Two Different Ways to Describe a Trip
A moving object can start and finish at positions that are close together after travelling a much longer route. To describe what happened, we need to distinguish two quantities: signed displacement, which records the net change in position, and total distance, which records how much ground the object travelled.
In one-dimensional motion, position is represented by a number on a line. The sign of a change in position tells us its direction: a positive change is motion in the positive direction, and a negative change is motion in the negative direction. Distance, in contrast, is never negative.
The distinction matters whenever an object changes direction. The starting and ending positions determine the displacement, but they do not necessarily tell us how far the object travelled in between.
Signed Displacement Uses Only the Endpoints
Let \(x(t)\) denote an object's position at time \(t\). Over the interval from \(t=a\) to \(t=b\), the signed displacement is the final position minus the initial position:
If the result is positive, the final position is in the positive direction from the initial position. If it is negative, the final position is in the negative direction. A zero result means the object ends where it started; it does not mean that the object stayed still.
Worked Example: A Trip Without a Direction Change
An object moves from position \(2\) metres to position \(11\) metres. Its motion is in the positive direction throughout. Find its signed displacement and total distance.
The initial position is \(2\) metres and the final position is \(11\) metres, so
Because the object moves in the positive direction throughout, it does not retrace any part of its path. The distance travelled is the magnitude of its position change:
Check: Moving \(9\) metres in the positive direction from position \(2\) gives \(2+9=11\), the stated final position. The displacement and distance agree here because there is no change of direction.
Direction Changes Require Separate Intervals
To calculate total distance when direction changes, first split the motion into intervals on which the object moves in a consistent direction. A change from positive to negative velocity, or from negative to positive velocity, signals a reversal of direction. A momentary zero velocity is not by itself enough to establish a reversal: the object might stop briefly and then continue in the same direction.
On each direction-consistent interval, the object's position moves monotonically: it does not turn back along the line. The distance travelled on that interval is therefore the magnitude of the change between its endpoint positions. Add these nonnegative distances to get the total.
The partition points should include the times when the object reverses direction. They may also include times at which it pauses, provided each resulting interval remains direction-consistent. Adding a pause to the partition does not change the total distance.
Worked Example: Moving Forward, Backward, Then Forward
An object starts at position \(3\) metres, reaches position \(10\) metres, moves back to position \(4\) metres, and then moves forward to position \(8\) metres. These positions occur in that order, with motion in a consistent direction between successive positions. Find the signed displacement and the total distance.
For signed displacement, use only the initial and final positions:
For total distance, calculate the magnitude of the position change on each direction-consistent interval:
Adding the three distances gives
Check: The signed changes are \(+7\), \(-6\), and \(+4\) metres. Their sum is \(7-6+4=5\) metres, which agrees with the endpoint calculation \(8-3=5\). Their magnitudes sum to \(17\) metres, the total distance.
Why the Two Calculations Differ
The difference between the two quantities follows from how they treat direction. Signed displacement retains the signs of the position changes. A movement in the negative direction subtracts from the net change. Total distance takes the magnitude of each change before adding, so movement in either direction contributes a nonnegative amount.
For a trip split at direction changes, write each successive position change as \(\Delta x_i=x(t_i)-x(t_{i-1})\). The endpoint displacement is the sum of the signed changes, because intermediate positions cancel:
On each direction-consistent interval, the distance travelled is \(|\Delta x_i|\). Thus total distance is the sum of those magnitudes, not the magnitude of the sum. Taking magnitudes before adding prevents travel in opposite directions from cancelling.
To see the inequality, use the triangle inequality for real numbers: the magnitude of a sum is no greater than the sum of the magnitudes. Applying it to the signed changes gives
This argument also explains the equality case. When all nonzero changes have the same sign, their magnitudes add to the magnitude of their sum, so distance equals the magnitude of displacement. Changes in opposite directions generally make the inequality strict.
