Tutorials › Topology (Undergraduate) › The Long Line And Its Local Euclidean Structure

Counterexamples in Topology · Tutorial 776 of 799

The Long Line And Its Local Euclidean Structure

Build the long line from ordinal-indexed intervals and verify its local Euclidean structure at ordinary points, limit points, and the central seam.

Intermediate 12 min read

What You'll Learn

  • Define the long ray and long line using lexicographically ordered ordinal intervals
  • Describe the order topology and the role of the two sides of the central point
  • Prove that bounded order intervals have the completeness and countability properties needed for real-interval charts
  • Construct explicit local charts at a successor seam, a limit ordinal, and the central point
  • Identify why uncountably many interval blocks cannot be replaced by a countable sequence

From Ordinal Intervals to a Long Line

The real line is locally an open interval at every point, but its order has only countably many unit intervals in either direction. The long line is built by concatenating unit intervals along all countable ordinals. This creates an ordered space with uncountably many interval blocks while retaining a real-interval neighborhood around each point. The construction makes the distinction between local structure and the size of the whole space explicit.

Let \(\omega_1\) denote the first uncountable ordinal, so its elements are exactly the countable ordinals. Give \(\omega_1\times[0,1)\) the lexicographic order: \((\alpha,s)<(\beta,t)\) if either \(\alpha<\beta\), or \(\alpha=\beta\) and \(s<t\). Equip this ordered set with its order topology, generated by open order intervals and the corresponding open rays at an endpoint.

Definition: The long ray is \(L_+=\omega_1\times[0,1)\) with the lexicographic order and its order topology. Its first point is \((0,0)\). The long line \(L\) is formed from two copies of \(L_+\) by identifying their first points. Write the common point as \(o\). Order the negative copy in reverse, place \(o\) between the copies, and order the positive copy as \(L_+\). The topology on \(L\) is the order topology of this linear order.

In each copy, the points \((\alpha,t)\) for a fixed \(\alpha\) form one interval block. The block has the order of \([0,1)\); its missing right endpoint is supplied as the first point \((\alpha+1,0)\) of the next block. At a limit ordinal \(\lambda<\omega_1\), the point \((\lambda,0)\) follows all the blocks indexed below \(\lambda\). It is not the first point of a block preceded by an immediate last point: there is no largest ordinal below \(\lambda\).

A Criterion for Bounded Intervals

We use a fact about ordered sets to produce local real-interval charts. A linear order is dense if between any two distinct points lies a third. It is order-complete if every nonempty subset that has an upper bound has a least upper bound. A subset is countable-dense if it has a countable subset meeting every nonempty open interval.

Lemma: A nondegenerate order-complete, densely ordered set with first and last points, and with a countable-dense subset, is order-isomorphic to \([0,1]\). An order isomorphism is a bijection preserving and reflecting order.

Proof. Remove the first and last points and let \(D\) be a countable-dense subset of the remaining order. It is a countable dense linear order with no first or last point. Such an order is isomorphic to \(\mathbb{Q}\cap(0,1)\): enumerate both sets and build finite order-preserving partial bijections in stages. At alternate stages take the first element not yet used in one enumeration and assign it an unused element of the other set between the images of its already assigned lower and upper neighbors. Density and the absence of endpoints provide such an element. The resulting union is an order-preserving bijection \(g:D\to\mathbb{Q}\cap(0,1)\).

Extend \(g\) to the whole order by sending the first and last points to \(0\) and \(1\), and, for every other point \(x\), setting \(h(x)=\sup\{g(d):d\in D,\ d<x\}\). This supremum exists in \([0,1]\). Density of \(D\) and of the rationals shows that \(h\) is strictly order-preserving: if \(x<y\), choose \(d_1,d_2\in D\) with \(x<d_1<d_2<y\); then \(h(x)\le g(d_1)<g(d_2)\le h(y)\). To see that it is onto, fix \(r\in(0,1)\) and take the supremum \(x\) of \(\{d\in D:g(d)<r\}\). The rational values below \(r\) have supremum \(r\), so the definition gives \(h(x)=r\). Thus \(h\) is an order isomorphism onto \([0,1]\). \(\square\)

Here is why bounded closed intervals in \(L\) meet the lemma’s hypotheses. Every bounded interval lies within a portion of the construction involving only countably many ordinal blocks: its two endpoints have countable ordinal coordinates, and every ordinal between those coordinates is countable. Consequently, the rational-coordinate points \((\alpha,q)\), with \(q\in\mathbb{Q}\cap[0,1)\), give a countable-dense subset after restricting to the interval. The same is true of an interval crossing \(o\), by using rational-coordinate points on both sides and \(o\).

