Comparing Two Motions
When two objects move through space, it is often more useful to compare their motions than to describe each motion separately. A vehicle may be moving east, for example, while another vehicle is moving west. Their individual velocities describe their motion relative to the chosen coordinate system; their relative velocity describes how quickly and in what direction their separation vector is changing.
The key operation is subtraction. Subtract the position of the object used as the reference from the position of the other object. Apply the same subtraction to their velocity vectors. The order matters: reversing the order reverses both relative vectors.
The subscript \(B/A\) means “\(B\) relative to \(A\).” The vector \(\mathbf r_{B/A}\) points from \(A\) to \(B\). Its magnitude is the distance between them. The vector \(\mathbf v_{B/A}\) describes the change in that relative position per unit time. If positions are measured in metres and time in seconds, relative position is measured in metres and relative velocity in metres per second.
For position functions that are differentiable, the velocity of each object is the derivative of its position. Subtracting the positions and differentiating gives the relative-velocity formula. This is the reason the same subtraction rule works for both quantities.
Why the Relative-Velocity Formula Works
By definition, \(\mathbf r_{B/A}(t)=\mathbf r_B(t)-\mathbf r_A(t)\).
When both position functions are differentiable, the derivative of a difference is the difference of the derivatives.
Since \(\mathbf r_A'(t)=\mathbf v_A(t)\) and \(\mathbf r_B'(t)=\mathbf v_B(t)\), the derivative is \(\mathbf v_B(t)-\mathbf v_A(t)\).
This derivation uses only the componentwise derivative rule for a difference. It also shows why relative velocity is not found by adding the two velocity vectors: the relevant change is the difference between their motions.
Calculating Relative Position and Separation
To find the separation at a particular time, first evaluate both position functions at that same time. Subtract in the stated order to get the relative-position vector. Then take its magnitude. In two or three dimensions, the magnitude is the square root of the sum of the squares of its components.
Worked Example: Relative Motion at a Given Time
Suppose two objects move in a plane, with positions in metres at time \(t\) seconds given by
Find the relative position and relative velocity of \(B\) with respect to \(A\), and their separation at \(t=1\).
Subtract the position of \(A\) from the position of \(B\), component by component:
Differentiate the components to find the velocities. Equivalently, differentiate the relative-position function:
At \(t=1\) second, the relative position is
Thus the separation is \(\sqrt{3^2+(-1)^2}=\sqrt{10}\) metres, approximately \(3.16\) metres to three significant figures. Check directly: \(\mathbf r_A(1)=\langle 3,2\rangle\) and \(\mathbf r_B(1)=\langle 6,1\rangle\); subtracting gives \(\langle 3,-1\rangle\), with the same magnitude.
Interception Requires Simultaneous Equality
An interception occurs only if the objects occupy the same point at the same time. In relative-position language, that means the relative-position vector is the zero vector. For functions written in coordinates, every component must equal zero for one and the same time. Solving only one coordinate equation is not enough.
Worked Example: Testing for an Interception
Two objects move in a plane, with positions in metres for \(t\geq 0\):
Find whether \(B\) intercepts \(A\), and if so, when and where. The relative position is
For interception, both components must be zero. The first gives \(10-2t=0\), so \(t=5\). The second gives \(5-t=0\), also \(t=5\). This is a valid time in the domain, so interception occurs at \(t=5\) seconds. Substitution into either position function gives
The positions agree, confirming the interception. Their velocities are \(\mathbf v_A=\langle 3,1\rangle\) m/s and \(\mathbf v_B=\langle 1,0\rangle\) m/s, so \(\mathbf v_{B/A}=\langle -2,-1\rangle\) m/s. The objects meet, but their velocities are different; interception does not require them to travel together afterward.
A Close Pass Is Not Necessarily an Interception
When the relative-position vector is nonzero, the objects are separated. They may nevertheless pass close to one another. The magnitude of the relative-position vector measures that separation at each time, while a zero relative-position vector identifies an actual meeting. A small distance alone is not evidence of interception.
Worked Example: A Close Pass Without Interception
For \(t\geq 0\), let the positions, in metres, be
The relative position and relative velocity of \(B\) with respect to \(A\) are
For interception, the first component requires \(t=0\), while the second requires \(t=1\). No single time satisfies both equations, so there is no interception. To see how close they come, calculate the squared separation:
The squared term is nonnegative and is zero at \(t=\frac12\). Therefore the smallest possible squared separation is \(\frac12\) square metres, and the minimum separation is \(\sqrt{\frac12}=\frac{1}{\sqrt2}\) metres, approximately \(0.71\) metres to two decimal places. Check at \(t=\frac12\): the positions are \(\mathbf r_A=\langle \frac12,1\rangle\) and \(\mathbf r_B=\langle 0,\frac12\rangle\). Their difference is \(\langle-\frac12,-\frac12\rangle\), whose magnitude is indeed \(\sqrt{\frac14+\frac14}=\frac{1}{\sqrt2}\) metres, not zero.
Keep the Reference Order Consistent
The most frequent error is reversing the subtraction in one calculation but not the other. If position is defined as \(B\) relative to \(A\), use \(\mathbf r_B-\mathbf r_A\). The matching relative velocity is \(\mathbf v_B-\mathbf v_A\). Reversing both gives a valid description from \(A\) relative to \(B\), but mixing the orders gives inconsistent directions.
For example, in the first worked example, at \(t=1\) the correct relative position of \(B\) with respect to \(A\) is \(\langle 3,-1\rangle\) m. Reversing the subtraction gives \(\mathbf r_A(1)-\mathbf r_B(1)=\langle-3,1\rangle\) m. This is the vector from \(B\) to \(A\), not from \(A\) to \(B\). Its magnitude is unchanged, but its direction is reversed. A related mistake is to decide that an interception occurs because one component of relative position is zero. In the close-pass example, one component vanishes at \(t=0\) and the other at \(t=1\); since the times differ, the objects do not meet.
These comparisons are useful whenever the question concerns the gap between two moving objects: their distance at a stated time, whether they meet, or whether they merely pass nearby. The coordinate-system positions may be complicated, but their difference directly describes the motion that matters for those questions.
Check Your Understanding
Use the reference order stated in each question, and show the coordinate equations when testing for interception.
- If \(\mathbf r_A(t)=\langle 2t,1\rangle\) and \(\mathbf r_B(t)=\langle 5-t,4\rangle\), find \(\mathbf r_{B/A}(t)\) and \(\mathbf v_{B/A}(t)\).
- How is the separation of two objects obtained from their relative-position vector?
- What condition must all components of the relative-position vector satisfy for an interception?
- Can two objects have the same first coordinate at a time and still fail to intercept? Explain.
- If the relative position is \(\langle 4,-3\rangle\) metres, what is the separation?