Tutorials › Topology (Undergraduate) › The Fundamental Group of the Projective Plane

The Seifert-van Kampen Theorem · Tutorial 760 of 799

The Fundamental Group of the Projective Plane

Read the projective plane’s polygon boundary as a degree-two attaching map and use Seifert–van Kampen to derive its fundamental group.

Advanced 10 min read

What You'll Learn

  • Describe the projective plane using a disk whose boundary points are identified antipodally.
  • Track the boundary attaching map using an explicit circle parameterization.
  • Translate the polygon’s edge word into a relator using Seifert–van Kampen.
  • Derive the presentation with one generator and a squared relation.
  • Verify that the presented group has exactly two elements.
  • Recognize why reversing one edge orientation would give an incorrect computation.

From the Projective Plane to a Polygon

The projective plane has a compact polygon description that makes its fundamental group accessible. Its key feature is that the boundary of a disk is identified in antipodal pairs. The resulting 1-dimensional part is a circle, and as the disk boundary is read once around, it travels twice around that circle in the same direction. Seifert–van Kampen turns this two-fold traversal into a relation on a generator.

Write \(\mathbb{R}P^2\) for the space of lines through the origin in \(\mathbb{R}^3\), with the quotient topology obtained from the sphere \(S^2\) with its standard subspace topology by identifying each point \(v\) with its antipode \(-v\). Write \(D^2\) for the closed unit disk in \(\mathbb{R}^2\), with its subspace topology, and \(S^1=\partial D^2\), also with its subspace topology. The standard polygon model of \(\mathbb{R}P^2\) is \(D^2\) with each boundary point identified with its antipode; interior points are not identified with other points.

To see why this disk model describes the projective plane, take the closed hemisphere of \(S^2\) given by \(z\geq 0\). It meets every antipodal pair, and meets each pair in exactly one point except for pairs on the equator, where both antipodes lie in the hemisphere. Projecting this hemisphere onto its first two coordinates identifies it with \(D^2\). Thus the only identifications that remain on the disk are antipodal identifications on its boundary. The induced map from the disk quotient to \(\mathbb{R}P^2\) is a continuous bijection. The disk quotient is compact, and \(\mathbb{R}P^2\) is Hausdorff: distinct antipodal orbits on the metric sphere are disjoint finite sets with positive distance, so disjoint small neighborhoods of the orbits give disjoint neighborhoods in the quotient. A continuous bijection from a compact space to a Hausdorff space is a homeomorphism: images of closed sets are compact, hence closed, so the inverse is continuous.

In the disk model the boundary quotient is a circle. It is the 1-skeleton of a cell description of \(\mathbb{R}P^2\): there is one vertex, one edge forming a circle, and one 2-cell attached along the boundary of the disk. The attaching map is the map from the disk boundary to that 1-skeleton induced by the boundary identification. Determining its direction and how many times it goes around the circle is the essential calculation.

Reading the Boundary Identification

Definition: The attaching map of the 2-cell in the disk model is the map from \(S^1=\partial D^2\) to the quotient of the disk boundary by antipodal identification. The degree of a circle map is its signed number of turns around the target circle; a positive turn follows the chosen orientation and a negative turn goes against it.

Identify both the original boundary circle and the quotient boundary circle with the unit circle in \(\mathbb{C}\). If \(z\in S^1\), its antipode is \(-z\). The map \(z\mapsto z^2\) takes the same value on \(z\) and \(-z\), and its fibers are exactly the antipodal pairs. It therefore gives a parameterization of the quotient boundary. In angular coordinates the attaching map is represented by \(e^{it}\mapsto e^{2it}\).

Worked Example: Counting the Boundary Turns

Parameterize the boundary of the disk by \(e^{it}\), with \(0\leq t\leq 2\pi\). Under the quotient-boundary parameterization \(z\mapsto z^2\), the attaching map is \(e^{it}\mapsto e^{2it}\).

On the first half of the boundary, \(0\leq t\leq\pi\), the output angle \(2t\) runs from \(0\) to \(2\pi\). Thus this half makes one positive turn around the quotient circle. On the second half, \(\pi\leq t\leq2\pi\), the output angle runs from \(2\pi\) to \(4\pi\), making a second positive turn. The direction is the same on both halves because the angle \(2t\) increases throughout the entire interval.

At the endpoints of the halves the values also agree with the identification: \(e^{2i\cdot 0}=1\), \(e^{2i\cdot\pi}=1\), and \(e^{2i\cdot2\pi}=1\). The boundary therefore starts and ends at the vertex of the quotient circle, and each of the two edge traversals follows its positive orientation. If \(a\) denotes the positively oriented edge loop, the boundary word is \(aa\), or \(a^2\).

Check: over the full interval \(0\leq t\leq2\pi\), the output angle increases from \(0\) to \(4\pi\), exactly two positive turns. The degree of the attaching map is therefore \(2\), in agreement with the boundary word.

Applying Seifert–van Kampen

Theorem (Disk-attachment form of Seifert–van Kampen): Let \(Y\) be a path-connected space with basepoint \(y_0\), and attach a 2-cell along a map \(f:S^1\to Y\) that sends a chosen point of \(S^1\) to \(y_0\). If \(X\) is the resulting space, then \(\pi_1(X,y_0)\cong \pi_1(Y,y_0)/N\), where \(N\) is the normal subgroup generated by the image of \(f_*:\pi_1(S^1)\to\pi_1(Y,y_0)\). This is the standard disk-attachment consequence of Seifert–van Kampen.

