Why Complex Scalars Guarantee an Eigenvalue
An eigenvalue is a scalar for which a matrix acts on some nonzero vector by simple scaling. Over the real numbers, a matrix need not have a real eigenvalue. Allowing complex scalars changes the general existence question: every complex square matrix of positive size has at least one complex eigenvalue. The reason combines two facts. Its characteristic polynomial has positive degree, and every nonconstant polynomial with complex coefficients has a complex root.
We work over \(\mathbb{C}\), and let \(n\) be a positive integer. Thus \(\mathbf{A}\in\mathbb{C}^{n\times n}\). A vector \(\mathbf{v}\in\mathbb{C}^n\) is a column. An eigenvalue of \(\mathbf{A}\) is a scalar \(\lambda\in\mathbb{C}\) for which there is a vector \(\mathbf{v}\ne\mathbf{0}\) satisfying \(\mathbf{A}\mathbf{v}=\lambda\mathbf{v}\); such a vector is an eigenvector for \(\lambda\).
We use the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra in the following form: every nonconstant polynomial with complex coefficients has at least one root in \(\mathbb{C}\). This theorem is a result from the theory of complex numbers; its proof is not part of the linear algebra argument here. The key point for applying it is to verify that the characteristic polynomial really is nonconstant.
The Characteristic Polynomial Has Positive Degree
For an \(n\times n\) matrix, the characteristic polynomial has degree exactly \(n\). To see why, the entry in row \(i\), column \(j\) of \(\mathbf{A}-\lambda\mathbf{I}_n\) is \(a_{ij}-\lambda\delta_{ij}\), where \(\delta_{ij}=1\) if \(i=j\) and \(0\) otherwise. In the determinant expansion, a term of degree \(n\) in \(\lambda\) can only come from choosing the \(-\lambda\) part from each diagonal entry. That contribution is \((-\lambda)^n\). Every other contribution has degree less than \(n\). Therefore the leading coefficient is \((-1)^n\), which is nonzero, and the degree is \(n\).
The positivity assumption \(n\ge 1\) matters: it ensures that this polynomial has positive degree, so the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra applies. The theorem does not say that its roots are distinct, or that every scalar is a root. It guarantees at least one root in \(\mathbb{C}\).
From a Root to an Eigenvalue
The link between a root and an eigenvalue is the determinant criterion for square matrices: for \(\mathbf{B}\in\mathbb{C}^{n\times n}\), \(\det\mathbf{B}=0\) if and only if \(\mathbf{B}\mathbf{x}=\mathbf{0}\) has a nonzero solution \(\mathbf{x}\). Equivalently, a square matrix has determinant zero exactly when its columns are linearly dependent. This standard determinant result applies to square matrices over \(\mathbb{C}\).
Proof. Since \(n\ge1\), the characteristic polynomial \(p_{\mathbf{A}}(\lambda)=\det(\mathbf{A}-\lambda\mathbf{I}_n)\) has degree \(n>0\), as shown above. The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra therefore gives a scalar \(\lambda_0\in\mathbb{C}\) such that \(p_{\mathbf{A}}(\lambda_0)=0\). By the definition of the characteristic polynomial, \(\det(\mathbf{A}-\lambda_0\mathbf{I}_n)=0\). The determinant criterion gives a vector \(\mathbf{v}\ne\mathbf{0}\) with \((\mathbf{A}-\lambda_0\mathbf{I}_n)\mathbf{v}=\mathbf{0}\). Expanding this equation yields \(\mathbf{A}\mathbf{v}-\lambda_0\mathbf{v}=\mathbf{0}\), hence \(\mathbf{A}\mathbf{v}=\lambda_0\mathbf{v}\). Thus \(\lambda_0\) is an eigenvalue of \(\mathbf{A}\). \(\square\)
The argument also proves the useful equivalence that a scalar \(\lambda\) is an eigenvalue of \(\mathbf{A}\) if and only if it is a root of \(p_{\mathbf{A}}\). In one direction, an eigenvector satisfies \((\mathbf{A}-\lambda\mathbf{I}_n)\mathbf{v}=\mathbf{0}\) with \(\mathbf{v}\ne\mathbf{0}\), so the determinant criterion gives \(p_{\mathbf{A}}(\lambda)=0\). In the other direction, if \(p_{\mathbf{A}}(\lambda)=0\), the same criterion produces a nonzero vector satisfying the eigenvector equation.
Worked Example: A One-Dimensional Complex Matrix
Consider \(\mathbf{A}=\begin{bmatrix}3+2i\end{bmatrix}\), a \(1\times1\) matrix over \(\mathbb{C}\). Its characteristic polynomial is
This polynomial has degree \(1\), and its root is \(\lambda=3+2i\). To check the eigenvalue directly, take the nonzero column vector \(\mathbf{v}=\begin{bmatrix}1\end{bmatrix}\). Then
The root is indeed an eigenvalue, and the displayed nonzero vector verifies it from the definition.
