Tutorials › Topology (Undergraduate) › Connectedness of the Topologist’s Sine Curve

Path-Connected Spaces and Components · Tutorial 437 of 799

Connectedness of the Topologist's Sine Curve

See why an increasingly oscillatory graph is connected and how its closure adds the entire vertical segment.

Intermediate 12 min read

What You'll Learn

  • Define the oscillating graph and the topologist’s sine curve as subspaces of the Euclidean plane
  • Prove that intervals are connected and that continuous images of connected spaces are connected
  • Show that every point on the vertical segment is a limit of points on the graph
  • Verify that the full sine curve is closed and equals the graph’s closure
  • Apply the theorem that the closure of a connected set is connected
  • Avoid confusing oscillation near a missing endpoint with membership at that endpoint

The Graph and Its Limiting Segment

The graph of \(y=\sin(1/x)\) becomes more and more oscillatory as \(x\) approaches \(0\). Although the formula is not defined at \(x=0\), the graph accumulates at every point of the vertical segment from height \(-1\) to height \(1\). The key to proving connectedness is to separate two tasks: prove that the graph itself is connected, then show that adjoining all its limiting points preserves connectedness.

All subsets of \(\mathbb{R}^2\) below have the subspace topology from the standard Euclidean topology. The interval \((0,1]\) has the subspace topology from \(\mathbb{R}\). Define the graph \(G\), the vertical segment \(V\), and the topologist’s sine curve \(S\) by

$$ G=\{(x,\sin(1/x)):0<x\le1\},\qquad V=\{0\}\times[-1,1],\qquad S=G\cup V. $$
Definition: A topological space \(X\) is connected if it cannot be written as the union of two disjoint, nonempty sets that are open in the subspace topology on \(X\). Such a pair is called a separation of \(X\). The empty space is connected under this definition, since it has no separation.

For a subset \(A\) of a space \(X\), its closure \(\overline{A}\) is the intersection of all closed subsets of \(X\) containing \(A\). We use the neighborhood test: \(x\in\overline{A}\) if and only if every open neighborhood of \(x\) meets \(A\). Indeed, if an open neighborhood \(U\) misses \(A\), then the closed set \(X\setminus U\) contains \(A\), so it contains \(\overline{A}\) and excludes \(x\). Conversely, if \(x\notin\overline{A}\), the open set \(X\setminus\overline{A}\) is a neighborhood of \(x\) disjoint from \(A\).

Why the Oscillating Graph Is Connected

The map \(f:(0,1]\to\mathbb{R}^2\) defined by \(f(x)=(x,\sin(1/x))\) is continuous: \(x\mapsto 1/x\) is continuous for \(x>0\), sine is continuous, and the two coordinates together define a continuous map into the Euclidean plane. Its image is exactly \(G\). We justify both facts about connectedness needed to conclude that \(G\) is connected.

Theorem 1: Every interval in \(\mathbb{R}\), with its subspace topology, is connected.

Proof. It is enough to consider a nonempty interval \(J\). Suppose, for contradiction, that \(J=U\cup W\) is a separation. Choose one point from each set; after exchanging the names if necessary, there are \(u\in U\) and \(v\in W\) with \(u<v\). The set \(U\cap[u,v]\) is nonempty and bounded above, so let \(c=\sup(U\cap[u,v])\). Since \(U\) is relatively open and contains \(u\), it contains points of \(J\) strictly greater than \(u\) and sufficiently close to \(u\); hence \(c>u\). Since \(W\) is relatively open and contains \(v\), there is an interval immediately to the left of \(v\) containing no points of \(U\), so \(c<v\). Thus \(c\in J\), and it belongs to either \(U\) or \(W\). If \(c\in U\), relative openness gives points of \(J\cap(u,v)\) strictly greater than \(c\) that belong to \(U\), contradicting that \(c\) is an upper bound. If \(c\in W\), relative openness gives an interval around \(c\) whose points in \(J\) belong to \(W\). But the definition of supremum gives points of \(U\cap[u,v]\) arbitrarily close to \(c\) from below, a contradiction. Thus \(J\) has no separation. The empty interval is connected by the definition. \(\square\)

Theorem 2: The continuous image of a connected space is connected.

