Tutorials › Calculus I › Monotone Functions Are Riemann Integrable

Riemann Sums and the Integral · Tutorial 951 of 1495

Monotone Functions Are Riemann Integrable

Learn how monotonicity bounds the gap between upper and lower sums and guarantees Riemann integrability on a closed interval.

Intermediate 9 min read

What You'll Learn

  • Define nondecreasing and nonincreasing functions on a closed interval.
  • Compute upper and lower Darboux sums on an equal partition.
  • Derive the telescoping bound for the difference of those sums.
  • Use the upper-lower sum criterion to prove bounded monotone functions are Riemann integrable.
  • Recognize and correct a sign error for decreasing functions.

Why Monotonicity Helps

A bounded function can vary in complicated ways across an interval. But if it is monotone, its values cannot repeatedly rise and fall. On any subinterval, its smallest and largest values occur at the endpoints. This lets us estimate the difference between upper and lower sums by adding endpoint changes, and those changes telescope.

The result is a useful integrability theorem: every bounded monotone function on a closed interval is Riemann integrable. The function need not be continuous. The proof depends on the upper-lower sum criterion and a direct estimate for equal partitions.

Monotonicity and Darboux Sums

Definition: A function \(f:[a,b]\to\mathbb{R}\) is nondecreasing if \(x\le y\) implies \(f(x)\le f(y)\). It is nonincreasing if \(x\le y\) implies \(f(x)\ge f(y)\). A function is monotone if it is either nondecreasing or nonincreasing. These definitions allow equality, so a monotone function need not be strictly increasing or strictly decreasing.

Let \(f\) be bounded on \([a,b]\), and let \(P=\{x_0,x_1,\ldots,x_n\}\) be a partition, where \(a=x_0<x_1<\cdots<x_n=b\). On the \(i\)-th subinterval \([x_{i-1},x_i]\), let \(m_i\) be the infimum of the values of \(f\), and let \(M_i\) be their supremum. The lower and upper Darboux sums are

$$ L(f,P)=\sum_{i=1}^{n}m_i(x_i-x_{i-1}), \qquad U(f,P)=\sum_{i=1}^{n}M_i(x_i-x_{i-1}). $$

Boundedness ensures these infima and suprema are finite. The upper-lower sum criterion says that a bounded function \(f\) on \([a,b]\) is Riemann integrable if and only if, for every \(\varepsilon>0\), there is a partition \(P\) such that \(U(f,P)-L(f,P)<\varepsilon\).

We will use equal partitions. For a positive integer \(n\), divide \([a,b]\) into \(n\) subintervals of common width \(\Delta x=(b-a)/n\), with partition points \(x_i=a+i\Delta x\) for \(i=0,\ldots,n\).

The Equal-Partition Estimate

Suppose first that \(f\) is nondecreasing. For every \(x\in[x_{i-1},x_i]\), monotonicity gives \(f(x_{i-1})\le f(x)\le f(x_i)\). Thus the infimum on that subinterval is \(f(x_{i-1})\) and its supremum is \(f(x_i)\). These endpoint values give the exact upper-lower sum difference:

$$ \begin{aligned} U(f,P)-L(f,P) &=\Delta x\sum_{i=1}^{n}\bigl(f(x_i)-f(x_{i-1})\bigr)\\ &=\Delta x\bigl(f(x_n)-f(x_0)\bigr)\\ &=\frac{b-a}{n}\bigl(f(b)-f(a)\bigr). \end{aligned} $$

The middle equality follows by cancellation: each interior value \(f(x_i)\), for \(1\le i<n\), appears once with a plus sign and once with a minus sign. Since \(f\) is nondecreasing, \(f(b)-f(a)\ge0\).