Worked Example: A Diagonal Matrix With Three Eigenvalues
Let \(\mathbf{A}=\begin{bmatrix}i&0&0\\0&-2&0\\0&0&1-i\end{bmatrix}\). Subtracting \(\lambda\mathbf{I}_3\) gives a diagonal matrix, so its determinant is the product of its diagonal entries:
This polynomial has degree \(3\), in agreement with the leading-term argument. In particular, \(\lambda=-2\) is a root. For \(\mathbf{v}=\begin{bmatrix}0\\1\\0\end{bmatrix}\), direct multiplication gives
Thus \(-2\) is an eigenvalue. The other two factors also show roots \(i\) and \(1-i\), but the important general point is that the characteristic polynomial is a polynomial over \(\mathbb{C}\) of positive degree.
An Example Where the Root Produces an Eigenvector
Worked Example: A Complex Root and a Verified Eigenpair
Consider the matrix \(\mathbf{A}=\begin{bmatrix}0&0&i\\1&0&0\\0&1&0\end{bmatrix}\). Its characteristic polynomial is
Set \(\zeta=\frac{\sqrt{3}+i}{2}\). First compute its powers:
Therefore \(p_{\mathbf{A}}(\zeta)=-\zeta^3+i=-i+i=0\). To check the associated eigenvector, choose \(\mathbf{v}=\begin{bmatrix}\zeta^2\\\zeta\\1\end{bmatrix}\), which is nonzero because its last entry is \(1\). Multiplication gives
Both checks agree: \(\zeta\) is a root of the characteristic polynomial and an eigenvalue with the displayed eigenvector.
What the Theorem Does—and Does Not—Guarantee
The conclusion is an existence statement. It guarantees at least one eigenvalue when the matrix has positive size and its entries are complex. It does not promise that an eigenvalue is real, that the roots are all different, or that the matrix can be diagonalized. Those stronger claims require additional hypotheses or further analysis. In particular, knowing that the characteristic polynomial has a root gives a scalar \(\lambda\); the determinant criterion then gives a nonzero vector, but it does not by itself describe all eigenvalues or all eigenvectors.
The distinction between roots counted with multiplicity and distinct roots is important. A polynomial may have positive degree while all its roots coincide. For instance, the identity matrix of size \(3\) has characteristic polynomial \((1-\lambda)^3\), not a polynomial with three distinct roots.
Worked Example: A Repeated Root Is Not Three Distinct Eigenvalues
Take \(\mathbf{A}=\mathbf{I}_3=\begin{bmatrix}1&0&0\\0&1&0\\0&0&1\end{bmatrix}\). Then
The only distinct root is \(\lambda=1\), even though the polynomial has degree \(3\). Directly, \(\mathbf{I}_3\mathbf{v}=\mathbf{v}\) for every \(\mathbf{v}\in\mathbb{C}^3\), so \(1\) is an eigenvalue. The calculation checks both the root and the eigenvalue claim; it also shows why “degree \(3\)” does not mean “three distinct eigenvalues.”
Common Pitfall: Confusing Existence With a Complete Description
A common incorrect argument is: “The characteristic polynomial has degree \(n\), so it has \(n\) distinct roots, and therefore the matrix has \(n\) distinct eigenvalues.” The conclusion does not follow. The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra guarantees a complex root for a nonconstant polynomial; it does not guarantee distinct roots. The identity-matrix calculation above corrects this: \((1-\lambda)^3\) has degree \(3\), but its only distinct root is \(1\).
A second error is to stop after finding a root and treat that alone as a displayed eigenpair. A root gives \(\det(\mathbf{A}-\lambda\mathbf{I}_n)=0\); the determinant criterion then guarantees a nonzero solution to \((\mathbf{A}-\lambda\mathbf{I}_n)\mathbf{v}=\mathbf{0}\). The vector must be nonzero to meet the definition of eigenvector. In a proof of existence, the criterion guarantees such a vector even when we do not calculate it explicitly. In a worked computation, checking \(\mathbf{A}\mathbf{v}=\lambda\mathbf{v}\) confirms the proposed pair.
There is also a size condition: the argument uses a square matrix with \(n\ge1\). It does not apply to a rectangular matrix, whose characteristic polynomial is not defined by \(\det(\mathbf{A}-\lambda\mathbf{I})\), or to a zero-size matrix, whose characteristic polynomial has no positive degree.
Why This Result Matters
The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra gives complex scalars a central role in eigenvalue theory. For a matrix of any positive size, it ensures that the characteristic equation has at least one solution once the scalars are allowed to be complex. The proof is short, but each link matters: positive size makes the characteristic polynomial nonconstant; the Fundamental Theorem gives a root; and the determinant criterion turns that root into a nonzero eigenvector. This establishes existence without assuming that the matrix is diagonalizable, and without requiring us to solve the characteristic equation explicitly.
Check Your Understanding
Use the definition of eigenvalue and the determinant criterion to justify your answers.
- Why does \(p_{\mathbf{A}}(\lambda)\) have degree exactly \(n\) when \(\mathbf{A}\in\mathbb{C}^{n\times n}\)? Identify its leading coefficient.
- State the version of the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra used to prove that every positive-size complex square matrix has an eigenvalue.
- Explain why \(p_{\mathbf{A}}(\lambda_0)=0\) implies that \(\lambda_0\) is an eigenvalue.
- For \(\mathbf{A}=\operatorname{diag}(2,2,2)\), compute the characteristic polynomial and state its distinct roots.
- What does the theorem guarantee about the number of distinct eigenvalues? What does it not guarantee?