Worked Example: Returning to the Starting Position
Worked Example: A Round Trip Along a Line
An object starts at position \(-2\) metres, travels in the positive direction to position \(6\) metres, then reverses and returns to position \(-2\) metres. Find the signed displacement and the total distance.
The initial and final positions are both \(-2\) metres. Therefore,
The object first moves from \(-2\) to \(6\), a change of
It then moves from \(6\) back to \(-2\), a change of \((-2)-6=-8\) metres. The distance for this second interval is the magnitude \(8\) metres. Thus
Check: The signed changes \(+8\) and \(-8\) sum to \(0\), agreeing with the endpoint displacement. Their magnitudes sum to \(16\), so the object can have zero net displacement while travelling a positive distance.
What Position Data Can and Cannot Tell You
Endpoint positions always determine signed displacement. They determine total distance only when the motion between them is known to be direction-consistent, or when enough information is available to identify all reversals and the positions at those times.
For example, if an object begins at \(0\) metres and ends at \(5\) metres, its displacement is \(5\) metres. If it moves steadily in the positive direction, its total distance is \(5\) metres. But the same endpoints are also consistent with a trip from \(0\) to \(8\) metres and then back to \(5\) metres; that trip has total distance \(8+3=11\) metres. Endpoint data alone do not distinguish these paths.
Likewise, a list of positions recorded at a few times does not necessarily reveal motion between observations. If an object passes through the same recorded positions while making an unobserved reversal between measurements, simply adding the magnitudes of the recorded position changes can underestimate its total distance. To use the sum correctly, the intervals must genuinely be direction-consistent.
Worked Example: Using Direction Information to Partition Motion
An object is at position \(0\) metres at time \(t=0\), position \(6\) metres at \(t=2\), position \(-3\) metres at \(t=5\), and position \(1\) metre at \(t=7\). Suppose the direction is consistent between each successive pair of these times. Find the displacement and total distance from \(t=0\) to \(t=7\).
First, use the initial and final positions:
Next, calculate the position changes on the three direction-consistent intervals and take their magnitudes:
Therefore,
Check: The signed changes are \(6\), \(-9\), and \(4\) metres. Their sum is \(6-9+4=1\) metre, matching the endpoint displacement. The total distance, \(19\) metres, is greater than the magnitude of displacement, \(1\) metre.
Common Mistake: Adding Signed Changes for Distance
A frequent error is to calculate each change correctly but then add the signed changes and call the result total distance. In the round-trip example, that incorrect calculation would be
This is the signed displacement, not the distance. The negative sign records the direction of the return trip; it does not mean that the object travelled a negative length.
The correction is to take the magnitude of each interval's change before adding:
Another error is to assume that returning to the starting position means no motion occurred. Equal initial and final positions imply zero displacement, but the total distance is zero only if the object did not move at all.
A Reliable Calculation Process
For a one-dimensional motion problem, use the following sequence:
Identify the initial position and the final position for the requested time interval.
Subtract the initial position from the final position: \(x(b)-x(a)\).
Use the motion information to divide the interval into parts on which direction is consistent.
For each part, take the magnitude of its position change, then add those magnitudes.
Confirm that total distance is nonnegative and at least as large as the magnitude of displacement.
These checks do not replace the calculation, but they can reveal common errors. A negative total distance is impossible, and a reported distance smaller than the magnitude of displacement cannot describe the motion.
Check Your Understanding
For each question, distinguish carefully between net position change and path length.
- An object moves from position \(4\) metres to position \(-3\) metres without changing direction. What are its signed displacement and total distance?
- An object moves from \(0\) metres to \(5\) metres, then back to \(2\) metres. Find its signed displacement and total distance.
- Why does knowing an object's initial and final positions always determine its displacement but not necessarily its total distance?
- An object starts and finishes at the same position. What can you conclude about its displacement? What can you conclude about its total distance?
- State the condition on a partition of a motion interval that makes the sum of magnitudes of successive position changes a valid total-distance calculation.