If \(f\) is nonincreasing, the endpoint roles reverse. On \([x_{i-1},x_i]\), the supremum is \(f(x_{i-1})\) and the infimum is \(f(x_i)\). Consequently,

$$ \begin{aligned} U(f,P)-L(f,P) &=\Delta x\sum_{i=1}^{n}\bigl(f(x_{i-1})-f(x_i)\bigr)\\ &=\Delta x\bigl(f(a)-f(b)\bigr)\\ &=\frac{b-a}{n}\bigl(f(a)-f(b)\bigr). \end{aligned} $$

Both cases can be expressed in one estimate. If \(f\) is monotone, the endpoint change in the direction of its variation is nonnegative, and its size is \(|f(b)-f(a)|\). Therefore, for the equal partition into \(n\) pieces,

$$ U(f,P)-L(f,P)=\frac{b-a}{n}|f(b)-f(a)|. $$
Key estimate: For a bounded monotone function on \([a,b]\), the upper-lower sum difference on the equal partition into \(n\) pieces is \(\dfrac{b-a}{n}|f(b)-f(a)|\). It decreases in proportion to \(1/n\).

Worked Examples

Worked Example: Increasing Function on an Equal Partition

Consider \(f(x)=\sqrt{x+1}\) on \([0,3]\), using three equal subintervals. This function is increasing, and the partition points and common width are

$$ x_0=0,\quad x_1=1,\quad x_2=2,\quad x_3=3, \qquad \Delta x=\frac{3-0}{3}=1. $$

The endpoint values are \(f(0)=1\), \(f(1)=\sqrt{2}\), \(f(2)=\sqrt{3}\), and \(f(3)=2\). Since \(f\) is increasing, each lower-sum contribution uses the left endpoint and each upper-sum contribution uses the right endpoint:

$$ \begin{aligned} L(f,P)&=1(1+\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{3})=1+\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{3},\\ U(f,P)&=1(\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{3}+2)=\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{3}+2. \end{aligned} $$

Subtracting gives \(U(f,P)-L(f,P)=1\). The estimate gives the same result: \(\dfrac{3-0}{3}|2-1|=1\). Thus the computed sums agree with the general formula.

Worked Example: Decreasing Function on an Equal Partition

Consider \(f(x)=1/(x+1)\) on \([0,3]\), again with three equal subintervals. The width is \(\Delta x=1\), and the partition points are \(0,1,2,3\). The function is decreasing, so the left endpoints supply the suprema and the right endpoints supply the infima. Its endpoint and interior values are

$$ f(0)=1,\qquad f(1)=\frac12,\qquad f(2)=\frac13,\qquad f(3)=\frac14. $$

Therefore,

$$ \begin{aligned} U(f,P)&=1\left(1+\frac12+\frac13\right)=\frac{11}{6},\\ L(f,P)&=1\left(\frac12+\frac13+\frac14\right) =\frac{6}{12}+\frac{4}{12}+\frac{3}{12} =\frac{13}{12}. \end{aligned} $$

The difference is \(\frac{11}{6}-\frac{13}{12}=\frac{22}{12}-\frac{13}{12}=\frac{9}{12}=\frac34\). The estimate also gives \(\frac{3-0}{3}|1-\frac14|=\frac34\). The absolute value accounts for the fact that the endpoint values decrease.

Worked Example: Choosing a Partition to Meet a Tolerance

Suppose \(f\) is nondecreasing on \([-2,4]\), with \(f(-2)=-1\) and \(f(4)=5\). Find an equal partition that guarantees \(U(f,P)-L(f,P)<0.1\).

The interval length is \(4-(-2)=6\), and the endpoint change is \(5-(-1)=6\). For a partition into \(n\) equal pieces, the exact gap is therefore

$$ U(f,P)-L(f,P)=\frac{6}{n}\cdot 6=\frac{36}{n}. $$

We need \(\frac{36}{n}<0.1=\frac{1}{10}\), which is equivalent to \(360<n\). Choose \(n=361\). Then the gap is \(36/361\), and \(36/361<1/10\) because \(360<361\). This partition meets the requested tolerance. The endpoint data are enough for this guarantee; the values of \(f\) at the interior partition points are not needed.

Why Every Bounded Monotone Function Is Integrable

The estimate proves the theorem directly. Boundedness is part of the hypothesis and ensures that the Darboux sums are finite. Monotonicity supplies the endpoint formulas, so we can choose the number of equal subintervals to make the gap as small as desired.