Proof. Let \(X\) be connected, let \(f:X\to Y\) be continuous, and give \(f(X)\) the subspace topology from \(Y\). Suppose \(f(X)=P\cup Q\) were a separation. Then \(f^{-1}(P)\) and \(f^{-1}(Q)\) are disjoint open subsets of \(X\): they are open by continuity, because \(P\) and \(Q\) are relatively open in \(f(X)\). They cover \(X\), and both are nonempty because every point of \(f(X)\) has a preimage. This contradicts connectedness of \(X\). Therefore \(f(X)\) is connected. \(\square\)

Worked Example: The Graph Is Connected

Apply the two theorems to \(f:(0,1]\to\mathbb{R}^2\), \(f(x)=(x,\sin(1/x))\). The domain \((0,1]\) is an interval, so Theorem 1 says it is connected. The map is continuous on its entire domain, since every \(x\) in that domain is positive. Its image is \(G\): each image point has first coordinate \(x\) with \(0<x\le1\) and second coordinate \(\sin(1/x)\), and every point specified in the definition of \(G\) is \(f(x)\) for its first coordinate \(x\). Theorem 2 now gives that \(G\) is connected.

Check: The argument concerns \(G\), whose points have strictly positive first coordinate. It does not substitute \(x=0\) into \(1/x\); that expression is undefined there.

Every Height on the Segment Is a Limit

To show that the whole vertical segment belongs to the closure of \(G\), fix any \(y\in[-1,1]\). Let \(\arcsin(y)\) denote the value in \([-\pi/2,\pi/2]\) whose sine is \(y\). For \(n\in\mathbb{N}=\{1,2,\ldots\}\), set

$$ t_n=2\pi n+\arcsin(y),\qquad x_n=\frac{1}{t_n}. $$

Since \(t_n\ge2\pi-\pi/2=3\pi/2>1\), each \(x_n\) satisfies \(0<x_n<1\). Also, \(t_n\to\infty\), so \(x_n\to0\). Periodicity of sine gives \(\sin(1/x_n)=\sin(t_n)=y\). Thus \((x_n,y)\in G\) for every \(n\), and \((x_n,y)\to(0,y)\). Every open neighborhood of \((0,y)\) therefore meets \(G\), so the neighborhood test gives \((0,y)\in\overline{G}\).

Worked Example: Approaching an Interior Height

Consider the point \((0,1/2)\). Since \(\sin(\pi/6)=1/2\), take \(t_n=2\pi n+\pi/6\) and \(x_n=1/t_n\). For each \(n\ge1\), \(t_n\ge2\pi+\pi/6=13\pi/6>1\), so \(0<x_n<1\). Moreover,

$$ \sin(1/x_n)=\sin(2\pi n+\pi/6)=1/2. $$

As \(n\to\infty\), \(t_n\to\infty\) and hence \(x_n\to0\). Therefore \((x_n,1/2)\in G\) and \((x_n,1/2)\to(0,1/2)\), proving \((0,1/2)\in\overline{G}\).

Check: The first coordinate tends to \(0\), while the second coordinate is exactly \(1/2\) for every \(n\). The limit is consequently \((0,1/2)\), not a point on the graph with positive first coordinate.

Worked Example: Approaching Both Endpoints

For the upper endpoint, put \(t_n=2\pi n+\pi/2\) and \(x_n=1/t_n\). Then \(t_n\ge5\pi/2>1\), \(x_n\to0\), and

$$ \sin(1/x_n)=\sin(2\pi n+\pi/2)=1. $$

Thus \((x_n,1)\in G\) and \((x_n,1)\to(0,1)\). For the lower endpoint, put \(s_n=2\pi n+3\pi/2\) and \(z_n=1/s_n\). Then \(s_n\ge7\pi/2>1\), \(z_n\to0\), and

$$ \sin(1/z_n)=\sin(2\pi n+3\pi/2)=-1. $$

Hence \((z_n,-1)\in G\) and \((z_n,-1)\to(0,-1)\). Both endpoints of \(V\) lie in \(\overline{G}\), as do the interior heights.

The Closure of the Graph Is the Whole Curve

We have proved \(V\subseteq\overline{G}\), and \(G\subseteq\overline{G}\) by the definition of closure. This gives \(S\subseteq\overline{G}\). To establish equality, we also need to check that \(S\) is closed in \(\mathbb{R}^2\).

Proposition: The set \(S=G\cup V\) is closed in \(\mathbb{R}^2\).

