Tutorials › Introduction to Statistics › Reading Stemplots for Shape and Unusual Values

Graphs for Quantitative Data · Tutorial 134 of 996

Reading Stemplots for Shape and Unusual Values

Use the pattern of ordered leaves to describe what a stemplot reveals about a distribution, and support each claim with values from the plot.

Beginner 9 min read

What You'll Learn

  • Explain how leaf counts show concentration across ranges of values.
  • Identify a distribution’s peak and describe its shape from the ordered leaves.
  • Distinguish a tail’s direction from the location of the distribution’s main cluster.
  • Recognize clusters and gaps, citing the observations that define them.
  • Describe an unusual observation without treating it automatically as an error.
  • Use the key and stem scale to interpret values correctly.

Reading the Pattern in Ordered Leaves

A stemplot preserves the individual data values while arranging them in order. That makes it possible to see both the overall pattern and the observations behind it. Reading one well means looking beyond the shape of the rows: use the key to recover the actual values, then support descriptions of concentration, skewness, clusters, gaps, and unusual observations with those values.

A stem represents a range or group of values, and each leaf represents one observation within that group. In a common format, the stem gives the leading digit or digits and the leaf gives the final digit. The key specifies the scale: for example, \(2\mid 7=27\) means that stem 2 and leaf 7 together represent 27. Read the key before describing the data, especially when values are decimals or stems have been split.

Definition: In a stemplot, the frequency of a stem is the number of leaves on that stem, and therefore the number of observations in the stem’s range. Concentration refers to ranges where observations are relatively numerous or closely packed. A gap is a range containing no observations. An unusual observation is a value that stands apart from the main pattern of the plotted data; this is a visual description, not a formal test or proof of error.

Begin by checking the key and the ordered leaves. Then look at how many observations fall in each range, where the data are most concentrated, and how the distribution extends away from its main cluster. Rows with many leaves show more observations in their ranges than rows with few leaves. Empty stems can indicate an interval with no observations, but the actual gap is best described by citing the nearest observed values on either side.

Concentration and Overall Shape

A distribution’s shape is its overall pattern across the values. A stemplot can show a single main concentration (often called unimodal) or more than one concentration (often called multimodal). If the leaves thin out on both sides of the main concentration in a broadly similar way, the distribution may be described as roughly symmetric. These are descriptions, not demands that every value mirror another exactly.

For a skewed distribution, one side extends farther from the main concentration than the other. The direction of skewness names the direction of that longer tail: a longer tail toward higher values is right-skewed, and one toward lower values is left-skewed. The peak or main cluster is not itself the tail. A few distant values may contribute to an apparent tail, so describe what is visible and cite the values rather than relying on a label alone.

Worked Example: Describing a Roughly Symmetric Pattern

Suppose a hypothetical group of students reports the number of hours they studied in a week. The stemplot uses hours as whole numbers:

$$ \begin{array}{c|l} \text{Stem} & \text{Leaves}\\ 1 & 2\ 6\ 8\ 9\\ 2 & 0\ 1\ 2\ 3\ 4\ 5\ 6\ 7\ 8\\ 3 & 0\ 4 \end{array} $$

Key: \(2\mid 7=27\) hours. The 15 reported values range from 12 to 34 hours. The stem for the 20s has nine leaves, compared with four in the teens and two in the 30s, so the observations are most concentrated in the 20s.

The values from 18 to 28 hours form a central group. Values extend below that group to 12 and above it to 34; values such as 16 and 30, and 18 and 28, also show observations on both sides of the center. The pattern is reasonably described as unimodal and roughly symmetric around the low-to-mid 20s, not as perfectly symmetric. Citing the range and the denser stem makes the description checkable.

Clusters, Gaps, and Sparse Ranges

A cluster is a group of observations concentrated in a particular part of the scale. A gap is a stretch of values without observations, separating parts of the data or leaving an isolated value. In a stemplot, an entirely empty stem is a useful clue, but a gap can also occur within a stem. Because a stem covers a range, stating the nearest observed values gives a clearer account than saying only that “there is a gap.”

Sparse rows are not necessarily gaps. A stem with one or two leaves still contains observations. Nor does a plot show why a gap or cluster occurred. It records the data values; explanations require information about how the data were collected and what they represent.

Worked Example: Identifying Two Clusters and the Gap Between Them

Suppose a hypothetical class records quiz scores as whole numbers. The stemplot has this key: \(5\mid 4=54\) points.

$$ \begin{array}{c|l} \text{Stem} & \text{Leaves}\\ 4 & 1\ 3\ 5\ 6\ 8\\ 5 & 1\ 2\ 4\\ 6 & \\ 7 & 2\ 4\ 5\ 7\ 9\\ 8 & 2\ 4 \end{array} $$

Five observations lie from 41 to 48 points, and three lie from 51 to 54. Together, these leaves form a lower cluster from 41 to 54. The upper cluster extends from 72 to 84 points, with seven observations. The 60s stem is empty, and the nearest observations on either side of the separation are 54 and 72. Thus, there are no recorded scores from 55 through 71.