These closed intervals are also order-complete. To find the supremum of a nonempty subset, first take the supremum of its ordinal coordinates. This is still a countable ordinal because the coordinates are bounded by a countable ordinal, and a countable union of countable sets is countable. If the coordinate supremum is not attained, the corresponding point with second coordinate \(0\) is the least upper bound. If it is attained, take the supremum of the second coordinates in that block; when this is less than \(1\), it gives the least upper bound in that block, and when it is \(1\), the least upper bound is the first point of the next block. Restricting to a bounded closed interval keeps the resulting supremum within the interval. Reversing the order on the negative side gives the corresponding completeness there. Finally, the order is dense: within a block this follows from density of \([0,1)\), and across blocks one can find another point in the earlier block above any given point there. Thus the lemma applies to every nondegenerate bounded closed interval in \(L\).

Every Point Has a Real-Interval Neighborhood

Theorem: Every point \(x\in L\) has an open neighborhood homeomorphic to an open interval in \(\mathbb{R}\) with its standard topology.

Proof. Choose points \(a<x<b\) in \(L\). Such points exist even when \(x=o\), since both copies have points other than their first point. The closed order interval \([a,b]\) is nondegenerate and satisfies the lemma, so it is order-isomorphic to \([0,1]\). The order isomorphism is a homeomorphism for the order topologies: it sends open order intervals and open rays to the corresponding intervals and rays. Its restriction sends \((a,b)\) homeomorphically to \((0,1)\). The interval \((a,b)\) is an open neighborhood of \(x\), so it is the required neighborhood. \(\square\)

The theorem includes points at limit ordinals. Although there is no immediately preceding block at such a point, one can still choose a bounded interval around it. The countably many blocks that occur in this bounded interval are enough for the countability and completeness argument. The following examples exhibit charts at three different kinds of points.

Worked Example: A Successor-Block Seam

Consider the point \(x=(5,0)\) on the positive long ray. This is the seam between the blocks indexed by \(4\) and \(5\). Choose \(a=(4,\tfrac14)\) and \(b=(5,\tfrac34)\). Define \(f\) on \([a,b]\) by \(f(4,t)=t-1\) for \(\tfrac14\le t<1\), and \(f(5,t)=t\) for \(0\le t\le\tfrac34\).

On the block indexed by \(4\), the image runs from \(-\tfrac34\) up to, but not including, \(0\), since \(t-1\) runs from \(-\tfrac34\) up to \(0\). The point \((5,0)\) maps to \(0\), and the rest of the selected part of block \(5\) maps from \(0\) to \(\tfrac34\). Thus \(f\) is an order-preserving bijection from \([a,b]\) onto \([-\tfrac34,\tfrac34]\). Its restriction maps the open neighborhood \((a,b)\) onto \((-\tfrac34,\tfrac34)\), with \(f(x)=0\). This explicit chart shows how the end of one unit block meets the beginning of the next.

Check: the left endpoint maps to \(f(4,\tfrac14)=\tfrac14-1=-\tfrac34\), and the right endpoint maps to \(f(5,\tfrac34)=\tfrac34\). At the seam, \(f(5,0)=0\), between those endpoint values.

Worked Example: A Limit-Ordinal Point

Consider \(x=(\omega,0)\), where \(\omega\) is the first infinite ordinal. Take \(a=(0,0)\) and \(b=(\omega,\tfrac12)\). For each finite ordinal \(n\in\{0,1,2,\ldots\}\), set \(f(n,t)=\frac{n+t}{1+n+t}\) for \(0\le t<1\), and set \(f(\omega,t)=1+t\) for \(0\le t\le\tfrac12\).