Here \(Y\) is the 1-skeleton, which is a circle with its vertex chosen as basepoint. The circle is path-connected, and its fundamental group is infinite cyclic, generated by the positively oriented loop \(a\). This standard calculation of the fundamental group of the circle is part of the earlier material on the fundamental group of the circle. The attaching map sends the positive generator of \(\pi_1(S^1)\) to \(a^2\), since it makes two positive turns. The theorem therefore says to impose the relator \(a^2\).

Theorem: The fundamental group of the projective plane has presentation \(\pi_1(\mathbb{R}P^2)\cong\langle a\mid a^2=1\rangle\).

Proof. Use the vertex of the polygon model as basepoint. Its 1-skeleton \(Y\) is a circle, so \(\pi_1(Y)\) is generated by the positive edge loop \(a\). The boundary attaching map has degree \(2\), as computed above, and therefore takes the generator of \(\pi_1(S^1)\) to \(a^2\). By the disk-attachment form of Seifert–van Kampen, attaching the 2-cell quotients \(\pi_1(Y)\) by the normal subgroup generated by \(a^2\). This is precisely the presentation \(\langle a\mid a^2=1\rangle\). \(\square\)

Worked Example: Turning the Attaching Map into a Relator

Begin with the fundamental group of the 1-skeleton, \(\langle a\rangle\), the infinite cyclic group. The boundary word is \(aa\). Reading the word as a loop means traversing the positive edge once, giving \(a\), and then traversing it positively again, giving \(a\cdot a=a^2\). The disk fills this boundary loop, so its class becomes the identity in the fundamental group of the completed space. The resulting relation is \(a^2=1\).

In the language of the theorem, the relation is imposed along with all its conjugates in the group. Here those conjugates do not add new relations: the group before attaching the disk is cyclic, so every element is a power of \(a\) and commutes with \(a^2\). In particular, for every integer \(n\), \(a^n a^2 a^{-n}=a^{n+2-n}=a^2\). Thus the normal subgroup generated by the attaching loop is exactly the subgroup generated by \(a^2\).

Check: the edge word has two letters, both \(a\), so its product is \(a^2\), not \(a\). Attaching the disk kills that whole boundary loop; it does not kill the single edge loop by itself.

Why the Group Has Exactly Two Elements

A presentation describes a group by generators and relations, but it is useful to determine explicitly how many elements the presentation gives. The relation \(a^2=1\) implies \(a^{-1}=a\), because multiplying \(a^2=1\) by \(a^{-1}\) gives \(a=a^{-1}\). Consequently every inverse in a word can be replaced by \(a\). Every word is then a power \(a^n\), and writing \(n=2k+r\), where \(r\) is either \(0\) or \(1\), gives \(a^n=(a^2)^k a^r=a^r\). Thus every element is either the identity or \(a\). This proves there are at most two elements; a homomorphism to a two-element group shows that \(a\) is not the identity.

Worked Example: Verifying the Group’s Order

Let \(G=\langle a\mid a^2=1\rangle\). The relation gives \(a^{-1}=a\), so, for example, the word \(a^{-1}aa^{-1}\) reduces as follows: \(a^{-1}aa^{-1}=aaa=a^3=a(a^2)=a\). Likewise \(a^4=(a^2)(a^2)=1\). More generally, reducing the exponent modulo \(2\) shows that every word represents either \(1\) or \(a\).

To check that these two possibilities are distinct, let \(\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}=\{0,1\}\) with addition modulo \(2\). Send \(a\) to \(1\). The defining relation is respected, because \(1+1=0\) in \(\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}\), the identity element of that additive group. Therefore the presentation defines a homomorphism \(G\to\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}\). It is surjective since its image contains \(1\). In particular \(a\) cannot be the identity of \(G\), since its image is \(1\), not \(0\). Hence \(G\) has exactly two elements and is isomorphic to \(\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}\).

Check: the reduction shows \(|G|\leq2\), while the surjection onto a group with two elements shows \(|G|\geq2\). Thus \(|G|=2\).

A Common Orientation Mistake

Common pitfall. It is easy to read the second half of the polygon boundary as \(a^{-1}\) and write the boundary word \(aa^{-1}\). That calculation would make the attaching loop trivial and would impose no new relation. But the boundary parameterization settles the direction: on each half the output angle \(2t\) increases by \(2\pi\). Both halves therefore travel positively, and the correct word is \(aa\).

The orientation here comes from the map between the boundary circles, not from a visual impression that the two boundary arcs lie on opposite sides of the polygon. The algebra depends on that distinction: the word \(aa^{-1}\) is the identity in the free group, whereas \(aa\) gives the nontrivial relator \(a^2\). Reversing one edge without checking the parameterized attaching map changes the computation.

The result can be summarized in three steps: the antipodal boundary quotient gives one circular 1-skeleton; the disk boundary maps around that circle twice in the same direction; and Seifert–van Kampen imposes the square of the edge generator as a relation. The resulting group is cyclic of order two.

Check Your Understanding

Use the boundary parameterization and the disk-attachment form of Seifert–van Kampen to answer the following.

  1. For the boundary map \(e^{it}\mapsto e^{2it}\), what is the output angle at \(t=3\pi/2\), and which direction is the map moving there?
  2. Why does the polygon boundary word have two copies of \(a\), rather than \(a\) followed by \(a^{-1}\)?
  3. If a connected 1-skeleton has fundamental group generated by \(a\) and a 2-cell is attached along a loop representing \(a^3\), what relator does the disk-attachment theorem impose?
  4. Explain why the relation \(a^2=1\) implies that every element of \(\langle a\mid a^2=1\rangle\) is either \(1\) or \(a\).
  5. What homomorphism verifies that \(a\) is not the identity in this presentation?