Proof. We show that every point \((a,b)\) outside \(S\) has an open neighborhood disjoint from \(S\). If \(a<0\) or \(a>1\), choose a sufficiently small open ball around \((a,b)\) whose first coordinates remain outside \([0,1]\); it misses both \(G\) and \(V\). If \(a\in[0,1]\) and \(b\notin[-1,1]\), choose a sufficiently small open ball whose second coordinates remain outside \([-1,1]\). This also misses \(G\) and \(V\), because the sine values and the heights in \(V\) all lie in \([-1,1]\). The only remaining possibility for a point outside \(S\) is \(0<a\le1\), \(b\in[-1,1]\), and \(b\ne\sin(1/a)\). On the open set \((0,\infty)\times\mathbb{R}\), the function \(h(x,y)=y-\sin(1/x)\) is continuous. Since \(h(a,b)\ne0\), the inverse image of \(\mathbb{R}\setminus\{0\}\) gives an open neighborhood of \((a,b)\) within that open set on which \(h\ne0\). This neighborhood misses \(G\), and it misses \(V\) because its first coordinates are positive. Thus the complement of \(S\) is open, so \(S\) is closed. \(\square\)

Since \(S\) is closed and contains \(G\), the definition of closure gives \(\overline{G}\subseteq S\). Combined with \(S\subseteq\overline{G}\), this proves \(\overline{G}=S\).

Theorem 3: If \(A\) is a connected subset of a topological space \(X\), then its closure \(\overline{A}\) is connected.

Proof. If \(A\) is empty, then \(\overline{A}\) is empty and is connected. Otherwise, suppose \(\overline{A}=P\cup Q\) were a separation. Each of \(P\) and \(Q\) is nonempty and relatively open in \(\overline{A}\), so each has the form \(O\cap\overline{A}\) for some open set \(O\) in \(X\). Any point \(p\in P\) lies in \(\overline{A}\), so the open set \(O\) defining \(P\) meets \(A\); because \(A\subseteq\overline{A}\), this gives \(P\cap A\ne\varnothing\). The same reasoning gives \(Q\cap A\ne\varnothing\). The sets \(P\cap A\) and \(Q\cap A\) are disjoint, relatively open in \(A\), nonempty, and cover \(A\). They would separate \(A\), contradicting its connectedness. Therefore \(\overline{A}\) is connected. \(\square\)

Apply Theorem 3 in \(\mathbb{R}^2\) to \(A=G\). The graph \(G\) is connected, and its closure is \(S\). Therefore the topologist’s sine curve \(S\) is connected.

A Common Mistake: Treating Oscillation as Membership

The fact that graph points approach \((0,1)\) does not mean \((0,1)\) belongs to \(G\). The definition of \(G\) requires \(x>0\); its formula does not assign a value at \(x=0\). For example, the sequence \(x_n=1/(2\pi n+\pi/2)\) has \(\sin(1/x_n)=1\) and \(x_n\to0\), so it proves that \((0,1)\) is in the closure. It does not make \((0,1)\) a point of the graph.

A related incomplete argument is to use just that sequence and conclude that the whole vertical segment is in the closure. That calculation establishes only the upper endpoint. For a general height \(y\in[-1,1]\), the corrected calculation uses \(x_n=1/(2\pi n+\arcsin(y))\); it gives \(\sin(1/x_n)=y\) for every \(n\) and \(x_n\to0\). The parameter \(y\) is arbitrary, so it proves the assertion for every point of \(V\).

The proof separates the roles of the two pieces: continuous images establish connectedness of the oscillating graph, while the closure calculation accounts for the missing limiting segment. Because taking the closure of a connected set preserves connectedness, no additional geometric intuition about the oscillations is needed.

Check Your Understanding

Use the definitions and arguments above to check each claim.

  1. For \(y=-1/2\), write an explicit sequence of points of \(G\) converging to \((0,y)\).
  2. Why does the formula \(f(x)=(x,\sin(1/x))\) define a continuous map on \((0,1]\), but not a map on \([0,1]\) as written?
  3. In the proof that \(S\) is closed, why must an off-graph point with first coordinate \(a>0\) have \(b\ne\sin(1/a)\)?
  4. State where connectedness of \((0,1]\) is used to prove connectedness of \(G\).
  5. Explain why proving \(V\subseteq\overline{G}\) alone does not yet establish \(\overline{G}=S\).