In each finite block, \(n+t\) ranges from \(n\) up to \(n+1\), without reaching \(n+1\). The function \(u\mapsto u/(1+u)\) is strictly increasing for \(u\ge0\), since for \(u<v\), \(u(1+v)<v(1+u)\) is equivalent to \(u<v\). As \(n+t\) increases without bound through the finite blocks, its image increases toward \(1\); it never reaches \(1\) on those blocks. The point \((\omega,0)\) maps to \(1\), and the points \((\omega,t)\) map from \(1\) to \(\tfrac32\). The map is therefore an order-preserving bijection from \([a,b]\) onto \([0,\tfrac32]\). Its restriction gives a chart from \((a,b)\) onto \((0,\tfrac32)\), taking \(x\) to \(1\).

Check: \(f(0,0)=0/(1+0)=0\), \(f(\omega,0)=1+0=1\), and \(f(\omega,\tfrac12)=1+\tfrac12=\tfrac32\). Points from finite blocks have image less than \(1\), so none is mapped past the limit point’s image.

Worked Example: The Central Point

On the negative side, let \(a\) be the point at distance \(\tfrac14\) from \(o\) in the first block; on the positive side, let \(b=(0,\tfrac34)\). The negative side is ordered toward \(o\), so as one moves from \(a\) to \(o\), the distance \(t\) decreases from \(\tfrac14\) to \(0\). Define \(f\) by \(f(o)=0\), \(f(\text{negative point at distance }t)=-t\), and \(f(0,t)=t\) on the positive side for \(0\le t\le\tfrac34\).

As points move in order from \(a\) through \(o\) to \(b\), their images increase from \(-\tfrac14\) through \(0\) to \(\tfrac34\). The map is an order-preserving bijection from \([a,b]\) to \([-\tfrac14,\tfrac34]\), so \((a,b)\) is an open interval neighborhood of \(o\) homeomorphic to \((-\tfrac14,\tfrac34)\).

Check: the endpoints map to \(f(a)=-\tfrac14\) and \(f(b)=\tfrac34\), while the identified first points on both copies map to the single point \(f(o)=0\).

Uncountable Extent and a Common Pitfall

There are uncountably many blocks in each long ray, one for each \(\alpha<\omega_1\), even though every point has a neighborhood that looks like an ordinary real interval. A common mistake is to replace the ordinal indexing by a sequence of blocks and then treat that sequence as if it reached all the way along the long ray. It cannot.

Common pitfall. Suppose someone proposes a sequence of countable ordinals \((\alpha_n)\) that is cofinal in \(\omega_1\), meaning that for every \(\beta<\omega_1\) some \(\alpha_n\) is at least \(\beta\). This is impossible. The supremum \(\gamma=\sup_n\alpha_n\) is countable: it is the union of countably many countable ordinals, hence a countable set. Therefore \(\gamma<\omega_1\), and every \(\alpha_n\le\gamma\). The ordinal \(\gamma+1\) is still countable, but no \(\alpha_n\) reaches it, contradicting cofinality. The correction is to retain all countable ordinals in the construction, rather than assume a countable sequence of blocks reaches the end.

This example is useful because a local description does not specify the global extent of a space. The long line has real-interval neighborhoods, but its order is built from uncountably many blocks, not from the usual countable succession of intervals in \(\mathbb{R}\). When examining a space, check both the neighborhood structure and how the whole space is assembled.

Check Your Understanding

Use the order definition and the local-chart arguments to answer the following.

  1. Why is \((\alpha+1,0)\) the point immediately following the block indexed by \(\alpha\), even though that block has no last point?
  2. For a point \((\lambda,0)\) with \(\lambda\) a countable limit ordinal, which property of a bounded interval around it supplies the least upper bounds needed in the local-interval lemma?
  3. In the limit-ordinal example, why does \(f(n,t)\) remain strictly below \(1\) for every finite \(n\) and every \(t<1\)?
  4. Explain why an order isomorphism between two linear orders with their order topologies is a homeomorphism.
  5. Why can no sequence of countable ordinals be cofinal in \(\omega_1\)?