Theorem: Every bounded monotone function \(f:[a,b]\to\mathbb{R}\) is Riemann integrable on \([a,b]\).
1
Fix a tolerance.
Let \(\varepsilon>0\) be arbitrary. We must produce a partition whose upper-lower sum difference is less than \(\varepsilon\).
2
Use the endpoint bound.
Because \(f\) is bounded and monotone, \(C=(b-a)|f(b)-f(a)|\) is a finite nonnegative number. On an equal partition into \(n\) pieces, \(U(f,P)-L(f,P)=C/n\).
3
Choose the number of pieces.
If \(C=0\), the gap is zero for every \(n\). If \(C>0\), choose a positive integer \(n>C/\varepsilon\). Such an integer exists, and then \(C/n<\varepsilon\).
4
Apply the criterion.
For the chosen partition, \(U(f,P)-L(f,P)<\varepsilon\). Since this is possible for every \(\varepsilon>0\), the upper-lower sum criterion implies that \(f\) is Riemann integrable.

This proof does not require continuity. Monotonicity controls the total variation between the endpoint values, while finer equal partitions divide that total into a smaller upper-lower sum gap. The argument establishes integrability without needing to identify the value of the integral.

A Common Sign Error

For a decreasing function, it is easy to use the increasing-function expression without changing its sign. For \(f(x)=1/(x+1)\) on \([0,3]\), that mistake would give

$$ \frac{3-0}{3}\bigl(f(3)-f(0)\bigr) =1\left(\frac14-1\right) =-\frac34. $$

But an upper sum cannot be smaller than a lower sum, so a negative difference is impossible. The error is using the change in the wrong direction. For a decreasing function, the exact expression is \(\frac{b-a}{n}(f(a)-f(b))\), which here gives \(1(1-\frac14)=\frac34\). Equivalently, use the absolute-value formula \(\frac{b-a}{n}|f(b)-f(a)|\), which works for either direction of monotonicity.

Why the Result Matters

The theorem gives a practical way to establish integrability for functions whose formulas or behavior may be less convenient to analyze through continuity. A bounded monotone function may have discontinuities, but the upper-lower sum criterion still applies: on a fine equal partition, the gap is controlled by the endpoint change divided by the number of pieces.

The key distinction is between the function's total endpoint change and the width of the subintervals. Each subinterval can contribute some gap, but when the function is monotone, the endpoint changes add by telescoping rather than accumulating independently at the full endpoint range. That cancellation is what makes the bound tend to zero.

Check Your Understanding

Use the equal-partition estimate and the upper-lower sum criterion to answer these questions.

  1. For a nondecreasing function on \([a,b]\), what are the infimum and supremum on one subinterval \([x_{i-1},x_i]\)?
  2. Why do the endpoint differences in the equal-partition sum telescope?
  3. A nonincreasing function has \(f(a)=7\) and \(f(b)=2\) on an interval of length \(5\). What is the upper-lower sum gap for an equal partition into \(n\) pieces?
  4. Why does choosing \(n>C/\varepsilon\), where \(C=(b-a)|f(b)-f(a)|>0\), ensure the gap is less than \(\varepsilon\)?
  5. Does the theorem require a monotone function to be continuous or strictly monotone?

Test yourself: Calculus I final exam practice

Ready to check what you know? Work a full-length practice final, then open the complete worked solutions.

Want all 1,114 practice problems?

This tutorial covers one topic. Calc Pass covers the full Calculus AB & BC curriculum (the core of Calculus I and II): full review, every practice question, and step-by-step solutions to each one.

QR code to download the Calc Pass app

Get the Calc Pass App

Scan to download and practice on the go, with instant scoring.

Calc Pass Volume 1: 1,114 Practice Questions book cover

Vol. 1: 1,114 Questions

The complete practice question bank, organized by AB & BC topic.

View on Amazon
Calc Pass Volume 2: Solutions Manual book cover

Vol. 2: Solutions Manual

Fully worked solutions to every question in Volume 1.

View on Amazon