than a full explicit formula for the trajectory.
Units provide a useful consistency check. If \(x\) and \(y\) are lengths and \(t\) is time, then \(x'\) and \(y'\) have units of length per time, while \(x''\) and \(y''\) have units of length per time squared. The terms in the second-derivative equation need not each have the same units if \(F\) has been chosen with different units or scaling, but they must all have the units of the second time derivative of \(F(x(t),y(t))\). In a concrete problem, keep the units attached to the resulting velocity and acceleration.
Check Your Understanding
Use the constraint and its time derivatives to answer each question.
- Write the first-derivative relation for a point satisfying \(F(x(t),y(t))=0\).
- In the second-derivative relation, where does the factor \(2\) in the mixed term come from?
- For \(x^2+y^2=25\) at \((3,4)\), with \(x'=2\), what is \(y'\)?
- Why is it invalid to solve the first-derivative equation for \(y'\) by dividing by \(F_y\) when \(F_y=0\)?
- For the constraint \(xy=12\), which term would be lost by treating \(F_x\) and \(F_y\) as constants during the second differentiation?