A complete description names both clusters and the gap between them. Saying “there is an empty 60s stem” is accurate but less informative, because it does not give the observations that mark the ends of the empty range. The plot shows two concentrations; it does not establish why the scores fall into those groups.

Unusual Observations and Long Tails

An observation is visually unusual when it lies apart from the main body of leaves, perhaps across a sizable gap or at a far end of the scale. Describe its value and its relation to the rest of the distribution. For example, say that one observation is much higher than the main group, and state the values that make that separation visible. Avoid calling every endpoint unusual: a largest or smallest value is not necessarily far from the others.

An unusual observation is not automatically a mistake, an outlier under a formal rule, or evidence that the value should be removed. A stemplot alone cannot establish whether the measurement is correct or whether there is a substantive reason for it. Those judgments require checking the data and understanding their context.

Worked Example: Describing a Separated High Value

Imagine that a hypothetical clinic records waiting times, in minutes, for 14 appointments. The stemplot uses the key \(3\mid 2=32\) minutes.

$$ \begin{array}{c|l} \text{Stem} & \text{Leaves}\\ 3 & 0\ 2\ 3\ 5\ 6\ 7\ 8\\ 4 & 0\ 1\ 2\ 4\ 6\ 9\\ 5 & \\ 6 & \\ 7 & \\ 8 & 1 \end{array} $$

Thirteen waiting times lie between 30 and 49 minutes. The remaining value is 81 minutes. The stems for the 50s, 60s, and 70s are empty, so the 81-minute wait is separated from the main group: the nearest lower observed value is 49 minutes, and no observation falls from 50 through 80 minutes.

It is reasonable to describe 81 minutes as a visually unusual high value. The large gap also gives the distribution a sparse extension toward higher waiting times. Do not conclude from the plot alone that 81 is a recording error, or that it meets a particular formal definition of an outlier. The appropriate description is that one recorded wait, 81 minutes, stands apart from the other recorded waits, which range from 30 to 49 minutes.

A Justification: Why Leaf Counts Show Concentration

Each leaf represents one observation, and the stem places that observation in a particular range. Therefore, counting the leaves on a stem counts the observations in that range. If one stem has more leaves than a neighboring stem, more observations fall in its range than in that neighboring range. This is why a group of longer rows can indicate a concentration in that part of the scale.

$$ \text{number of leaves on a stem} = \text{number of observations in that stem's range} $$

The conclusion has a useful limit: row lengths compare counts across the ranges defined by the stems, not the precise spacing of all observations. The key and the way stems are arranged determine the range represented by each row. In a plot with split stems, for instance, a row may represent only part of a ten-unit interval. Interpret the visible pattern at the scale the plot actually displays.

A Reliable Reading Process

Use this sequence when describing a stemplot. Each step links a claim to evidence in the plot.

1
Read the key.
Identify the units and scale so that stems and leaves can be translated into actual values.
2
Locate the concentration.
Compare the number of leaves across stems and identify where observations are most numerous.
3
Describe the shape.
Look for one or more concentrations and compare how the data extend on either side. Name a longer tail by its direction.
4
Check for gaps and unusual values.
Look for empty ranges or values separated from the main group; cite the closest observed values that show the separation.
5
Write in context.
State the variable and units, then support each feature with actual values from the plot.

Common Pitfalls and Why Descriptions Matter

A common mistake is to call a distribution right-skewed because its main cluster sits on the right side of the plot. That confuses the peak with the tail. The correction is to locate the main concentration first, then see which direction the thinner, more extended part of the data reaches. If the leaves trail toward higher values, describe a right tail, even if the main group is nearer the lower end.

Another mistake is to report a feature without evidence: “the data have a gap” or “there is an outlier.” Instead, identify the values around the gap or the observation that stands apart. Also avoid treating an empty stem as proof that every nearby value is absent; state the actual interval represented by the empty stem and the nearest recorded values.

These careful descriptions matter because a graph is evidence, not a substitute for words. Naming the variable, its units, the range of a feature, and the observations that support it makes the interpretation understandable to someone who has not seen the plot. It also prevents a visual impression from becoming a stronger claim than the data justify.

Key takeaway: Read the key first, use leaf counts to locate concentration, and describe shape, gaps, and unusual observations with the actual values that create them. A visual feature identifies a pattern in the recorded data; it does not by itself explain the pattern or establish an error.

Check Your Understanding

Use the key and the plotted values as evidence for each answer.

  1. A stemplot has the key \(4\mid 6=46\) and has its longest row in the 40s. What does that row say about concentration, and what does it not tell you about the exact spacing of observations?
  2. In a stemplot, values cluster from 18 to 27, with a few leaves extending to 45. Which direction does the sparse extension point? What values would you cite when describing it?
  3. A plot has an empty 30s stem, with the nearest observed values 28 and 41. State the gap using the actual observed values and explain what the empty stem contributes.
  4. Why is the largest value in a data set not automatically an unusual observation?
  5. A single value is separated from the rest of a stemplot by an empty interval. What can you conclude visually, and what can you not conclude about whether that value is an error?